Analysing content and patterns of interaction for improving the learning design of networked learning environments

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 300-316

  Haya, Pablo A ^a   Daems, Oliver ^b   Malzahn, Nils ^b   Castellanos, Jorge ^c   Hoppe, Heinz Ulrich ^d  

^a Instituto de Ingeniería Del Conocimiento   (Spain)

^b Rhein Ruhr Institut für Angewandte Systeminnovation RIAS   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEARNING SYSTEMS; TEACHING;

CONTENT ANALYSIS; LEARNING ANALYTICS; LEARNING DESIGNS; LEARNING PROCESS; LEVELS OF ANALYSIS; NETWORKED LEARNING; SOCIAL LEARNING; STUDENT LEARNING;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 84925371637     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12264     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Asensio, M., &, Young, C., (2002). A learning and teaching perspective. In, S. Thornhill, M. Asensio, &, C. Young, (Eds), Click and go video. Video streaming-a guide for educational development (pp. 10-19). The JISC click and go video project. Retrieved February 06, 2015, from http://www.media-and-learning.eu/resource/video-streaming-a-guide-for-educational-development
2. Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., &, Geva, A., (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 3, 1-23.
3. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., &, Labianca, G., (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323, 5916, 892-895. doi: 10.1126/science.1165821.
4. Burn, A., (2002). Making moving images with digital media. Moving image in the classroom. A secondary teachers' guide to using film & television (pp. 41-43). London: British Film Institute.
5. Carley, K. M., &, Columbus, D., (2012). Basic Lessons in ORA and AutoMap 2012. Report No. CMU-ISR-12-107, Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research.
6. Chen, Z., &, Watanabe, S., (2007). A case study of applying SNA to analyze CSCL social network. In, J. M. Spector, D. G. Sampson, T. Okamoto, Kinshuk, S. A. Cerri, M. Ueno, A. Kashihara, (Eds), Seventh IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies, (ICALT 2007), Niigata, Japan (pp. 18-20). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2007.3.
7. Cho, H., Stefanone, M., &, Gay, G., (2002). Social information sharing in a CSCL community. In, G. Stahl, (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community (pp. 43-50). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
8. Clark, W., Luckin, R., &, Jewitt, C., (2011). Methods and Specifications for TISL Components V1, NEXT-TELL Consortium, EU.
9. Daly, A. J., (2010). Social network theory and educational change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
10. Dana, N. F., &, Yendol-Hoppey, D., (2008). The reflective educator's guide to classroom research: learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
11. Dawson, K., (2006). Teacher inquiry: a vehicle to merge prospective teachers' experience and reflection during curriculum-based, technology-enhanced field experiences. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 3, 265-292.
12. Duffy, T. M., &, Cunningham, D. J., (1996). Constructivism: implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In, D. H. Jonassen, (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170-198). New York: Simon & Shuster Macmillan.
13. Ferguson, R., &, Shum, S. B., (2012). Social learning analytics: five approaches. In, S. B. Shum, D. Gasevic, &, R. Ferguson, (Eds), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Vancouver, BC, Canada (pp. 23-33). New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2330601.2330616.
14. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., &, Archer, W., (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 2, 87-105.
15. Gartner, A., Kohler, M. C., &, Riessman, F., (1971). Children teach children: learning by teaching. New York City: Harper & Row.
16. Göhnert, T., Ziebarth, S., Malzahn, N., &, Hoppe, H. U., (2014). Enriching (learning) community platforms with learning analytics components. In, G. Zurita, F. Burstein, F. Santoro, H. Ogata, &, N. Baloian, (Eds), Lecture notes in computer science: vol. 8658, collaboration and technology (pp. 177-184). Springer Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrect, London: Springer International Publishing.
17. Hansen, C., Emin, V., Wasson, B., Mor, Y., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Dascalu, M., et al (2013). Towards an integrated model of teacher inquiry into student learning, learning design and learning analytics. In, D. Hernández-Leo, T. Ley, R. Klamma, &, A. Harrer, (Eds), Lecture notes in computer science: vol. 8095. scaling up learning for sustained impact (pp. 605-606). Berlin, Germany: Springer Berlin-Heidelberg.
18. Harrer, A., (2006). An approach to organize re-usability of learning designs and collaboration scripts of various granularities. In, Kinshuk, et al (Eds), The 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Kerkrade, The Netherlands (pp. 164-168). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
19. Harrer, A., &, Hoppe, U., (2008). Visual modelling of collaborative learning processes-uses, desired properties, and approaches. In, L. Botturi, &, T. Stubbs, (Eds), Handbook of visual languages for instructional design: theory and practices (pp. 280-297). Hershey, PA: Information Science.
20. Haythornthwaite, C., (2001). Exploring multiplexity: social network structures in a computer-supported distance learning class. The Information Society, 17, 3, 211-226.
21. Heo, H., Lim, K. Y., &, Kim, Y., (2010). Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning. Computers & Education, 55, 3, 1383-1392.
22. Hernández-Leo, D., (2007). A pattern-based design process for the creation of CSCL macro-scripts computationally represented with IMS LD (Doctoral dissertation, University of Valladolid, Spain).
23. Hoppe, H. U., Erkens, M., Cloughs, G., Daems, O., &, Adams, A., (2013). Using network text analysis to characterise teachers and students conceptualisations in science domains. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Teaching Analytics (IWTA-2103), Leuven, Belgium. CEUR (985). Retrieved February 06, 2015, from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-985/paper7.pdf.
24. Janneck, M., &, Janneck, M., (2012). Gruppen und Gruppenarbeit. In, J. M. Haake, G. Schwabe, &, M. Wessner, (Eds), CSCL Kompendium 2.0 (2nd ed., pp. 57-68). München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.
25. Jimoyiannis, A., &, Angelaina, S., (2012). Towards an analysis framework for investigating students' engagement and learning in educational blogs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 3, 222-234.
26. Jonassen, D. H., (1995). Supporting communities of learners with technology: a vision for integrating technology with learning in schools. Educational Technology, 35, 4, 60-63.
27. Jonassen, D. H., (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28. Lambropoulos, N., Faulkner, X., &, Culwin, F., (2012). Supporting social awareness in collaborative e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 2, 295-306. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01184.x.
29. Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., &, Hakkarainen, K., (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students' computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 5, 487-509.
30. Malzahn, N., Pokrandt, M., &, Hoppe, H. U., (2008). Extending a learning design editor with a monitoring component. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2008). Taipei, Taiwan (pp. 499-504).
31. Martínez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gõmez, E., &, de la Fuente, P., (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers & Education, 41, 4, 353-368. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.06.001.
32. Meier, A., Spada, H., &, Rummel, N., (2007). A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 2, 63-68.
33. Meyer, J., &, Land, R., (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. UK: University of Edinburgh.
34. Mor, Y., &, Craft, B., (2012). Learning design: reflections upon the current landscape. Research in Learning Technology, 20. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19196.
35. Nurmela, K., Lehtinen, E., &, Palonen, T., (1999). Evaluating CSCL log files by social network analysis. In, C. M. Hoadley, &, J. Roschelle, (Eds), Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL '99). Stanford, CA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
36. Papert, S., &, Harel, I., (1991). Situating constructionism. Constructionism, 36, 1-11.
37. Reffay, C., &, Chanier, T., (2003). How social network analysis can help to measure cohesion in collaborative distance-learning. In Proceeding of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning conference (CSCL'2003), pp. 343-352. Bergen, Norway: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
38. Reid, M., Burn, A., &, Parker, D., (2002). Evaluation report of the BECTa digital video pilot project. London: British Film Institute.
39. Rich, P., &, Hannafin, M., (2008). Capturing and assessing evidence of student teacher inquiry: a case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 6, 1426-1440. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2007.11.016.
40. Ritchie, G. V., (2006). Teacher research as a habit of mind (Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University, Virginia, U.S).
41. Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Martínez-Monés, A., &, Ignacio, J., (2012). Script-aware monitoring model: using teachers' pedagogical intentions to guide learning analytics. In Towards Theory and Practice of Teaching Analytics (TAPTA) Workshop, EC-TEL (Vol. 12).
42. Salomon, G., &, Leigh, T., (1984). Predispositions about Learning from, Print and Television. Journal of Communication, 34, 2, 119-135.
43. Shea, P., Hayes, S., Uzuner-Smith, S., Gozza-Cohen, M., Vickers, J., &, Bidjerano, T., (2014). Reconceptualizing the community of inquiry framework: exploratory and confirmatory analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 9-17.
44. Siemens, G., &, Long, P., (2011). Penetrating the fog: analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 46, 5, 30-32.
45. Vahtivuori, S., Ruokamo, H., Tella, S., &, Tuovinen, H., (2002). Pedagogical models in the design and assessment of network-based education. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2002, 1, 1676-1681.
46. Vaquero, L. M., &, Cebrian, M., (2013). The rich club phenomenon in the classroom. Scientific Reports, 3, 1174. doi: 10.1038/srep01174.
47. Wasserman, S., &, Faust, K., (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.