Limitations of calculating field distributions and magnetic susceptibilities in MRI using a Fourier based method

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1169-1189

  Cheng, Yu Chung N ^a   Neelavalli, Jaladhar ^b   Haacke, E Mark ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Wayne State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2D FIELDS; 3-D SPACES; DISCRETE GREEN'S FUNCTIONS; DISCRETE METHODS; FIELD DISTRIBUTIONS; FOURIER; LEAST-SQUARES FITS; LOCAL STRUCTURES; LORENTZ; MR-IMAGES; PHANTOM STUDIES; SINGLE OBJECTS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

GREEN'S FUNCTION;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOURIER ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAGNETIC FIELD; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION;

FOURIER ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING;

EID: 63649149471     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/5/005     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bevington P R and Robinson D K 1992 Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences (New York: McGraw-Hill)
2. 3 He Phys. Rev. B 19 5666-88
3. Gradshteyn I S and Ryzhik I M 1994 Table of Integrals, Series, and Products 5th edn (San Diego: Academic)
4. Haacke E M, Brown R W, Thompson M R and Venkatesan R 1999 Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design (New York: Wiley)
5. Haacke E M, Cheng Y C N, House M J, Liu Q, Neelavalli J, Ogg R J, Khan A, Ayaz M, Kirsch W and Obenaus A 2005 Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging Magn. Reson. Imag. 23 1-25
6. Haacke E M, Xu Y, Cheng Y C N and Reichenbach J 2004 Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) Magn. Reson. Med. 52 612-8
7. Haacke E M et al 2007 Establishing a baseline phase behavior in magnetic resonance imaging to determine normal vs. abnormal iron content in the brain J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 26 256-64
8. Jackson J D 1999 Classical Electrodynamics 3rd edn (Hoboken: Wiley)
9. Jenkinson M, Wilson J L and Jezzard P 2004 Perturbation method for magnetic field calculations of nonconductive objects Magn. Reson. Med. 52 471-7
10. Koch K M, Papademetris X, Rothman D L and de Graaf R A 2006 Rapid calculations of susceptibility-induced magnetostatic field perturbations for in vivo magnetic resonance Phys. Med. Biol. 51 6381-402
11. Lide D R (ed) 2006-2007 Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 87th edn (New York: CRC Press)
12. Marques J P and Bowtell R 2005 Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility Concepts Magn. Reson. Part B (Magn. Reson. Eng.) 25B 65-78
13. Pandian D S, Ciulla C, Haacke E M, Jiang J and Ayaz M 2008 Complex threshold method for identifying pixels that contain predominantly noise in magnetic resonance images J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 28 727-35
14. Salomir R, de Senneville B D and Moonen C T 2003 A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility Concepts Magn. Reson. Part B (Magn. Reson. Eng.) 198 26-34
15. Sen P N and Axelrod S 1999 Inhomogeneity in local magnetic field due to susceptibility contrast J. Appl. Phys. 86 4548-54
16. Sepulveda N G, Thomas I M and Wikswo J P 1994 Magnetic susceptibility tomography for three dimensional imaging of diamagnetic and paramagnetic objects IEEE Trans. Magn. 30 5062-9
17. Tan S, Ma Y P, Thomas I M and Wikswo J P 1996 Reconstruction of two-dimensional magnetization and susceptibility distributions from the magnetic field of soft magnetic materials IEEE Trans. Magn. 32 230-4
18. Yoder D A, Zhao Y S, Paschal C B and Fitzpatrick J M 2004 MRI simulator with object-specific field map calculations Magn. Reson. Imag. 22 315-28