Quantitative susceptibility mapping: Current status and future directions

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-25

  Haacke, E Mark ^a,b,c   Liu, Saifeng ^b   Buch, Sagar ^b   Zheng, Weili ^a   Wu, Dongmei ^c   Ye, Yongquan ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c EAST CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Iron quantification; Magnetic susceptibility; Phase imaging; Quantitative susceptibility mapping; Susceptibility weighted imaging; Venous oxygen saturation

Indexed keywords

IRON; OXYGEN;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ANISOTROPY; ARTIFACT; BRAIN; BRAINMASK; CAUDATE NUCLEUS; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; CONVOLUTION; DATA PROCESSING; DECONVOLUTION; DIPOLE; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; GLOBUS PALLIDUS; GRAY MATTER; IMAGE ACQUISITION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MAXIMUM INTENSITY PROJECTION; NOISE; OPTIMAL ECO TIME; ORIENTING RESPONSE; OXYGEN SATURATION; PHASE TRANSITION; PHASE UNWRAPPING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROTON INDUCED X RAY EMISSION; PUTAMEN; QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES; QUANTITATIVE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING; REVIEW; SCINTISCANNING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SUPERIOR SAGITTAL SINUS; WHITE MATTER; WHITE NOISE; X RAY FLUORESCENCE; ANIMAL; BRAIN MAPPING; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MOUSE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANIMALS; ANISOTROPY; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICE; OXYGEN; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO;

EID: 84926420681     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: 18735894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.09.004     Document Type: Review

References (148)

1. Haacke E.M., Lai S., Yablonskiy D.A., Lin W. In vivo validation of the bold mechanism: a review of signal changes in gradient echo functional MRI in the presence of flow. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 1995, 6(2-3):153-163.
2. Haacke E.M., Lai S., Reichenbach J.R., Kuppusamy K., Hoogenraad F.G., Takeichi H., et al. In vivo measurement of blood oxygen saturation using magnetic resonance imaging: a direct validation of the blood oxygen level-dependent concept in functional brain imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 1997, 5(5):341-346.
3. Reichenbach J.R., Venkatesan R., Schillinger D.J., Kido D.K., Haacke E.M. Small vessels in the human brain: MR venography with deoxyhemoglobin as an intrinsic contrast agent. Radiology 1997, 204(1):272-277.
4. Reichenbach J.R., Essig M., Haacke E.M., Lee B.C., Przetak C., Kaiser W.A., et al. High-resolution venography of the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. MAGMA 1998, 6(1):62-69.
5. Reichenbach J.R., Barth M., Haacke E.M., Klarhöfer M., Kaiser W.A., Moser E. High-resolution MR venography at 3.0 Tesla. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000, 24(6):949-957.
6. Haacke E.M., Xu Y., Cheng Y.N., Reichenbach J.R. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 2004, 52(3):612-618.
7. Haacke E.M., Mittal S., Wu Z., Neelavalli J., Cheng Y.-C.N. Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 1. Am J Neuroradiol 2009, 30(1):19-30.
8. Haacke E.M., Patrick J.L., Lenz G.W., Parrish T. The separation of water and lipid components in the presence of field inhomogeneities. Rev Magn Reson Med 1986, 1(2):123-154.
9. Glover G.H., Schneider E. Three-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med 1991, 18(2):371-383.
10. Ishihara Y., Calderon A., Watanabe H., Okamoto K., Suzuki Y., Kuroda K., et al. A precise and fast temperature mapping using water proton chemical shift. Magn Reson Med 1995, 34(6):814-823.
11. Gillies R.J., Raghunand N., Garcia-Martin M.L., Gatenby R.A. pH imaging. A review of pH measurement methods and applications in cancers. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2004, 23(5):57-64.
12. Weis J., Covaciu L., Rubertsson S., Allers M., Lunderquist A., Ortiz-Nieto F., et al. Phase-difference and spectroscopic imaging for monitoring of human brain temperature during cooling. Magn Reson Imaging 2012, 30(10):1505-1511.
13. Haacke E.M., Cheng N.Y.C., House M.J., Liu Q., Neelavalli J., Ogg R.J., et al. Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2005, 23(1):1-25.
14. Haacke E.M., Ayaz M., Khan A., Manova E.S., Krishnamurthy B., Gollapalli L., et al. Establishing a baseline phase behavior in magnetic resonance imaging to determine normal vs. abnormal iron content in the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 26(2):256-264.
15. Haacke E.M., Makki M., Ge Y., Maheshwari M., Sehgal V., Hu J., et al. Characterizing iron deposition in multiple sclerosis lesions using susceptibility weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 29(3):537-544.
16. Fatemi-Ardekani A., Boylan C., Noseworthy M.D. Identification of breast calcification using magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 2009, 36(12):5429-5436.
17. He X., Yablonskiy D.A. Biophysical mechanisms of phase contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106(32):13558-13563.
18. Lee J., Shmueli K., Kang B.-T., Yao B., Fukunaga M., van Gelderen P., et al. The contribution of myelin to magnetic susceptibility-weighted contrasts in high-field MRI of the brain. NeuroImage 2012, 59(4):3967-3975.
19. Bartzokis G., Cummings J.L., Markham C.H., Marmarelis P.Z., Treciokas L.J., Tishler T.A., et al. MRI evaluation of brain iron in earlier- and later-onset Parkinson's disease and normal subjects. Magn Reson Imaging 1999, 17(2):213-222.
20. Bilgic B., Pfefferbaum A., Rohlfing T., Sullivan E.V., Adalsteinsson E. MRI estimates of brain iron concentration in normal aging using quantitative susceptibility mapping. NeuroImage 2012, 59(3):2625-2635.
21. Li W., Wu B., Batrachenko A., Bancroft-Wu V., Morey R.A., Shashi V., et al. Differential developmental trajectories of magnetic susceptibility in human brain gray and white matter over the lifespan. Hum Brain Mapp 2014, 35(6):2698-2713.
22. Haacke E.M., Brown R.W., Thompson M.R., Venkatesan R. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design 1999, Wiley-Liss. 1st ed.
23. Wisnieff C., Liu T., Spincemaille P., Wang S., Zhou D., Wang Y. Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy: cylindrical symmetry from macroscopically ordered anisotropic molecules and accuracy of MRI measurements using few orientations. NeuroImage 2013, 70:363-376.
24. Sati P., van Gelderen P., Silva A.C., Reich D.S., Merkle H., de Zwart J.A., et al. Micro-compartment specific T2* relaxation in the brain. NeuroImage 2013, 77:268-278.
25. 3He. Phys Rev B 1979, 19(11):5666-5688.
26. Salomir R., de Senneville B.D., Moonen C.T. A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility. Concepts Magn Reson Part B: Magn Reson Eng 2003, 19B(1):26-34.
27. Marques J.p, Bowtell R. Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility. Concepts Magn Reson Part B: Magn Reson Eng 2005, 25B(1):65-78.
28. De Rochefort L., Brown R., Prince M.R., Wang Y. Quantitative MR susceptibility mapping using piece-wise constant regularized inversion of the magnetic field. Magn Reson Med 2008, 60(4):1003-1009.
29. Shmueli K., de Zwart J.A., van Gelderen P., Li T., Dodd S.J., Duyn J.H. Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data. Magn Reson Med 2009, 62(6):1510-1522.
30. Liu T., Spincemaille P., de Rochefort L., Kressler B., Wang Y. Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): a method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009, 61(1):196-204.
31. Cheng Y.-C.N., Neelavalli J., Haacke E.M. Limitations of calculating field distributions and magnetic susceptibilities in MRI using a Fourier based method. Phys Med Biol 2009, 54(5):1169-1189.
32. Haacke E.M., Tang J., Neelavalli J., Cheng Y.C. Susceptibility mapping as a means to visualize veins and quantify oxygen saturation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010, 32(3):663-676.
33. Liu C. Susceptibility tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010, 63(6):1471-1477.
34. Schweser F., Deistung A., Lehr B.W., Reichenbach J.R. Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: an approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism?. NeuroImage 2011, 54(4):2789-2807.
35. Liu J., Liu T., de Rochefort L., Ledoux J., Khalidov I., Chen W., et al. Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map. NeuroImage 2012, 59(3):2560-2568.
36. Schweser F., Sommer K., Deistung A., Reichenbach J.R. Quantitative susceptibility mapping for investigating subtle susceptibility variations in the human brain. NeuroImage 2012, 62(3):2083-2100.
37. Wu B., Li W., Guidon A., Liu C. Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med 2012, 67(1):137-147.
38. Tang J., Liu S., Neelavalli J., Cheng Y.C.N., Buch S., Haacke E.M. Improving susceptibility mapping using a threshold-based K-space/image domain iterative reconstruction approach. Magn Reson Med 2013, 69(5):1396-1407.
39. Jackson J.D. Classical electrodynamics third edition 1998, Wiley, New York, [832 pp.]. 3rd ed.
40. Koch K.M., Papademetris X., Rothman D.L., de Graaf R.A. Rapid calculations of susceptibility-induced magnetostatic field perturbations for in vivo magnetic resonance. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51(24):6381-6402.
41. Neelavalli J., Cheng Y.N., Jiang J., Haacke E.M. Removing background phase variations in susceptibility-weighted imaging using a fast, forward-field calculation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 29(4):937-948.
42. Yamada N., Imakita S., Sakuma T., Takamiya M. Intracranial calcification on gradient-echo phase image: depiction of diamagnetic susceptibility. Radiology 1996, 198(1):171-178.
43. Wang Y., Yu Y., Li D., Bae K.T., Brown J.J., Lin W., et al. Artery and vein separation using susceptibility-dependent phase in contrast-enhanced MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000, 12(5):661-670.
44. Susceptibility weighted imaging in MRI: basic concepts and clinical applications 2011, Wiley-Blackwell, [776 pp.]. 1st ed. E.M. Haacke, J.R. Reichenbach (Eds.).
45. Xu Y., Haacke E.M. The role of voxel aspect ratio in determining apparent vascular phase behavior in susceptibility weighted imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 24(2):155-160.
46. Xu Y., Haacke E.M. An iterative reconstruction technique for geometric distortion-corrected segmented echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 26(10):1406-1414.
47. Wu B., Li W., Avram A.V., Gho S.-M., Liu C. Fast and tissue-optimized mapping of magnetic susceptibility and T2* with multi-echo and multi-shot spirals. NeuroImage 2012, 59(1):297-305.
48. Krämer M., Reichenbach J.R. High resolution T2(*)-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla using PROPELLER-EPI. Z Med Phys 2014, 24(2):164-173.
49. Haacke E.M., Lindskogj E.D., Lin W. A fast, iterative, partial-fourier technique capable of local phase recovery. J Magn Reson 1991, 92(1):126-145.
50. Xu Y., Haacke E.M. Partial Fourier imaging in multi-dimensions: a means to save a full factor of two in time. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001, 14(5):628-635.
51. Griswold M.A., Jakob P.M., Heidemann R.M., Nittka M., Jellus V., Wang J., et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002, 47(6):1202-1210.
52. Cheng Y.-C.N., Hsieh C.-Y., Neelavalli J., Liu Q., Dawood M.S., Haacke E.M. A complex sum method of quantifying susceptibilities in cylindrical objects: the first step toward quantitative diagnosis of small objects in MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 25(8):1171-1180.
53. Schweser F., Deistung A., Lehr B.W., Reichenbach J.R. Differentiation between diamagnetic and paramagnetic cerebral lesions based on magnetic susceptibility mapping. Med Phys 2010, 37(10):5165-5178.
54. Liu T., Surapaneni K., Lou M., Cheng L., Spincemaille P., Wang Y. Cerebral microbleeds: burden assessment by using quantitative susceptibility mapping. Radiology 2012, 262(1):269-278.
55. Liu S., Neelavalli J., Cheng Y.-C.N., Tang J., Haacke E.Mark Quantitative susceptibility mapping of small objects using volume constraints. Magn Reson Med 2013, 69(3):716-723.
56. Spees W.M., Yablonskiy D.A., Oswood M.C., Ackerman J.J. Water proton MR properties of human blood at 1.5 tesla: magnetic susceptibility, T(1), T(2), T*(2), and non-Lorentzian signal behavior. Magn Reson Med 2001, 45(4):533-542.
57. Jain V., Langham M.C., Wehrli F.W. MRI estimation of global brain oxygen consumption rate. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010, 30(9):1598-1607.
58. Zhao J.M., Clingman C.S., Närväinen M.J., Kauppinen R.A., van Zijl P.C.M. Oxygenation and hematocrit dependence of transverse relaxation rates of blood at 3T. Magn Reson Med 2007, 58(3):592-597.
59. Abdul-Rahman H.S., Gdeisat M.A., Burton D.R., Lalor M.J., Lilley F., Moore C.J. Fast and robust three-dimensional best path phase unwrapping algorithm. Appl Opt 2007, 46(26):6623-6635.
60. Feng W., Neelavalli J., Haacke E.M. Catalytic multiecho phase unwrapping scheme (CAMPUS) in multiecho gradient echo imaging: removing phase wraps on a voxel-by-voxel basis. Magn Reson Med 2013, 70(1):117-126.
61. Ye Y., Hu J., Wu D., Haacke E.M. Noncontrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and venography imaging with enhanced angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013, 38(6):1539-1548.
62. Zhou D., Liu T., Spincemaille P., Wang Y. Background field removal by solving the Laplacian boundary value problem. NMR Biomed 2014, 27(3):312-319.
63. Liu S., Buch S., Haacke E.M. Phase image artifact reduction through interpolation. Proc Jt Annu Meet ISMRM-ESMRMB 2014 Milan Italy 2014, 3183.
64. Hammond K.E., Lupo J.M., Xu D., Metcalf M., Kelley D.A.C., Pelletier D., et al. Development of a robust method for generating 7.0T multichannel phase images of the brain with application to normal volunteers and patients with neurological diseases. NeuroImage 2008, 39(4):1682-1692.
65. Robinson S., Grabner G., Witoszynskyj S., Trattnig S. Combining phase images from multi-channel RF coils using 3D phase offset maps derived from a dual-echo scan. Magn Reson Med 2011, 65(6):1638-1648.
66. Koopmans P.J., Manniesing R., Niessen W.J., Viergever M.A., Barth M. MR venography of the human brain using susceptibility weighted imaging at very high field strength. MAGMA 2008, 21(1-2):149-158.
67. Bernstein M.A., Grgic M., Brosnan T.J., Pelc N.J. Reconstructions of phase contrast, phased array multicoil data. Magn Reson Med 1994, 32(3):330-334.
68. Li W., Wu B., Liu C. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. NeuroImage 2011, 55(4):1645-1656.
69. Schweser F., Deistung A., Sommer K., Reichenbach J.R. Toward online reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility maps: superfast dipole inversion. Magn Reson Med 2013, 69(6):1582-1594.
70. Witoszynskyj S., Rauscher A., Reichenbach J.R., Barth M. Phase unwrapping of MR images using ΦUN-a fast and robust region growing algorithm. Med Image Anal 2009, 13(2):257-268.
71. Ghiglia D.C., Romero L.A. Robust two-dimensional weighted and unweighted phase unwrapping that uses fast transforms and iterative methods. J Opt Soc Am A 1994, 11(1):107-117.
72. Schofield M.A., Zhu Y. Fast phase unwrapping algorithm for interferometric applications. Opt Lett 2003, 28(14):1194-1196.
73. Jenkinson M. Fast, automated, N-dimensional phase-unwrapping algorithm. Magn Reson Med 2003, 49(1):193-197.
74. Ghiglia D.C., Pritt M.D. Two-dimensional phase unwrapping: theory, algorithms, and software 1998, Wiley, [520 pp.].
75. Robinson S., Schödl H., Trattnig S. A method for unwrapping highly wrapped multi-echo phase images at very high field: UMPIRE. Magn Reson Med 2014, 72(1):80-92.
76. Li W., Avram A.V., Wu B., Xiao X., Liu C. Integrated Laplacian-based phase unwrapping and background phase removal for quantitative susceptibility mapping. NMR Biomed 2014, 27(2):219-227.
77. Liu S., Buch S., Haacke E.M. Accuracies of the Laplacian based phase processing methods. Proc Jt Annu Meet ISMRM-ESMRMB 2014 Milan Italy 2014, 3180.
78. Liu S., Buch S., Haacke E.M. Background field removal based on local complex phase unwrapping and spherical mean value property. Proc 21st Annu Meet ISMRM Salt Lake City Utah USA 2013, 2496.
79. Smith S.M. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002, 17(3):143-155.
80. Pandian D.S.J., Ciulla C., Haacke E.M., Jiang J., Ayaz M. Complex threshold method for identifying pixels that contain predominantly noise in magnetic resonance images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 28(3):727-735.
81. Liu T., Khalidov I., de Rochefort L., Spincemaille P., Liu J., Tsiouris A.J., et al. A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF). NMR Biomed 2011, 24(9):1129-1136.
82. Li L., Leigh J.S. High-precision mapping of the magnetic field utilizing the harmonic function mean value property. J Magn Reson 2001, 148(2):442-448.
83. Wen Y., Zhou D., Liu T., Spincemaille P., Wang Y. An iterative spherical mean value method for background field removal in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2013, 10.1002/mrm.24998.
84. Sun H., Wilman A.H. Background field removal using spherical mean value filtering and Tikhonov regularization. Magn Reson Med 2013, 10.1002/mrm.24765.
85. McPhee K.C., Denk C., Al-Rekabi Z., Rauscher A. Bilateral filtering of magnetic resonance phase images. Magn Reson Imaging 2011, 29(7):1023-1029.
86. De Rochefort L., Liu T., Kressler B., Liu J., Spincemaille P., Lebon V., et al. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010, 63(1):194-206.
87. Kressler B., de Rochefort L., Liu T., Spincemaille P., Jiang Q., Wang Y. Nonlinear regularization for per voxel estimation of magnetic susceptibility distributions from MRI field maps. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010, 29(2):273-281.
88. Liu T., Xu W., Spincemaille P., Avestimehr A.S., Wang Y. Accuracy of the morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) algorithm for quantitative susceptibility mapping in MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2012, 31(3):816-824.
89. Wharton S., Schäfer A., Bowtell R. Susceptibility mapping in the human brain using threshold-based k-space division. Magn Reson Med 2010, 63(5):1292-1304.
90. Wharton S., Bowtell R. Whole-brain susceptibility mapping at high field: a comparison of multiple- and single-orientation methods. NeuroImage 2010, 53(2):515-525.
91. Bernstein M.A., Zhou X.J., Polzin J.A., King K.F., Ganin A., Pelc N.J., et al. Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and correction. Magn Reson Med 1998, 39(2):300-308.
92. Buch S., Liu S., Haacke E.M., Neelavalli J. Studying the Effects of Homodyne High Pass Filtering on Susceptibility Mapping Using a 3D Simulated Brain Model. Proc 20th Annu Meet ISMRM Melbourne Australia 2012, 4462.
93. Yablonskiy D.A., Haacke E.M. Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: the static dephasing regime. Magn Reson Med 1994, 32(6):749-763.
94. Hopp K., Popescu B.F.G., McCrea R.P.E., Harder S.L., Robinson C.A., Haacke M.E., et al. Brain iron detected by SWI high pass filtered phase calibrated with synchrotron X-ray fluorescence. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010, 31(6):1346-1354.
95. Zheng W., Haacke E.M., Webb S.M., Nichol H. Imaging of stroke: a comparison between X-ray fluorescence and magnetic resonance imaging methods. Magn Reson Imaging 2012, 30(10):1416-1423.
96. Zheng W., Nichol H., Liu S., Cheng Y.-C.N., Haacke E.M. Measuring iron in the brain using quantitative susceptibility mapping and X-ray fluorescence imaging. NeuroImage 2013, 78:68-74.
97. Butz T., Flagmeyer R.-H., Heitmann J., Jamieson D.N., Legge G.J.F., Lehmann D., et al. The Leipzig high-energy ion nanoprobe: a report on first results. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B Beam Interact Mater Atoms 2000, 161-163:323-327.
98. Langkammer C., Krebs N., Goessler W., Scheurer E., Ebner F., Yen K., et al. Quantitative MR imaging of brain iron: a postmortem validation study. Radiology 2010, 257(2):455-462.
99. Langkammer C., Schweser F., Krebs N., Deistung A., Goessler W., Scheurer E., et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) as a means to measure brain iron? A post mortem validation study. NeuroImage 2012, 62(3):1593-1599.
100. Langkammer C., Krebs N., Goessler W., Scheurer E., Yen K., Fazekas F., et al. Susceptibility induced gray-white matter MRI contrast in the human brain. NeuroImage 2012, 59(2):1413-1419.
101. House M.J., St Pierre T.G., Kowdley K.V., Montine T., Connor J., Beard J., et al. Correlation of proton transverse relaxation rates (R2) with iron concentrations in postmortem brain tissue from alzheimer's disease patients. Magn Reson Med 2007, 57(1):172-180.
102. Haacke E.M. Quantitative measurements of iron. Clin Intensive Course Adv Neuroimaging 1 20th Annu Meet ISMRM Melb Aust [Internet]. Available from:. http://www.ismrm.org/12/WK_Neuro1.htm.
103. Hallgren B., Sourander P. The effect of age on the non-haemin iron in the human brain. J Neurochem 1958, 3(1):41-51.
104. Liu M., Liu S., Dicicco D., Habib C., Miao Y., Haacke E.M. Establishing a reference of iron deposition in human brain deep grey matter nuclei using susceptibility mapping. Proc Jt Annu Meet ISMRM-ESMRMB 2014 Milan Italy 2014, 4687.
105. LeVine S.M., Wulser M.J., Lynch S.G. Iron quantification in cerebrospinal fluid. Anal Biochem 1998, 265(1):74-78.
106. Li X., Vikram D.S., Lim I.A.L., Jones C.K., Farrell J.A.D., van Zijl P.C.M. Mapping magnetic susceptibility anisotropies of white matter in vivo in the human brain at 7T. NeuroImage 2012, 62(1):314-330.
107. Lim I.A.L., Faria A.V., Li X., Hsu J.T.C., Airan R.D., Mori S., et al. Human brain atlas for automated region of interest selection in quantitative susceptibility mapping: application to determine iron content in deep gray matter structures. NeuroImage 2013, 82:449-469.
108. Deistung A., Schäfer A., Schweser F., Biedermann U., Turner R., Reichenbach J.R. Toward in vivo histology: a comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with magnitude-, phase-, and R2*-imaging at ultra-high magnetic field strength. NeuroImage 2013, 65:299-314.
109. Xia S., Utriainen D., Tang J., Kou Z., Zheng G., Wang X., et al. Decreased oxygen saturation in asymmetrically prominent cortical veins in patients with cerebral ischemic stroke. Magn Reson Imaging 2014, 10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.012.
110. Langkammer C., Liu T., Khalil M., Enzinger C., Jehna M., Fuchs S., et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping in multiple sclerosis. Radiology 2013, 267(2):551-559.
111. Chen W., Gauthier S., Gupta A., Comunale J., Liu T., Wang S., et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of multiple sclerosis lesions at various ages. Radiology 2014, 271(1):183-192.
112. Sun Y., Parker D.L. Performance analysis of maximum intensity projection algorithm for display of MRA images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999, 18(12):1154-1169.
113. Jin Z., Xia L., Du Y.P. Reduction of artifacts in susceptibility-weighted MR venography of the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 28(2):327-333.
114. Gho S.-M., Liu C., Li W., Jang U., Kim E.Y., Hwang D., et al. Susceptibility map-weighted imaging (SMWI) for neuroimaging. Magn Reson Med 2014, 72(2):337-346.
115. Liu S., Mok K., Neelavalli J., Cheng Y.C.N., Tang J., Ye Y., et al. Improved MR Venography Using Quantitative Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014, 40(3):698-708.
116. Lee J., Shmueli K., Fukunaga M., van Gelderen P., Merkle H., Silva A.C., et al. Sensitivity of MRI resonance frequency to the orientation of brain tissue microstructure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107(11):5130-5135.
117. Bender B., Klose U. The in vivo influence of white matter fiber orientation towards B(0) on T2* in the human brain. NMR Biomed 2010, 23(9):1071-1076.
118. Lee J., van Gelderen P., Kuo L.-W., Merkle H., Silva A.C., Duyn J.H. T2*-based fiber orientation mapping. NeuroImage 2011, 57(1):225-234.
119. Denk C., Hernandez Torres E., MacKay A., Rauscher A. The influence of white matter fibre orientation on MR signal phase and decay. NMR Biomed 2011, 24(3):246-252.
120. Liu C., Li W., Johnson G.A., Wu B. High-field (9.4T) MRI of brain dysmyelination by quantitative mapping of magnetic susceptibility. NeuroImage 2011, 56(3):930-938.
121. Wharton S., Bowtell R. Fiber orientation-dependent white matter contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109(45):18559-18564.
122. 2 anisotropy in white matter fibers in marmoset monkeys. NeuroImage 2012, 59(2):979-985.
123. Liu C., Li W. Imaging neural architecture of the brain based on its multipole magnetic response. NeuroImage 2013, 67:193-202.
124. Sukstanskii A.L., Yablonskiy D.A. On the role of neuronal magnetic susceptibility and structure symmetry on gradient echo MR signal formation. Magn Reson Med 2014, 71(1):345-353.
125. Luo J., He X., Yablonskiy D.A. Magnetic susceptibility induced white matter MR signal frequency shifts-experimental comparison between Lorentzian sphere and generalized Lorentzian approaches. Magn Reson Med 2013, 10.1002/mrm.24762.
126. Liu C., Li W., Wu B., Jiang Y., Johnson G.A. 3D fiber tractography with susceptibility tensor imaging. NeuroImage 2012, 59(2):1290-1298.
127. Li W., Wu B., Avram A.V., Liu C. Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of human brain in vivo and its molecular underpinnings. NeuroImage 2012, 59(3):2088-2097.
128. Li X., van Zijl P.C.M. Mean magnetic susceptibility regularized susceptibility tensor imaging (MMSR-STI) for estimating orientations of white matter fibers in human brain. Magn Reson Med 2014, 72(3):610-619.
129. Wikswo J.P. Noninvasive magnetic detection of cardiac mechanical activity: theory. Med Phys 1980, 7(4):297-306.
130. Wikswo J.P., Opfer J.E., Fairbank W.M. Noninvasive magnetic detection of cardiac mechanical activity: experiments. Med Phys 1980, 7(4):307-314.
131. Farrell D.E., Tripp J.H., Zanzucchi P., Harris J., Brittenham G.M., Muir W. Magnetic measurement of human iron stores. IEEE Trans Magn 1980, 16(5):818-823.
132. Bastuscheck C.M., Williamson S.J. Technique for measuring the ac susceptibility of portions of the human body or other large objects. J Appl Phys 1985, 58(10):3896-3906.
133. Sepulveda N.G., Thomas I.M., Wikswo J.P. Magnetic susceptibility tomography for three-dimensional imaging of diamagnetic and paramagnetic objects. IEEE Trans Magn 1994, 30(6):5062-5069.
134. Reilly C.A., McConnell H.M., Meisenheimer R.G. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of annular samples. Phys Rev 1955, 98:264-265.
135. Orrell K.G., Sik V. Correction to static tube nuclear magnetic resonance method for determination of magnetic susceptibilities of solutes in solution. Anal Chem 1980, 52(3):567-569.
136. Chu S.C., Xu Y., Balschi J.A., Springer C.S. Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in NMR studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents. Magn Reson Med 1990, 13(2):239-262.
137. Cheng Y.-C., Hsieh C.-Y., Neelavalli J., Haacke E.M. Quantifying effective magnetic moments of narrow cylindrical objects in MRI. Phys Med Biol 2009, 54(22):7025-7044.
138. McAuley G., Schrag M., Sipos P., Sun S., Obenaus A., Neelavalli J., et al. Quantification of punctate iron sources using magnetic resonance phase. Magn Reson Med 2010, 63(1):106-115.
139. McAuley G., Schrag M., Barnes S., Obenaus A., Dickson A., Holshouser B., et al. Iron quantification of microbleeds in postmortem brain. Magn Reson Med 2011, 65(6):1592-1601.
140. Fernández-Seara M.A., Techawiboonwong A., Detre J.A., Wehrli F.W. MR susceptometry for measuring global brain oxygen extraction. Magn Reson Med 2006, 55(5):967-973.
141. Barnes S.R.S., Haacke E.M. Susceptibility-weighted imaging: clinical angiographic applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2009, 17(1):47-61.
142. Jain V., Abdulmalik O., Propert K.J., Wehrli F.W. Investigating the magnetic susceptibility properties of fresh human blood for noninvasive oxygen saturation quantification. Magn Reson Med 2012, 68(3):863-867.
143. Yang Q., Liu J., Barnes S.R.S., Wu Z., Li K., Neelavalli J., et al. Imaging the vessel wall in major peripheral arteries using susceptibility-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 30(2):357-365.
144. Barnes S., Haacke E.M. Settling properties of venous blood demonstrated in the peripheral vasculature using susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI). J Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 29(6):1465-1470.
145. Wang M., Dai Y., Han Y., Haacke E.M., Dai J., Shi D. Susceptibility weighted imaging in detecting hemorrhage in acute cervical spinal cord injury. Magn Reson Imaging 2011, 29(3):365-373.
146. Balassy C., Feier D., Peck-Radosavljevic M., Wrba F., Witoszynskyj S., Kiefer B., et al. Susceptibility-weighted MR imaging in the grading of liver fibrosis: a feasibility study. Radiology 2014, 270(1):149-158.
147. Xing W., He X., Kassir M.A., Chen J., Ding J., Sun J., et al. Evaluating hemorrhage in renal cell carcinoma using susceptibility weighted imaging. PLoS One 2013, 8(2):e57691. 10.1371/journal.pone.0057691.
148. Haacke E.M., Reichenbach J.R., Wang Y. Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging and Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping. In: A.W. Toga (ed.)Brain Mapping: An Encyclopedic Reference, 2015 (in press). New York 2015, 10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-9.00019-7.