Susceptibility map-weighted imaging (SMWI) for neuroimaging

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 337-346

  Gho, Sung Min ^a   Liu, Chunlei ^b   Li, Wei ^b   Jang, Ung ^a   Kim, Eung Yeop ^c   Hwang, Dosik ^a   Kim, Dong Hyun ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Gachon University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

imaging; phase image; quantitative susceptibility mapping; susceptibility map weighted imaging; susceptibility weighted imaging

Indexed keywords

IMAGING TECHNIQUES; MAPPING; NEUROIMAGING; SIGNAL DENOISING; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; TISSUE;

DIAMAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; GRADIENT ECHO SEQUENCES; HIGH QUALITY RECONSTRUCTION; NONLOCAL PROPERTIES; PHASE IMAGE; RECONSTRUCTION PROCESS; SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING; SUSCEPTIBILITY WEIGHTED IMAGING;

BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CALCIFICATION; CAPSULA INTERNA; GRAY MATTER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PHANTOM; RED NUCLEUS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIMULATION; STROKE PATIENT; SUSCEPTIBILITY MAP WEIGHTED IMAGING; SUSCEPTIBILITY WEIGHTED IMAGING; THALAMUS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; WHITE MATTER; ALGORITHM; BRAIN; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; CEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROIMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO;

EID: 84904462294     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24920     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Haacke EM, Cheng NY, House MJ, Liu Q, Neelavalli J, Ogg RJ, Khan A, Ayaz M, Kirsch W, Obenaus A., Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 23: 1-25.
2. Bilgic B, Pfefferbaum A, Rohlfing T, Sullivan EV, Adalsteinsson E,. MRI estimates of brain iron concentration in normal aging using quantitative susceptibility mapping. Neuroimage 2012; 59: 2625-2635.
3. Wong R, Chen X, Wang Y, Hu X, Jin MM,. Visualizing and quantifying acute inflammation using ICAM-1 specific nanoparticles and MRI quantitative susceptibility mapping. Ann Biomed Eng 2012; 40: 1328-1338.
4. de Rochefort L, Liu T, Kressler B, Liu J, Spincemaille P, Lebon V, Wu J, Wang Y,. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 194-206.
5. Schweser F, Herrmann KH, Deistung A, Atterbury M, Baltzer PA, Burmeister HP, Kaiser WA, Reichenbach JR,. Quantitative magnetic susceptibility mapping (QSM) in breast disease reveals additional information for MR-based characterization of carcinoma and calcification. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Montreal, Quebec, 2011. Abstract 1014.
6. Liu T, Surapaneni K, Lou M, Cheng L, Spincemaille P, Wang Y,. Cerebral microbleeds: burden assessment by using quantitative susceptibility mapping. Radiology 2012; 262: 269-278.
7. Lotfipour AK, Wharton S, Schwarz ST, Gontu V, Schafer A, Peters AM, Bowtell RW, Auer DP, Gowland PA, Bajaj NP,. High resolution magnetic susceptibility mapping of the substantia nigra in Parkinson's disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 35: 48-55.
8. Liu C,. Susceptibility tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 1471-1477.
9. Liu C, Li W, Wu B, Jiang Y, Johnson GA,. 3D fiber tractography with susceptibility tensor imaging. Neuroimage 2012; 59: 1290-1298.
10. Lee J, Shmueli K, Fukunaga M, van Gelderen P, Merkle H, Silva AC, Duyn JH,. Sensitivity of MRI resonance frequency to the orientation of brain tissue microstructure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107: 5130-5135.
11. Haacke EM, Xu Y, Cheng YC, Reichenbach JR,. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 612-618.
12. Haacke EM, Mittal S, Wu Z, Neelavalli J, Cheng YC,. Susceptibility- weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 19-30.
13. Mittal S, Wu Z, Neelavalli J, Haacke EM,. Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 232-252.
14. Thomas B, Somasundaram S, Thamburaj K, Kesavadas C, Gupta AK, Bodhey NK, Kapilamoorthy TR,. Clinical applications of susceptibility weighted MR imaging of the brain-a pictorial review. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 105-116.
15. Xu Y, Haacke EM,. The role of voxel aspect ratio in determining apparent vascular phase behavior in susceptibility weighted imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 155-160.
16. Ogg RJ, Langston JW, Haacke EM, Steen RG, Taylor JS,. The correlation between phase shifts in gradient-echo MR images and regional brain iron concentration. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 17: 1141-1148.
17. Mori N, Miki Y, Kasahara S, Maeda C, Kanagaki M, Urayama S, Sawamoto N, Fukuyama H, Togashi K,. Susceptibility-weighted imaging at 3 Tesla delineates the optic radiation. Invest Radiol 2009; 44: 140-145.
18. Jang U, Hwang D,. High-quality multiple T(2)(*) contrast MR images from low-quality multi-echo images using temporal-domain denoising methods. Med Phys 2012; 39: 468.
19. Jang U, Nam Y, Kim DH, Hwang D,. Improvement of the SNR and resolution of susceptibility-weighted venography by model-based multi-echo denoising. Neuroimage 2013; 70C: 308-316.
20. Li W, Wu B, Liu C,. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. Neuroimage 2011; 55: 1645-1656.
21. Wang Y, Yu Y, Li D, Bae KT, Brown JJ, Lin W, Haacke EM,. Artery and vein separation using susceptibility-dependent phase in contrast-enhanced MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 661-670.
22. Liu T, Khalidov I, de Rochefort L, Spincemaille P, Liu J, Tsiouris AJ, Wang Y,. A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF). NMR Biomed 2011; 24: 1129-1136.
23. Walsh AJ, Wilman AH,. Susceptibility phase imaging with comparison to R2* mapping of iron-rich deep grey matter. Neuroimage 2011; 57: 452-461.
24. Deistung A, Schafer A, Schweser F, Biedermann U, Turner R, Reichenbach JR,. Toward in vivo histology: a comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with magnitude-, phase-, and R2*-imaging at ultra-high magnetic field strength. Neuroimage 2013; 65: 299-314.
25. Schafer A, Wharton S, Gowland P, Bowtell R,. Using magnetic field simulation to study susceptibility-related phase contrast in gradient echo MRI. Neuroimage 2009; 48: 126-137.
26. Liu T, Spincemaille P, de Rochefort L, Kressler B, Wang Y,. Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): a method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 196-204.
27. Liu T, Xu W, Avestimehr AS, Wang Y,. A theoretical analysis of the morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) method: using anatomical information to improve the calculation of susceptibility. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Montreal, Canada, 2011. Abstract 4473.
28. Kim DH, Adalsteinsson E, Glover GH, Spielman DM,. Regularized higher-order in vivo shimming. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 715-722.
29. Hsu JJ, Glover GH,. Mitigation of susceptibility-induced signal loss in neuroimaging using localized shim coils. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 243-248.
30. Bilgic B, Chatnuntawech I, Fan A, Adalsteinsson E,. Regularized QSM in seconds. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 2013. Abstract 168.
31. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P,. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42: 952-962.
32. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM,. Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 1182-1195.
33. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, Nittka M, Jellus V, Wang J, Kiefer B, Haase A,. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 1202-1210.
34. Zur Y, Stokar S, Bendel P,. An analysis of fast imaging sequences with steady-state transverse magnetization refocusing. Magn Reson Med 1988; 6: 175-193.
35. McKinnon GC,. Ultrafast interleaved gradient-echo-planar imaging on a standard scanner. Magn Reson Med 1993; 30: 609-616.
36. Ahn CB, Kim JH, Cho ZH,. High-speed spiral-scan echo planar NMR imaging-I. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1986; 5: 2-7.
37. Gho SM, Li W, Kim DH,. Quantitative susceptibility based susceptibility weighted imaging (QSWI) for venography. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, 2012. Abstract 2364.
38. Mok K, Neelavalli J, Liu S, Haacke E,. Generating susceptibility weighted images using susceptibility maps. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, 2012. Abstract 2366.
39. Li TQ, van Gelderen P, Merkle H, Talagala L, Koretsky AP, Duyn J,. Extensive heterogeneity in white matter intensity in high-resolution T2*-weighted MRI of the human brain at 7.0 T. Neuroimage 2006; 32: 1032-1040.