Psychological essentialism of human categories

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 202-206

  Prentice, Deborah A ^a   Miller, Dale T ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorization; Entitativity; Essentialism; Prejudice; Stereotyping

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547755108     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00504.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Gelman, S.A. (2003). The essential child. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113-127.
3. Miller, D.T., & Prentice, D.A. (1999). Some consequences of a belief in group essence: The category divide hypothesis. In D.A. Prentice & D.T. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 213-236). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
4. Ahn, W.-k., Flanagan, E.H., Marsh, J.K. Sanislow, C.A. (2006). Beliefs about essences and the reality of mental disorders. Psychological Science, 17, 759 766.
5. Bastian, B. Haslam, N. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 228 235.
6. Fischer, E.F. (1999). Cultural logic and Maya identity. Current Anthropology, 40, 473 499.
7. Gelman, S.A. (2003). The essential child. New York : Oxford University Press.
8. Gil-White, F.J. (2001). Are ethnic groups biological "species" to the human brain? Current Anthropology, 42, 515 554.
9. Haslam, N. Levy, S.R. (2006). Essentialist beliefs about homosexuality: Structure and implications for prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 471 485.
10. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L. Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113 127.
11. Hirschfeld, L.A. (1996). Race in the making: Cognition, culture, and the child's construction of human kinds. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
12. Kalish, C.W. (2002). Essentialist to some degree: Beliefs about the structure of natural kind categories. Memory & Cognition, 30, 340 352.
13. Mahalingam, R. (2003). Essentialism, culture, and power: Representations of social class. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 733 749.
14. Martin, C.L. Parker, S. (1995). Folk theories about sex and race differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 45 57.
15. Medin, D.L. Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosnaidou A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179 195). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
16. Miller, D.T. Prentice, D.A. (1999). Some consequences of a belief in group essence: The category divide hypothesis. In D.A. Prentice D.T. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 213 236). New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
17. Prentice, D.A. Miller, D.T. (2006). Essentializing differences between women and men. Psychological Science, 17, 129 135.
18. Rothbart, M. Taylor, M. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In G.R. Semin K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction, and social cognition (pp. 11 36). Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
19. Shelton, J.N. Richeson, J.A. (2005). Intergroup contact and pluralistic ignorance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 91 107.
20. Williams, M.J. Eberhardt, J.L. (2006). Physical versus social conceptions of race and the motivation to cross racial boundaries. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
21. Yzerbyt, V., Corneille, O. Estrada, C. (2001). The interplay of subjective essentialism and entitativity in the formation of stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 141 155.