The juxtamembrane regions of human receptor tyrosine kinases exhibit conserved interaction sites with anionic lipids

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Hedger, George ^a   Sansom, Mark S P ^a   Koldsø, Heidi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; MEMBRANE LIPID; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 4,5 BISPHOSPHATE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CELL MEMBRANE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONFORMATION; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; POSITION WEIGHT MATRIX; PROTEIN DOMAIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACIDS; CELL MEMBRANE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MEMBRANE LIPIDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 4,5-DIPHOSPHATE; POSITION-SPECIFIC SCORING MATRICES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; RECEPTOR PROTEIN-TYROSINE KINASES;

EID: 84924956027     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep09198     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Lemmon, M. A. & Schlessinger, J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 141, 1117-1134 (2010).
2. Robinson, D. R., Wu, Y. M. & Lin, S. F. The protein tyrosine kinase family of the human genome. Oncogene 19, 5548-5557 (2000).
3. Manning, G.,Whyte, D. B.,Martinez, R.,Hunter, T.&Sudarsanam, S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 298, 1912-1934 (2002).
4. Ullrich, A. & Schlessinger, J. Signal transduction by receptors with tyrosine kinase activity. Cell 61, 203-212 (1990).
5. Schlessinger, J. Cell Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases. Cell 103, 211-225 (2000).
6. Gschwind, A., Fischer, O. M. & Ullrich, A. The discovery of receptor tyrosine kinases: targets for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 361-370 (2004).
7. Mendelsohn, J.&Baselga, J. The EGF receptor family as targets for cancer therapy. Oncogene 19, 6550-6565 (2000).
8. Zwick, E., Bange, J. & Ullrich, A. Receptor tyrosine kinases as targets for anticancer drugs. Trends Mol. Med. 8, 17-23 (2002).
9. Hubbard, S. R. Juxtamembrane autoinhibition in receptor tyrosine kinases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 464-471 (2004).
10. Nagy, P., Claus, J., Jovin, T. M. & Arndt-Jovin, D. J. Distribution of resting and ligand-bound ErbB1 and ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinases in living cells using number and brightness analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 107, 16524-16529 (2010).
11. Clayton, A. H. A., Tavarnesi, M. L. & Johns, T. G. Unligated epidermal growth factor receptor forms higher order oligomers within microclusters on A431 cells that are sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibitor binding. Biochemistry 46, 4589-4597 (2007).
12. Saffarian, S., Li, Y., Elson, E. L. & Pike, L. J. Oligomerization of the EGF receptor investigated by live cell fluorescence intensity distribution analysis. Biophys. J. 93, 1021-1031 (2007).
13. Coskun,Ü., Grzybek, M., Drechsel, D. & Simons, K. Regulation of human EGF receptor by lipids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 108, 9044-9048 (2011).
14. Goh, L. K. & Sorkin, A. Endocytosis of receptor tyrosine kinases. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5 (2013) doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a017459.
15. Arkhipov, A. et al. Architecture and membrane interactions of the EGF receptor. Cell 152, 557-569 (2013).
16. Arkhipov, A., Shan, Y., Kim, E. T. & Shaw, D. E. Membrane interaction of bound ligands contributes to the negative binding cooperativity of the EGF Receptor. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003742 (2014) doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003742.
17. Koland, J. G. Coarse-grained molecular simulation of epidermal growth factor receptor protein tyrosine kinase multi-site self-phosphorylation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003435 (2014) doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003435.
18. Mi, L. et al. Simultaneous visualization of the extracellular and cytoplasmic domains of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 984-989 (2011).
19. Thiel, K. W. & Carpenter, G. Epidermal growth factor receptor juxtamembrane region regulates allosteric tyrosine kinase activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 104, 19238-19243 (2007).
20. Aifa, S. et al. A basic peptide within the juxtamembrane region is required for EGF receptor dimerization. Exp. Cell Res. 302, 108-114 (2005).
21. Martín-Nieto, J. & Villalobo, A. The human epidermal growth factor receptor contains a juxtamembrane calmodulin-binding site. Biochemistry 37, 227-236 (1998).
22. Griffith, J. et al. The structural basis for autoinhibition of FLT3 by the juxtamembrane domain. Mol. Cell 13, 169-178 (2004).
23. Mol, C. D. et al. Structural basis for the autoinhibition and STI-571 inhibition of c-Kit tyrosine kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 31655-31663 (2004).
24. Till, J. H. et al. Crystal structure of the MuSK tyrosine kinase: Insights into receptor autoregulation. Structure 10, 1187-1196 (2002).
25. Wybenga-Groot, L. E. et al. Structural basis for autoinhibition of the EphB2 receptor tyrosine kinase by the unphosphorylated juxtamembrane region. Cell 106, 745-757 (2001).
26. Brewer, M. R. et al. The juxtamembrane region of the EGF receptor functions as an activation domain. Mol. Cell 34, 641-651 (2009).
27. Michailidis, I. E. et al. Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate regulates epidermal growth factor receptor activation. Pflugers Arch. 461, 387-397 (2011).
28. McLaughlin, S., Smith, S. O., Hayman, M. J. &Murray, D. An electrostatic engine model for autoinhibition and activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/ErbB) family. J. Gen. Physiol. 126, 41-53 (2005).
29. Abd Halim, K. B., Koldsø, H. & Sansom, M. S. P. Interactions of the EGFR juxtamembrane domain with PIP2-containing lipid bilayers: Insights from multiscale molecular dynamics simulations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. (2014) In Press, doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.09.006.
30. McLaughlin, S. & Murray, D. Plasma membrane phosphoinositide organization by protein electrostatics. Nature 438, 605-611 (2005).
31. Matsushita, C. et al. Transmembrane helix orientation influences membrane binding of the intracellular juxtamembrane domain in Neu receptor peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 110, 1646-1651 (2013).
32. Hilgemann, D.W., Feng, S. & Nasuhoglu, C. The complex and intriguing lives of PIP2 with ion channels and transporters. Sci. STKE. 2001, re19 (2001).
33. McLaughlin, S., Wang, J., Gambhir, A. & Murray, D. PIP2 and proteins: Interactions, organization, and information flow. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 31, 151-175 (2002).
34. Koldsø, H. & Sansom, M. S. P. Local lipid reorganization by a transmembrane protein domain. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3, 3498-3502 (2012).
35. Sharpe, H. J., Stevens, T. J. & Munro, S. A comprehensive comparison of transmembrane domains reveals organelle-specific properties. Cell 142, 158-169 (2010).
36. Bessman, N. J., Freed, D. M. & Lemmon, M. A. Putting together structures of epidermal growth factor receptors. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 29, 95-101 (2014).
37. Scott, K. A. et al. Coarse-grained MD simulations of membrane protein-bilayer self-assembly. Structure 16, 621-630 (2008).
38. Stansfeld, P. J., Hopkinson, R., Ashcroft, F. M. & Sansom, M. S. P. PIP2-binding site in Kir channels: Definition by multiscale biomolecular simulations. Biochemistry 48, 10926-10933 (2009).
39. Arnarez, C., Marrink, S. J. & Periole, X. Identification of cardiolipin binding sites on cytochrome c oxidase at the entrance of proton channels. Sci. Rep. 3, 1263 (2013).
40. Arnarez, C., Mazat, J. P., Elezgaray, J., Marrink, S. J. & Periole, X. Evidence for cardiolipin binding sites on the membrane-exposed surface of the cytochrome bc1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 3112-3120 (2013).
41. Ohkubo, Y., Pogorelov, T., Arcario, M., Christensen, G. & Tajkhorshid, E. Accelerating membrane insertion of peripheral proteins with a novel membrane mimetic model. Biophys. J. 102, 2130-2139.
42. Koldsø, H., Shorthouse, D., Hélie, J. & Sansom,M. S. P. Lipid clustering correlates with membrane curvature as revealed by molecular simulations of complex lipid bilayers. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003911 (2014) doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003911.
43. van Meer, G., Voelker, D. R. & Feigenson, G. W. Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 112-124 (2008).
44. van Meer, G. & de Kroon, A. I. P. M. Lipid map of the mammalian cell. J. Cell Sci. 124, 5-8 (2011).
45. Goose, J. E. & Sansom, M. S. P. Reduced lateral mobility of lipids and proteins in crowded membranes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003033 (2013) doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003033.
46. Hamilton, P. J. et al. PIP2 regulates psychostimulant behaviors through its interaction with a membrane protein. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 582-589 (2014).
47. van den Bogaart. et al. Membrane protein sequestering by ionic protein-lipid interactions. Nature 479, 552-555 (2011).
48. Groves, J. T. & Kuriyan, J. Molecular mechanisms in signal transduction at the membrane. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 659-665 (2010).
49. Salaita, K. et al. Restriction of receptor movement alters cellular response: Physical force sensing by EphA2. Science 327, 1380-1385 (2010).
50. Magrane, M. & Unirprot Consortium. UniProt Knowledgebase: a hub of integrated protein data. Database 2011 (2011).
51. Hofmann, K. & Stoffel, W. TMBASE-A database of membrane spanning protein segments. Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 374, 166 (1993).
52. Jones, D. T. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 292, 195-202 (1999).
53. Lin, K., Simossis, V. A., Taylor, W. R. & Heringa, J. A simple and fast secondary structure prediction method using hidden neural networks. Bioinformatics 21, 152-159 (2005).
54. Cole, C., Barber, J. D. & Barton, G. J. The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucl. Acids Res. 36, W197-W201 (2008).
55. Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van, d. S. & Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 435-447 (2008).
56. Monticelli, L. et al. The MARTINI coarse-grained force field: Extension to proteins. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 819-834 (2008).
57. Marrink, S. J., Risselada, H. J., Yefimov, S., Tieleman, D. P. & de Vries, A. H. The MARTINI force field: Coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 7812-7824 (2007).
58. Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A. & Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684-3690 (1984).
59. Hess, B. P-LINCS: A parallel linear constraint solver for molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 116-122 (2008).
60. Stansfeld, P. J. & Sansom, M. S. P. From coarse grained to atomistic: A serial multiscale approach to membrane protein simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 1157-1166 (2011).
61. Oostenbrink, C., Villa, A., Mark, A. E. & Van Gunsteren, W. F. A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: The GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1656-1676 (2004).
62. Essmann, U. et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577-8593 (1995).
63. Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126 (2007).
64. Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182-7190 (1981).
65. Levine, B. G., Stone, J. E. & Kohlmeyer, A. Fast analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories with graphics processing units - Radial distribution function histogramming. J. Comput. Phys. 230, 3556-3569 (2011).
66. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33-38 (1996).
67. Bond, C. S. & Schüttelkopf, A. W. ALINE: a WYSIWYG protein-sequence alignment editor for publication-quality alignments. Acta Cryst. 65, 510-512 (2009).
68. Crooks, G. E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J. & Brenner, S. E. WebLogo: A sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14, 1188-1190 (2004).
69. Sali, A. & Blundell, T. L. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779-815 (1993).
70. Zhang, X., Gureasko, J., Shen, K., Cole, P. A. & Kuriyan, J. An allosteric mechanism for activation of the kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor. Cell 125, 1137-1149 (2006).
71. Yun, C. et al. The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.US A105, 2070-2075 (2008).
72. Endres, N. et al. Conformational coupling across the plasma membrane in activation of the EGF receptor. Cell 152, 543-556 (2013).
73. Lu, C. et al. Structural evidence for loose linkage between ligand binding and kinase activation in the epidermal growth factor receptor. Mol. Cell Biol. 30, 5432-5443 (2010).