Role of cross-sectional imaging for structural heart disease interventions

Cardiology Clinics

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 467-478

  Cavalcante, João L ^a   Schoenhagen, Paul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac computed tomography; Cardiac magnetic resonance; Cross sectional imaging; Structural heart disease interventions; Transcatheter therapies

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE DISEASE; ASCENDING AORTA; CARDIAC IMAGING; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CORONARY ARTERY CALCIFICATION; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; HEART ATRIUM SEPTUM DEFECT; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY; MITRAL VALVE DISEASE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PATENT FORAMEN OVALE; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY VALVE DISEASE; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TWO DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE; VASCULAR ACCESS;

CARDIAC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING; STRUCTURAL HEART DISEASE INTERVENTIONS; TRANSCATHETER THERAPIES;

AORTIC VALVE; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; FORAMEN OVALE, PATENT; HEART SEPTAL DEFECTS, ATRIAL; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; MITRAL VALVE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PATIENT SELECTION; PULMONARY VALVE; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; VASCULAR CALCIFICATION;

EID: 84881364258     PISSN: 07338651     EISSN: 15582264     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2013.04.006     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Webb J.G., Wood D.A. Current status of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JAm Coll Cardiol 2012, 60:483-492.
2. Halliburton S.S. Recent technologic advances in multi-detector row cardiac CT. Cardiol Clin 2009, 27:655-664.
3. Leipsic J., Gurvitch R., Labounty T.M., et al. Multidetector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011, 4:416-429.
4. Achenbach S., Delgado V., Hausleiter J., et al. SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). JCardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012, 6:366-380.
5. Schoenhagen P., Falkner J., Piraino D. Transcatheter aortic valve repair, imaging, and electronic imaging health record. Curr Cardiol Rep 2013, 15:319.
6. Kasel A.M., Cassese S., Bleiziffer S., et al. Standardized imaging for aortic annular sizing: implications for transcatheter valve selection. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013, 6:249-262.
7. Schoenhagen P., Kapadia S.R., Halliburton S.S., et al. Computed tomography evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): imaging of the aortic root and iliac arteries. JCardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011, 5:293-300.
8. Ng A.C., Delgado V., van der Kley F., et al. Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries before andafter transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2- and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010, 3:94-102.
9. Jilaihawi H., Kashif M., Fontana G., et al. Cross-sectional computed tomographic assessment improves accuracy of aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and reduces the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation. JAm Coll Cardiol 2012, 59:1275-1286.
10. Hamdan A., Guetta V., Konen E., et al. Deformation dynamics and mechanical properties of the aortic annulus by 4-dimensional computed tomography: insights into the functional anatomy of the aortic valve complex and implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapy. JAm Coll Cardiol 2012, 59:119-127.
11. Genereux P., Head S.J., Hahn R., et al. Paravalvular leak after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the new Achilles' heel? A comprehensive review of the literature. JAm Coll Cardiol 2013, 61:1125-1136.
12. Kodali S.K., Williams M.R., Smith C.R., et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. NEngl J Med 2012, 366:1686-1695.
13. Delgado V., Ng A.C., van de Veire N.R., et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: role of multi-detector row computed tomography to evaluate prosthesis positioning and deployment in relation to valve function. Eur Heart J 2010, 31:1114-1123.
14. Pouleur A.C., le Polain de Waroux J.B., Pasquet A., et al. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology 2007, 244:745-754.
15. Feuchtner G.M., Dichtl W., Friedrich G.J., et al. Multislice computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity. JAm Coll Cardiol 2006, 47:1410-1417.
16. Haensig M., Lehmkuhl L., Rastan A.J., et al. Aortic valve calcium scoring is a predictor of significant paravalvular aortic insufficiency in transapical-aortic valve implantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012, 41:1234-1240.
17. Ewe S.H., Ng A.C., Schuijf J.D., et al. Location and severity of aortic valve calcium and implications for aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 2011, 108:1470-1477.
18. Masson J.B., Kovac J., Schuler G., et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: review of the nature, management, and avoidance of procedural complications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009, 2:811-820.
19. Tuzcu E.M. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement malposition and embolization: innovation brings solutions also new challenges. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008, 72:579-580.
20. Kurra V., Kapadia S.R., Tuzcu E.M., et al. Pre-procedural imaging of aortic root orientation and dimensions: comparison between X-ray angiographic planar imaging and 3-dimensional multidetector row computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010, 3:105-113.
21. Gurvitch R., Wood D.A., Leipsic J., et al. Multislice computed tomography for prediction of optimal angiographic deployment projections during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010, 3:1157-1165.
22. Samim M., Stella P.R., Agostoni P., et al. Automated 3D analysis of pre-procedural MDCT to predict annulus plane angulation and C-arm positioning: benefit on procedural outcome in patients referred for TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013, 6:238-248.
23. Kurra V., Lieber M.L., Sola S., et al. Extent of thoracic aortic atheroma burden and long-term mortality after cardiothoracic surgery: a computed tomography study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010, 3:1020-1029.
24. Szeto W.Y., Augoustides J.G., Desai N.D., et al. Cerebral embolic exposure during transfemoral and transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JCard Surg 2011, 26:348-354.
25. Kappetein A.P., Head S.J., Genereux P., et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. JAm Coll Cardiol 2012, 60:1438-1454.
26. Bapat V.N., Attia R.Q., Thomas M. Distribution of calcium in the ascending aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation and its relevance to the transaortic approach. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012, 5:470-476.
27. Kurra V., Schoenhagen P., Roselli E.E., et al. Prevalence of significant peripheral artery disease in patients evaluated for percutaneous aortic valve insertion: preprocedural assessment with multidetector computed tomography. JThorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009, 137:1258-1264.
28. Kempfert J., Noettling A., John M., et al. Automatically segmented DynaCT: enhanced imaging during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JAm Coll Cardiol 2011, 58:e211.
29. Schultz C.J., Weustink A., Piazza N., et al. Geometry and degree of apposition of the CoreValve ReValving system with multislice computed tomography after implantation in patients with aortic stenosis. JAm Coll Cardiol 2009, 54:911-918.
30. Jabbour A., Ismail T.F., Moat N., et al. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography. JAm Coll Cardiol 2011, 58:2165-2173.
31. Koos R., Altiok E., Mahnken A.H., et al. Evaluation of aortic root for definition of prosthesis size by magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 2012, 158:353-358.
32. Iozzelli A., D'Orta G., Aliprandi A., et al. The value of true-FISP sequence added to conventional gadolinium-enhanced MRA of abdominal aorta and its major branches. Eur J Radiol 2009, 72:489-493.
33. Stahli B.E., Bunzli R., Grunenfelder J., et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) outcome according to standardized endpoint definitions by the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC). JInvasive Cardiol 2011, 23:307-312.
34. Miyazaki M., Lee V.S. Nonenhanced MR angiography. Radiology 2008, 248:20-43.
35. Shanks M., Delgado V., Ng A.C., et al. Mitral valve morphology assessment: three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography versus computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 2010, 90:1922-1929.
36. Cavalcante J.L., Rodriguez L.L., Kapadia S., et al. Role of echocardiography in percutaneous mitral valve interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012, 5:733-746.
37. Tops L.F., Van de Veire N.R., Schuijf J.D., et al. Noninvasive evaluation of coronary sinus anatomy and its relation to the mitral valve annulus: implications for percutaneous mitral annuloplasty. Circulation 2007, 115:1426-1432.
38. Schofer J., Siminiak T., Haude M., et al. Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty for functional mitral regurgitation: results of the CARILLON Mitral Annuloplasty Device European Union Study. Circulation 2009, 120:326-333.
39. Choure A.J., Garcia M.J., Hesse B., et al. Invivo analysis of the anatomical relationship of coronary sinus to mitral annulus and left circumflex coronary artery using cardiac multidetector computed tomography: implications for percutaneous coronary sinus mitral annuloplasty. JAm Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1938-1945.
40. Chiribiri A., Kelle S., Kohler U., et al. Magnetic resonance cardiac vein imaging: relation to mitral valve annulus and left circumflex coronary artery. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008, 1:729-738.
41. McElhinney D.B., Hellenbrand W.E., Zahn E.M., et al. Short- and medium-term outcomes after transcatheter pulmonary valve placement in the expanded multicenter US melody valve trial. Circulation 2010, 122:507-516.
42. Bartel T., Muller S. Contemporary echocardiographic guiding tools for device closure of interatrial communications. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2013, 3:38-46.
43. Ko S.F., Liang C.D., Yip H.K., et al. Amplatzer septal occluder closure of atrial septal defect: evaluation of transthoracic echocardiography, cardiac CT, and transesophageal echocardiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193:1522-1529.