Forward-oriented designing for learning as a means to achieve educational quality

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 280-299

  Ghislandi, Patrizia M M ^a   Raffaghelli, Juliana E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; ITERATIVE METHODS; JOB ANALYSIS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; STUDENTS;

ACADEMIC STAFF; DAILY ACTIVITY; DESIGN FOR CONFIGURATIONS; EDUCATIONAL QUALITIES; IS DESIGN; METALEARNING; UNIVERSITY COURSE; WORK DESIGN;

DESIGN;

EID: 84925443198     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12257     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Agostinho, S., (2011). The use of a visual learning design representation to support the design process of teaching in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 6, 961-978.
2. Agostinho, S., Harper, B., Oliver, R., Hedberg, J., &, Wills, S., (2008). A visual learning design representation to facilitate dissemination and reuse of innovative pedagogical strategies in university teaching. In, L. Botturi, &, T. Stubbs, (Eds), Handbook of visual languages for instructional design: theories and practices (pp. 380-393). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference (IGI Global).
3. Agostinho, S., Bennett, S., Lockyer, L., &, Harper, H., (2013a). The future of learning design (p. 128). London: Routledge.
4. Agostinho, S., Bennett, S., Lockyer, L., Jones, J., &, Harper, B., (2013b). Learning design as stimulus and support for teachers' design practices. In, H. Beetham, &, R. Sharpe, (Eds), Rethinking pedagogy for the digital age, designing for the 21st century (2nd ed., pp. 119-132). London: Routledge.
5. Anderson, T., &, Shattuck, J., (2012). Design-based research: a decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41, 1, 16-25. doi: 10.3102/0013189X11428813.
6. Auvinen, A., &, Ehlers, U.-D., (2007). Handbook of quality management of peer production (p. 83). Brussels.
7. Botturi, L., (2006). E2ML: a visual language for the design of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54, 3, 265-293. doi: 10.1007/s11423-006-8807-x.
8. Castro, F., Vellido, A., Nebot, À., &, Mugica, F., (2007). Applying data mining techniques to e-learning problems. In, L. C. Jain, R. A. Tedman, &, D. K. Tedman, (Eds), Evolution of teaching and learning paradigms in intelligent environment (pp. 183-221). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
9. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., &, Schauble, L., (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 1, 9-13. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001009.
10. Collins, A., Joseph, D., &, Bielaczyc, K., (2004). Design research: theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 1, 15-42.
11. Conole, G., (2010). Learning design-making practice explicit. In, F. Graham, (Ed.), Proceedings of ConnectED2010 International Conference on Design Education (pp. 1-28). Sydney: The University of New South Wales (UNSW).
12. Conole, G., (2012). Designing for Learning in an Open World.
13. Cross, N., (2007). Designerly ways of knowing (Google eBook) (p. 138). London: Springer-Verlag.
14. Curtis, W., Murphy, M., &, Shields, S., (2013). Research and education (p. 240). New York: Routledge.
15. Dana, N. F., &, Yendol-Hoppey, D., (2008). The reflective educator's guide to classroom research: learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry (p. 216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
16. Dimitriadis, Y., &, Goodyear, P., (2013). Forward-oriented design for learning: illustrating the approach. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1-13. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v21i0.20290.
17. EFQUEL European Foundation for the Quality in e-Learning (2006). Learners as active stakeholders of eLearning quality (pp. 1-5).
18. Ehlers, U. D., (2007). Quality literacy-competencies for quality development in education and e-learning. Educational Technology and Society, 10, 2, 96-108.
19. Ehlers, U. D., (2009). Understanding quality culture. Quality Assurance in Education, 17, 4, 343-363. doi: 10.1108/09684880910992322.
20. Ehlers, U. D., &, Schneckenberg, D., (2010). Changing cultures in higher education: moving ahead to future learning (p. 568). Berlin: Springer.
21. Ehlers, U. D., Helmstedt, C., &, Bijnens, M., (2011). Shared Evaluation of Quality in Technology-enhanced Learning. White Paper developed in the Framework of the SEVAQ+ Project, 25.
22. Ferguson, R., (2012). Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4, 5/6, 304-317.
23. Ghislandi, P., &, Raffaghelli, J. E., (2012). Implementing quality e-learning in higher education: change efforts, tensions and contradictions. In, L. Gõmez Chova, A. Lõpez Martínez, &, I. Candel Torres, (Eds), Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Edition of ICERI2012: 5th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (pp. 1107-1117). Barcelona: IATED. ISBN 978-84-616-0763-1. 19-21 November 2012.
24. Ghislandi, P., Pedroni, A., Pellegrini, A., &, Franceschini, D., (2008). eLearning e qualità. Il Giornale dell'eLearning, 2, 3.
25. Ghislandi, P., Raffaghelli, J. E., &, Yang, N., (2013). Mediated quality. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 4, 1, 56-73. doi: 10.4018/jdldc.2013010106.
26. Goodyear, P., (2005). Educational design and networked learning: patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21, 1, 82-101.
27. Goodyear, P., &, Dimitriadis, Y., (2013). In medias res: reframing design for learning. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1-13. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v21i0.19909.
28. Gorard, S., Roberts, K., &, Taylor, C., (2004). What kind of creature is a design experiment? British Educational Research Journal, 30, 4, 577-590.
29. Gustafson, K. L., Branch, R. M., &, Maribe, R., (2002). Survey of instructional development models (4th ed., p. 93). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology, Syracuse University.
30. Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., &, Wilson, B. G., (1999). Learning with technology: a constructivist perspective. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.
31. Kali, Y., Levin-Peled, R., &, Dori, Y. J., (2009). The role of design-principles in designing courses that promote collaborative learning in higher-education. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 5, 1067-1078.
32. Kelly, A. E., (2003). Theme issue: the role of design in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 1, 3-4. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001003.
33. Koper, R., (2006). Current research in learning design. Educational Technology & Society, 9, 1, 13-22.
34. Laurillard, D., (2012). Teaching as a design science: building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. London: Routledge.
35. Lincoln, Y., Lynham, S., &, Guba, N., (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In, N. K. Denzin, &, Y. S. Lincoln, (Eds), The sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 97-128). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
36. McAleese, M., (2013). Report to the European Commission on improving the quality of teaching and learning in Europe's higher education institutions (p. 84). Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. ISBN 978-92-79-30360-9, doi 10.2766/42468
37. Middleton, J., Gorard, S., Taylor, C., &, Bannan-Ritland, B., (2006). The "Compleat" design experiment: from soup to nuts (p. 39). In, A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, &, J. Y. Baek, (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Moore, J. C., (2005). The sloan consortium quality framework and the five pillars (p. 9). Needham, MA: Sloan-C.
39. Mor, Y., (2011). Design narratives: an intuitive scientific form for capturing design knowledge in education. In, Y. Eshet-Alkalai, A. Caspi, S. Eden, N. Geri, &, Y. Yair, (Eds.), Learning in the technological era: Proceedings of the sixth Chais conference on instructional technologies research 2011 (pp. 57-63). Raanana: The Open University of Israel.
40. Mor, Y., &, Craft, B., (2012). Learning design: reflections upon the current landscape. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 85-94. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19196.
41. Mor, Y., &, Noss, R., (2008). Programming as mathematical narrative. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 18, 2, 214-233. doi: 10.1504/IJCEELL.2008.017377.
42. Mor, Y., &, Winters, N., (2007). Design approaches in technology-enhanced learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 15, 1, 61-75. doi: 10.1080/10494820601044236.
43. Mor, Y., Craft, B., &, Hernández-Leo, D., (2013). The art and science of learning design. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1-8. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v21i0.22513.
44. Oliver, R., Harper, B., Wills, S., Agostinho, S., &, Hedberg, J., (2013). Describing ICT-based learning designs that promote quality learning outcomes. In, H. Beetham, &, R. Sharpe, (Eds), Rethinking pedagogy for the digital age, designing for the 21st century (2nd ed., pp. 64-80). London: Routledge.
45. Persico, D. G., (2013). Learning Design research: where are we going? TD Tecnologie Didattiche, 21, 1, 58-60.
46. Persico, D. G., &, Pozzi, F., (2013). Participatory culture in Learning Design. In, D. G. Persico, &, V. Midoro, (Eds), Pedagogia nell'era digitale (pp. 134-141). Genoa, Italy: Menabò.
47. Pérez-Mateo, M., Maina, M. F., Guitert, M., Romero, M., (2012). Learner Generated Content: quality criteria in online collaborative learning, EURODOL-European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning, http://www.eurodl.org/?p=special&sp=articles&article=459
48. Reiser, R. A., (2000). A history of instructional design and technology: part II: a history of instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 2, 57-67.
49. Simon, H. A., (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
50. Vygotskij, L., (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Vygotskij, L., (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Oxford: Harvard University Press.
52. Wenger, E., (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.2277/0521663636.