Product and environmental social performance: Varying effect on firm performance

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 34, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1255-1264

  Jayachandran, Satish ^a   Kalaignanam, Kartik ^a   Eilert, Meike ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

corporate social performance; environment social performance; firm performance; negativity bias; product social performance

Indexed keywords

CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE; DIFFERENT DOMAINS; FIRM PERFORMANCE; NEGATIVITY BIAS; SOCIAL PERFORMANCE;

MANAGEMENT; PLANNING;

INDUSTRY;

EID: 84882455136     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: 10970266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.2054     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bhushan R,. 2010. Cos go over the top to tap bottom. The Economic Times Hyderabad 11 January.
2. Brammer S, Millington AI,. 2008. Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 29 (12): 1325-1343.
3. Carroll AB,. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 7: 235-241.
4. Chung KH, Pruitt SW,. 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financial Management 23 (3): 70-74.
5. Dechow PM, Dichev ID,. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. Accounting Review 77 (Suppl): 35-59.
6. Francis J, Lafond R, Olsson P, Schipper K,. 2007. Information uncertainty and post-earnings-announcement-drift. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 34 (3/4): 403-433.
7. Friedman M,. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine 13 September.
8. Godfrey PC, Merrill CB, Hansen JM,. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal 30 (4): 425-445.
9. Goldstein H, Healy MJR, Rasbash J,. 1994. Multilevel time series models with applications to repeated measures data. Statistics in Medicine 13 (16): 1643-1655.
10. Grewal R, Chakravarty A, Ding M, Liechty J,. 2008. Counting chickens before the eggs hatch: associating new product development portfolios with shareholder expectations in the pharmaceutical sector. International Journal of Research in Marketing 25 (4): 261-272.
11. Hillman AJ, Keim GD,. 2001. Stakeholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal 22 (2): 125-139.
12. Jones TM,. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review 20 (2): 404-437.
13. Kane J,. 2001. The Politics of Moral Capital. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
14. Kor YY, Mahoney JT,. 2005. How dynamics, management and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management Journal 26 (5): 489-496.
15. Lankoski L,. 2009. Differential economic impacts of corporate responsibility issues. Business and Society 48 (2): 206-224.
16. Lev B, Petrovits C, Radhakrishnan S,. 2010. Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal 31 (2): 182-200.
17. Luo X, Bhattacharya CB,. 2006. Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction and market value. Journal of Marketing 70 (4): 1-18.
18. Luo X, Homburg C,. 2008. Satisfaction, complaint, and the stock value gap. Journal of Marketing 72 (4): 29-43.
19. Margolis JD, Elfenbein HA, Walsh JP,. 2007. Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Available at: http://stakeholder.bu.edu/Docs/Walsh,%20Jim%20Does%20It%20Pay%20to%20Be%20Good. pdf (accessed 11 March 2013).
20. McConnell JJ, Servaes H,. 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27 (2): 595-612.
21. McWilliams A, Siegel D,. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21 (5): 603-609.
22. Montgomery CA, Wernerfelt B,. 1988. Diversification, Ricardian rents and Tobin's q. RAND Journal of Economics 19 (4): 623-632.
23. Rhee M, Haunschild PR,. 2006. The liability of good reputation: a study of product recalls in the U.S. automobile industry. Organization Science 17 (1): 101-117.
24. Rozin P, Royzman EB,. 2001. Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review 5 (4): 296-320.
25. Simmons CJ, Becker-Olsen KL,. 2006. Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing 70 (4): 154-169.
26. Singer JD,. 1998. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 23 (4): 323-355.
27. Skowronski JJ, Carlston DE,. 1987. Social judgment and social memory: the role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (4): 689-699.
28. Strike VM, Gao J, Bansal P,. 2006. Being good while being bad: social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies 37 (6): 850-862.
29. Sustainable Enterprise Institute. 2009. The road not yet taken: the state of U.S. corporate environmental policy and management. Available at: http://www.sustainableenterpriseinstitute.org/media/ The-Road-Not-Yet-Taken- FINAL2020092008.pdf (accessed 1 March 2012).
30. Turban D, Greening D,. 1996. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal 40 (3): 658-672.
31. Varadarajan PR,. 1985. A two-factor classification of competitive strategy variables. Strategic Management Journal 6 (4): 357-375.
32. Waddock SA, Graves SB,. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 18 (4): 303-319.
33. Wolfinger RD,. 1996. Heterogeneous variance: covariance structures for repeated measures. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 1 (2): 205-230.
34. Wood DJ,. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review 16 (4): 691-718.