When to consider cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement?

Current Opinion in Cardiology

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 505-511

  Lopez Mattei, Juan C ^a   Shah, Dipan J ^a  

^a HOUSTON METHODIST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

aortic annulus sizing; aortic stenosis; cardiac magnetic resonance; paravalvular regurgitation; phase contrast velocity mapping; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Indexed keywords

AORTA ATHEROSCLEROSIS; AORTA ROOT; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; CARDIAC IMAGING; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FLOW RATE; HEART CYCLE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE OVERLOAD; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE;

AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CARDIAC IMAGING TECHNIQUES; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; PROSTHESIS FITTING;

EID: 84883452680     PISSN: 02684705     EISSN: 15317080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32836245fb     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:1597-1607.
2. Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008; 1:321-330.
3. Mulvagh SL, Rakowski H, Vannan MA, et al., American Society of Echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Consensus Statement on the clinical applications of ultrasonic contrast agents in echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21:1179-1201.
4. Seitz J, Wild T. Quantification of blood flow in the carotid arteries: comparison of Doppler ultrasound and three different phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Invest Radiol 2001; 36:642-647.
5. Chai P, Mohiaddin R. How do we perform cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow assessment using phase contrast velocity mapping? J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005; 7:705-716.
6. Globits S, Mayr H, Frank H, et al. Quantification of regurgitant lesions by MRI. Int J Card Imaging 1990-1991; 6:109-116.
7. Cawley PJ, Hamilton-Craig C, Owens DS, et al. Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 6:48-57.
8. Debl K, Djavidani B, Buchner S, et al. Assessment of the anatomical regurgitant orifice in aortic regurgitation: a clinical magnetic resonance study. Heart 2008; 94:e8.
9. Yucel EK, Anderson CM, Edelman RR, et al. AHA Scientific Statement. Magnetic resonance angiography: update on applications for extracranial arteries. Circulation 1999; 100:2284-2301.
10. Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ, Kaul S, et al. 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59:1200-1254.
11. Jabbour A, Ismail TF, Moat N, et al. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and postprocedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58:2165-2173.
12. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:2187-2198.
13. Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:1686-1695.
14. Généreux P, Head SJ, Hahn R, et al. Paravalvular leak after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the new achilles' heel? A comprehensive review of the literature. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61:1125-1136.
15. Sherif MA, Abdel-Wahab M, Beurich HW, et al. Haemodynamic evaluation of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. EuroIntervention 2011; 7:57-63.
16. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999; 100:1992-2002.
17. Shah DJ, Judd RM, Kim RJ. Technology insight: MRI of the myocardium. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005; 2:597-605.
18. Nigri M, Azevedo CF, Rochitte CE, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging identifies focal regions of intramyocardial fibrosis in patients with severe aortic valve disease: correlation with quantitative histopathology. Am Heart J 2009; 157:361-368.
19. Quarto C, Dweck MR, Murigu T, et al. Late gadolinium enhancement as a potential marker of increased perioperative risk in aortic valve replacement. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012; 15:45-50.