Legal principles in WTO dispute

Legal Principles in WTO Dispute

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-308

  Mitchell, Andrew D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926173811     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511674556     Document Type: Book

References (301)

1. Abi-Saab, Georges, ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement and General International Law’ in Rufus Yerxa and Bruce Wilson (eds.), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement: The First Ten Years (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)
2. Adede, A. O., ‘A Fresh Look at the Meaning of Denial of Justice under International Law’ (1976) 14 Canadian Yearbook of International Law73.
3. Affolder, Natasha, ‘Tadic, the Anonymous Witness and the Sources of International Procedural Law’ (1998) 19 Michigan Journal of International Law445
4. Akehurst, Michael, ‘Custom as a Source of Law’ (1974) 47 British Yearbook of International Law 1
5. Alavi, Amin, ‘On the (Non-)Effectiveness of the World Trade Organization Special and Differential Treatments in the Dispute Settlement Process’ (2007) 41 Journal of World Trade 319
6. Alexander, Larry, ‘The Philosophy of Criminal Law’ in Jules Coleman and Scott Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence & Philosophy of Law(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) 815
7. Alexander, Larry and Kress, Ken, ‘Against Legal Principles’ (1997) 82 Iowa Law Review 739
8. Allars, Margaret, Introduction to Australian Administrative Law (Sydney: Butterworths, 1990)
9. American Law Institute Restatement of the Law Third: The Foreign Relations Law of the United States (St Paul, MN: American Law Institute Publishers, 1987)
10. American Law InstituteRestatement of the Law Second, Contracts (St Paul, MN: American Law Institute Publishers, 1981)
11. Andenas, Mads and Zleptnig, Stefan, ‘Proportionality and Balancing in WTO Law: A Comparative Perspective’ (2007) 20 Cambridge Review of International Affairs 71
12. Andenas, Mads and Zleptnig, Stefan, ‘Proportionality: WTO Law: In Comparative Perspective’ (2007) 42 Texas International Law Journal 371
13. Anderson, Kym, ‘Peculiarities of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2002) 1 World Trade Review123
14. Anderson, Kym, ‘Setting the Trade Policy Agenda: What Roles for Economists?’ (2005) 39 Journal of World Trade 341
15. Appleton, Arthur and Heiskanen, Veijo, ‘The Sardines Decision: Fish without Chips?’ in Andrew D. Mitchell (ed.), Challenges and Prospects for the WTO(London: Cameron May, 2005) 165
16. Atiyah, P. S., Law and Modern Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983).
17. Avila, Humberto, Theory of Legal Principles (Dordrecht: Springer, 2007)
18. Bafundo, Nina E., ‘Compliance with the Ozone Treaty: Weak States and the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility’ (2005) 21 American University International Law Review461
19. Bagchi, Aditi, ‘Compulsory Licensing and the Duty of Good Faith in TRIPS’ (2003) 55 Stanford Law Review1529
20. Bartels, Lorand, ‘Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade 499
21. Bartels, Lorand, ‘The Separation of Powers in the WTO: How to Avoid Judicial Activism’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly861
22. Bartels, Lorand, ‘The WTO Enabling Clause and Positive Conditionality in the European Community’s GSP Program’ (2003) 6 Journal of International Economic Law507
23. Berlin, Isaiah, Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969)
24. Bermann, George, ‘The Principle of Proportionality’ (1977-78) 26 American Journal of Comparative Law Supplement 415
25. Beynon, Robert (ed.),The Routledge Companion to Global Economics (London: Routledge, 2001)
26. Bhala, Raj, Modern GATT Law: A Treatise on the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2005)
27. Bix, Brian H., A Dictionary of Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)
28. Blackshield, Tony, Coper, Michael and Williams, George (eds.),The Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia (South Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2001)
29. Bohanes, Jan, ‘Risk Regulation in WTO Law: A Procedure-Based Approach to the Precautionary Principle’ (2002) 40 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 323
30. Bossche, Peter van den, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases and Materials (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005)
31. Bowett, Derek, ‘Estoppel Before International Tribunals and Its Relation to Acquiescence’ (1957) 33 British Yearbook of International Law 176
32. Bridge, M. G., ‘Does Anglo-Canadian Contract Law Need a Doctrine of Good Faith?’ (1984) 9 Canadian Business Law Journal385
33. Briggs, H., ‘The Incidental Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice as Compulsory Jurisdiction’ in F. A. Frhr vd Heydte et al. (eds.), Völkerrecht und Rechtliches Weltbild: Festschrift fur Alfred Verdross (Vienna: Springer, 1960)
34. Bronckers, Marco, ‘Better Rules for a New Millennium: A Warning against Undemocratic Developments in the WTO’ (1999) 2 Journal of International Economic Law 547
35. Broude, Tomer, International Governance in the WTO: Judicial Boundaries and Political Capitulation (London: Cameron May, 2004)
36. Brown, L. Neville and Jacobs, Francis G., The Court of Justice of the European Communities (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2nd edn, 1983)
37. Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford International Press, 5th edn, 1998)
38. Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford International Press, 6th edn, 2003)
39. Bureau, Jean-Christophe, Jean, Sebastien and Matthews, Alan, ‘The Consequences of Agricultural Trade Liberalization for Developing Countries: Distinguishing between Genuine Benefits and False Hopes’ (Discussion Paper No 73, Institute for International Integration Studies, April 2005)
40. Butler, Andrew and Butler, Petra, The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act: A Commentary(Wellington: LexisNexis New Zealand, 2005)
41. Byers, Michael, Custom, Power, and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)
42. Byers, Michael, ‘Abuse of Rights: An Old Principle, A New Age’ (2002) 47 McGill Law Journal 389
43. Cameron, James and Gray, Kevin, ‘Principles of International Law in the WTO Dispute Settlement Body’ (2001) 50 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 248
44. Cannizzaro, Enzo, ‘The Role of Proportionality in the Law of International Countermeasures’ (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law 889
45. Cass, Deborah Z., ‘The “Constitutionalization” of International Trade Law: Judicial Norm-Generation as the Engine of Constitutional Development in International Trade’ (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law 39
46. Cass, Deborah Z.,The Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization: Legitimacy, Democracy, and Community in the International Trading System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
47. Cassese, Antonio, ‘The Contribution of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia to the Ascertainment of General Principles of Law Recognized by the Community of Nations’ in Sienho Yee and Wang Tieya (eds.), International Law in the Post-Cold War World: Essays in Memory of Li Haopei (London: Routledge, 2001) 43
48. Cassese, Antonio,International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 2005)
49. Cattaneo, Olivier, ‘Has the WTO Gone Too Far or Not Far Enough? Some Reflections on the Concept of “Policy Space”’ in Andrew D. Mitchell (ed.), Challenges and Prospects for the WTO(London: Cameron May, 2005) 55
50. Chang, Ruth (ed.), Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997)
51. Charlesworth, Hilary and Chinkin, Christine, The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000)
52. Charnovitz, Steve, ‘Should the Teeth Be Pulled? An Analysis of WTO Sanctions’ in Daniel Kennedy and James Southwick, The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002) 602
53. Cheng, Bin, General Principles of Law: As Applied by International Courts and Tribunals(Cambridge: Grotius, 1987)
54. Cheyne, Ilona, ‘Gateways to the Precautionary Principle in WTO Law’ (2007) 19 Journal of Environmental Law155
55. Cheyne, Ilona, ‘Risk and Precaution in World Trade Organization Law’ (2006) 40 Journal of World Trade 837
56. ‘China Announces Increased Export Tariffs on Textiles’ People’s Daily Online, 13 December 2004
57. Choudhry, Sujit, ‘Globalization in Search of Justification: Toward a Theory of Comparative Constitutional Interpretation’ (1999) 74 Indiana Law Journal 819
58. Cohen, George, ‘Implied Terms and Interpretation in Contract Law’ in Boudewijn Bouckaert and Gerrit de Geest (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2000) vol. III, 78.
59. Cohen, Morris R.,Reason and Law(New York: Collier Books, 1961)
60. Consultative Board, WTO,The Future of the WTO: Addressing Institutional Challenges in the New Millennium (Geneva: WTO, 2004)
61. Cottier, Thomas, Oesch, Matthias and Fischer, Thomas, International Trade Regulation: Law and Policy in the WTO, the European Union and Switzerland -Cases, Materials and Comments (Berne: Staempfli Publishers, 2005)
62. Cottier, Thomas and Schefer, Krista, ‘Good Faith and the Protection of Legitimate Expectations in the WTO’ in Marco Bronckers and Reinhard Quick (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H Jackson (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000) 47
63. Cottier, Thomas and Schefer, Krista, ‘Non-Violation Complaints in WTO/GATT Dispute Settlement: Past, Present and Future’ in Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (ed.), International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System (London: Kluwer Law International, 1997) 145
64. Crawford, James, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text, and Commentaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)
65. D’Amato, Anthony A., The Concept of Custom in International Law (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971)
66. Davey, William, ‘Has the WTO Dispute Settlement System Exceeded Its Authority? A Consideration of Deference Shown by the System to Member Government Decisions and Its Use of Issue-Avoidance Techniques’ in Thomas Cottier and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds.), The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation: Experience and Lessons for the WTO (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2003) vol. IV, 43
67. deBurca, Grainne, ‘Subsidiarity and Proportionality as General Principles of Law’ in Joakim Nergelius and Ulf Bernitz (eds.), General Principles of European Community Law: Reports from a Conference in Malmo, 27-28, August 1999 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000) 97
68. DeNoronha Goyos, Durval D., ‘Brazil: Duty of Good Faith in International Services Negotiations’ (2005) 11 International Trade Law & Regulation N15
69. Degan, Vladimir, Sources of International Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997)
70. Delbridge, A. et al. (eds.), The Macquarie Dictionary (McMahons Point: Macquarie Library, 2nd edn, 1991)
71. DelbrUck, Jost, ‘Proportionality’ in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co, 2003) vol. III, 1140
72. Delimatsis, Panagiotis, ‘Due Process and “Good” Regulation Embedded in the GATS - Disciplining Regulatory Behaviour in Services through Article VI of the GATS’ (2007) 10 Journal of International Economic Law13
73. Desmedt, Axel, ‘Proportionality in WTO Law’ (2001) 4 Journal of International Economic Law441
74. Dodge, William, ‘Loewen Group, Inc v. United States. Modev International Ltd v. United States’ (2004) 98 American Journal of International Law155
75. Dominice, Christian, ‘Methodology of International Law’ in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co, 2003) vol. III, 354
76. Durling, James, ‘Deference, but Only when Due: WTO Review of Anti-Dumping Measures’ (2003) 6 Journal of International Economic Law125
77. Dworkin, Ronald, Law's Empire (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1986)
78. Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977)
79. Edmundson, William, ‘The Antinomy of Coherence and Determinacy’ (1996) 82 Iowa Law Review 1
80. Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter, ‘Six Years on the Bench of the “World Trade Court” Some Personal Experiences as Member of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization’ (2002) 36 Journal of World Trade 605
81. Ellinghaus, M. P. and Wright, E. W., ‘The Common Law of Contracts: Are Broad Principles Better than Detailed Rules? An Empirical Investigation’ (2005) 11 Texas Wesleyan Law Review 399
82. Ellis, Evelyn (ed.),The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Oxford: Hart, 1999)
83. Endicott, Timothy A. O., Vagueness in Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)
84. Fallon, Richard, ‘Foreword: Implementing the Constitution’ (1997) 111 Harvard Law Review 54
85. Farnsworth, Allan, ‘Duties of Good Faith and Fair Dealing under the UNIDROIT Principles, Relevant International Conventions, and National Laws’ (1995) 3 Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law47
86. Fatouros, A. A., ‘Developing States’ in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co, 2003) vol. I, 1017
87. Fenrick, William, ‘The Rule of Proportionality and Protocol in Conventional Warfare’ (1982) 98 Military Law Review 91
88. Finger, Michael, ‘A Diplomat’s Economics: Reciprocity in the Uruguay Round Negotiations’ (2005) 4 World Trade Review 27
89. Finger, Michael and Nogues, Julio, ‘The Unbalanced Uruguay Round Outcome: The New Areas in Future WTO Negotiations’ (2002) 25 World Economy 321
90. Fitzmaurice, Gerald, ‘Some Problems Regarding the Formal Sources of International Law’ [1958] Symbolae Verzijl153
91. Fitzmaurice, Gerald ‘The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law’ (1957-II) Recueil des Cours 1
92. Fitzmaurice, Gerald ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, 1951-4: General Principles and Sources of Law’ (1959) 30 British Yearbook of International Law1
93. Fitzmaurice, Gerald ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1951-4: Treaty Interpretation and Other Treaty Points’ (1957) 33 British Yearbook of International Law203
94. Ford, Christopher, ‘Judicial Discretion in International Jurisprudence: Article 38(1)(C) and “General Principles of Law”’ (1994) 5 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law35
95. Fox, Richard, ‘The Meaning of Proportionality in Sentencing’ (1994) 19 Melbourne University Law Review489
96. Franck, Thomas M., Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)
97. Freeman, Alwyn V., The International Responsibility of States for Denial of Justice (London: Longmans, Green & Co, 1938)
98. Friedmann, Wolfgang, ‘The Uses of “General Principles” in the Development of International Law’ (1963) 57 American Journal of International Law 279
99. Frischtak, Ana, ‘Balancing Judicial Economy, State Opportunism, and Due Process Concerns in the WTO’ (2005) 26 Michigan Journal of International Law 947
100. Gaffney, John, ‘Due Process in the World Trade Organization: The Need for Procedural Justice in the Dispute Settlement System’ (1999) 14 American University International Law Review1173
101. Garcia, Frank, ‘Beyond Special and Differential Treatment’ (2004) 27 Boston College International & Comparative Law Review 291
102. Gardam, Judith, ‘Proportionality as a Restraint on the Use of Force’ (1999) 20 Australian Yearbook of International Law161
103. Garner, Bryan A., A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage (New York: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 1995)
104. Gerstetter, Christiane and Maier, Matthais Leonhard, ‘Legalise It, or Criticise It? Debating the Precautionary Principle in and around the WTO’ (Working Paper, Universität Bremen, 2004)
105. Goldsmith, Jack and Posner, Eric, ‘A Theory of Customary International Law’ (1999) 66 University of Chicago Law Review1113
106. Goldsmith, Jack and Posner, Eric, ‘Understanding the Resemblance between Modern and Traditional Customary International Law’ (2000) 40 Virginia Journal of International Law639
107. Gonthier, Charles, ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity: The Forgotten Leg of the Trilogy, or Fraternity: The Unspoken Third Pillar of Democracy’ (2000) 45 McGill Law Journal 567
108. Goode, Royston, Commercial Law (New York, NY: Penguin Books 2nd edn, 1995)
109. Goodwin-Gill, Guy, ‘State Responsibility and the “Good Faith” Obligation in International Law’ in Malgosia Fitzmaurice and Dan Sarooshi (eds.), Issues of State Responsibility Before International Judicial Institutions (Oxford: Hart, 2004) 75
110. Greenawalt, Kent, ‘Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation’ in Jules Coleman and Scott Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) 268
111. Grieg, D. W., ‘Reciprocity, Proportionality, and the Law of Treaties’ (1994) 34 Virginia Journal of International Law295
112. Grossman, Gene and Sykes, Alan, ‘A Preference for Development: the Law and Economics of GSP’ (2005) 4 World Trade Review 41
113. Gutteridge, H. C., ‘Comparative Law and the Law of Nations’ (1944) 21 British Yearbook of International Law 1
114. Gutteridge, H. C.,Comparative Law(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn, 1949)
115. Hall, Kermit L (ed.),The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States(New York: Oxford University Press, 1992)
116. Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961)
117. Hart, Michael and Dymond, Bill, ‘Special and Differential Treatment and the Doha “Development” Round’ (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade 395
118. Harvard Research in International Law, ‘Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1935) 29 American Journal ofInternational Law (Supplement)697
119. Harvard Research in International Law, ‘The Law of Responsibility of States for Damage Done in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigners’ (1929) 23 American Journal of International Law (Supplement) 131
120. Hilf, Meinhard, ‘Power, Rules and Principles - Which Orientation for WTO/GATT Law?’ (2001) 4 Journal of International Economic Law111
121. Hilf, Meinhard and Goettsche, Goetz J., ‘The Relation of Economic and Non-Economic Principles in International Law’ in Stefan Griller (ed.), International Economic Governance and Non-Economic Concerns: New Challenges for the International Legal Order (New York: Springer, 2003)
122. Hilf, Meinhard and Puth, Sebastian, ‘The Principle of Proportionality on its Way into WTO/GATT law’ in Armin von Bogdandy, Petros Mavroidis and Yves Meny (eds.), European Integration and International Co-Ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002) 199
123. Hiscock, Mary, ‘The Keeper of the Flame: Good Faith and Fair Dealing in International Trade’ (1996) 29 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review1059
124. Hoekman, Bernard, ‘Operationalizing the Concept of Policy Space in the WTO: Beyond Special and Differential Treatment’ (2005) 8 Journal of International Economic Law 405
125. Hoekman, Bernard and Braga, Carlos, ‘Special and Differential Treatment and the Doha Development Agenda: Beyond Tariff Preferences’ (Paper presented at the OECD Global Forum on Trade, Special and Differential Treatment: Thinking Outside the Box, Bridgetown, Barbados, 28-29June 2005)
126. Hoekman, Bernard and Mavroidis, Petros, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement, Transparency and Surveillance’ (2000) 23 World Economy527
127. Hoekman, Bernard, Michalopoulos, Constantine and Winters, Alan, ‘Special and Differential Treatment of Developing Countries in the WTO: Moving Forward After CancUn’ (2004) World Economy 481
128. Hoekman, Bernard and Prowse, Susan, ‘Policy Responses to Preference Erosion: From Trade as Aid to Aid for Trade’ (Paper presented at the OECD Global Forum on Trade, Special and Differential Treatment: Thinking Outside the Box, Bridgetown, Barbados, 28-29 June 2005)
129. Hogg, Peter W., Constitutional Law of Canada (Toronto: Carswell, student edn, 2002)
130. Honderich, Ted (ed.),The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)
131. Horlick, Gary, ‘Problems with the Compliance Structure of the WTO Dispute Resolution Process’ in Daniel Kennedy and James Southwick, The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E Hudec(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002) 636.
132. Howse, Robert, ‘Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law: The Early Years of WTO Jurisprudence’ in Joseph Weiler (ed.), The EU, the WTO and the NAFTA: Toward a Common Law of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000) 35
133. Howse, Robert, ‘India’s WTO Challenge to Drug Enforcement Conditions in the European Community Generalized System of Preferences: A Little Known Case with Major Repercussions for “Political” Conditionality in US Trade Policy’ (2003) 4 Chicago Journal of International Law 385
134. Howse, Robert, ‘The Jurisprudential Achievement of the WTO Appellate Body: A Preliminary Appreciation’ (Working Paper, University of Michigan, 2004)
135. Howse, Robert, ‘The Most Dangerous Branch? WTO Appellate Body Jurisprudence on the Nature and Limits of the Judicial Power’ in Thomas Cottier and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds.), The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation: Experience and Lessons for the WTO(Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2003) vol. I, 11
136. Howse, Robert and Nicolaidis, Kalypso, ‘Enhancing WTO Legitimacy: Constitutionalization or Global Subsidiarity?’ (2003) 16 Governance 73
137. Hudec, Robert E., Developing Countries in the GATT Legal System(Aldershot,Hampshire, UK: Gower, for the Trade Policy Research Centre, London, 1987)
138. Ismail, Faizel, ‘Mainstreaming Development in the World Trade Organization’ (2005) 39 Journal of World Trade 11
139. Jacobs, Francis, ‘Varieties of Approach to Treaty Interpretation: With Special Reference to the Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties Before the Vienna Diplomatic Conference’ (1969) 18 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 318
140. Jaenicke, Gunther, ‘States, Equal Treatment and Non-Discrimination’ in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co, 2003) vol. IV, 660
141. Jalet, Frances, ‘The Quest for the General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations - A Study’ (1963) 10 UCLA Law Review1041
142. Janis, Mark W., An Introduction to International Law (New York: Aspen Publishers, 4th edn, 2003)
143. Jennings, Robert, ‘What is International Law and How Do We Tell It When We See It?’ (1981) 37 Schweizerisches Jahrbuch fur Internationales Recht.
144. Jennings, Robert and Watts, Arthur (eds.), Oppenheim’s International Law (Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman, 1992)
145. Johnstone, Ian, ‘Treaty Interpretation: The Authority of Interpretive Communities’ (1991) 12 Michigan Journal of International Law 371
146. Jung, Youngjin and Lee, Sun Hyeong, ‘The Legacy of the Byrd Amendment Controversies: Rethinking the Principle of Good Faith’ (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade 921
147. Jiirgensen, Thomas, ‘Crime and Punishment: Retaliation under the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement System’ (2005) 39 Journal of World Trade 327
148. Kaplow, Louis, ‘General Characteristics of Rules’ in Boudewijn Bouckaert and Gerrit de Geest (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2000) vol. V, 502
149. Kaplow, Louis, ‘Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis’ (1992) 42 Duke Law Journal 557
150. Keck, Alexander and Low, Patrick, ‘Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO: Why, When and How?’ in Simon Evenett and Bernard Hoekman (eds.), Economic Development & Multilateral Trade Cooperation(Washington DC: Palgrave Macmillan, World Bank, 2006) 147
151. Keily, Troy, ‘Good Faith & the Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)’ (1999) 3 Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law & Arbitration 15
152. Kelly, Patrick, ‘The Twilight of Customary International Law’ (2000) 40 Virginia Journal of International Law 449
153. Kelsen, Hans, Pure Theory of Law (Berkeley: University of California Press, Max Knight trans, 2nd rev. edn, 1967)
154. Kennedy, David, ‘Theses about International Legal Discourse’ (1980) 23 German Yearbook of International Law353
155. Kerr, William, ‘Special and Differential Treatment: A Mechanism to Promote Development?’ (2005) 6 Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy84
156. Kirgis, Fredric, ‘Custom on a Sliding Scale’ (1987) 81 American Journal of International Law 146
157. Kirgis, Fredric, ‘Evolving Constitutions of International Organizations by Tetsuo Sato’ (1998) 92 American Journal of International Law 153
158. Kirk, Jeremy, ‘Constitutional Guarantees, Characterisation and the Concept of Proportionality’ (1997) 21 Melbourne University Law Review 1
159. Kishoiyian, Bernard, ‘The Utility of Bilateral Investment Treaties in the Formulation of Customary International Law’ (1994) 14 Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 327
160. Kiss, Alexandre, ‘Abuse of Rights’ in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law(Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co, 2003) vol. I, 4
161. Knop, Karen, ‘Reflections on Thomas Franck, Race and Nationalism (1960): “General Principles of Law” and Situated Generality’ (2003) 35 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 437
162. Kolb, Robert, ‘Principles as Sources of International Law (with Special Reference to Good Faith)’ (2006) 53 Netherlands International Law Review 1
163. Koskenniemi, Martii, From Apology to Utopia (Helsinki: Finnish Lawyers’ Pub. Co., 1989)
164. Koskenniemi, Martii,General Principles: Reflexions on Constructivist Thinking in International Law(1985) XVIII Oikeustiede-Jurisprudentia 121.
165. Kuyper, Pieter, ‘The Law of GATT as a Special Field of International Law: Ignorance, Further Refinement or Self-Contained System of International Law?’ (1994) 25 Netherlands International Law Review227
166. Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘De l’interprétation des traites’ (1950) 43 Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International366
167. Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties’ (1949) 26 British Yearbook of International Law 48
168. Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Stevens, 1958)
169. Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Function of Law in the International Community(Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books 1966)
170. Lee, Yong-Shik, ‘Destabilization of the Discipline on Safeguards? Inherent Problems with the Continuing Application of Article XIX after the Settlement of the Agreement on Safeguards’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade1235
171. Lennard, Michael, ‘Navigating by the Stars: Interpreting the WTO Agreements’ (2002) 5 Journal of International Economic Law 17
172. Lieber, Francis, Legal and Political Hermeneutics, or Principles of Interpretation and Construction in Law and Politics, with Remarks on Precedents and Authorities(Boston: C.C. Little and J. Brown, 1839)
173. Lockhart, Nicolas and Mitchell, Andrew, ‘Regional Trade Agreements Under GATT 1994: An Exception and Its Limits’ in Andrew D. Mitchell (ed.), Challenges and Prospects for the WTO (London: Cameron May, 2005) 217
174. Lucy, William, ‘Adjudication’ in Jules Coleman and Scott Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence & Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) 206
175. MacCormick, Neil, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)
176. Malanczuk, Peter,Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law(London: Routledge, 7th edn, 1997)
177. Mann, F. A., ‘Reflections on a Commercial Law of Nations’ (1957) 33 British Yearbook of International Law 20
178. Mann, F. A., ‘British Treaties for the Promotion and Protection of Investments’ (1982) 52 British Yearbook of International Law241
179. Marceau, Gabrielle, ‘A Call for Coherence in International Law - Praise for the Prohibition against “Clinical Isolation” in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (1999) 33 Journal of World Trade 87
180. Marceau, Gabrielle, ‘Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions: The Relationship between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and other Treaties’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade1081
181. Marceau, Gabrielle, ‘La jurisprudence sur le principe de precaution dans le droit de l’OMC’ (Paper presented at the Inaugural Professorial Lecture, Faculty of Law, University of Geneva, 19 May 2005)
182. Margue, Georges, ‘Abuse of Rights and Luxembourg Law’ in Council of Europe (ed.), Abuse of Rights and Equivalent Concepts: The Principle and Its Present Day Application (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Pub. and Documentation Service 1990) 58
183. Martin, Elizabeth, A Dictionary of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5th edn, 2002)
184. Matsushita, Mitsuo, Schoenbaum, Thomas and Mavroidis, Petros, The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)
185. Mavroidis, Petros, ‘Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law763
186. McGinnis, John, ‘The Appropriate Hierarchy of Global Multilateralism and Customary International Law: The Example of the WTO’ (2003) 44 Virginia Journal of International Law 229
187. McLachlan, Campbell, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly279
188. McNair, Arnold, ‘The Functions and Differing Legal Character of Treaties’ (1930) 11 British Yearbook of International Law 100
189. McNair, Arnold, The Law of Treaties (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961)
190. McRae, Donald, ‘Reflections on the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization (WTO): Comments on Dr Claus-Dieter Ehlermann’s Lecture’ (2003) 97 American Society of International Law Proceedings87
191. McRae, Donald, ‘What is the Future of WTO Dispute Settlement?’ (2004) 7 Journal of International Economic Law3
192. Mendelson, Maurice, ‘The International Court of Justice and the Sources of International Law’ in Vaughan Lowe and Malgosia Fitzmaurice (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice (Cambridge: Grotius/Cambridge University Press, 1996) 63
193. Mendelson, Maurice, ‘Reservations to the Constitutions of International Organizations’ (1971) 45 British Yearbook of International Law137
194. Merrills, J., International Dispute Settlement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3rd edn, 1998)
195. Mitchell, Andrew, ‘Does One Illegality Merit Another? The Law of Belligerent Reprisals in International Law’ (2001) 170 Military Law Review155
196. Mitchell, Andrew and Griffith, Gavan, ‘Contractual Dispute Resolution in International Trade: The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (1976) and the UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules (1980)’ (2002) 3 Melbourne Journal of International Law 184
197. Müller, Jörg and Cottier, Thomas, ‘Estoppel’ in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law(New York: North-Holland, 2003) vol. 2, 116
198. Müller, Jörg and Kolb, Robert, ‘Article 2(2)’ in Bruno Simma (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 2002) vol. 1, 91
199. Neumann, Jan and Türk, Elisabeth, ‘Necessity Revisited: Proportionality in World Trade Organization Law After Korea - Beef, EC - Asbestos and EC - Sardines’ (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade 199
200. Ngangjoh, Yenkong, ‘Pacta Sunt Servanda and Complaints in the WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2004) 1 Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 76
201. Nordas, Hildegunn Kyvik, Discussion Paper No 5: The Global Textile and Clothing Industry post the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (Geneva: WTO, 2004)
202. Note, ‘Looking It Up: Dictionaries and Statutory Interpretation’ (1994) 107 Harvard Law Review1437
203. Nygh, Peter and Butt, Peter (eds.), Australian Legal Dictionary(1997)
204. O’Connell, Daniel,International Law (London: Stevens, 2nd edn, 1970)
205. O’Connor, J., Good Faith in International Law(Aldershot, Hants, England: Dartmouth, 1991)
206. Olivares, Gustavo, ‘The Case for Giving Effectiveness to GATT/WTO Rules on Developing Countries and LDCs’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade 545
207. Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘Questions of International Judicial Jurisdiction in the LaGrand Case’ (2002) 15 Leiden Journal of International Law 105
208. Ortino, Federico, Basic Legal Instruments for the Liberalisation of Trade: A Comparative Analysis of EC and WTO Law (Portland: Hart Publishing, 2004)
209. Ortino, Federico, ‘From “Non-Discrimination” to “Reasonableness”: A Paradigm Shift in International Economic Law?’ (Working Paper No 01/05, Jean Monnet Centre for International and Regional Economic Law & Justice, 2005)
210. Osiro, D. A., ‘GATT/WTO Necessity Analysis: Evolutionary Interpretation and its Impact on the Authority of Domestic Regulation’ (2002) 29 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 123
211. Page, Sheila and Kleen, Peter, Special and Differential Treatment of Developing Countries in the World Trade Organization (Stockholm: Norstedts Tryckeri AB, 2005)
212. Palmeter, David, ‘The Need for Due Process in WTO Proceedings’ (1997) 31 Journal of World Trade 51.
213. Palmeter, David and Alexandrov, Stanimir, ‘“Inducing Compliance” in WTO Dispute Settlement’ in Daniel Kennedy and James Southwick, The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002) 646
214. Palmeter, David and Mavroidis, Petros C., Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization: Practice and Procedure (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn, 2004)
215. Palmeter, David and Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law’ (1998) 92 American Journal of International Law398
216. Pangestu, Mari, ‘Special and Differential Treatment in the Millennium: Special for Whom and How Different?’ (2000) 23 World Economy1285
217. Panitchpakdi, Supachai, ‘Why CancUn Matters’, Second International Conference on Globalisation, Leuven, 26 November 2002, www.wto.org/english/news_e/spsp_e/spsp08_e.html
218. Panizzon, Marion, Good Faith in the Jurisprudence of the WTO (Oxford: Hart, 2006)
219. Park, Kyung, ‘Korean Principle of Proportionality, American Multi-Leveled Scrutiny, and Empiricist Elements in US-Korean Constitutional Jurisprudence’ (2001) 1 Journal of Korean Law 105
220. Pater, Joshua, ‘Struck out Looking: Continued Confusion in Eighth Amendment Proportionality Review after Ewing v. California, 123 S. Ct. 1179 (2003)’ (2003-04) 27 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 399
221. Pauwelyn, Joost, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)
222. Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules - Toward a More Collective Approach’ (2000) 94 American Journal ofInternational Law335
223. Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘The Nature of WTO Obligations’ (Working Paper No 1/02, Jean Monnet Centre for International and Regional Economic Law & Justice, 2002)
224. Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘The Puzzle of WTO Safeguards and Regional Trade Agreements’ (2004) 7 Journal ofInternational Economic Law109
225. Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law 535
226. Perez-Aznar, Facundo, Countermeasures in the WTO Dispute Settlement System: An Analysis of Their Characteristics and Procedure in the Light of General International Law (Geneva: Graduate Institute of International Studies, 2006)
227. Perry, Stephen, ‘Two Models of Legal Principles’ (1997) 82 Iowa Law Review787
228. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System: International Law, International Organizations and Dispute Settlement (London: Kluwer Law International, 1997)
229. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, ‘Trade Policy as a Constitutional Problem: On the Domestic Policy Functions of International Rules’ (1996) 41 Aussenwirtschaft 405
230. Petrova, Irina, ‘“Stepping on the Shoulders of a Drowning Man”: The Doctrine of Abuse of Right as a Tool for Reducing Damages for Lost Profits: Troubling Lessons from the Patuha and Himpurna Arbitrations’ (2004) 35 Georgetown Journal of International Law455
231. Pound, Roscoe, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1922)
232. Powers, Paul, ‘Defining the Undefinable: Good Faith and the United Nations Convention on the Contracts for the International Sale of Goods’ (1999) 18 Journal of Law and Commerce 333
233. Qureshi, Asif, ‘Interpreting World Trade Organization Agreements for the Development Objective’ (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade 847
234. Randelzhofer, Albrecht, ‘Article 2’ in Bruno Simma (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 2002) vol. 1,63
235. Raz, Joseph, Practical Reason and Norms (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, rev. edn, 1999)
236. Raz, Joseph,The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986)
237. Redfern, Alan et al., Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 4th edn, 2004)
238. Regan, Donald, ‘Do WTO Dispute Settlement Reports Affect the Obligations of Non-Parties?’ (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade 883
239. Renouf, Yves, ‘A Brief Introduction to Countermeasures in the WTO Dispute Settlement System’ in Rufus Yerxa and Bruce Wilson (eds.), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement: The First Ten Years (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 75
240. Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its Fifty-third Session, UN GAOR, 56th sess, Supp No 10, UN Doc A/56/10 (2001)
241. Ricupero, Rubens, ‘Rebuilding Confidence in the Multilateral Trading System: Closing the “Legitimacy Gap”’ in Gary Sampson (ed.), The Role of the World Trade Organization in Global Governance (Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2001) 37
242. Roberts, Anthea, ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law757
243. Robinson, Davis, ‘Expropriation in the Restatement (Revised)’ (1984) 78 American Journal of International Law176
244. Roessler, Frieder and Gappah, Petina, ‘A Re-Appraisal of Non-Violation Complaints under the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures’ in Patrick F. J. Macrory et al. (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis (New York: Springer, 2005) vol. I, 1371
245. Rosenne, Shabtai, Developments in the Law of Treaties 1945-1986 (Cambridge: New York, 1989)
246. Sacerdoti, Giorgio, ‘Bilateral Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investment Protection’ (1997) 269 Recueil des Cours251
247. Sartorius, Rolf, ‘The Justification of the Judicial Decision’ (1968) 78 Ethics 184
248. Sato, Tetsuo, Evolving Constitutions of International Organizations (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996)
249. Schlesinger, Rudolf, ‘Research on General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations’ (1957) 51 American Journal of International Law 734
250. Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice’ (2005) 6 Journal of World Investment and Trade357
251. Schwarzenberger, Georg, The Inductive Approach to International Law (London: Stevens, 1965)
252. Schwarzenberger, Georg and Brown, E. D., A Manual ofInternational Law (Milton, UK: Professional Books, 6th edn, 1976)
253. Schwebel, Stephen, ‘The Effect of Resolutions of the UN General Assembly on Customary International Law’ (1979) 73 American Society of International Law Proceedings 301
254. Sebastian, Thomas, ‘World Trade Organization Remedies and the Assessment of Proportionality: Equivalence and Appropriateness’ (2007) 48 Harvard International Law Journal 337
255. Sim, Disa, The Scope and Application of Good Faith in the Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods(Cambridge: Law School, Harvard University, 2000)
256. Simpson, John and Weiner, Edmund (eds.), The Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 1989)
257. Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 2nd edn, 1984)
258. Srinivasan, T., ‘Developing Countries in the World Trading System: From GATT, 1947, to the Third Ministerial Meeting of the WTO, 1999’ (1999) 22 World Economy1047
259. Srinivasan, T., ‘Nondiscrimination in GATT/WTO: Was There Anything to Begin with and Is There Anything Left?’ (2005) 4 World Trade Review69
260. Stack, David, ‘The Two Standards of Good Faith in Canadian Contract Law’ (1999) 62 Saskatchewan Law Review201
261. Steger, Debra, ‘Jurisdiction of the WTO’ (2004) 98 American Society of International Law Proceedings 142
262. Steinberg, Richard and Josling, Timothy, ‘When the Peace Ends: The Vulnerability of EC and US Agricultural Subsidies to WTO Legal Challenge’ (2003) 6 Journal of International Economic Law369
263. Stone, Julius, ‘Fictional Elements in Treaty Interpretation - A Study in the International Judicial Process’ (1953-55) 1 Sydney Law Review 344
264. Sykes, Alan, ‘The Least Restrictive Means’ (2003) 70 University of Chicago Law Review403
265. Tasioulas, John, ‘In Defence of Relative Normativity: Communitarian Values and the Nicaragua Case’ (1996) 16 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 85
266. Taylor, G. D. S., ‘The Content of the Rule against Abuse of Rights in International Law’ (1972-73) 46 British Yearbook of International Law 323
267. Tetley, William, ‘Good Faith in Contract: Particularly in the Contracts of Arbitration and Chartering’ (2004) 35 Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 561
268. Thirlway, Hugh, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960-1989: Part Two’ (1990) 61 British Yearbook of International Law 1
269. Thirlway, Hugh, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice’ (1998) 69 British Yearbook of International Law1
270. Trachtman, Joel ‘Book Review of Joost Pauwelyn, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law’ (2004) 98 American Journal of International Law 855
271. Trachtman, Joel ‘Jurisdiction in WTO Disputes’ in Rufus Yerxa and Bruce Wilson (eds.), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge: WTO/Cambridge University Press, 2005)
272. Trachtman, Joel ‘The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution’ (1999) 40 Harvard International Law Journal 333
273. Trachtman, Joel ‘The Jurisdiction of the World Trade Organization’ (2004) 98 American Society of International Law Proceedings 139
274. Trachtman, Joel ‘United States: Tax Treatment for “Foreign Sales Corporations” European Journal of International Law: Survey of Decisions of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization, available at www.ejil.org/journal/curdevs/sr8.html
275. Trebilcock, Michael J. and Howse, Robert, The Regulation of International Trade (London: Routledge, 3rd edn, 2005)
276. Trumble, William and Stevenson, Angus (eds.), Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5th edn, 2002)
277. ‘Unquotable’, The Economist, 28 December 2004
278. US International Trade Commission, Textiles and Apparel: Assessment of the Competitiveness of Certain Foreign Suppliers to the US Market(Publication No 3671, January 2004)
279. Ustor, Endre, ‘Most-Favoured-Nation Clause’ in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co, 2003) vol. III, 468
280. Vagts, Detlev and Varges, Gabe, ‘Book Review: Good Faith in International Law’ (1992) 86 American Journal of International Law 841
281. Van Alstine, Michael P., ‘The Death of Good Faith in Treaty Jurisprudence and a Call for Resurrection’ (2005) 93Georgetown Law Journal1885
282. Vandevelde, Kenneth, United States Investment Treaties: Policy and Practice (Deventer, Netherlands: Kluwer Law and Taxation, 1992)
283. Verosta, Stephan, ‘Denial of Justice’ in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co, 2003) vol. I, 1007
284. Virally, Michael, ‘Review Essay: Good Faith in Public International Law’ (1983) 77 American Journal of International Law 130
285. von Hirsch, Andrew A., ‘Proportionality in the Philosophy of Punishment’ (1992) 16 Crime & Justice 55
286. Voyame, Joseph et al., ‘Abuse of Rights in Comparative Law’ in Council of Europe (ed.), Abuse of Rights and Equivalent Concepts: The Principle and Its Present Day Application (Strasbourg: The Council, 1990) 23
287. Waincymer, Jeff, WTO Litigation: Procedural Aspects of Formal Dispute Settlement(London: Cameron May, 2002)
288. Waldock, Humphrey, ‘General Course on Public International Law’ (1962-II) 106 Recueil Des Cours 1
289. Walker, David M., The Oxford Companion to Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980)
290. Wallace, Rebecca M. M.,International Law(London: Sweet & Maxwell, 4th edn, 2002)
291. Weiler, Joseph, ‘The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats - Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade 191
292. Weiss, Wolfgang, ‘Security and Predictability under WTO Law’ (2003) 2 World Trade Review183
293. White, Gillian, ‘The Principle of Good Faith’ in Vaughan Lowe and Colin Warbrick (eds.), The United Nations and the Principles of International Law: Essays in Memory of Michael Akehurst (London: Routledge, 1994) 230
294. White, N. D. and Abass, A., ‘Countermeasures and Sanctions’ in Malcolm Evans (ed.), International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003) 505
295. Whittington, Keith E,Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review(Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999)
296. Winckel, Anne, ‘The Contextual Role of a Preamble in Statutory Interpretation’ (1999) 23 Melbourne University Law Review 184
297. Woolman, Stu and Botha, Henk, ‘Limitations’ in Constitutional Law of South Africa (2nd edn, Original Service 07-06)
298. WTO, Understanding the WTO(Geneva: WTO, 3rd edn, 2003)
299. Yanovich, Alan and Voon, Tania, ‘What Is the Measure at Issue?’ in Andrew D Mitchell (ed.), Challenges and Prospects for the WTO (London: Cameron May, 2005) 115
300. Zeitler, Helge, ‘“Good Faith” in the WTO Jurisprudence - Necessary Balancing Element or an Open Door to Judicial Activism’ (2005) 8 Journal of International Economic Law721
301. Zoller, Elisabeth, La Bonne Foi en Droit International Public (Paris: Editions A Pedone, 1977)