Rapid calculations of susceptibility-induced magnetostatic field perturbations for in vivo magnetic resonance

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 24, 2006, Pages 6381-6402

  Koch, Kevin M ^a   Papademetris, Xenophon ^a   Rothman, Douglas L ^a   De Graaf, Robin A ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MAGNETIC MATERIALS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE MEASUREMENT; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES;

DISTORTION CORRECTION; FIELD MAP ACQUISITIONS; STATIC FIELDS;

MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BRAIN; CALCULATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT;

AIR; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; WATER; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

EID: 33846873463     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/24/007     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andersson J L, Hutton C, Ashburner J, Turner R and Friston K 2001 Modeling geometric deformations in EPI time series NeuroImage 13 909-19
2. Bhagwandian R, Moerland M A, Bakker C J G, Beersma R and Langendijk J J W 1994 Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 3D Magn. Reson. Imaging 12 101-7
3. BioImage 2006 Bioimaging Sciences, Yale University New Haven, CT (http://www.bioimagesuite.org)
4. Bowtell R 2006 Private communiction
5. Bowtell R, Gutteridge S and Ramanathan C 2001 Imaging the long-range dipolar field in structured liquid state samples J. Magn. Reson. 150 147-55
6. Chen C N and Hoult D I 2005 Biomedical Magnetic Resonance Technology (Bristol: Adam Hilger)
7. Chu S C K, Xu Y, Balschi J A and Springer C S 1990 Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in NMR studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents Magn. Reson. Med. 13 239-62
8. Collins C M, Yang B, Yang Q and Smith M 2002 Numerical calculations of the static magnetic field in three-dimensional multi-tissue models of the human head Magn. Reson. Imaging 20 413-24
9. 0 fluctuations and their spatial distribution in the human brain at 7 Tesla Magn. Reson. Med. 47 888-95
10. de Munck J C, Bhagwandien R, Muller S H, Verster F C and van Herk M B 1996 The computation of MR image distortions caused by tissue susceptibility using the boundary element method IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 15 620-7
11. Deville G, Bernier M and Delrieux J 1979 NMR multiple echoes observed in solid He Phys. Rev. B 19 5666
12. Dickinson W C 1951 He time average magnetic field at the nucleus in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments Phys. Rev. 81 717-31
13. Feynman R P, Leighton R P and Sands M 1975 The Feynman Lectures on Physics vol 2 (Reading, MA: Addison Wesley)
14. Haake E M, Brown R W, Thompson M R and Venkantensan R 1999 Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Priciples and Sequence Design (New York: Wiley)
15. Hopkins J A and Wehrli F W 1997 Magnetic susceptibility measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: magnetic susceptibility of bone Magn. Reson. Med. 37 494
16. Idiyatullin D, Corum C, Park J Y and Garwood M 2006 Fast and quiet MRI using a swept radiofrequency J. Magn. Reson. 181 342-9
17. Jackson J D 1999 Classical Electrodynamics (New York: Wiley)
18. Jenkinson M, Wilson J L and Jezzard P 2004 Perturbation method for magnetic field calculations of nonconductive objects Magn. Reson. Med. 52 471-7
19. 0 field variations Magn. Reson. Med. 34 65-73
20. Jezzard P and Clare S 1999 Sources of distortion in functional MRI data Human Brain Mapping 8 80-5
21. Jochimsen T H, Schafer A, Bammer R and Moseley M E 2006 Efficient simulation of magnetic resonance imaging with Bloch-Torrey equations using intra-voxel magnetization gradients J. Magn. Reson. 180 29-38
22. Koch K M, Brown P B, Rothman D L and de Graaf R A 2006 Sample-specific diamagnetic and paramagnetic passive shimming J. Magn. Reson. 182 66-74
23. Li S, Dardzinski B J, Collins C M, Yang Q X and Smith M B 1996 Three-dimensional mapping of the static magnetic field inside the human head Magn. Reson. Med. 36 705-14
24. Lorentz H A 1915 The Theory of Electrons and Its Application to the Phenomena of Light and Heat (New York: Dover)
25. Marques J P and Bowtell R 2003 Evaluation of a fourier based method for calculation susceptibility induced magnetic field perturbations Proc. 11th ISMRM p 1020
26. Marques J P and Bowtell R 2005 Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility Concepts Magn. Reson. B 25 65-78
27. Ogawa S, Lee T M, Nayak A and Glynn P 1990 Oxygenation-sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields Magn. Reson. Med. 14 68-78
28. Papademetris X, Jackowski A, Schultz R T, Staib L H and Duncan J S 2004 Integrated intensity and point-feature nonrigid registration MICCAI pp 763-70
29. Raj D, Paley D P, Anderson A W, Kennan R P and Gore J C 2000 A model for susceptibility artefacts from respiration in functional echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging Phys. Med. Biol. 45 3809-20
30. Rueckert D, Sonoda L I, Hayes C, Hill D L G, Leach M O and Hawkes D J 1999 Non-rigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18 712-21
31. Salomir R, de Senneville B D and Moonen C T W 2003 A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility Concepts Magn. Reson. B 19 26-34
32. Schenck J F 1996 The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds Med. Phys. 23 815-50
33. Studholme C, Hill D L G and Hawkes D J 1999 An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment Pattern Recognit. 32 71-86
34. Styner M, Brechbühler C, Székely G and Gerig G 2000 Parametric estimate of intensity inhomogeneities applied to MRI IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19 153-65
35. Truong T, Clymer B D, Chakeres D W and Schmalbrock P 2002 Three-dimensional numerical simulations of susceptibility-induced magneti field inhomogeneities in the human Magn. Reson. Imaging 20 759-70
36. Ward H A, Riederer S J and Jack C F J 2002 Real-time autoshimming for echo-planar timecourse imaging Magn. Reson. Med. 48 771-80
37. Watson G 1995 A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
38. Wilson J L, Jenkinson M and Jezzard P 2002 Optimization of static field homogeneity in human brain using diamagnetic passive shims Magn. Reson. Med. 48 906-14
39. Yeo D T B, Fessler J A and Kim B 2004 Motion correction in fMRI by mapping slice-to-volume with concurrent field-inhomogeneity correction MICCAI pp 752-60
40. Yoder D A, Zhao Y, Paschal C B and Fitzpatrick J M 2004 MRI simulator with object-specific field map calculations Magn. Reson. Imag. 22 315-28
41. Zubal I G, Harrell C R, Smith E O, Rattner Z, Gindi G R and Hoffer P B 1994 Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy Med. Phys. 21 299-302