No brain left behind: consequences of neuroscience discourse for education

Learning, Media and Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 168-186

  Busso, Daniel S ^a   Pollack, Courtney ^a  

^a HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain based learning; Education; Neuroethics; Neuroscience

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926407505     PISSN: 17439884     EISSN: 17439892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2014.908908     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Adams, Glenn, Donna M. Garcia, Valerie Purdie-Vaughns, and Claude M. Steele. 2006. “The Detrimental Effects of a Suggestion of Sexism in an Instruction Situation.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42 (5): 602–615. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.004.
2. Amen Clinics. 2013. “Real People, Real Outcomes.” Accessed September 4, 2013. http://www.amenclinics.com/outcome-study
3. Anderson, Mike, and Sergio Della Sala. 2012. “Neuroscience in Education: An (opinionated) Introduction.” In Neuroscience in Education: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly, edited by S. Della Sala and M. Anderson, 3–12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Ansari, Daniel, and Donna Coch. 2006. “Bridges over Troubled Waters: Education and Cognitive Neuroscience.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (4): 146–151. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.007.
5. Baron-Cohen, Simon. 2002. “The Extreme Male Brain Theory of Autism.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (6): 248–254. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01904-6.
6. Baumeister, Roy F., E. J. Masicampo, and C. Nathan DeWall. 2009. “Prosocial Benefits of Feeling Free: Disbelief in Free Will Increases Aggression and Reduces Helpfulness.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35 (2): 260–268. doi:10.1177/0146167208327217.
7. Beilock, Sian L., Elizabeth A. Gunderson, Gerardo Ramirez, and Susan C. Levine. 2010. “Female Teachers’ Math Anxiety Affects Girls’ Math Achievement.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (5): 1860–1863. doi:10.1073/pnas.0910967107.
8. Beilock, Sian L., William A. Jellison, Robert J. Rydell, Allen R. McConnell, and Thomas H. Carr. 2006. “On the Causal Mechanisms of Stereotype Threat: Can Skills That Don't Rely Heavily on Working Memory Still be Threatened?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32 (8): 1059–1071. doi:10.1177/0146167206288489.
9. Bell, Emily C., Morgan C. Willson, Alan H. Wilman, Sanjay Dave, and Peter H. Silverstone. 2006. “Males and Females Differ in Brain Activation During Cognitive Tasks.” NeuroImage 30 (2): 529–538. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.049.
10. Bruer, John T. 1997. “Education and the Brain: A Bridge Too Far.” Educational Researcher 26 (8): 4–16. doi:10.3102/0013189X026008004.
11. Bruer, John T. 1998. “Brain Science, Brain Fiction.” Educational Leadership 56 (3): 14–18.
12. Butterworth, Brian, and Yulia Kovas. 2013. “Understanding Neurocognitive Developmental Disorders Can Improve Education for All.” Science 340 (6130) (April 19): 300–305. doi:10.1126/science.1231022.
13. Choudhury, Suparna, Saskia Kathi Nagel, and Jan Slaby. 2009. “Critical Neuroscience: Linking Neuroscience and Society Through Critical Practice.” BioSocieties 4 (1): 61–77. doi:10.1017/S1745855209006437.
14. Coates, J. M., and J. Herbert. 2008. “Endogenous Steroids and Financial Risk Taking on a London Trading Floor.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (16) (April 22): 6167–6172. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704025105.
15. Coch, Donna, and Daniel Ansari. 2012. “Constructing Connection: The Evolving Field of Mind, Brain and Education.” In Neuroscience in Education: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly, edited by S. Della Sala and M. Anderson, 33–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Coch, Donna, Stephen A. Michlovitz, Daniel Ansari, and Abigail Baird. 2009. “Building Mind, Brain, and Education Connections: The View from the Upper Valley.” Mind, Brain, and Education 3 (1): 27–33. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2008.01050.x.
17. Counts, George S. 1978. Dare the School Build a New Social Order? Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
18. Dar-Nimrod, Ilan, and Steven J. Heine. 2011. “Genetic Essentialism: On the Deceptive Determinism of DNA.” Psychological Bulletin 137 (5): 800–818. doi:10.1037/a0021860.
19. Delk, John L., R. Burt Madden, Mary Livingston, and Timothy T. Ryan. 1986. “Adult Perceptions of the Infant as a Function of Gender Labeling and Observer Gender.” Sex Roles 15 (9–10): 527–534. doi:10.1007/BF00288229.
20. Dewey, John. 1916. Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan.
21. Dubinsky, J. M., G. Roehrig, and S. Varma. 2013. “Infusing Neuroscience into Teacher Professional Development.” Educational Researcher 42 (6): 317–29. doi:10.3102/0013189X13499403.
22. Farah, Martha J. 2005. “Neuroethics: The Practical and the Philosophical.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (1): 34–40. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.001.
23. Farah, Martha J., and Cayce J. Hook. 2013. “The Seductive Allure of ‘Seductive Allure’.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (1): 88–90. doi:10.1177/1745691612469035.
24. Fine, Cordelia. 2008. “Will Working Mothers’ Brains Explode? The Popular New Genre of Neurosexism.” Neuroethics 1 (1): 69–72. doi:10.1007/s12152-007-9004-2.
25. Fine, Cordelia. 2012. “Explaining, or Sustaining, the Status Quo? The Potentially Self-Fulfilling Effects of ‘Hardwired’ Accounts of Sex Differences.” Neuroethics 5 (3): 285–294. doi:10.1007/s12152-011-9118-4.
26. Fischer, Kurt W. 2009. “Mind, Brain, and Education: Building a Scientific Groundwork for Learning and Teaching1.” Mind, Brain, and Education 3 (1): 3–16. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2008.01048.x.
27. Fischer, Kurt W., David B. Daniel, Mary Helen Immordino-Yang, Elsbeth Stern, Antonio Battro, and Hideaki Koizumi. 2007. “Why Mind, Brain, and Education? Why Now?” Mind, Brain, and Education 1 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00006.x.
28. Flood, James, Diane Lapp, and Douglas Fisher. 2005. “Neurological Impress Method PLUS.” Reading Psychology 26 (2): 147–160. doi:10.1080/02702710590930500.
29. Frazzetto, Giovanni, and Suzanne Anker. 2009. “Neuroculture.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10 (11): 815–821. doi:10.1038/nrn2736.
30. Fukuyama, Francis. 2003. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Picador.
31. Gabrieli, John D. E. 2009. “Dyslexia: A New Synergy Between Education and Cognitive Neuroscience.” Science 325 (5938): 280–283. doi:10.1126/science.1171999.
32. Giedd, J. N., A. Raznahan, K. L. Mills, and R. K. Lenroot. 2012. “Review: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Male/Female Differences in Human Adolescent Brain Anatomy.” Biology of Sex Differences 3 (1): 19. doi:10.1186/2042-6410-3-19.
33. Goldstein, Jill M., Larry J. Seidman, Nicholas J. Horton, Nikos Makris, David N. Kennedy, Verne S. Caviness, Stephen V. Faraone, and Ming T. Tsuang. 2001. “Normal Sexual Dimorphism of the Adult Human Brain Assessed by In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging.” Cerebral Cortex 11 (6): 490–497. doi:10.1093/cercor/11.6.490.
34. Greene, Joshua, and Jonathan Cohen. 2004. “For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 359 (1451): 1775–85. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1546.
35. Gurian, Michael. 2006. “Learning and Gender.” American School Board Journal 193 (10). http://www.uwplatt.edu/library/ereserves/Learning_And_Gender.pdf
36. Gurian, Michael, and Kathy Stevens. 2007. The Minds of Boys: Saving Our Sons From Falling Behind in School and Life. Reprint ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37. Gurian, Michael, and Kathy Stevens. 2010. Boys and Girls Learn Differently! A Guide for Teachers and Parents. Revised 10th Anniversary Edition. Jossey-Bass.
38. Halpern, Diane F., Lise Eliot, Rebecca S. Bigler, Richard A. Fabes, Laura D. Hanish, Janet Hyde, Lynn S. Liben, and Carol Lynn Martin. 2011. “The Pseudoscience of Single-Sex Schooling.” Science 333 (6050): 1706–1707. doi:10.1126/science.1205031.
39. Hardiman, Mariale M. 2012. The Brain-Targeted Teaching Model for 21st-Century Schools. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
40. Herculano-Houzel, Suzana. 2002. “Do You Know Your Brain? A Survey on Public Neuroscience Literacy at the Closing of the Decade of the Brain.” The Neuroscientist: A Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology, Neurology and Psychiatry 8 (2): 98–110.
41. Herrnstein, Richard J., and Charles Murray. 1996. Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. 1st Free Press pbk. ed. New York: Simon & Schuster.
42. Hinton, Christina, and Kurt W. Fischer. 2008. “Research Schools: Grounding Research in Educational Practice.” Mind, Brain, and Education 2 (4): 157–160. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2008.00048.x.
43. Hoeft, Fumiko, Bruce D. McCandliss, Jessica M. Black, Alexander Gantman, Nahal Zakerani, Charles Hulme, Heikki Lyytinen, 2010. “Neural Systems Predicting Long-term Outcome in Dyslexia.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (1): 361–366. doi:10.1073/pnas.1008950108.
44. Hook, Cayce J., and Martha J. Farah. 2013. “Neuroscience for Educators: What Are They Seeking, and What Are They Finding?.” Neuroethics 6 (2): 331–341. doi:10.1007/s12152-012-9159-3.
45. Howard-Jones, Paul, Lorna Franey, Rasha Mashmoushi, and Yen-Chun Liao. 2009. “The Neuroscience Literacy of Trainee Teachers.” In University of Manchester. http://70.33.241.170/~neuro647/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Literacy.pdf
46. Hruby, George G. 2012. “Three Requirements for Justifying an Educational Neuroscience.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02068.x.
47. Hurley, Dan. 2012. “A New Kind of Tutoring Aims to Make Students Smarter.” The New York Times, October 31, sec. Education/Education Life. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/a-new-kind-of-tutoring-aims-to-make-students-smarter.html
48. Immordino-Yang, Mary Helen. 2013. “Emotions, Social Relationships, and the Brain: Implications for the Classroom.” ASCD Express. http://www.ascd.org/ascd_express/vol3/320_immordino-yang.aspx
49. Jensen Learning. 2014. “Enriching the Brains of Students in Poverty.” Accessed February 21, 2014. http://www.jensenlearning.com/products.php
50. Kapp, Steven K., Kristen Gillespie-Lynch, Lauren E. Sherman, and Ted Hutman. 2013. “Deficit, Difference, or Both? Autism and Neurodiversity.” Developmental Psychology 49 (1): 59–71. doi:10.1037/a0028353.
51. Kovas, Yulia, and Robert Plomin. 2012. “Genetics and Genomics: Good, Bad and Ugly.” In Neuroscience in Education: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly, edited by S. Della Sala and M. Anderson, 155–173. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Lakoff, George. 2002. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. LearningRx. 2013a. “Brain Training 101.” Accessed February 21, 2014. http://www.learningrx.com/brain-training-101.htm
55. LearningRx. 2013b. “Who Can We Help?” Accessed February 21, 2014. http://www.learningrx.com/brain-training-help.htm
56. LearningRx. 2013c. “What is Brain Training?” Accessed February 21, 2014. http://www.learningrx.com/what-is-brain-training.htm
57. Leinhardt, Gaea, Andrea M. Seewald, and Mary Engel. 1979. “Learning What's Taught: Sex Differences in Instruction.” Journal of Educational Psychology 71 (4): 432–439. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.4.432.
58. Lindell, Annukka K., and Evan Kidd. 2013. “Consumers Favor ‘Right Brain’ Training: The Dangerous Lure of Neuromarketing.” Mind, Brain, and Education 7 (1): 35–39. doi:10.1111/mbe.12005.
59. McCabe, David P., and Alan D. Castel. 2008. “Seeing Is Believing: The Effect of Brain Images on Judgments of Scientific Reasoning.” Cognition 107 (1): 343–352. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.017.
60. Muntaner, Carles, F. Javier Nieto, and Patricia O'Campo. 1996. “The Bell Curve: On Race, Social Class, and Epidemiologic Research.” American Journal of Epidemiology 144 (6): 531–536.
61. Ortega, Francisco. 2009. “The Cerebral Subject and the Challenge of Neurodiversity.” BioSocieties 4 (4): 425–445. doi:10.1017/S1745855209990287.
62. Perkins, David. 2009. “On Grandmother Neurons and Grandfather Clocks.” Mind, Brain, and Education 3 (3): 170–175. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01067.x.
63. Peterson, Robin L., Bruce F. Pennington, and Richard K. Olson. 2013. “Subtypes of Developmental Dyslexia: Testing the Predictions of the Dual-route and Connectionist Frameworks.” Cognition 126 (1): 20–38. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.007.
64. Pickering, Susan J., and Paul Howard-Jones. 2007. “Educators’ Views on the Role of Neuroscience in Education: Findings From a Study of UK and International Perspectives.” Mind, Brain, and Education 1 (3): 109–113. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00011.x.
65. Prentice, Deborah A., and Dale T. Miller. 2007. “Psychological Essentialism of Human Categories.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 16 (4): 202–206. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00504.x.
66. Rappolt-Schlichtmann, Gabrielle, Catherine C. Ayoub, and Jenna W. Gravel. 2009. “Examining the ‘Whole Child’ to Generate Usable Knowledge.” Mind, Brain, and Education 3 (4): 209–217. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01071.x.
67. Reading Horizons. 2013. “Dyslexia – Learning Disability Information – Reading Horizons.” Accessed September 4. http://www.readinghorizons.com/research/dyslexia/dyslexia-learning-disability-information
68. Ritchie, Stuart J., Eric H. Chudler, and D. Della Sala. 2012. “Don't Try This at School: The Attraction of ‘Alternative’ Educational Techniques.” In Neuroscience in Education: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly, edited by S. Della Sala and M. Anderson, 244–264. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69. Rogers, Carl. 1994. Freedom to Learn. 3rd ed. New York: Merrill.
70. Rose, L. Todd, Parisa Rouhani, and Kurt W. Fischer. 2013. “The Science of the Individual.” Mind, Brain, and Education 7 (3): 152–158. doi:10.1111/mbe.12021.
71. Rubinsten, O., and A. Henik. 2009. “Developmental Dyscalculia: Heterogeneity Might not Mean Different Mechanisms.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (2): 92–99. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.002.
72. Sadker, David, and Karen Zittleman. 2009. Still Failing at Fairness: How Gender Bias Cheats Girls and Boys in School and What We Can Do About It. New York: Scribner.
73. Sheridan, Kimberly, Elena Zinchenko, and Howard Gardner. 2005. “Neuroethics in Education.” In Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy, edited by Judy Illes, 265–276. New York: Oxford University Press.
74. Shonkoff, Jack P. 2010. “Building a New Biodevelopmental Framework to Guide the Future of Early Childhood Policy.” Child Development 81 (1): 357–367. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01399.x.
75. Shonkoff, Jack P., and Susan Nall Bales. 2011. “Science Does Not Speak for Itself: Translating Child Development Research for the Public and Its Policymakers: Translating Research for Policymakers.” Child Development 82 (1): 17–32. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01538.x.
76. Stein, Zachary. 2010. “On the Difference Between Designing Children and Raising Them: Ethics and the Use of Educationally Oriented Biotechnology.” Mind, Brain, and Education 4 (2): 53–67. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2010.01085.x.
77. Stein, Zachary, Bruno Della Chiesa, Christina Hinton, and Kurt W. Fischer. 2011. “Ethical Issues in Educational Neuroscience: Raising Children in a Brave New World.” In Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics, edited by Judy Illes and Barbara J. Sahakian, 803–822. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
78. Sylvan, Lesley J., and Joanna A. Christodoulou. 2010. “Understanding the Role of Neuroscience in Brain Based Products: A Guide for Educators and Consumers.” Mind, Brain, and Education 4 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01077.x.
79. Szűcs, Dénes, and Usha Goswami. 2007. “Educational Neuroscience: Defining a New Discipline for the Study of Mental Representations.” Mind, Brain, and Education 1 (3): 114–127. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00012.x.
80. Thibodeau, Paul H., and Lera Boroditsky. 2013. “Natural Language Metaphors Covertly Influence Reasoning.” PLoS ONE 8 (1): e52961. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052961.
81. Trout, J. D. 2008. “Seduction Without Cause: Uncovering Explanatory Neurophilia.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (8): 281–282. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.004.
82. US Department of Education. 2013. “IDEA – Building The Legacy of IDEA 2004.” Accessed September 4. http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/,root,dynamic,TopicalBrief,23
83. Uttal, William R. 2011. Mind and Brain a Critical Appraisal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
84. Vidal, Fernando. 2009. “Brainhood, Anthropological Figure of Modernity.” History of the Human Sciences 22 (1): 5–36. doi:10.1177/0952695108099133.
85. Vidal, Catherine. 2012. “The Sexed Brain: Between Science and Ideology.” Neuroethics 5 (3): 295–303. doi:10.1007/s12152-011-9121-9.
86. Vohs, Kathleen D., and Jonathan W. Schooler. 2008. “The Value of Believing in Free Will Encouraging a Belief in Determinism Increases Cheating.” Psychological Science 19 (1): 49–54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02045.x.
87. Weisberg, Deena Skolnick, Frank C. Keil, Joshua Goodstein, Elizabeth Rawson, and Jeremy R. Gray. 2008. “The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20 (3): 470–477. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20040.
88. Willerman, Lee, Robert Schultz, J. Neal Rutledge, and Erin D. Bigler. 1992. “Hemisphere Size Asymmetry Predicts Relative Verbal and Nonverbal Intelligence Differently in the Sexes: An MRI Study of structure − Function Relations.” Intelligence 16 (3–4): 315–328. doi:10.1016/0160-2896(92)90012-G.
89. Williams, Melissa J., and Jennifer L. Eberhardt. 2008. “Biological Conceptions of Race and the Motivation to Cross Racial Boundaries.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 (6): 1033–1047. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1033.
90. Witelson, S. F., I. I. Glezer, and D. L. Kigar. 1995. “Women Have Greater Density of Neurons in Posterior Temporal Cortex.” The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 15 (5 Pt 1): 3418–3428.
91. Wolff, Sula. 2004. “The History of Autism.” European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 13 (4): 201–208. doi:10.1007/s00787-004-0363-5.
92. Wood, Wendy, and Alice H. Eagly. 2002. “A Cross-cultural Analysis of the Behavior of Women and Men: Implications for the Origins of Sex Differences.” Psychological Bulletin 128 (5): 699–727. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.699.