Mean magnetic susceptibility regularized susceptibility tensor imaging (MMSR-STI) for estimating orientations of white matter fibers in human brain

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 610-619

  Li, Xu ^a,b   Van Zijl, Peter C M ^a,b  

^a KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

diffusion tensor imaging; fiber orientation; magnetic susceptibility anisotropy; mean magnetic susceptibility; MMS; MSA; susceptibility tensor imaging; white matter

Indexed keywords

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; FIBER REINFORCED MATERIALS; FIBERS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MAGNETIC ANISOTROPY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETISM; TENSORS;

ACCURATE ESTIMATION; HEAD ROTATION; ILL-CONDITIONED INVERSE PROBLEM; REGULARIZATION STRATEGIES; SUSCEPTIBILITY ANISOTROPY; SUSCEPTIBILITY TENSORS; WHITE MATTER; WHITE MATTER FIBERS;

DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING;

ADULT; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORPUS CALLOSUM; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FEMALE; GRAY MATTER; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; MALE; MEAN MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY REGULARIZED SUSCEPTIBILITY TENSOR IMAGING; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; ORIENTATION; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; WHITE MATTER; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BRAIN MAPPING; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; ANISOTROPY; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FEMALE; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; WHITE MATTER;

EID: 85027957567     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25322     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Duyn JH, van Gelderen P, Li TQ, de Zwart JA, Koretsky AP, Fukunaga M,. High-field MRI of brain cortical substructure based on signal phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104: 11796-11801.
2. Li L,. Magnetic susceptibility quantification for arbitrarily shaped objects in inhomogeneous fields. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 907-916.
3. Salomir R, De Senneville BD, Moonen CTW,. A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility. Concept Magn Reson B 2003; 19B: 26-34.
4. Marques JP, Bowtell R,. Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility. Concept Magn Reson B 2005; 25B: 65-78.
5. Shmueli K, de Zwart JA, van Gelderen P, Li TQ, Dodd SJ, Duyn JH,. Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 1510-1522.
6. de Rochefort L, Liu T, Kressler B, Liu J, Spincemaille P, Lebon V, Wu J, Wang Y,. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 194-206.
7. Wharton S, Bowtell R,. Whole-brain susceptibility mapping at high field: a comparison of multiple- and single-orientation methods. Neuroimage 2010; 53: 515-525.
8. Li W, Wu B, Liu C,. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. Neuroimage 2011; 55: 1645-1656.
9. Schweser F, Deistung A, Lehr BW, Reichenbach JR,. Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: an approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism? Neuroimage 2011; 54: 2789-2807.
10. Liu J, Liu T, de Rochefort L, Ledoux J, Khalidov I, Chen W, Tsiouris AJ, Wisnieff C, Spincemaille P, Prince MR, et al. Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map. Neuroimage 2012; 59: 2560-2568.
11. Schweser F, Sommer K, Deistung A, Reichenbach JR,. Quantitative susceptibility mapping for investigating subtle susceptibility variations in the human brain. Neuroimage 2012; 62: 2083-2100.
12. Bilgic B, Pfefferbaum A, Rohlfing T, Sullivan EV, Adalsteinsson E,. MRI estimates of brain iron concentration in normal aging using quantitative susceptibility mapping. Neuroimage 2012; 59: 2625-2635.
13. Deistung A, Schafer A, Schweser F, Biedermann U, Turner R, Reichenbach JR,. Toward in vivo histology: a comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with magnitude-, phase-, and R2*-imaging at ultra-high magnetic field strength. Neuroimage 2013; 65: 299-314.
14. Deistung A, Schafer A, Schweser F, Biedermann U, Gullmar D, Trampel R, Turner R, Reichenbach JR,. High-resolution MR imaging of the human brainstem in vivo at 7 tesla. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 710.
15. Lee J, Shmueli K, Fukunaga M, van Gelderen P, Merkle H, Silva AC, Duyn JH,. Sensitivity of MRI resonance frequency to the orientation of brain tissue microstructure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107: 5130-5135.
16. Denk C, Hernandez Torres E, MacKay A, Rauscher A,. The influence of white matter fibre orientation on MR signal phase and decay. NMR Biomed 2011; 24: 246-252.
17. He X, Yablonskiy DA,. Biophysical mechanisms of phase contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106: 13558-13563.
18. Luo J, He X, Yablonskiy DA,. Magnetic susceptibility induced white matter MR signal frequency shifts-experimental comparison between Lorentzian sphere and generalized Lorentzian approaches. Magn Reson Med 2014; 71: 1251-1263.
19. Liu C,. Susceptibility tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 1471-1477.
20. Li W, Wu B, Avram AV, Liu C,. Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of human brain in vivo and its molecular underpinnings. Neuroimage 2012; 59: 2088-2097.
21. Li X, Vikram DS, Lim IA, Jones CK, Farrell JA, van Zijl PC,. Mapping magnetic susceptibility anisotropies of white matter in vivo in the human brain at 7 T. Neuroimage 2012; 62: 314-330.
22. Wisnieff C, Liu T, Spincemaille P, Wang S, Zhou D, Wang Y,. Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy: cylindrical symmetry from macroscopically ordered anisotropic molecules and accuracy of MRI measurements using few orientations. Neuroimage 2013; 70: 363-376.
23. Wharton S, Bowtell R,. Fiber orientation-dependent white matter contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109: 18559-18564.
24. Sati P, van Gelderen P, Silva AC, Reich DS, Merkle H, de Zwart JA, Duyn JH,. Micro-compartment specific T2* relaxation in the brain. Neuroimage 2013; 77: 268-278.
25. Chen WC, Foxley S, Miller KL,. Detecting microstructural properties of white matter based on compartmentalization of magnetic susceptibility. Neuroimage 2013; 70: 1-9.
26. Liu C, Li W, Wu B, Jiang Y, Johnson GA,. 3D fiber tractography with susceptibility tensor imaging. Neuroimage 2012; 59: 1290-1298.
27. Chu SC, Xu Y, Balschi JA, Springer CS, Jr,. Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in NMR studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents. Magn Reson Med 1990; 13: 239-262.
28. Lim IA, Faria AV, Li X, Hsu JT, Airan RD, Mori S, van Zijl PC,. Human brain atlas for automated region of interest selection in quantitative susceptibility mapping: application to determine iron content in deep gray matter structures. Neuroimage 2013; 82: 449-469.
29. Liu T, Liu J, de Rochefort L, Spincemaille P, Khalidov I, Ledoux JR, Wang Y,. Morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) from a single-angle acquisition: comparison with COSMOS in human brain imaging. Magn Reson Med 2011; 66: 777-783.
30. Gudbjartsson H, Patz S,. The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 910-914.
31. Hansen PC,. The L-curve and its use in the numerical treatment of inverse problems. Computational Inverse Problems in Electrocardiology 2000: 119-124.
32. Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S,. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002; 17: 825-841.
33. Wu B, Li W, Guidon A, Liu C,. Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med 2012; 67: 137-147.
34. Wu B, Li W, Avram AV, Gho SM, Liu C,. Fast and tissue-optimized mapping of magnetic susceptibility and T2* with multi-echo and multi-shot spirals. Neuroimage 2012; 59: 297-305.
35. Liu T, Spincemaille P, de Rochefort L, Kressler B, Wang Y,. Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): a method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 196-204.
36. Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S,. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20: 45-57.
37. Jiang H, van Zijl PC, Kim J, Pearlson GD, Mori S,. DtiStudio: resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2006; 81: 106-116.
38. Oishi K, Faria A, Jiang H, et al. Atlas-based whole brain white matter analysis using large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping: application to normal elderly and Alzheimer's disease participants. Neuroimage 2009; 46: 486-499.
39. Oh SH, Kim YB, Cho ZH, Lee J,. Origin of B0 orientation dependent R2(*) (=1/T2(*)) in white matter. Neuroimage 2013; 73: 71-79.
40. Lee J, van Gelderen P, Kuo LW, Merkle H, Silva AC, Duyn JH,. T2*-based fiber orientation mapping. Neuroimage 2011; 57: 225-234.
41. Wharton S, Bowtell R,. Gradient echo based fiber orientation mapping using R2* and frequency difference measurements. Neuroimage 2013; 83: 1011-1023.
42. Wharton S, Bowtell R,. Effects of white matter microstructure on phase and susceptibility maps. Magn Reson Med 2014. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25189.
43. Liu C, Li W, Johnson GA, Wu B,. High-field (9.4T) MRI of brain dysmyelination by quantitative mapping of magnetic susceptibility. Neuroimage 2011; 56: 930-938.
44. Beaulieu C,. The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system-a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002; 15: 435-455.
45. Liu C, Li W,. Imaging neural architecture of the brain based on its multipole magnetic response. Neuroimage 2013; 67: 193-202.
46. Ulug AM, van Zijl PC,. Orientation-independent diffusion imaging without tensor diagonalization: anisotropy definitions based on physical attributes of the diffusion ellipsoid. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9: 804-813.