Role of multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Echocardiography

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 677-698

  Ramineni, Rajesh ^a   Almomani, Ahmed ^a   Kumar, Arnav ^a   Ahmad, Masood ^a  

^a University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

aortic stenosis; echocardiography; multimodality imaging; multislice detector CT; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Indexed keywords

AORTA STENOSIS; ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGING; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; MULTIMODALITY IMAGING; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCUTANEOUS AORTIC VALVE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT PLANNING; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PROCEDURES;

AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; HUMANS; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84926525067     PISSN: 07422822     EISSN: 15408175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/echo.12854     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, et al. Burden of valvular heart diseases: A population-based study. Lancet 2006; 368: 1005-1011.
2. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: First human case description. Circulation 2002; 106: 3006-3008.
3. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1597-1607.
4. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 2187-2198.
5. Adams DH, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 967-968.
6. Sinning JM, Werner N, Nickenig G, et al. Next-generation transcatheter heart valves: Current trials in Europe and the USA. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 2012; 8: 9-12.
7. Shanewise JS, Cheung AT, Aronson S, et al. ASE/SCA guidelines for performing a comprehensive intraoperative multiplane transesophageal echocardiography examination: Recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Council for Intraoperative Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force for Certification in Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999; 12: 884-900.
8. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 2438-2488.
9. Grayburn PA,: Assessment of low-gradient aortic stenosis with dobutamine. Circulation 2006; 113: 604-606.
10. Clavel MA, Dumesnil JG, Capoulade R, et al. Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 1259-1267.
11. Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P, Carabello B,: Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: Implications for diagnosis and treatment. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 281-289.
12. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG,: New concepts in valvular hemodynamics: Implications for diagnosis and treatment of aortic stenosis. Can J Cardiol 2007; 23 (Suppl B): 40B-47B.
13. Lancellotti P, Magne J,: Valvuloarterial impedance in aortic stenosis: Look at the load, but do not forget the flow. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011; 12: 354-357.
14. Briand M, Dumesnil JG, Kadem L, et al. Reduced systemic arterial compliance impacts significantly on left ventricular afterload and function in aortic stenosis: Implications for diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 291-298.
15. Cramariuc D, Cioffi G, Rieck AE, et al. Low-flow aortic stenosis in asymptomatic patients: Valvular-arterial impedance and systolic function from the SEAS Substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2: 390-399.
16. Saikrishnan N, Kumar G, Sawaya FJ, et al. Accurate assessment of aortic stenosis: A review of diagnostic modalities and hemodynamics. Circulation 2014; 129: 244-253.
17. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009; 10: 1-25.
18. Okura H, Yoshida K, Hozumi T, et al. Planimetry and transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in noninvasive assessment of aortic valve area in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30: 753-759.
19. Cormier B, Iung B, Porte JM, et al. Value of multiplane transesophageal echocardiography in determining aortic valve area in aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 882-885.
20. Goland S, Trento A, Iida K, et al. Assessment of aortic stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography: An accurate and novel approach. Heart 2007; 93: 801-807.
21. Lopez-Mattei JC, Shah DJ,: When to consider cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement? Curr Opin Cardiol 2013; 28: 505-511.
22. Jabbour A, Ismail TF, Moat N, et al. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: Comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 2165-2173.
23. Zamorano JL, Badano LP, Bruce C, et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for the use of echocardiography in new transcatheter interventions for valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2189-2214.
24. Tsang W, Meineri M, Hahn RT, et al. A three-dimensional echocardiographic study on aortic-mitral coupling in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 14: 950-956.
25. Bedogni F, Latib A, De Marco F, et al. Interplay between mitral regurgitation and transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the CoreValve Revalving System: A multicenter registry. Circulation 2013; 128: 2145-2153.
26. Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P,: Usefulness of the valvuloarterial impedance to predict adverse outcome in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 1003-1011.
27. Shibayama K, Harada K, Berdejo J, et al. Effect of transcatheter aortic valve replacement on the mitral valve apparatus and mitral regurgitation: Real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7: 344-351.
28. De Chiara B, Moreo A, De Marco F, et al. Influence of CoreValve ReValving System implantation on mitral valve function: An echocardiographic study in selected patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 78: 638-644.
29. Piazza N, de Jaegere P, Schultz C, et al. Anatomy of the aortic valvar complex and its implications for transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 1: 74-81.
30. Zamorano JL, Gonçalves A, Lang R,: Imaging to select and guide transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 1578-1587.
31. Nagueh SF, Bachinski LL, Meyer D, et al. Tissue Doppler imaging consistently detects myocardial abnormalities in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and provides a novel means for an early diagnosis before and independently of hypertrophy. Circulation 2001; 104: 128-130.
32. Cannon RO, McIntosh CL, Schenke WH, et al. Effect of surgical reduction of left ventricular outflow obstruction on hemodynamics, coronary flow, and myocardial metabolism in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1989; 79: 766-775.
33. Herrmann HC, Pibarot P, Hueter I, et al. Predictors of mortality and outcomes of therapy in low-flow severe aortic stenosis: A Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial analysis. Circulation 2013; 127: 2316-2326.
34. Généreux P, Head SJ, Van Mieghem NM, et al. Clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using valve academic research consortium definitions: A weighted meta-analysis of 3,519 patients from 16 studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 2317-2326.
35. Mylotte D, Martucci G, Piazza N,: Patient selection for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: An interventional cardiology perspective. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 1: 206-215.
36. Kurra V, Schoenhagen P, Roselli EE, et al. Prevalence of significant peripheral artery disease in patients evaluated for percutaneous aortic valve insertion: Preprocedural assessment with multidetector computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137: 1258-1264.
37. Bloomfield GS, Gillam LD, Hahn RT, et al. A practical guide to multimodality imaging of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 5: 441-455.
38. Hayashida K, Lefèvre T, Chevalier B, et al. Transfemoral aortic valve implantation new criteria to predict vascular complications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 851-858.
39. Masson JB, Kovac J, Schuler G, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Review of the nature, management, and avoidance of procedural complications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 811-820.
40. Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty JM, Brochet E, et al. Multimodal assessment of the aortic annulus diameter: Implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 186-194.
41. Babaliaros VC, Liff D, Chen EP, et al. Can balloon aortic valvuloplasty help determine appropriate transcatheter aortic valve size? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 1: 580-586.
42. Santos N, de Agustín JA, Almería C, et al. Prosthesis/annulus discongruence assessed by three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography: A predictor of significant paravalvular aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 13: 931-937.
43. Kasel AM, Cassese S, Bleiziffer S, et al. Standardized imaging for aortic annular sizing: Implications for transcatheter valve selection. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 6: 249-262.
44. Blanke P, Spira EM, Ionasec R, et al. Semiautomated quantification of aortic annulus dimensions on cardiac CT for TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7: 320-322.
45. Ussia GP, Barbanti M, Sarkar K, et al. Accuracy of intracardiac echocardiography for aortic root assessment in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am Heart J 2012; 163: 684-689.
46. Willson AB, Webb JG, Labounty TM, et al. 3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography predicts moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A multicenter retrospective analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 1287-1294.
47. Jilaihawi H, Doctor N, Kashif M, et al. Aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement using cross-sectional 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 908-916.
48. Little SH, Shah DJ, Mahmarian JJ,: Multimodality noninvasive imaging for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A primer. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 2012; 8: 29-37.
49. Ribeiro HB, Nombela-Franco L, Urena M, et al. Coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A systematic review. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6: 452-461.
50. Saia F, Marrozzini C, Marzocchi A,: Displacement of calcium nodules of the native valve as a possible cause of left main occlusion following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Invasive Cardiol 2011; 23: E106-E109.
51. Azzalini L, Ghoshhajra BB, Elmariah S, et al. The aortic valve calcium nodule score (AVCNS) independently predicts paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2014; 8: 131-140.
52. Hahn RT, Khalique O, Williams MR, et al. Predicting paravalvular regurgitation following transcatheter valve replacement: Utility of a novel method for three-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of the aortic annulus. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013; 26: 1043-1052.
53. Détaint D, Lepage L, Himbert D, et al. Determinants of significant paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve: Implantation impact of device and annulus discongruence. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 821-827.
54. John M, Liao R, Zheng Y, et al. System to guide transcatheter aortic valve implantations based on interventional C-arm CT imaging. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2010; 13 (Pt 1): 375-382.
55. Maeda K, Kuratani T, Torikai K, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement using DynaCT. J Card Surg 2012; 27: 551-553.
56. Babaliaros VC, Junagadhwalla Z, Lerakis S, et al. Use of balloon aortic valvuloplasty to size the aortic annulus before implantation of a balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 114-118.
57. Kasel AM, Cassese S, Leber AW, et al. Fluoroscopy-guided aortic root imaging for TAVR: "follow the right cusp" rule. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 6: 274-275.
58. Kempfert J, Falk V, Schuler G, et al. Dyna-CT during minimally invasive off-pump transapical aortic valve implantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: 2041.
59. Barbash IM, Ben-Dor I, Dvir D, et al. Incidence and predictors of acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J 2012; 163: 1031-1036.
60. Bartel T, Bonaros N, Edlinger M, et al. Intracardiac echo and reduced radiocontrast requirements during TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7: 319-320.
61. Bartel T, Bonaros N, Müller L, et al. Intracardiac echocardiography: A new guiding tool for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011; 24: 966-975.
62. Tuzcu EM,: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement malposition and embolization: Innovation brings solutions also new challenges. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 72: 579-580.
63. Rallidis LS, Moyssakis IE, Ikonomidis I, et al. Natural history of early aortic paraprosthetic regurgitation: A five-year follow-up. Am Heart J 1999; 138 (2 Pt 1): 351-357.
64. Tarantini G, Gasparetto V, Napodano M, et al. Valvular leak after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A clinician update on epidemiology, pathophysiology and clinical implications. Am J Cardiovasc Dis 2011; 1: 312-320.
65. Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG, et al. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: A report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22: 975-1014; quiz 82-84.
66. Sinning JM, Hammerstingl C, Vasa-Nicotera M, et al. Aortic regurgitation index defines severity of peri-prosthetic regurgitation and predicts outcome in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 1134-1141.
67. Sinning JM, Vasa-Nicotera M, Chin D, et al. Evaluation and management of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 11-20.
68. Eggebrecht H, Doss M, Schmermund A, et al. Interventional options for severe aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Balloons, snares, valve-in-valve. Clin Res Cardiol 2012; 101: 503-507.
69. Toggweiler S, Wood DA, Rodés-Cabau J, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5: 571-577.
70. Webb JG, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral artery. Circulation 2006; 113: 842-850.
71. Walther T, Falk V, Kempfert J, et al. Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation; the initial 50 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 33: 983-988.
72. Shames S, Koczo A, Hahn R, et al. Flow characteristics of the SAPIEN aortic valve: The importance of recognizing in-stent flow acceleration for the echocardiographic assessment of valve function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012; 25: 603-609.
73. Clavel MA, Rodés-Cabau J, Dumont É, et al. Validation and characterization of transcatheter aortic valve effective orifice area measured by Doppler echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4: 1053-1062.
74. Jilaihawi H, Chin D, Spyt T, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Medtronic-Corevalve bioprosthesis. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 857-864.
75. Dumesnil JG, Honos GN, Lemieux M, et al. Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 637-643.
76. Ewe SH, Muratori M, Delgado V, et al. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 1910-1918.
77. Clavel MA, Webb JG, Pibarot P, et al. Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 1883-1891.
78. Kohsaka S, Mohan S, Virani S, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects long-term survival after mechanical valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135: 1076-1080.
79. Ruel M, Rubens FD, Masters RG, et al. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with mitral prosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 128: 278-283.
80. Tasca G, Brunelli F, Cirillo M, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 505-510.
81. Lerakis S, Hayek S, Arepalli CD, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance for paravalvular leaks in post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2014; 129: e430-e431.
82. Iida R, Welsh RC, Meyer SR, et al. Pre-dismissal surveillance echocardiography second day after TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 5: 1182-1184.
83. Eisen A, Shapira Y, Sagie A, et al. Infective endocarditis in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era: Comprehensive review of a rare complication. Clin Cardiol 2012; 35: E1-E5.
84. Tzikas A, Schultz C, Piazza N, et al. Perforation of the membranous interventricular septum after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 582-583.
85. Levi DS, Salem M, Suh W,: Transcatheter closure of an iatrogenic ventricular septal defect after SAPIEN valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 2: E90-94.
86. Zhao Y, Lindqvist P, Nilsson J, et al. Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation-early recovery of left and preservation of right ventricular function. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011; 12: 35-39.
87. La Manna A, Sanfilippo A, Capodanno D, et al. Left ventricular reverse remodeling after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013; 15: 39.
88. van der Boon RM, Nuis RJ, Van Mieghem NM, et al. New conduction abnormalities after TAVI-frequency and causes. Nat Rev Cardiol 2012; 9: 454-463.
89. Cavalcante JL, Schoenhagen P,: Role of cross-sectional imaging for structural heart disease interventions. Cardiol Clin 2013; 31: 467-478.
90. Leon MB, Piazza N, Nikolsky E, et al. Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials: A consensus report from the valve academic research consortium. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 253-269.