Noncontrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and venography imaging with enhanced angiography

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1539-1548

  Ye, Yongquan ^a   Hu, Jiani ^a   Wu, Dongmei ^b   Haacke, E Mark ^a,c  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EAST CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Wayne State University   (United States)

Author keywords

MRAV; nonlinear processing; SWI; TOF MRA

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERY; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; FEMALE; GRADIENT RECALLED ECHO; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY AND VENOGRAPHY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; PHLEBOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; SUSCEPTIBILITY WEIGHTED IMAGING; TIME OF FLIGHT ANGIOGRAPHY; VEIN;

MRAV; NONLINEAR PROCESSING; SWI; TOF MRA;

ADULT; ARTERIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PHLEBOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; VEINS;

EID: 84890097804     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24128     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Marchal G, Bosmans H, Van Fraeyenhoven L, et al. Intracranial vascular lesions: optimization and clinical evaluation of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1990; 175: 443-448.
2. van den Berg R, Verbist BM, Mertens BJ, van der Mey AG, van Buchem MA,. Head and neck paragangliomas: improved tumor detection using contrast-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography as compared with fat-suppressed MR imaging techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 863-870.
3. Sehgal V, Delproposto Z, Haddar D, et al. Susceptibility-weighted imaging to visualize blood products and improve tumor contrast in the study of brain masses. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 41-51.
4. Kohler R, Vargas MI, Masterson K, Lovblad KO, Pereira VM, Becker M,. CT and MR angiography features of traumatic vascular injuries of the neck. Am J Radiol 2011; 196: W800-809.
5. Shen Y, Kou Z, Kreipke CW, Petrov T, Hu J, Haacke EM,. In vivo measurement of tissue damage, oxygen saturation changes and blood flow changes after experimental traumatic brain injury in rats using susceptibility weighted imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 219-227.
6. Du YP, Jin Z,. Simultaneous acquisition of MR angiography and venography (MRAV). Magn Reson Med 2008; 59: 954-958.
7. Barnes S, Haacke E,. Single echo simultaneous angiography and venography (MRAV) techniques at 3T. In: Proc 17th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Honolulu; 2009. p 1861.
8. Park SH, Moon CH, Bae KT,. Compatible dual-echo arteriovenography (CODEA) using an echo-specific K-space reordering scheme. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 767-774.
9. Du YP, Jin Z, Hu Y, Tanabe J,. Multi-echo acquisition of MR angiography and venography of the brain at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: 449-454.
10. Haacke EM, Xu Y, Cheng YC, Reichenbach JR,. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 612-618.
11. Haacke EM, Mittal S, Wu Z, Neelavalli J, Cheng YC,. Susceptibility- weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, Part 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 19-30.
12. Mittal S, Wu Z, Neelavalli J, Haacke EM,. Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, Part 2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 232-252.
13. Lin W, Mukherjee P, An H, et al. Improving high-resolution MR bold venographic imaging using a T1 reducing contrast agent. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 118-123.
14. Brown BG, Bolson E, Frimer M, Dodge HT,. Quantitative coronary arteriography: estimation of dimensions, hemodynamic resistance, and atheroma mass of coronary artery lesions using the arteriogram and digital computation. Circulation 1977; 55: 329-337.
15. Coatrieux JL, Garreau M, Collorec R, Roux C,. Computer vision approaches for the three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries: review and prospects. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1994; 22: 1-38.
16. Kimura T, Ikedo M, Takemoto S,. Hybrid of opposite-contrast MR angiography (HOP-MRA) combining time-of-flight and flow-sensitive black-blood contrasts. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 450-458.
17. Axel L, Morton D,. MR flow imaging by velocity-compensated/uncompensated difference images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987; 11: 31-34.
18. James E, Potchen MD, Haacke EM,. Magnetic resonance angiography: concepts & applications: St. Louis: Mosby YearBook; 1993. p 169-170.
19. Wedeen VJ, Meuli RA, Edelman RR, et al. Projective imaging of pulsatile flow with magnetic resonance. Science 1985; 230: 946-948.
20. Laub GA, Kaiser WA,. MR angiography with gradient motion refocusing. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988; 12: 377-382.
21. Jeong EK, Parker DL, Tsuruda JS, Won JY,. Reduction of flow-related signal loss in flow-compensated 3D TOF MR angiography, using variable echo time (3D TOF-VTE). Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 667-676.
22. Haacke EM, Brown R, Thompson M, Venkatesan R,. Magnetic resonance imaging. Physical principles and sequence design. New York: Wiley-Liss: 1999. p 670-697.
23. Edelman RR, Ahn SS, Chien D, et al. Improved time-of-flight MR angiography of the brain with magnetization transfer contrast. Radiology 1992; 184: 395-399.
24. Atkinson D, Brant-Zawadzki M, Gillan G, Purdy D, Laub G,. Improved MR angiography: magnetization transfer suppression with variable flip angle excitation and increased resolution. Radiology 1994; 190: 890-894.
25. Parker DL, Yuan C, Blatter DD,. MR angiography by multiple thin slab 3D acquisition. Magn Reson Med 1991; 17: 434-451.
26. Tkach J, Masaryk T, Ruggieri P,. Use of tilted optimized nonsaturating excitation. SMRM. Vol. 2. Berlin: 1992. p 3095.
27. Ishimori Y, Monma M, Kohno Y,. Artifact reduction of susceptibility- weighted imaging using a short-echo phase mask. Acta Radiol 2009; 50: 1027-1034.
28. Xu Y, Haacke EM,. An iterative reconstruction technique for geometric distortion-corrected segmented echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 26: 1406-1414.
29. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM,. Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 1182-1195.
30. Wu B, Li W, Guidon A, Liu C,. Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med 2012; 67: 137-147.
31. Cukur T, Lustig M, Saritas EU, Nishimura DG,. Signal compensation and compressed sensing for magnetization-prepared MR angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2011; 30: 1017-1027.