Dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization: Practice and procedure, second edition

Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization: Practice and Procedure, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-330

  Palmeter, David ^c   Mavroidis, Petros C ^a,b  

^a Columbia Law School New York ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926093502     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139177931     Document Type: Book

References (101)

1. Brenner, Saul & Spaeth, Harold J., Stare Indecisis: The Alteration of Precedent on the Supreme Court (Cambridge, 1995).
2. Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (4th ed., Oxford, 1990).
3. Carter, Barry E. & Trimble, Philip R., International Law (2d ed., Little Brown, 1994).
4. Chayes, Abram & Chayes, Antonia Handler, The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Harvard, 1995).
5. Croome, John, Reshaping the World Trading System: A History of the Uruguay Round (World Trade Organization, 1995).
6. Dam, Kenneth W., The GATT: Law and International Economic Organization (Chicago, 1970).
7. Damrosch, Lori F., Henkin, Louis, Pugh, Richard, Schacter, Oscar, Schmidt, Hans, International Law (2d ed., West, 2002).
8. David, Rene, French Law: Its Structure, Sources, and Methodology (Michael Kindred, trans.) (Louisiana State University Press, 1972).
9. European Commission, Report on United States Barriers to Trade and Investment (2002).
10. Evans, Malcolm (Ed), Remedies in International Law: The Institutional Dilemma (Hart, 1998).
11. Fitzmaurice, Gerald, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice (Cambridge, 1986).
12. Franck, Thomas, Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Clarendon Press, 1995).
13. Gardner, Richard N., Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy in Current Perspective: The Origins and Prospects of Our International Economic Order (Columbia Univ. Press ed., 1980).
14. Gaskin, Richard H., Burdens of Proof in Modern Discourse (Yale, 1992).
15. Gray, Christine, Judicial Remedies in International Law (Oxford, 1990).
16. Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (2d ed., Oxford, 1994).
17. Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems & Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford, 1994).
18. Hoekman, Bernard & Kostecki, Michael, The Political Economy of the World Trading System: From GATT to the WTO (Oxford, 1995).
19. Hudec, Robert E., Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System (Butterworth, 1993).
20. Hudec, Robert E., The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy (2d ed., Butterworth, 1990).
21. Hudec, Robert E., GATT and the Developing Countries (Trade Policy Research Centre, 1988).
22. International Law Commission, Report (United Nations, 2000).
23. Jackson, John H., The World Trading System (2d ed., MIT Press, 1997).
24. Jackson, John H., World Trade and the Law of GATT (Bobbs-Merrill, 1969).
25. Kazazi, Mojtaba, Burden of Proof and Related Issues: A Study on Evidence before International Tribunals (Kluwer, 1996).
26. Long, Oliver, Law and Its Limitations in the GATT Multilateral Trade System (Martinus Nijhoff, 1985).
27. MacCormick, Neil, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford, 1978).
28. Matsushita, Mitsuo, 5 Selected GATT/WTO Panel Reports: Summaries and Commentaries (Fair Trade Center, Tokyo, 1999).
29. Messerlin, Patrick, La Nouvelle OMC (Dunod, 1995).
30. Montaigne, Michel de, The Complete Essays of Montaigne (Donald M. Frame, Ed) (Stanford, 1965).
31. Oppenheim, Lassa, International Law (Jennings & Watts, Eds) (9th ed., Longman, 1992).
32. Paemen, Hugo & Bensch, Alexandra, From the GATT to the WTO: The European Community in the Uruguay Round (Leuven University Press, 1995).
33. Preeg, Ernest H., Traders in a Brave New World: The Uruguay Round and the Future of the International Trading System (Chicago, 1995).
34. Rosenne, Shabtai, The World Court (5th ed., Martinus Nijhoff, 1995).
35. Sands, Phillipe, Principles of International Environmental Law (Manchester Univ. Press, 1995).
36. Schott, Jeffrey J., The Uruguay Round: An Assessment (Institute for International Economics, 1994).
37. Shahabuddeen, Mohamed, Precedent in the World Court (Grotius, Cambridge, 1996).
38. Shaw, Malcolm N., International Law (Grotius, Cambridge, 1991).
39. Walker, David M., The Scottish Legal System (W. Green & Son, 1981).
40. World Trade Organization, Analytical Index, Guide to GATT Law and Practice (1995).
41. Bilder, Richard B., The Fact/Law Distinction in International Adjudication, in Richard Lillich (Ed) Fact-Finding before International Tribunals 95 (Transnational, 1991).
42. Charnovitz, Steve, Should the Teeth Be Pulled? An Analysis of WTO Sanctions, in Kennedy & Southwick (Eds) The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 602 (Cambridge, 2002).
43. Davey, William J., A Permanent Panel Body for WTO Dispute Settlement: Desirable or Practical? in Kennedy & Southwick (Eds) The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 496 (Cambridge, 2002).
44. Davey, William J., WTO Dispute Settlement: Segregating the Useful Political Aspects and Avoiding “Over-Legalization,” in Marco Bronckers & Reinhard Quick (Eds) New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honor of John H. Jackson 291 (Kluwer, 2000).
45. Horlick, Gary N., Problems with the Compliance Structure of the WTO Dispute Resolution Process, in Kennedy & Southwick (Eds) The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 636 (Cambridge, 2002).
46. Hudec, Robert E., Broadening the Scope of Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement, in Friedl Weiss (Ed) Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues & Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts & Tribunals 369 (Cameron May, 2000).
47. Hudec, Robert E., The Role of the GATT Secretariat in the Evolution of the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure, in Jagdish Bhagwati & Mathias Hirsch (Eds) The Uruguay Round and Beyond: Essays in Honour of Arthur Dunkel 101 (Springer-Verlag, 1998).
48. Jansen, Bernhard, Scope of Jurisdiction in GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement: Consultations and Panel Requests, in Friedl Weiss (Ed) Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts and Tribunals 45 (Cameron May, 2001).
49. Lafer, Celso, The World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement System (1996 Gilberto Amado Memorial Lecture, United Nations, 1996).
50. Mattoo, Aaditya & Mavroidis, Petros C., Trade Environment and the WTO: How Real Is the Conflict?, in Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (Ed) International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System (Kluwer, 1997).
51. Mavroidis, Petros C., Proposal for Reform of Article 22 of the DSU: Reconsidering the Sequencing Issue and Suspension of Concessions, in E. U. Petersmann (Ed) Preparing for the Doha Development Round 81 (European University Institute, Florence, 2002).
52. Mavroidis, Petros C., Amicus Curiae Briefs before the WTO: Much Ado About Nothing, in Armin von Bogdandy, Petros C. Mavroidis and Yves Meny (Eds) European Integration and International Co-ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann (Kluwer, Leiden, 2002).
53. Palmeter, David & Alexandrov, Stanimir A., “Inducing Compliance” in WTO Dispute Settlement, in Kennedy & Southwick (Eds) The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 646 (Cambridge, 2002).
54. Porges, Amelia, Step by Step to an International Trade Court, in Kennedy & Southwick (Eds) The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 496 (Cambridge, 2002).
55. Shaw, Malcolm N., A Practical Look at the International Court of Justice, in Malcolm Evans (Ed) Remedies in International Law: The Institutional Dilemma 13 (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 1998).
56. Alexandrov, Stanimir A., Non-Appearance before the International Court of Justice, 33 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 41 (1995).
57. Anderson, Kym, Peculiarities of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement, 1 World Trade Review 123 (No. 2, July 2002).
58. Bartels, Lorand, Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings, 35 Journal of World Trade 499 (No. 3, June 2001).
59. Bourgeois, Jacques H. J., Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).
60. Carmody, Chi, Remedies and Conformity under the WTO Agreement, 5 Journal of International Economic Law 307 (No. 2, June 2002).
61. Cartland, Michael, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).
62. Chang, Seung Wha, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).
63. Charnovitz, Steve, The WTO’s Problematic “Last Resort” Against Noncompliance, Aussenwirtschaft 57 (2002).
64. Cottier, Thomas, The WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 187 (No. 1, March 2003).
65. Croley, Steven P. & Jackson, John H., WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments, 90 American Journal of International Law 193 (April 1996).
66. Davey, William J., The Case for a Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 177 (No. 1, March 2003).
67. Davey, William J., Dispute Settlement in GATT, 11 Fordham International Law Journal 51 (1987).
68. Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter, Six Years on the Bench of the “World Trade Court” –Some Personal Experiences as a Member of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization, 36 Journal of World Trade 605 (No. 4, August 2002).
69. Grané, Patricio, Remedies under WTO Law, 4 Journal of International Economic Law 755 (No. 4, December 2001).
70. Howse, Robert, Trade, Environment and the Role of NGOs, 4 Journal of World Intellectual Property 277 (No. 4, March 2001).
71. Lacarte, Julio, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).
72. Lennard, Michael, Navigating by the Stars: Interpreting the WTO Agreements, 5 Journal of International Economic Law 17 (March 2002).
73. Long, Russell, United States Law and the International Antidumping Code, 3 International Lawyer 464 (1969).
74. Lugard, Maurits, Scope of Appellate Review: Objective Assessment of the Facts and Issues of Law, 1 Journal of International Economic Law 323 (1998).
75. Marceau, Gabrielle, A Call for Coherence in International Law: Praises for the Prohibition against “Clinical Isolation” in WTO Dispute Settlement, 33 Journal of World Trade 87 (No. 5, October 1999).
76. Martha, Rutsel Silvestre J., Presumptions and Burden of Proof in World Trade Law, 14 Journal of International Arbitration 67 (No. 1, March 1997).
77. Martha, Rutsel Silvestre J., World Trade Dispute Settlement and the Exhaustion of Local Remedies Rule, 30 Journal of World Trade 107 (No. 4, August 1996).
78. Mavroidis, Petros C., Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place, 11 European Journal of International Law 763 (No. 4, December 2000).
79. Mavroidis, Petros C., Government Procurement Agreement: The Trondheim Case, 49 Aussenwirtschaft 77 (1993).
80. McGivern, Brendan P., Seeking Compliance with WTO Rulings: Theory, Practice, and Alternatives, 36 International Lawyer 141 (No. 1, Spring 2002).
81. Meagher, Niall P., The Sound of Silence: Giving Meaning to Omissions in Provisions of the WTO Agreements, 37 Journal of World Trade 417(No. 2, April 2003).
82. Monnier, Pierre, The Time to Comply with an Adverse WTO Ruling, 35 Journal of World Trade 825 (No. 5, October 2001).
83. Palmeter, David, The WTO as a Legal System, 24 Fordham International Law Journal 444 (November–December 2000).
84. Palmeter, David, The WTO Appellate Body Needs Remand Authority, 32 Journal of World Trade 51 (No. 1, February 1998).
85. Palmeter, David, The WTO Appellate Body’s First Decision, 9 Leiden Journal of International Law 337 (1996).
86. Palmeter, David, Section 337 and the WTO Agreements: Still in Violation?, 20 World Competition No. 1 (September 1996).
87. Palmeter, David, A Commentary on the WTO Anti-Dumping Code, 30 Journal of World Trade 43 (No. 4, August 1996).
88. Pauwelyn, Joost, The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?, 95 American Journal of International Law 535 (April 2001).
89. Pauwelyn, Joost, Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules – Toward a More Collective Approach, 94 American Journal of International Law 535 (April 2000).
90. Pauwelyn, Joost, Evidence, Proof and Persuasion in WTO Dispute Settlement, 1 Journal of International Economic Law 227 (1998).
91. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, The Dispute Settlement of the World Trade Organization and the Evolution of the GATT Dispute Settlement System Since 1948, 31 Common Market Law Review 1157 (1994).
92. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, Dispute Settlement Proceedings in the Field of Antidumping Law, 28 Common Market Law Review 69 (1991).
93. Quick, Reinhard, Trade, Environment and the Role of NGOs, 4Journal of World Intellectual Property 281 (No. 4, March 2001).
94. Roessler, Frieder, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).
95. Shoyer, Andrew W., Panel Selection in WTO Proceedings, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 203 (No. 1, March 2003).
96. Thomas, J. C., The Need for Due Process in WTO Proceedings, 31 Journal of World Trade 45 (No. 1, February 1997).
97. Trachtman, Joel P., The Domain of WTO Dispute Settlement, 40 Harvard International Law Journal 333 (Spring, 1999).
98. Valles, Cherise M. & McGivern, Brendan P., The Right to Retaliate under the WTO Agreement: The “Sequencing” Problem, 34 Journal of World Trade 63 (No. 2, 2000).
99. Wasescha, Luzius, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003).
100. Weiler, J. H. H., The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement, 35 Journal of World Trade 191 (No. 2, April 2001).
101. Zonnekeyn, Geert A., The Appellate Body’s Communication on Amicus Curiae Briefs in the Asbestos Case, 35 Journal of World Trade 553 (No. 3, June 2001).