Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: Comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 58, Issue 21, 2011, Pages 2165-2173

  Jabbour, Andrew ^a,b   Ismail, Tevfik F ^a,b   Moat, Neil ^a,b   Gulati, Ankur ^a,b   Roussin, Isabelle ^a,b   Alpendurada, Francisco ^a,b   Park, Bradley ^a   Okoroafor, Francois ^a   Asgar, Anita ^a   Barker, Sarah ^a   Davies, Simon ^a   Prasad, Sanjay K ^a,b   Rubens, Michael ^a   Mohiaddin, Raad H ^a,b  

^a ROYAL BROMPTON AND HAREFIELD NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL BROMPTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

aortic stenosis; cardiac computed tomography; cardiovascular magnetic resonance; transcatheter aortic valve implantation; transthoracic echocardiography

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AGED; AORTA; AORTA ROOT; AORTA SINUS; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVER VARIATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SINOTUBULAR JUNCTION; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80855144812     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: 15583597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. M.B. Leon, C.R. Smith, and M. Mack Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery N Engl J Med 363 2010 1597 1607
2. E. Grube, G. Schuler, and L. Buellesfeld Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome J Am Coll Cardiol 50 2007 69 76 (Pubitemid 46970878)
3. C. Tamburino, D. Capodanno, and A. Ramondo Incidence and predictors of early and late mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in 663 patients with severe aortic stenosis Circulation 123 2011 299 308
4. M.A. Sherif, M. Abdel-Wahab, and B. Stocker Anatomic and procedural Ppedictors of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve bioprosthesis J Am Coll Cardiol 56 2010 1623 1629
5. V. Delgado, A.C.T. Ng, and N.R. van de Veire Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: role of multi-detector row computed tomography to evaluate prosthesis positioning and deployment in relation to valve function Eur Heart J 31 2010 1114 1123
6. J.G. Webb, S. Pasupati, and K. Humphries Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis Circulation 116 2007 755 763 (Pubitemid 47255993)
7. L.F. Tops, D.A. Wood, and V. Delgado Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement J Am Coll Cardiol Img 1 2008 321 330 (Pubitemid 351681425)
8. A. Tzikas, C.J. Schultz, and N. Piazza Assessment of the aortic annulus by multislice computed tomography, contrast aortography, and trans-thoracic echocardiography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77 2011 868 875
9. C.J. Schultz, A. Moelker, and N. Piazza Three dimensional evaluation of the aortic annulus using multislice computer tomography: are manufacturer's guidelines for sizing for percutaneous aortic valve replacement helpful? Eur Heart J 31 2010 849 856
10. A. Vahanian, O. Alfieri, and N. Al-Attar Transcatheter valve implantation for patients with aortic stenosis: a position statement from the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) Eur Heart J 29 2008 1463 1470 (Pubitemid 351806497)
11. E.D. Burman, J. Keegan, and P.J. Kilner Aortic root measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: specification of planes and lines of measurement and corresponding normal values Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 1 2008 104 113
12. H. Baumgartner, J. Hung, and J. Bermejo Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22 2009 1 23
13. K.K. Kapur, P. Fan, N.C. Nanda, A.P. Yoganathan, and R.G. Goyal Doppler color flow mapping in the evaluation of prosthetic mitral and aortic valve function J Am Coll Cardiol 13 1989 1561 1571 (Pubitemid 19145555)
14. W.A. Zoghbi, M. Enriquez-Sarano, and E. Foster Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16 2003 777 802 (Pubitemid 37391035)
15. F. Grothues, G.C. Smith, and J.C. Moon Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy Am J Cardiol 90 2002 29 34 (Pubitemid 34671198)
16. D.G. Altman, and J.M. Bland Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies The Statistician 32 1983 307 317
17. D. Messika-Zeitoun, J.M. Serfaty, and E. Brochet Multimodal assessment of the aortic annulus diameter: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation J Am Coll Cardiol 55 2010 186 194
18. V.C. Babaliaros, D. Liff, and E.P. Chen Can balloon aortic valvuloplasty help determine appropriate transcatheter aortic valve size? J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 1 2008 580 586
19. A. Dashkevich, P. Blanke, and M. Siepe Preoperative Assessment of aortic annulus dimensions: comparison of noninvasive and intraoperative measurement Ann Thorac Surg 91 2011 709 714