Security and predictability under WTO law

World Trade Review

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 183-219

  Weiss, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008173951     PISSN: 14747456     EISSN: 14753138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1474745603001423     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Petersmann, The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System (1997), at 64.
2. Kuyper, ‘The Law of GATT as a Special Field of International Law’, 35 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law (1994): 227 at 229.
3. Cameron and Gray, ‘Principles of International Law in the WTO Dispute Settlement Body’, International Comparative Law Quarterly (2001): 248;
4. Lennard, ‘Navigating by the Stars’, 17 at 42;
5. Shanker, ‘The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’, 721 at 729.
6. Palmeter and Mavroidis, The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law, American Journal of International Law (1998): 399 at 402.
7. Bhala, ‘The Myth About Stare Decisis and International Trade Law’, 14 American University International Law Review (1999): 845.
8. Lennard, ‘Navigating by the Stars’, 17 at 87–88;
9. Shanker, ‘The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’, 721 at 748–751.
10. McRae, ‘The WTO in International Law: Tradition Continued or New Frontier?’, Journal of International Economic Law (2000): 27 at 39.
11. Pauwelyn, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law, 2003, 25.
12. Pauwelyn, ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far can we Go?’, American Journal of International Law (2001): 535 at 538, 542.
13. Contra Mattoo and Mavroidis, ‘Trade, Environment and the WTO: How real is the conflict?’, in Petersmann (ed.), International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System (1997): 325 at 333.
14. Marceau, ‘A Call for Coherence in International Law’, 87 at 110;
15. ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights’, European Journal of International Law (2002): 753 at 776–777.
16. Contra Bartels, ‘Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’, Journal of World Trade (2001): 499 at 503, 513, 518;
17. Pauwelyn, ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO’, 535 at 561.
18. Bartels, ‘Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’, 499 at 501.
19. Pauwelyn, ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO’, 535 at 564,
20. Marceau, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights’, 753 at 777.
21. Pauwelyn, ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO’, 535 at 554f.
22. Palmeter and Mavroidis, ‘The WTO Legal System’, 412.
23. Lennard, ‘Navigating by the Stars’, 17 at 36ff.
24. Marceau, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights’, 753 at 781.
25. Pauwelyn, ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO’, 535 at 575f.
26. Pauwelyn, The Nature of WTO Obligations, Jean Monnet Working Paper 01/02;
27. Pauwelyn, ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO’, 535 at 549.
28. Pauwelyn, ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO’, 535 at 562.
29. Cameron and Gray, ‘Principles of International’, 248 at 253;
30. Panel, Korea Measures Affecting Government Procurement, para. 7.96, fn. 753.
31. Marceau, ‘Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions’, 1081 at 1103–1104.
32. Neumann, Die materielle und prozessuale Koordination vö lkerrechtlicher Ordnungen, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (2001): 529 at 558.
33. McRae, ‘The WTO in International Law’, 27 at 37.
34. Weiβ, ‘Allgemeine Rechtsgrundsä tze des Völkerrechts ’, Archiv des Voelkerrechts (2001): 394 at 418ff.
35. Karl, ‘Treaties, Conflict between’, in Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, IV (2000): 935 at 936.
36. Marceau, ‘Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions’, 1081 at 1086.
37. Pauwelyn, ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO’, 535 at 551.
38. Eggers and Mackenzie, ‘The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety’, JIEL (2000) 525 at 540;
39. Marceau, ‘Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions’, 1081 at 1085;
40. Marceau, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights’, 753 at 792–793;
41. Pauwelyn, ‘Cross Agreement Complaints before the Appellate Body’, 63 at 75.
42. Karl, ‘Treaties, Conflict between’, 935 at 936ff.
43. Marceau, ‘Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions’, 1081 at 1089.
44. Pauwelyn, ‘Cross Agreement Complaints before the Appellate Body’, 63 at 79.
45. Marceau, ‘Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions’, 1081 at 1097.
46. Marceau, ‘Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions’, 1081 at 1099.
47. Pauwelyn, ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO’, 535 at 545.
48. Arbitrators, EC — Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), para. 50.
49. Marceau, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights’, 753 at 778.
50. Vranes, ‘Principles and Emerging Problems of WTO Cross Retaliation’, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (2001): 10 at 14.
51. Pauwelyn, ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO’, 535 at 549.
52. Pauwelyn, ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO’, 535 at 545–546.
53. Marceau, ‘A Call for Coherence in International Law’, 87 at 111.