Regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments through homeostatic control during mitosis

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 57-64

  Godek, Kristina M ^a,b   Kabeche, Lilian ^a,b   Compton, Duane A ^a,b  

^a DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b NORRIS COTTON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AURORA A KINASE; AURORA B KINASE; CYCLIN A; CYCLIN B; CYCLIN C; CYCLIN D; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE;

CANCER CELL; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GENOME; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMAN; KINETOCHORE MICROTUBULE; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; NUCLEAR DIVISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ANIMAL; GENETICS; METABOLISM; NEOPLASM; PATHOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84925286731     PISSN: 14710072     EISSN: 14710080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrm3916     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Cimini, D. & Degrassi, F. Aneuploidy: a matter of bad connections. Trends Cell Biol. 15, 442-451 (2001
2. Cimini, D. Merotelic kinetochore orientation, aneuploidy, and cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1786, 32-40 (2008
3. Weaver, B. A. & Cleveland, D. W. Aneuploidy: instigator and inhibitor of tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 67, 10103-10105 (2006
4. Siegel, J. J. & Amon, A. New insights into the troubles of aneuploidy. Annu. Rev. Cell Devel. Biol. 28, 189-214 (2012
5. Duijf, P. H. & Benezra, R. The cancer biology of whole-chromosome instability. Oncogene 32, 4727-4736 (2013
6. Cheeseman, I. The kinetochore. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 6, a015826 (2014
7. Cimini, D., Moree, B., Canman, J. C. & Salmon, E. D. Merotelic kinetochore orientation occurs frequently during early mitosis in mammalian tissue cells and error correction is achieved by two different mechanisms. J. Cell Sci. 116, 4213-4225 (2003
8. Salmon, E. D., Cimini, D., Cameron, L. A. & DeLuca, J. G. Merotelic kinetochores in mammalian tissue cells. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 360, 553-568 (2005
9. Rieder, C. L. The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber. Int. Rev. Cytol. 79, 1-58 (1982
10. Magidson, V., et al. The spatial arrangement of chromosomes during prometaphase facilitates spindle assembly. Cell 146, 555-567 (2011
11. Maure, J. F., et al. The Ndc80 looop region facilitates formation of kinetochore attachment to the dynamic microtubule plus end. Curr. Biol. 21, 207-213 (2011
12. Shrestha, R. L. & Draviam, V. M. Lateral to end on conversion of chromosome-microtubule attachment requires kinesins CENP E and MCAK. Curr. Biol. 23, 1514-1526 (2013
13. Cai, S., O'Connell, C. B., Khodjakov, A. & Walczak, C. E. Chromosome congression in the absence of kinetochore fibers. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 832-838 (2009
14. Tanaka, K., et al. Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules. Nature 434, 987-994 (2005
15. Maiato, H., DeLuca, J., Salmon, E. D. & Earnshaw, W. C. The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface. J. Cell Sci. 117, 5461-5477 (2004
16. Nicklas, R. B. & Ward, S. C. Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension. J. Cell Biol. 126, 1241-1253 (1994
17. Li, S. & Nicklas, R. B. Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature 373, 630-632 (1995
18. Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W. & Vogelstein, B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature 396, 643-649 (1998
19. Thompson, S. L. & Compton, D. A. Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 180, 665-672 (2008
20. Thompson, S. L., Bakhoum, S. F. & Compton, D. A. Mechanisms of chromosomal instability. Curr. Biol. 20, R285-R295 (2010
21. Zhai, Y., Kronebusch, P. J. & Borisy, G. G. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and the metaphase-Anaphase transition. J. Cell Biol. 131, 721-734 (1995
22. Bakhoum, S. F., Genovese, G. & Compton, D. A. Deviant kinetochore microtubule dynamics underlie chromosomal instability. Curr. Biol. 19, 1937-1942 (2009
23. Bakhoum, S. F., Thompson, S. L., Manning, A. L. & Compton, D. A. Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 27-35 (2009
24. Kabeche, L. & Compton, D. A. Cyclin A regulates kinetochore microtubules to promote faithful chromosome segregation. Nature 502, 110-113 (2013
25. Stolz, A., et al. The CHIF2 BRCA1 tumor suppressor pathway ensures chromosomal stability in human somatic cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 492-499 (2010
26. Bakhoum, S. F., Danilova, O. V., Kaur, P., Levy, N. B. & Compton, D. A. Chromosomal instability substantiates poor prognosis in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 7704-7711 (2011
27. Hecht, B. K., et al. Cytogenetics of malignant gliomas: I. The autosomes with reference to rearrangements. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 84, 1-8 (1995
28. Bakhoum, S. F. & Compton, D. A. Kinetochores and disease: keeping microtubule dynamics in check! Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24, 64-70 (2012
29. Carmena, M., Wheelock, M., Funabiki, H. & Earnshaw, W. C. The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC): from easy rider to the godfather of mitosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 789-803 (2012
30. Vader, G., Medema, R. H. & Lens, S. M. The chromosomal passenger complex: guiding Aurora B through mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 173, 833-837 (2006
31. Lampson, M. A. & Cheeseman, I. M. Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function. Trends Cell Biol. 21, 133-140 (2011
32. Cimini, D., Wan, X., Hirel, C. B. & Salmon, E. D. Aurora kinase promotes turnover of kinetochore microtubules to reduce chromosome segregation errors. Curr. Biol. 16, 1711-1718 (2006
33. Shannon, K. B. & Salmon, E. D. Chromosome dynamics: new light on Aurora B kinase function. Curr. Biol. 12, R458-R460 (2002
34. Liu, D., Vader, G., Vromans, M. J., Lampson, M. A. & Lens, S. M. Sensing chromosome bi orientation by spatial separation of aurora B kinase from kinetochore substrates. Science 323, 1350-1353 (2009
35. Wang, E., Ballister, E. R. & Lampson, M. A. Aurora B dynamics at centromeres create a diffusion-based phosphorylation gradient. J. Cell Biol. 194, 539-549 (2011
36. Welburn, J. P., et al. Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol. Cell 38, 383-392 (2010
37. Campbell, C. S. & Desai, A. Tension sensing by Aurora B kinase is independent of survivin-based centromere localization. Nature 497, 118-121 (2013
38. DeLuca, K. F., Lens, S. M. & DeLuca, J. G. Temporal changes in Hec1 phosphorylation control kinetochore-microtubule attachment stability during mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 124, 622-634 (2011
39. Skibbens, R. V., Skeen, V. P. & Salmon, E. D. Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 122, 859-875 (1993
40. Jaqaman, K., et al. Kinetochore alignment within the metaphase plate is regulated by centromere stiffness and microtubule depolymerases. J. Cell Biol. 188, 665-679 (2010
41. Lara-Gonzalez, P., Westhorpe, F. G. & Taylor, S. S. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 22, R966-R980 (2012
42. Bruinsma, W., Baaijmakers, J. A. & Medema, R. H. Switching Polo-like kinase 1 on and off in time and space. Trends Biochem. Sci. 37, 534-542 (2012
43. Maffini, S., et al. Motor-independent targeting of CLASPs to kinetochores by CENP E promotes microtubule turnover and poleward flux. Curr. Biol. 19, 1566-1572 (2009
44. Maia, A. R., et al. Cdk1 and Plk1 mediate a CLASP2 phospho-switch that stabilizes kinetochore-microtubule attachments. J. Cell Biol. 199, 285-301 (2012
45. Manning, A. L., Bakhoum, S. F., Maffini, S., Correia-Melo, C. Maiato, H. & Compton, D. A. CLASP1, astrin and Kif2b form a molecular switch that regulates kinetochore-microtubule dynamics to promote mitotic progression and fidelity. EMBO J. 29, 3531-3543 (2010
46. DeLuca, J G., et al. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 127, 969-982 (2006
47. Cheeseman, I. M., Chappie, J. S., Wilson Kubalek, E. M. & Desai, A. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 127, 983-997 (2006
48. Zaytsev, A. V., Sundin, L. J., DeLuca, K. F., Grishchuk, E. L. & DeLuca, J. G. Accurate phosphoregulation of kinetochore-microtubule affinity requires unconstrained molecular interactions. J. Cell Biol. 206, 45-59 (2014
49. Ahonen, L. F., et al. Polo-like kinase 1 creates the tension-sensing 3F3/2 phosphoepitope and modulates the association of spindle-checkpoint proteins at kinetochores. Curr. Biol. 15, 1078-1089 (2005
50. Lenart, P., et al. The small-molecule inhibitor BI2536 reveals novel insights into mitotic roles of polo-like kinase 1. Curr. Biol. 17, 304-315 (2007
51. Elowe, S., Hummer, S., Uldschmid, A., Li, X. & Nigg, E. A. Tension-sensitive Plk1 phosphorylation on BubR1 regulates the stability of kinetochore microtubule interactions. Genes Dev. 21, 2205-2219 (2007
52. Liu, D., Davydenko, O. & Lampson, M. A. Polo-like kinase 1 regulates kinetocohore-microtubule dynamics and spindle checkpoint silencing. J. Cell Biol. 198, 491-499 (2012
53. Lampson, M. A. & Kapoor, M. The human mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1 regulates chromosome-spindle attachments. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 93-98 (2005
54. Manning, A. L., et al. The kinesin 13 proteins Kif2a, Kif2b, and Kif2c/MCAK have distinct roles during mitosis in human cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 2970-2979 (2007
55. Hood, E. A., Kettenbach, A. N., Gerber, S. A. & Compton, D. A. Plk1 regulates the kinesin 13 protein Kif2b to promote faithful chromosome segregation. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 2264-2274 (2012
56. Carmena, M., et al. The chromosomal passenger complex activated Polo kinase at centromeres. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001250 (2012
57. Kruse, T., et al. Direct binding between BubR1 and B56 PP2A phosphatase complexes regulate mitotic progression. J. Cell Sci. 126, 1086-1092 (2013
58. Foley, E. A., Maldonado, M. & Kapoor, T. M. Formation of stable attachments between kinetochores and microtubules depends on the B56 PP2A phosphatase. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1265-1271 (2011
59. Knowlton, A. L., Lan, W. & Stukenberg, P. T. Aurora B is enriched at merotelic attachment sites, where it regulates MCAK. Curr. Biol. 16, 1705-1710 (2006
60. Chu, Y., et al. Aurora B kinase activation requires survivin priming phosphorylation by PLK1. J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 3, 260-267 (2011
61. Salimian, K. J., et al. Feedback control in sensing chromosome biorientation by the Aurora B kinase. Curr. Biol. 21, 1158-1165 (2011
62. Goto, H., et al. Complex formation of Plk1 and INCENP required for metaphase-Anaphase transition. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 180-187 (2006
63. Trinkle-Mulcahy, L., et al. Time-lapse imaging reveals dynamic relocalization of PP1? throughout the mammalian cell cycle. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 107-117 (2003
64. De Wulf, P., Montani, F. & Visintin, R. Protein phosphatases take the mitotic stage. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 806-815 (2009
65. Liu, D., et al. Regulated targeting of protein phosphatase 1 to the outer kinetochore by KNL1 opposes Aurora B kinase. J. Cell Biol. 188, 809-820 (2010
66. Parry, D. H., Hickson, G. R., O'Farrell, P. H. Cyclin B destruction triggers changes in kinetochore behavior essential for successful anaphase. Curr. Biol. 13, 647-653 (2003
67. Soni, D. V., Sramkoski, R. M., Lam, M., Stegan, T. & Jacobberger, J. W. Cyclin B1 is rate limiting but not essential for mitotic entry and progression in mammalian somatic cells. Cell Cycle 7, 1285-1300 (2008
68. Vazquez-Novelle, M. D., et al. Cdk1 inactivation terminates mitotic checkpoint surveillance and stabilizes kinetochore attachments in anaphase. Curr. Biol. 24, 638-645 (2014
69. Porter, I. M., et al. Bod1, a novel kinetochore protein required for chromosome biorientation. J. Cell Biol. 179, 187-197 (2007
70. Porter, I. M., Schleicher, K., Porter, M. & Swedlow, J. R. Bod1 regulates protein phosphatase 2A at mitotic kinetochores. Nat. Commun. 4, 2677 (2013
71. Collin, P., Nashchenkina, O., Walker, R. & Pines, J. The spindle assembly checkpoint works like a rheostat rather than a toggle switch. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 1378-1385 (2013
72. DiFiore, B. & Pines, J. How cyclin A destruction escapes the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 190, 501-509 (2010
73. den Elzen, N. & Pines, J. Cyclin A is destroyed in prometaphase and can delay chromosome alignment and anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 153, 121-136 (2001
74. Musacchio, A. & Salmon, E. D. The spindle-Assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 379-393 (2007
75. Maresca, T. J. & Salmon, E. D. Intrakinetochore stretch is associated with changes in kinetochore phosphorylation and spindle assembly checkpoint activity. J. Cell Biol. 184, 373-381 (2009
76. Uchida, K. S. K., et al. Kinetochore stretching inactivates the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 184, 383-390 (2009
77. Foley, E. A. & Kapoor, T. M. Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signaling at the kinetochore. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 25-37 (2013
78. Kettenbach, A. N., et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics identifies substrates and functional modules of Aurora and Polo-like kinase activities in mitotic cells. Sci. Signal. 4, rs5 (2011
79. Indjeian, V. B. & Murray, A. W. Budding yeast mitotic chromosomes have an intrinsic bias to biorient on the spindle. Curr. Biol. 17, 1837-1846 (2007
80. Loncarek, J., et al. The centromere geometry essential for keeping mitosis error free is controlled by spindle forces. Nature 450, 745-749 (2007
81. Salic, A., Waters, J. C. & Mitchison, T. J. Vertebrate shugoshin links sister centromere cohesion and kinetochore microtubule stability in mitosis. Cell 118, 567-578 (2004
82. Logarinho, E., Resende, T., Torres, C. & Bousbaa, H. The human spindle assembly checkpoint protein Bub3 is required for the establishment of efficient kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Mol. Biol. Cell. 19, 1798-1813 (2008
83. Kabeche, L. & Compton, D. A. Checkpoint-independent stabilization of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by Mad2 in human cells. Curr. Biol. 22, 638-644 (2012
84. Amaro, A. C., et al. Molecular control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics and chromosome oscillations. Nature Cell Biol. 12, 319-329 (2010
85. McHedlishvili, N., et al. Kinetochores accelerate centrosome separation to ensure faithful chromosome segregation. J. Cell Sci. 125, 906-918 (2012
86. Ye, F., et al. HURP regulates chromosome congression by modulating kinesin Kif18A function. Curr. Biol. 21, 1584-1591 (2011
87. Wang, X., et al. Mitotic regulator SKAP forms a link between kinetochore core complex KMN and dynamic spindle microtubules. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 39380-39390 (2012
88. DeLuca, J. G., et al. Hec1 and Nuf2 are core components of the kinetochore outer plate essential for organizing microtubule attachment sites. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16, 519-531 (2005
89. Ishii, S., Kurasawa, Y., Wong, J. & Yu Lee, L. Y. Histone deacetylase 3 localizes to the mitotic spindle and is required for kinetochore-microtubule attachment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 4179-4184 (2008
90. Gaitanos, T N., et al. Stable kinetochore-microtubule interactions depend on the Ska complex and its new component Ska3/C13Orf3. EMBO J. 28, 1442-1452 (2009