A method for teacher inquiry in cross-curricular projects: Lessons from a case study

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 249-264

  Avramides, Katerina ^a   Hunter, Jade ^a   Oliver, Martin ^a   Luckin, Rosemary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOLMIUM COMPOUNDS;

ANALYTICS TOOLS; EVIDENCE-BASED; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; LEARNING DESIGNS; SCIENCE , TECHNOLOGY , ENGINEERING AND MATHEMATICS; SECONDARY SCHOOLS; TEACHING PRACTICES; TOP-DOWN PROCESS;

STEM (SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING AND MATHEMATICS);

EID: 84925368056     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12233     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ali, L., Hatala, M., Gaševic, D., &, Jovanovic, J., (2012). A qualitative evaluation of evolution of a learning analytics tool. Computers & Education, 58, 1, 470-489.
2. Arnold, K. E., &, Pistilli, M. D., (2012). Course signals at Purdue: using learning analytics to increase student success. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 267-270). ACM.
3. Banks, F., Leach, J., &, Moon, B., (1999). New understandings of teachers' pedagogic knowledge. In, J. Leach, &, B. Moon, (Eds), Learners and pedagogy (pp. 89-110). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
4. Bannan-Ritland, B., (2008). Teacher Design Research. An emerging paradigm for teachers' professional development. In, A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, &, J. Y. Baek, (Eds), Handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 246-262). New York: Routledge.
5. Bennett, K. R., &, Cunningham, A. C., (2009). Teaching formative assessment strategies to preservice teachers: exploring the use of handheld computing to facilitate the action research process. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25, 99-105.
6. BERA (2011). Ethical guidelines for educational research. London: BERA (British Educational Research Association). ISBN: 978-0-946671-32-8.
7. Bull, S., &, Kay, J., (2007). Student models that invite the learner in: the SMILI open learner modelling framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17, 89-120.
8. Clark, W., &, Luckin, R., (2013). London Knowledge Lab Innovations report on "iPads in the Classroom" [WWW document]. Retrieved May 2014, from https://www.lkldev.ioe.ac.uk/lklinnovation/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/2013-iPads-in-the-Classroom-v2.pdf.
9. Clow, D., (2012). The learning analytics cycle: closing the loop effectively. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 134-138). ACM.
10. Dyckhoff, A. L., Lukarov, V., Muslim, A., Chatti, M. A., &, Schroeder, U., (2013). Supporting action research with learning analytics. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 220-229). ACM.
11. Ferguson, R., (2012). Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4, 5/6, 304-317.
12. Giles, C., &, Hargreaves, A., (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 1, 124-156.
13. Grossman, P. L., Wineburg, S., &, Woolworth, S., (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 6, 942-1012.
14. Hargreaves, D., (1999). The knowledge-creating school. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47, 2, 122-144.
15. van Harmelen, M., &, Workman, D., (2012). Analytics for learning and teaching. CETIS Analytics Series, 1, 3.
16. Harris, A., (2003). Distributed leadership in schools: leading or misleading? Management in Education, 16, 5, 10-13.
17. Ingram, D., Seashore Louis, K., &, Schroeder, R., (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: barriers to the use of data to improve practice. The Teachers College Record, 106, 6, 1258-1287.
18. Leithwood, K. A., &, Riehl, C., (2003). What we know about successful school leadership (pp. 1-14). Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
19. Mandinach, E., &, Gummer, E. S., (2013). A systematic view of implementing data literacy in educator preparation. Educational Researcher, 42, 1, 30-37.
20. Means, B., Chen, E., DeBarger, A., &, Padilla, C., (2011). Teachers' ability to use data to inform instruction: challenges and supports. Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, US Department of Education.
21. Nelson, T., &, Slavit, D., (2008). Supported teacher collaborative inquiry. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35, 1, 99-116.
22. Priestley, M., Miller, K., Barrett, L., &, Wallace, C., (2011). Teacher learning communities and educational change in Scotland: the Highland experience. British Educational Research Journal, 37, 2, 265-284.
23. Rich, P., &, Hannafin, M., (2008). Capturing and assessing evidence of student teacher inquiry: a case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 6, 1426-1440.
24. Scueuermann, F., &, Pedro, F., (2010). Assessing the effects of ICT in education. Luxembourg: OECD.
25. Spillane, J. P., (2012). Distributed leadership Vol. 4. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
26. Strauss, A., &, Corbin, J., (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
27. Thorpe, M., (2009). Technology mediated learning contexts. In, R. Edwards, G. Biesta, &, M. Thorpe, (Eds), Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching (pp. 119-132). London UK: Routledge.
28. Vatrapu, R., Teplovs, C., Fujita, N., &, Bull, S., (2011). Towards visual analytics for teachers' dynamic diagnostic pedagogical decision-making. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 93-98). ACM.