Development of a tandem affinity phosphoproteomic method with motif selectivity and its application in analysis of signal transduction networks

Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences

Volumn 988, Issue , 2015, Pages 166-174

  Herring, Laura E ^a   Grant, Kyle G ^b   Blackburn, Kevin ^a   Haugh, Jason M ^c   Goshe, Michael B ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Liquid chromatography; Mass spectrometry; Motif analysis; Pathway analysis; Phosphopeptide enrichment

Indexed keywords

CHROMATOGRAPHY; ENZYMES; HYDROPHILICITY; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PHOSPHORYLATION; SIGNALING;

ELECTROSTATIC REPULSION; HYDROPHILIC INTERACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY; MOTIF ANALYSIS; PATHWAY ANALYSIS; PHOSPHOINOSITIDE 3-KINASE; PHOSPHOPEPTIDE ENRICHMENT; PHOSPHORYLATION SITES; POST-TRANSLATIONAL MODIFICATIONS;

SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

PHOSPHOPEPTIDE; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; PLATELET DERIVED GROWTH FACTOR; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BASOPHIL; BIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS; CELL STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTATIC REPULSION HYDROPHILIC INTERACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY; HYDROPHILIC INTERACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY; IMMOBILIZED METAL AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROTEOMICS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHOSPHOPEPTIDES; PROTEOMICS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84924710504     PISSN: 15700232     EISSN: 1873376X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Manning G., Plowman G.D., Hunter T., Sudarsanam S. Evolution of protein kinase signaling from yeast to man. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2002, 27:514-520.
2. Dhillon A.S., Hagan S., Rath O., Kolch W. MAP kinase signalling pathways in cancer. Oncogene 2007, 26:3279-3290.
3. Lemmon M.A., Schlessinger J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 2010, 141:1117-1134.
4. Park C.S., Schneider I.C., Haugh J.M. Kinetic analysis of platelet-derived growth factor receptor/phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling in fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:37064-37072.
5. Wang C.-C., Cirit M., Haugh J.M. PI3K-dependent cross-talk interactions converge with Ras as quantifiable inputs integrated by Erk. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2009, 5:246-257.
6. Cirit M., Wang C.-C., Haugh J.M. Systematic quantification of negative feedback mechanisms in the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling network. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:36736-36744.
7. Cirit M., Haugh J.M. Data-driven modelling of receptor tyrosine kinase signalling networks quantifies receptor-specific potencies of PI3K- and Ras-dependent ERK activation. Biochem. J. 2012, 441:77-85.
8. Birtwistle M.R., Hatakeyama M., Yumoto N., Ogunnaike B.A., Hoek J.B., Kholodenko B.N. Ligand-dependent responses of the ErbB signaling network: experimental and modeling analyses. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2007, 3:144-160.
9. Chen W.W., Schoeberl B., Jasper P.J., Niepel M., Nielsen U.B., Lauffenburger D.A., Sorger P.K. Input-output behavior of ErbB signaling pathways as revealed by a mass action model trained against dynamic data. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2009, 5:239-258.
10. Olsen J.V., Blagoev B., Gnad F., Macek B., Kumar C., Mortensen P., Mann M. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 2006, 127:635-648.
11. Brill L.M., Xiong W., Lee K.-B., Ficarro S.B., Crain A., Xu Y., Terskikh A., Snyder E.Y., Ding S. Phosphoproteomic analysis of human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5:204-213.
12. Peng J., Elias J.E., Thoreen C.C., Licklider L.J., Gygi S.P. Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome. J. Proteome Res. 2003, 2:43-50.
13. Beausoleil S.A., Jedrychowski M., Schwartz D., Elias J.E., Villén J., Li J., Cohn M.A., Cantley L.C., Gygi S.P. Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:12130-12135.
14. Han G., Ye M., Zhou H., Jiang X., Feng S., Jiang X., Tian R., Wan D., Zou H., Gu J. Large-scale phosphoproteome analysis of human liver tissue by enrichment and fractionation of phosphopeptides with strong anion exchange chromatography. Proteomics 2008, 8:1346-1361.
15. McNulty D.E., Annan R.S. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography reduces the complexity of the phosphoproteome and improves global phosphopeptide isolation and detection. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7:971-980.
16. Mertins P., Qiao J.W., Patel J., Udeshi N.D., Clauser K.R., Mani D.R., Burgess M.W., Gillette M.A., Jaffe J.D., Carr S.A. Integrated proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications by serial enrichment. Nat. Methods 2013, 10:634-637.
17. Alpert A.J. Electrostatic repulsion hydrophilic interaction chromatography for isocratic separation of charged solutes and selective isolation of phosphopeptides. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80:62-76.
18. Hoffert J.D., Knepper M.A. Taking aim at shotgun phosphoproteomics. Anal. Biochem. 2008, 375:1-10.
19. Villén J., Gygi S.P. The SCX/IMAC enrichment approach for global phosphorylation analysis by mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3:1630-1638.
20. Macek B., Mann M., Olsen J.V. Global and site-specific quantitative phosphoproteomics: principles and applications. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2009, 49:199-221.
21. Grimsrud P.A., Swaney D.L., Wenger C.D., Beauchene N.A., Coon J.J. Phosphoproteomics for the Masses. ACS Chem. Biol. 2010, 5:105-119.
22. 2 for global phosphoproteomics approaches. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10:3474-3483.
23. Iliuk A.B., Martin V.A., Alicie B.M., Geahlen R.L., Tao W.A. In-depth analyses of kinase-dependent tyrosine phosphoproteomes based on metal ion-functionalized soluble nanopolymers. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9:2162-2172.
24. Zhou H., Low T.Y., Hennrich M.L., van der Toorn H., Schwend T., Zou H., Mohammed S., Heck A.J.R. Enhancing the identification of phosphopeptides from putative basophilic kinase substrates using Ti (IV) based IMAC enrichment. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10. M110.006452.
25. Rush J., Moritz A., Lee K.A., Guo A., Goss V.L., Spek E.J., Zhang H., Zha X.-M., Polakiewicz R.D., Comb M.J. Immunoaffinity profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation in cancer cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23:94-101.
26. Graves L.M., Duncan J.S., Whittle M.C., Johnson G.L. The dynamic nature of the kinome. Biochem. J. 2013, 450:1-8.
27. Ficarro S.B., McCleland M.L., Stukenberg P.T., Burke D.J., Ross M.M., Shabanowitz J., Hunt D.F., White F.M. Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20:301-305.
28. Larsen M.R., Thingholm T.E., Jensen O.N., Roepstorff P., Jørgensen T.J.D. Highly selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides from peptide mixtures using titanium dioxide microcolumns. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4:873-886.
29. Bodenmiller B., Mueller L.N., Mueller M., Domon B., Aebersold R. Reproducible isolation of distinct, overlapping segments of the phosphoproteome. Nat. Methods 2007, 4:231-237.
30. Thingholm T.E., Jensen O.N., Robinson P.J., Larsen M.R. SIMAC (sequential elution from IMAC), a phosphoproteomics strategy for the rapid separation of monophosphorylated from multiply phosphorylated peptides. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7:661-671.
31. Yue X.-S., Hummon A.B. Combination of multistep IMAC enrichment with high-pH reverse phase separation for in-depth phosphoproteomic profiling. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12:4176-4186.
32. Zhang X., Ye J., Jensen O.N., Roepstorff P. Highly efficient phosphopeptide enrichment by calcium phosphate precipitation combined with subsequent IMAC enrichment. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6:2032-2042.
33. 2, SIMAC, and HILIC. J. Proteomics 2012, 75:5749-5761.
34. Chien K., Liu H., Goshe M.B. Development and application of a phosphoproteomic method using electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC), IMAC, and LC-MS/MS analysis to study Marek's disease virus infection. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10:4041-4053.
35. Swaney D.L., Mcalister G.C., Coon J.J. Decision tree - driven tandem mass spectrometry for shotgun proteomics. Nat. Methods 2008, 5:959-964.
36. Olsen J.V., de Godoy L.M.F., Li G., Macek B., Mortensen P., Pesch R., Makarov A., Lange O., Horning S., Mann M. Parts per million mass accuracy on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer via lock mass injection into a C-trap. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4:2010-2021.
37. Taus T., Köcher T., Pichler P., Paschke C., Schmidt A., Henrich C., Mechtler K. Universal and confident phosphorylation site localization using phosphoRS. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10:5354-5362.
38. Schwartz D., Gygi S.P. An iterative statistical approach to the identification of protein phosphorylation motifs from large-scale data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23:1391-1398.
39. Chou M.F., Schwartz D. Biological sequence motif discovery using motif-x. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 2011, 15-24. Chapter 13:Unit 13.
40. Bindea G., Mlecnik B., Hackl H., Charoentong P., Tosolini M., Kirilovsky A., Fridman W.-H., Pagès F., Trajanoski Z., Galon J. ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1091-1093.
41. Shannon P., Markiel A., Ozier O., Baliga N.S., Wang J.T., Ramage D., Amin N., Schwikowski B., Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13:2498-2504.
42. Gan C.S., Guo T., Zhang H., Lim S.K., Sze S.K. A comparative study of electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) versus SCX-IMAC-based methods for phosphopeptide isolation/enrichment. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7:4869-4877.
43. Zhang H., Guo T., Li X., Datta A., Park J.E., Yang J., Lim S.K., Tam J.P., Sze S.K. Simultaneous characterization of glyco- and phosphoproteomes of mouse brain membrane proteome with electrostatic repulsion hydrophilic interaction chromatography. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9:635-647.
44. Hao P., Guo T., Li X., Adav S.S., Yang J., Wei M., Sze S.K. Novel application of electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography ( ERLIC ) in shotgun proteomics: comprehensive profiling of rat kidney proteome. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9:3520-3526.
45. Pearce L.R., Komander D., Alessi D.R. The nuts and bolts of AGC protein kinases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:9-22.
46. Alexander J., Lim D., Joughin B.A., Hegemann B., Hutchins J.R., Ehrenberger T., Ivins F., Sessa F., Hudecz O., Nigg E.A., Fry A.M., Musacchio A., Stukenberg P.T., Mechtler K., Peters J.-M., Smerdon S.J., Yaffe M.B. Spatial exclusivity combined with positive and negative selection of phosphorylation motifs is the basis for context-dependent mitotic signaling. Sci. Signal. 2011, 4:ra42.
47. Manning B.D., Cantley L.C. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell 2007, 129:1261-1274.
48. Meggio F., Pinna L.A. One-thousand-and-one substrates of protein kinase CK2?. FASEB J. 2003, 17:349-368.
49. Cesaro L., Salvi M. Protein Kinase CK2 2013, 117-129. John Wiley & Sons. L.A. Pinna (Ed.).
50. Kettenbach A.N., Wang T., Faherty B.K., Madden D.R., Knapp S., Bailey-Kellogg C., Gerber S.A. Rapid determination of multiple linear kinase substrate motifs by mass spectrometry. Chem. Biol. 2012, 19:608-618.
51. Dunlop E.A., Tee A.R. Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1: signalling inputs, substrates and feedback mechanisms. Cell. Signal. 2009, 21:827-835.
52. Laplante M., Sabatini D.M. mTOR signaling at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122:3589-3594.
53. Zoncu R., Efeyan A., Sabatini D.M. mTOR: from growth signal integration to cancer, diabetes and ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12:21-35.
54. Dougherty M.K., Müller J., Ritt D.A., Zhou M., Zhou X.Z., Copeland T.D., Conrads T.P., Veenstra T.D., Lu K.P., Morrison D.K. Regulation of Raf-1 by direct feedback phosphorylation. Mol. Cell 2005, 17:215-224.