Editorial: Learning design, teacher inquiry into student learning and learning analytics: A call for action

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 221-229

  Mor, Yishay ^a   Ferguson, Rebecca ^b   Wasson, Barbara ^c  

^a Open University ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY;

CAPACITY BUILDING; EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES; EFFECTIVE LEARNING; LEARNING DESIGNS; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; SEMANTIC STRUCTURES; STUDENT LEARNING;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84925357437     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12273     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abdous, M., He, W., &, Yen, C.-J., (2012). Using data mining for predicting relationships between online question theme and final grade. Educational Technology & Society, 15, 3, 77-88.
2. Arnold, K. E., &, Pistilli, M., (2012). Course signals at Purdue: using learning analytics to increase student success. Paper presented at the LAK12: 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (30 April-2 May), Vancouver, Canada.
3. Avramides, K., Hunter, J., Oliver, M., &, Luckin, R., (2014). A method for teacher inquiry in cross-curricular projects: lessons from a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 2, 249-264.
4. Bannan-Ritland, B., (2008). Teacher design research: an emerging paradigm for teachers' professional development. In, R. Lesh, A. Kelly, &, J. Baek, (Eds), Handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 246-262). New York: Routledge.
5. Beetham, H., &, Sharpe, R., (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: designing for 21st-century learning. London: Routledge.
6. Buckingham Shum, S., &, Ferguson, R., (2012). Social learning analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15, 3, 3-26.
7. Clark, W., Luckin, R., &, Jewitt, C., (2011). NEXT-TELL research report D5.1: methods and specifications for TISL components V1. NEXT-TELL Consortium, European Commission IST-285114.
8. Clarke, A., &, Erickson, G. L., (2003). Teacher inquiry: a defining feature of professional practice. In, A. Clarke, &, G. Erickson, (Eds), Teacher inquiry: living the research in everyday practice (pp. 1-6). London: Psychology Press.
9. Cochran-Smith, M., &, Lytle, S. L., (1999). The teacher research movement: a decade later. Educational Researcher, 28, 15-25.
10. Craft, B., &, Mor, Y., (2012). Learning Design: mapping the landscape. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 85-94.
11. Cross, N., (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17, 3, 49-55.
12. Dalziel, J., Conole, G., Wills, S., Walker, S., Bennett, S., Dobozy, E., et al. (2013). The larnaca declaration on learning design-2013. Retrieved January 1, 2015, from http://www.larnacadeclaration.org.
13. Dietz-Uhler, B., &, Hurn, J. E., (2013). Using learning analytics to predict (and improve) student success: a faculty perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 12, 1, 17-26.
14. Emin-Martínez, V., Hansen, C., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Wasson, B., Mor, Y., Dascalu, M., Ferguson, R., &, Pernin, J.-P., (2014). Towards teacher-led design inquiry of learning. eLearning Papers. Accessed March 6, 2015, from http://openeducationeuropa.eu/en/article/Towards-Teacher-led-Design-Inquiry-of-Learning?paper=134810.
15. Ferguson, R., (2012). Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning (IJTEL), 4, 5/6, 304-317.
16. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., &, Archer, W., (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 2, 87-105.
17. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., &, Archer, W., (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: a retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 1, 5-9.
18. Ghislandi, P., &, Raffaghelli, J., (2015). Forward-oriented designing for learning as a means to achieve educational quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 2, 280-299.
19. Guo, P. J., Kim, J., &, Rubin, R., (2014). How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos. Paper presented at the Learning@Scale Conference.
20. Haya, P., Daems, O., Malzahn, N., Castellanos, J., &, Hoppe, H., (2015). Analysing content and patterns of interaction for improving the learning design of networked learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 2, 300-316.
21. Holmberg, J., (2014). Studying the process of educational design-revisiting Schön and making a case for reflective design-based research on teachers' 'conversations with situations'. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23, 3, 293-310.
22. Kali, Y., McKenney, S., &, Sagy, O., (2012). Teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning. Instructional Science, 1-7.
23. Kim, J., Guo, P. J., Seaton, D. T., Mitros, P., Gajos, K. Z., &, Miller, R. C., (2014). Understanding in-video dropouts and interaction peaks in online lecture videos. Paper presented at the Learning@Scale conference.
24. Latour, B., (2008). A cautious Prometheus? A few steps toward a philosophy of design (with special attention to Peter Sloterdijk). Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2008 Annual International Conference of the Design History Society.
25. Laurillard, D., (2013). Teaching as a design science: building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York / Oxon: Routledge.
26. Long, P., &, Siemens, G., (2011). Penetrating the fog: analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46, 5, 31-40.
27. Lytle, S., &, Cochran-Smith, M., (1990). Learning from teacher research: a working typology. The Teachers College Record, 92, 1, 83-103.
28. McKenney, S., &, Mor, Y., (2015). Supporting teachers in data-informed educational design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 2, 265-279.
29. Melero, J., Hernández-Leo, D., Sun, J., Santos, P., &, Blat, J., (2015). How was the activity? A visualization support for a case of location-based learning design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 2, 317-329.
30. Mor, Y., &, Mogilevsky, O., (2013). The learning design studio: collaborative design inquiry as teachers' professional development. Research in Learning Technology, 21. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.22054
31. Mor, Y., &, Winters, N., (2007). Design approaches in technology-enhanced learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 15, 1, 61-75.
32. Persico, D., &, Pozzi, F., (2014). Informing learning design with learning analytics to improve teacher inquiry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 2, 230-248.
33. Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Martínez-Monés, A., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., &, Dimitriadis, Y., (2014). Scripting and monitoring meet each other: aligning learning analytics and learning design to support teachers in orchestrating CSCL situations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 2, 330-343.
34. Schön, D. A., (1992a). Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Research in Engineering Design, 3, 3, 131-147.
35. Schön, D. A., (1992b). The theory of inquiry: Dewey's legacy to education. Curriculum Inquiry, 22, 2, 119-139.
36. Simon, H. A., (1996). The sciences of the artificial Vol. 136. Boston: MIT Press.
37. Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., &, Fung, I., (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington: New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
38. Voogt, J., Westbroek, H., Handelzalts, A., Walraven, A., McKenney, S., Pieters, J., et al (2011). Teacher learning in collaborative curriculum design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 8, 1235-1244.