Business model innovation performance: When does adding a new business model benefit an incumbent?

Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 34-57

  Kim, Stephen K ^a   Min, Sungwook ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Business model Innovation; Complementary assets; Conflicting assets; Discriminating alignment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924137571     PISSN: 19324391     EISSN: 1932443X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sej.1193     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Advertising Age. 1997. Megabrands ranked by 1996 measured media spending. 68(10): 43-44.
2. Amit R, Zott C. 2001. Value creation in e-businesses. Strategic Management Journal 22(6/7): 493-520.
3. Amit R, Zott C. 2012. Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review 53(3): 41-49.
4. Barnard CI. 1938. The Functions of the Executive. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
5. Barney JB, Arikan AM. 2001. The resource-based view: origins and implications. In The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management, Hitt MA, Freeman RE, Harrison JS (eds). Blackwell: Oxford, U.K.; 124-188.
6. Barney JB, Clark DN. 2007. Resource-Based Theory. Oxford University Press: New York.
7. Best Buy. 1999. Annual Report. Richfield, MN.
8. Best Buy. 2001. Annual Report. Richfield, MN.
9. Bohlmann JD, Golder PN, Mitra D. 2002. Deconstructing the pioneer's advantage: examining vintage effects and consumer valuations of quality and variety. Management Science 48(9): 1175-1195.
10. Bowman D, Gatignon H. 1995. Determinants of competitor response time to a new product introduction. Journal of Marketing Research 32(2): 42-53.
11. Bradach JL. 1997. Using the plural form in the management of restaurant chains. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(6): 276-303.
12. Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM. 1997. The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(3): 1-34.
13. Brush CG, Greene PG, Hart MM, Haller HS. 2001. From initial idea to unique advantage: the entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Academy of Management Executive 15(2): 64-78.
14. Bucklin RE, Gupta S, Siddarth S. 1998. Determining segmentation in sales response across consumer purchase behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research 35(2): 189-197.
15. Casadesus-Masanell R, Ricart JE. 2011. How to design a winning business model. Harvard Business Review 89(1/2): 101-107.
16. Casadesus-Masanell R, Tarzijan J. 2012. When one business model is not enough. Harvard Business Review 90(1/2): 132-137.
17. Chandy RK, Tellis GJ. 1998. Organizing for radical product innovation: the overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. Journal of Marketing Research 35(4): 474-487.
18. Charitou CD, Markides CC. 2003. Responses to disruptive strategic innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review 44(2): 55-63.
19. Chesbrough HW. 2010. Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning 43: 354-363.
20. Chesbrough HW, Rosenbloom RS. 2002. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change 11(6): 529-555.
21. Chico's FAS, Inc. 2000. Annual Report. Fort Myers, FL.
22. Christensen CM. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
23. Christensen CM, Raynor M. 2003. The Innovator's Solution. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
24. Christensen CM, Tedlow RS. 2000. Patterns of disruption in retailing. Harvard Business Review 78: 42-45.
25. Chung KH, Pruitt SW. 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financial Management 23(3): 70-74.
26. Circuit City. 2000. Annual Report. Richmond, VA.
27. Day GS. 1981. The product life cycle: analysis and applications issues. Journal of Marketing 45(4): 60-67.
28. Deeds DL, Mang PY, Frandsen ML. 2004. The influence of firms' and industries' legitimacy on the flow of capital into high-technology ventures. Strategic Organization 2(1): 9-34.
29. Desyllas P, Sako M. 2013. Profiting from business model innovation: evidence from pay-as-you-drive auto insurance. Research Policy 42(1): 101-116.
30. Gibbons R. 2005. Four formal(izable) theories of the firm? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 58(2): 200-245.
31. Gilbert CG. 2005. Unbundling the structure of inertia: resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal 48(5): 741-763.
32. Gilbert CG, Eyring M, Foster RN. 2012. Two routes to resilience. Harvard Business Review 90(12): 67-73.
33. Goldstein H. 1987. Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research. Oxford University Press: New York.
34. Gomez MI, McLaughlin EW, Wittink DR. 2004. Customer satisfaction and retail sales performance: an empirical investigation. Journal of Retailing 80(4): 265-278.
35. Gort M, Klepper S. 1982. Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Economic Journal 92(9): 630-653.
36. Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA. 2003. Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization 1(1): 51-78.
37. Hannan MT, Freeman J. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review 49(4): 149-164.
38. Heckman J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1): 153-161.
39. Helfat CE, Raubitschek RS. 2000. Product sequencing: co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities, and products. Strategic Management Journal 21(10): 961-980.
40. Holcomb TR, Holmes RM Jr., Connelly BL. 2009. Making the most of what you have: managerial ability as a source of resource value creations. Strategic Management Journal 30(5): 457-485.
41. Hot Topic. 1998. Annual Report. City of Industry, CA.
42. Hot Topic. 2004. Annual Report. City of Industry, CA.
43. Iansiti M, McFarlan FW, Westerman G. 2003. Leveraging the incumbent's advantage. MIT Sloan Management Review 44(4): 58-64.
44. Jayachandran S, Kalaignanam K, Eilert M. 2013. Product and environmental social performance: varying effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 34(10): 1255-1264.
45. Johnson M, Christensen CM, Kagermann H. 2008. Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review 86(12): 51-59.
46. Knott AM. 2001. The dynamic value of hierarchy. Management Science 47: 430-448.
47. Kor YY, Mahoney JT. 2005. How dynamics, management and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management Journal 26(5): 489-496.
48. Lieberman MB, Montgomery DB. 1988. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 9: 41-58.
49. Lieberman MB, Montgomery DB. 2013. Conundra and progress: research on entry order and performance. Long Range Planning 46(4): 312-324.
50. Markides C, Charitou CD. 2004. Competing with dual business models: a contingency approach. Academy of Management Executive 18(3): 22-36.
51. Markides C, Oyon D. 2010. What to do against disruptive business models (when and how to play two games at once). MIT Sloan Management Review 51(4): 25-32.
52. Markides C, Sosa L. 2013. Pioneering and first mover advantages: the importance of business models. Long Range Planning 46(4): 325-334.
53. Milgrom P, Roberts J. 1995. Complementarities and fit: strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19(2/3): 179-208.
54. Min S, Kalwani MU, Robinson WT. 2006. Market pioneer and early follower survival risks: a contingency analysis of really new versus incrementally new product-markets. Journal of Marketing 70(1): 15-33.
55. Min S, Wolfinbarger M. 2005. Market share, profit margin, and marketing efficiency of early movers, bricks and clicks, and specialists in e-commerce. Journal of Business Research 58(8): 1030-1039.
56. Moskowitz DS, Hershberger SL. 2002. Modeling Intraindividual Variability with Repeated Measures Data: Methods and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.
57. Newbert SL. 2007. Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal 28(2): 121-146.
58. Nickerson JA, Hamilton BH, Wada T. 2001. Market position, resource profile, and governance: linking Porter and Williamson in the context of international courier and small package services in Japan. Strategic Management Journal 22(3): 251-273.
59. Pouder R, St. John CH. 1996. Hot spots and blind spots: geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review 21(10): 1192-1225.
60. Robinson WT. 1990. Product innovation and start-up business market share performance. Management Science 36(10): 1279-1289.
61. Robinson WT, Fornell C. 1985. Sources of market pioneer advantages in consumer goods industries. Journal of Marketing Research 22(8): 305-317.
62. Rothaermel FT. 2001. Complementary assets, strategic alliances, and the incumbent's advantage: an empirical study of industry and firm effects in the biopharmaceutical industry. Research Policy 30(10): 1235-1251.
63. Rothaermel FT, Boeker W. 2008. Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal 29(1): 47-77.
64. Rothaermel FT, Hill CW. 2005. Technological discontinuities and complementary assets: a longitudinal study of industry and firm performance. Organization Science 16: 52-70.
65. Sabatier V, Mangematin V, Rousselle T. 2010. From business model to business model portfolio in the European biopharmaceutical industry. Long Range Planning 43: 431-447.
66. Sa Vinhas A, Anderson E. 2005. How potential conflict drives channel structure: concurrent (direct and indirect) channels. Journal of Marketing Research 42(4): 507-515.
67. Schindler RM, Kibarian TM. 1996. Increased consumer sales response though use of 99-ending prices. Journal of Retailing 72(2): 187-199.
68. Schoonhoven C. 1981. Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 26(9): 349-377.
69. Shaver JM. 1998. Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Science 44(4): 571-585.
70. Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA. 2003. Temporarily divide to conquer: centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science 14: 650-669.
71. Singer JD. 1998. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 24(4): 323-355.
72. Sirmon DG, Gove S, Hitt MA. 2008. Resource management in dyadic competitive rivalry: the effects of resource bundling and deployment. Academy of Management Journal 51(5): 919-935.
73. Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Ireland RD. 2007. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review 32(1): 273-292.
74. Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Gilbert BA. 2011. Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management 37(5): 1390-1412.
75. Smith WK, Binns A, Tushman ML. 2010. Complex business models: managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Planning 43(2/3): 448-461.
76. Sorescu A, Frambach RT, Singh J, Rangaswamy A, Bridges C. 2011. Innovation in retail business models. Journal of Retailing 87S: S3-S16.
77. Sosna M, Trevinyo-Rodriguez RN, Velamuri SR. 2010. Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning. Long Range Planning 43(2/3): 383-407.
78. Srivastava RK, Shervani TA, Fahey L. 1998. Market-based assets and shareholder value: a framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing 62(1): 2-18.
79. Suchman MC. 1995. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 20(7): 571-610.
80. Teece DJ. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15(12): 285-305.
81. Teece DJ. 2006. Reflections on 'profiting from innovation.' Research Policy 35(10): 1131-1146.
82. Teece DJ. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 28(12): 1319-1350.
83. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(8): 509-533.
84. Tripsas M. 1997. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 18: 119-142.
85. Tushman ML, O'Reilly CA. 1996. Ambidextrous organizations: managing revolutionary and evolutionary change. California Management Review 38(4): 8-30.
86. U.S. Census Bureau. 2014. E-stats. Available at: http://www.census.gov/econ/estats (accessed 10 June 2014).
87. U.S. News and World Report. 2010. Online education. Available at: http://www.usnews.com/directories/online-education/specialty/index_html/cat+mba/st+/name+/inst_finaid/fed_finaid/detail+less/page_number+1/page_size+10] (accessed 28 March 2014).
88. Videl E, Mitchell W. 2013. When do first entrants become first survivors? Long Range Planning 46(4): 335-347.
89. Webb KL. 2002. Managing channels of distribution in the age of electronic commerce. Industrial Marketing Management 31(1): 95-102.
90. Wernerfelt B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171-180.
91. Williamson OE. 1991. Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(6): 269-296.
92. Zott C, Amit R. 2007. Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science 18(3/4): 181-202.
93. Zott C, Amit R. 2008. The fit between product-market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 29(1): 1-26.
94. Zott C, Massa L, Amit R. 2011. The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of Management 37(5): 1019-1042.