A Nutrient-Driven tRNA Modification Alters Translational Fidelity and Genome-wide Protein Coding across an Animal Genus

PLoS Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 12, 2014, Pages

  Zaborske, John M ^a   Bauer DuMont, Vanessa L ^b   Wallace, Edward W J ^a   Pan, Tao ^a   Aquadro, Charles F ^b   Drummond, D Allan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GUANOSINE; MESSENGER RNA; PERIODATE; QUEUOSINE; TRANSFER RNA; ANTICODON; CODON;

ARTICLE; CODON; CODON USAGE; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA; DROSOPHILA VIRILIS; DROSOPHILA WILLISTONI; DROSOPHILIDAE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC CODE; LARVA; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; NORTHERN BLOTTING; NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; RIBOSOME; RNA EXTRACTION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; ANIMAL; ANTICODON; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; DROSOPHILA; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; INSECT GENOME; KINETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; OPEN READING FRAME; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS;

ANIMALIA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EUKARYOTA;

ANIMALS; ANTICODON; BASE SEQUENCE; CODON; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENOME, INSECT; KINETICS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEOSIDE Q; OPEN READING FRAMES; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; RNA, TRANSFER; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84924084262     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002015     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Agashe D, Martinez-Gomez NC, Drummond DA, Marx CJ, (2013) Good codons, bad transcript: large reductions in gene expression and fitness arising from synonymous mutations in a key enzyme. Mol Biol Evol 30: 549–560.
2. Hershberg R, Petrov DA, (2008) Selection on codon bias. Annu Rev Genet 42: 287–299.
3. Plotkin JB, Kudla G, (2011) Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias. Nat Rev Genet 12: 32–42.
4. Lawrie DS, Messer PW, Hershberg R, Petrov DA, (2013) Strong purifying selection at synonymous sites in D. melanogaster. PLoS Genet 9: e1003527.
5. Kramer EB, Farabaugh PJ, (2007) The frequency of translational misreading errors in E. coli is largely determined by tRNA competition. Rna 13: 87–96.
6. Kramer EB, Vallabhaneni H, Mayer LM, Farabaugh PJ, (2010) A comprehensive analysis of translational missense errors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Rna 16: 1797–1808.
7. Kudla G, Lipinski L, Caffin F, Helwak A, Zylicz M, (2006) High guanine and cytosine content increases mRNA levels in mammalian cells. PLoS Biol 4: e180.
8. Gu W, Zhou T, Wilke CO, (2010) A universal trend of reduced mRNA stability near the translation-initiation site in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000664.
9. Kudla G, Murray AW, Tollervey D, Plotkin JB, (2009) Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Science 324: 255–258.
10. Goodman DB, Church GM, Kosuri S, (2013) Causes and effects of N-terminal codon bias in bacterial genes. Science 342: 475–479.
11. Kimchi-Sarfaty C, Oh JM, Kim IW, Sauna ZE, Calcagno AM, et al. (2007) A “silent” polymorphism in the MDR1 gene changes substrate specificity. Science 315: 525–528.
12. Tuller T, Carmi A, Vestsigian K, Navon S, Dorfan Y, et al. (2010) An evolutionarily conserved mechanism for controlling the efficiency of protein translation. Cell 141: 344–354.
13. Parmley JL, Urrutia AO, Potrzebowski L, Kaessmann H, Hurst LD, (2007) Splicing and the evolution of proteins in mammals. PLoS Biol 5: e14.
14. Wallace EW, Airoldi EM, Drummond DA, (2013) Estimating selection on synonymous codon usage from noisy experimental data. Mol Biol Evol 30: 1438–1453.
15. Rocha EP, (2004) Codon usage bias from tRNA's point of view: redundancy, specialization, and efficient decoding for translation optimization. Genome Res 14: 2279–2286.
16. Sharp PM, Bailes E, Grocock RJ, Peden JF, Sockett RE, (2005) Variation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 1141–1153.
17. Ran W, Higgs PG, (2010) The influence of anticodon-codon interactions and modified bases on codon usage bias in bacteria. Mol Biol Evol 27: 2129–2140.
18. Bulmer M, (1991) The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics 129: 897–907.
19. Charneski CA, Hurst LD, (2013) Positively charged residues are the major determinants of ribosomal velocity. PLoS Biol 11: e1001508.
20. Qian W, Yang JR, Pearson NM, Maclean C, Zhang J, (2012) Balanced codon usage optimizes eukaryotic translational efficiency. PLoS Genet 8: e1002603.
21. Li GW, Oh E, Weissman JS, (2012) The anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence drives translational pausing and codon choice in bacteria. Nature 484: 538–541.
22. Akashi H, (1994) Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. Genetics 136: 927–935.
23. Zhou T, Weems M, Wilke CO, (2009) Translationally optimal codons associate with structurally sensitive sites in proteins. Mol Biol Evol 26: 1571–1580.
24. Drummond DA, Wilke CO, (2008) Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 134: 341–352.
25. Drummond DA, Wilke CO, (2009) The evolutionary consequences of erroneous protein synthesis. Nat Rev Genet 10: 715–724.
26. Geiler-Samerotte KA, Dion MF, Budnik BA, Wang SM, Hartl DL, et al. (2011) Misfolded proteins impose a dosage-dependent fitness cost and trigger a cytosolic unfolded protein response in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 680–685.
27. Stoletzki N, Eyre-Walker A, (2007) Synonymous codon usage in Escherichia coli: selection for translational accuracy. Mol Biol Evol 24: 374–381.
28. dos Reis M, Wernisch L, Savva R, (2003) Unexpected correlations between gene expression and codon usage bias from microarray data for the whole Escherichia coli K-12 genome. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 6976–6985.
29. Duret L, (2002) Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans. Curr Opin Genet Dev 12: 640–649.
30. Agris PF, (2004) Decoding the genome: a modified view. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 223–238.
31. Grosjean HJ, de Henau S, Crothers DM, (1978) On the physical basis for ambiguity in genetic coding interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 75: 610–614.
32. Novoa EM, Pavon-Eternod M, Pan T, Ribas de Pouplana L, (2012) A role for tRNA modifications in genome structure and codon usage. Cell 149: 202–213.
33. Shah P, Gilchrist MA, (2010) Effect of correlated tRNA abundances on translation errors and evolution of codon usage bias. PLoS Genet 6.
34. Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium (2007) Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny. Nature 450: 203–218.
35. Vicario S, Moriyama EN, Powell JR, (2007) Codon usage in twelve species of Drosophila. BMC Evol Biol 7: 226.
36. Heger A, Ponting CP, (2007) Variable strength of translational selection among 12 Drosophila species. Genetics 177: 1337–1348.
37. Bergman C, Ardell D, (2014): Nuclear tRNA gene predictions for 12 species in the genus Drosophila. figshare. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1233437
38. White BN, Tener GM, (1973) Activity of a transfer RNA modifying enzyme during the development of Drosophila and its relationship to the su(s) locus. J Mol Biol 74: 635–651.
39. Gunduz U, Katze JR, (1984) Queuine salvage in mammalian cells. Evidence that queuine is generated from queuosine 5′-phosphate. J Biol Chem 259: 1110–1113.
40. Siard TJ, Jacobson KB, Farkas WR, (1991) Queuine metabolism and cadmium toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster. Biofactors 3: 41–47.
41. Jacobson KB, Farkas WR, Katze JR, (1981) Presence of queuine in Drosophila melanogaster: correlation of free pool with queuosine content of tRNA and effect of mutations in pteridine metabolism. Nucleic Acids Res 9: 2351–2366.
42. Yokoyama S, Miyazawa T, Iitaka Y, Yamaizumi Z, Kasai H, et al. (1979) Three-dimensional structure of hyper-modified nucleoside Q located in the wobbling position of tRNA. Nature 282: 107–109.
43. Das G, Lyngdoh RH, (2012) Role of wobble base pair geometry for codon degeneracy: purine-type bases at the anticodon wobble position. J Mol Model 18: 3805–3820.
44. Meier F, Suter B, Grosjean H, Keith G, Kubli E, (1985) Queuosine modification of the wobble base in tRNAHis influences ‘in vivo’ decoding properties. EMBO J 4: 823–827.
45. Noguchi S, Nishimura Y, Hirota Y, Nishimura S, (1982) Isolation and characterization of an Escherichia coli mutant lacking tRNA-guanine transglycosylase. Function and biosynthesis of queuosine in tRNA. J Biol Chem 257: 6544–6550.
46. Powell JR, Sezzi E, Moriyama EN, Gleason JM, Caccone A, (2003) Analysis of a shift in codon usage in Drosophila. J Mol Evol 57 Suppl 1: S214–225.
47. Chiari Y, Dion K, Colborn J, Parmakelis A, Powell JR, (2010) On the possible role of tRNA base modifications in the evolution of codon usage: queuosine and Drosophila. J Mol Evol 70: 339–345.
48. Igloi GL, Kossel H, (1985) Affinity electrophoresis for monitoring terminal phosphorylation and the presence of queuosine in RNA. Application of polyacrylamide containing a covalently bound boronic acid. Nucleic Acids Res 13: 6881–6898.
49. Kasai H, Nakanishi K, Macfarlane RD, Torgerson DF, Ohashi Z, et al. (1976) Letter: The structure of Q* nucleoside isolated from rabbit liver transfer ribonucleic acid. J Am Chem Soc 98: 5044–5046.
50. Stolc V, Gauhar Z, Mason C, Halasz G, van Batenburg MF, et al. (2004) A gene expression map for the euchromatic genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 306: 655–660.
51. Vicario S, Mason CE, White KP, Powell JR, (2008) Developmental stage and level of codon usage bias in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 25: 2269–2277.
52. Higgs PG, Ran W, (2008) Coevolution of codon usage and tRNA genes leads to alternative stable states of biased codon usage. Mol Biol Evol 25: 2279–2291.
53. Ogle JM, Ramakrishnan V, (2005) Structural insights into translational fidelity. Annu Rev Biochem 74: 129–177.
54. Waldron C, Jund R, Lacroute F, (1977) Evidence for a high proportion of inactive ribosomes in slow-growing yeast cells. Biochem J 168: 409–415.
55. Singh ND, Arndt PF, Petrov DA, (2006) Minor shift in background substitutional patterns in the Drosophila saltans and willistoni lineages is insufficient to explain GC content of coding sequences. BMC Biol 4: 37.
56. Pathak C, Jaiswal YK, Vinayak M, (2005) Hypomodification of transfer RNA in cancer with respect to queuosine. RNA Biol 2: 143–148.
57. Zaborske J, Dumont VLB, Wallace EWJ, Pan T, Aquadro CF, et al. (2014) Data from: A nutrient-driven tRNA modification alters translational fidelity and genome-wide protein coding across an animal genus. Dryad Digital Repository Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1jn88.
58. Sella G, Hirsh AE, (2005) The application of statistical physics to evolutionary biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 9541–9546.
59. Mantel N, Haenszel W, (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Biometrics 15: 639–640.
60. Robins J, Breslow N, Greenland S, (1986) Estimators of the Mantel-Haenszel variance consistent in both sparse data and large-strata limiting models. Biometrics 42: 311–323.
61. McQuilton P, St Pierre SE, Thurmond J, (2012) FlyBase 101–the basics of navigating FlyBase. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D706–714.
62. Suter B, Altwegg M, Choffat Y, Kubli E, (1986) The nucleotide sequence of two homogeneic Drosophila melanogaster tRNATyr isoacceptors: application of a rapid tRNA anticodon sequencing method using S-1 nuclease. Arch Biochem Biophys 247: 233–237.