Nondiscrimination in GATT/WTO: Was there anything to begin with and is there anything left?

World Trade Review

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 69-95

  Srinivasan, T N ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85019497084     PISSN: 14747456     EISSN: 14753138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1474745605002144     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bagwell, Kyle and Robert W. Staiger (2002), The Economics of the World Trading System, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bhagwati, Jagdish and Robert Hudec (1996), Fair Trade and Harmonization, Vols I and II, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Bronckers, Marco and Natalie McNelius (2000), ‘Rethinking the ‘Like Product’ Definition in GATT 1994: Anti-Dumping and Environmental Protection’, in Cottier and Mavroidis 2000.
4. Caplin, Andrew and Kala Krishna (1988), ‘Tariffs and the Most-Favored-Nation Clause: A Game-Theoretic Approach’, Seoul Journal of Economics, 1: 267–289.
5. Coneybeare, John A. C. (1987), Trade Wars: The Theory and Practice of International Commercial Rivalry, New York: Columbia University Press.
6. Cottier, Thomas and Petros C. Mavroidis (2000), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7. Ethier, Wilfred J. (2002), ‘Unilateralism in a Multilateral World’, The Economic Journal, 112(179): 266–292.
8. Ethier, Wilfred J. (2004), ‘Political Externalities, Nondiscrimination, and a Multilateral World’, Review of International Economics, 12(3): 303–320.
9. GATT (1994), The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts, Geneva: GATT Secretariat.
10. Grandmont, Jean-Michel and Daniel McFadden (1972), ‘A Technical Note on Classical Gains from Trade’, Journal of International Economics, 2(2): 109–125.
11. Hoekman, Bernard (2004), ‘Overcoming Discrimination Against Developing Countries: Access, Rules and Differential Treatment’, Paper presented at the conference ‘Role of the WTO System in the World Economy’, Cornell Law School and Cordell Hull Institute, 9–10 July 2004, Paris.
12. Hoekman, Bernard, Constantine Michalopoulos, and L. Alan Winters (2004), ‘Special and Differential Treatment of Developing Countries in the WTO: Moving Forward After Cancún’, World Economy, 27(4): 481–506.
13. Horn, Henrik and Petros Mavroidis (2001), ‘Economic and Legal Aspects of the Most-Favored-Nation Clause’, European Journal of Political Economy, 17: 233–279.
14. Horn, Henrik and Petros Mavroidis (2004), ‘Still Hazy After All These Years: The Interpretation of National Treatment in the GATT/WTO Case Law on Tax Discrimination’, European Journal of International Law, 15(1): 39–69.
15. Hudec, Robert (1988), ‘Tiger, Tiger in the House: A Critical Appraisal of the Case Against Discriminatory Trade Measures’, The New GATT Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Legal and Economic Problems, Boston: Kluwer.
16. Hudec, Robert (1999a), Essays on the Nature of International Trade Law, London: Cameron May.
17. Hudec, Robert (1999b), ‘The New WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure: An Overview of the First Three Years’, Minnesota Journal of Global Trade, 8(1): 34–56.
18. Hudec, Robert (2000), ‘ “Like Product”: The Differences in Meaning in GATT Articles I and III’, in Cottier and Mavroidis 2000.
19. Keck, Alexander and Patrick Low (2004), ‘Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO: Why, When and How?’, Staff Working Paper ERSD-2004–03. World Trade Organization, Washington, DC.
20. League of Nations (1932), ‘Procedure for the Friendly Settlement of Economic Disputes between States’ (Official No. C.57.M.32.1932.Il.B), at 4.
21. Mattoo, Aaditya (2000), ‘MFN and the GATS’, in Cottier and Mavroidis 2000.
22. Neven, Damien J. (2000), ‘The Economic Evaluation of Protection Under Art III: Some Principles and Suggestions for the Definition of a Trade Relevant Market’, in Cottier and Mavroidis 2000.
23. Srinivasan, T.N. (1998), Developing Countries and the Multilateral Trading System: From the GATT to the Uruguay Round and the Future, Boulder, CO: Westview.
24. US Department of State (1948), ‘Suggested Charter for an International Trade Organization of the United Nations’, Article 76; reprinted in US Department of State Publication 2598, Commercial Policy Series 93, United States Department of State, Washington, DC.
25. WTO (2004), ‘Annual Report 2004’, http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/annual_report_e.htm, Accessed October 12, 2004.
26. WTO (1995), Regionalism and the World Trading System, Geneva: World Trade Organization.