On Look-Ahead in Language: Navigating a Multitude of Familiar Paths

Predictions in the Brain: Using Our Past to Generate a Future

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Edelman, Shimon ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Experience data; Language learning; Language processing; Linguistic knowledge; Predictions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922760499     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195395518.003.0060     Document Type: Chapter

References (144)

1. Abeles, M. (1982). Role of cortical neuron: Integrator or coincidence detector? Israel Journal of Medical Sciences, 18, 83-92.
2. Adlam, A-L. R., Vargha-Khadem, F., Mishkin, M., & de Haan, M. (2005). Deferred imitation of action sequences in developmental amnesia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 240-248.
3. Agster, K. L., Fortin, N. J., & Eichenbaum, H. (2002). The hippocampus and disambiguation of overlapping sequences. The Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 5760-5768.
4. Albouy, G., Sterpenich, V., Balteau, E., Vandewalle, G., Desseilles, M., Dang-Vu, T., Darsaud, A., Ruby, P., Luppi, P-H., Degueldre, C., Peigneux, P., Luxen, A., & Maquet, P. (2008). Both the hippocampus and striatum are involved in consolidation of motor sequence memory. Neuron, 58, 261-272.
5. Arbib, M. A. (2006). A sentence is to speech as what is to action? Cortex, 42, 507-514.
6. Baker, J. K. (1975). Stochastic modeling for automatic speech understanding. In R. Reddy (Ed.), Speech recognition (pp. 521-542). New York: Academic Press.
7. Bates, E., & Goodman, J. C. (1999). On the emergence of grammar from the lexicon. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Emergence of language (pp. 29-79). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Bates, E., Thal, D., Finlay, B. L., & Clancy, B. (2003). Early language development and its neural correlates. In I. Rapin & S. Segalowitz (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (2nd ed., Vol. 8, pp. 525-592. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
9. Bienenstock, E. (1992). Suggestions for a neurobiological approach to syntax. In D. Andler, E. Bienenstock, & B. Laks (Eds.), Proceedings of Second Interdisciplinary Workshop on Compositionality in Cognition and Neural Networks (pp. 13-21). Abbaye de Royaumont, France.
10. Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Berlin: Springer.
11. Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic priming in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355-387.
13. Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Onishi, K. H. (2007). Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition, 104, 437-458.
14. Bod, R. (2009). From exemplar to grammar: A probabilistic analogy-based model of language learning. Cognitive Science, 33, 752-793.
15. Bos, J., Clark, S., Curran, J. R., Hockenmaier, J., & Steedman, M. (2004). Wide-coverage semantic representations from a CCG parser. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING '04), Geneva, Switzerland. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ.
16. Breitenstein, C., Jansen, A., Deppe, M., Foerster, A-F., Sommer, J., Wolbers, T., & Knecht, S. (2005). Hippocampus activity differentiates good from poor learners of a novel lexicon. NeuroImage, 25, 958-968.
17. Brusk, J. (2008). Dialogue management for social game characters using statecharts. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (pp. 219-222). Yokohama, Japan:
18. Buzsaki, G. (2005). Theta rhythm of navigation: Link between path integration and landmark navigation, episodic and semantic memory. Hippocampus, 15, 827-840.
19. Buzsáki, G., & K. Diba (2010). Oscillation-supported information processing and transfer in the hippocampus-entorhinal-neocortical interface. In C. von der Malsburg, W. A. Phillips, & W. Singer (Eds.), Strungmann Forum Report: Vol. 5, Chapter 7. Dynamic coordination in the brain: From neurons to mind (pp. xx-xx). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Caporale, N., & Dan, Y. (2008). Spike timing-dependent plasticity: A Hebbian learning rule. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 25-46.
21. Chater, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Yuille, A. (2006). Probabilistic models of cognition:Conceptual foundations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 287-291.
22. Chipere, N. (2001). Native speaker variations in syntactic competence: Implications for first language teaching. Language Awareness, 10, 107-124.
23. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
24. Chomsky, N. (2004). The generative enterprise revisited. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
25. Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 489-509.
26. Clark, A. (1998). Magic words: How language augments human computation. In P. Carruthers & J. Boucher (Eds.), Language and thought: Interdisciplinary themes (pp. 162-183). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27. Cohen, M. X., & Frank, M. J., (2009). Neurocomputational models of basal ganglia function in learning, memory and choice. Behavioural Brain Research, 199, 141-156.
28. Conant, R. C., & Ashby, W. R. (1970). Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. International Journal of Systems Science, 1, 89-97.
29. Conway, C. M., & Pisoni, D. B. (2008). Neurocognitive basis of implicit learning of sequential structure and its relation to language processing. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1145, 113-131.
30. Craik, K. J. W. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
31. Crocker, M. W., Knoeferle, P., & Mayberry, M. R. (2010). Situated sentence processing:The coordinated interplay account and a neurobehavioral model. Brain and Language, 112, 189-201.
32. Da Cunha, C., Wietzikoski, E. C., Dombrowski, P., Bortolanza, M., Santos, L. M., Boschen, S. L. & Miyoshi, E. (2009). Learning processing in the basal ganglia: A mosaic of broken mirrors. Behavioural Brain Research, 199, 157-170.
33. Dabrowska, E., & Street, J. (2006). Individual differences in language attainment:Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences, 28, 604-615.
34. Dave, A. S., & Margoliash, D. (2000). Song replay during sleep and computational rules for sensorimotor vocal learning. Science, 290, 812-816.
35. Davidson, T. J., Kloosterman, F., & Wilson, M. A. (2009). Hippocampal replay of extended experience. Neuron, 63, 497-507.
36. Decety, J., & Sommerville, J. A. (2003). Shared representations between self and other: A social cognitive neuroscience view. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 527-533.
37. DeLong, G. R., & Heinz, E. R. (1997). The clinical syndrome of early-life bilateral hippocampal sclerosis. Annals of Neurology, 42, 11-17.
38. Deneve, S. (2008). Bayesian spiking neurons I: Inference. Neural Computation, 20, 91-117.
39. Dennett, D. C. (2003). Freedom evolves. New York: Viking.
40. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
41. Diessel, H. (2004). Cambridge studies in linguistics: Vol. 105. The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
42. Dominey, P. F. (2005). From sensorimotor sequence to grammatical construction:Evidence from simulation and neurophysiology. Adaptive Behavior, 13, 347-361.
43. Dominey, P. F., & Hoen, M. (2006). Structure mapping and semantic integration in a construction-based neurolinguistic model of sentence processing. Cortex, 42, 476-479.
44. Du Bois, J. W. (2003). Argument structure: Grammar in use. In J. W. Du Bois, L. E. Kumpf, & W. J. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred argument structure. Grammar as architecture for function (pp. 11-60). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
45. Edelman, S. (2008a). Computing the mind: How the mind really works. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Edelman, S. (2008b). On the nature of minds, or: Truth and consequences. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical AI, 20, 181-196.
47. Edelman, S., & Waterfall, H. R. (2007). Behavioral and computational aspects of language and its acquisition. Physics of Life Reviews, 4, 253-277.
48. Eichenbaum, H., Dudchenko, P., Wood, E., Shapiro, M., & Tanila, H. (1999). The hippocampus, memory and place cells: Is it spatial memory or memory space? Neuron, 23, 209-226.
49. Eisenstein, J., Clarke, J., Goldwasser, D., & Roth, D. (2009). Reading to learn: Constructing features from semantic abstracts. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-2009), Singapore.
50. Fortin, N. J., Agster, K. L., & Eichenbaum, H. B. (2002). Critical role of the hippocampus in memory for sequences of events. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 458-462.
51. Frank, M. C., Goodman, N. D., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009). Using speakers' referential intentions to model early cross-situational word learning. Psychological Science, 20, 578-585.
52. Goldsmith, J. A. (2007). Towards a new empiricism. In J. B. de Carvalho (Ed.), Recherches linguistiques à Vincennes (Vol. 36).
53. Goldstein, M. H., King, A. P., & West, M. J. (2003). Social interaction shapes babbling:Testing parallels between birdsong and speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100, 8030-8035.
54. Goldstein, M. H., & Schwade, J. A. (2008). Social feedback to infants' babbling facilitates rapid phonological learning. Psychological Science, 19, 515-523.
55. Goldstein, M. H., Waterfall, H. R., Lotem, A., Halpern, J., Schwade, J., Onnis, L., & Edelman, S. (2010). General cognitive principles for learning structure in time and space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 249-258.
56. Goodman, J. T. (2001). A bit of progress in language modeling. Computer Speech and Language, 15, 403-434.
57. Grünwald, P. (1994). A minimum description length approach to grammar inference. In G. Scheler, S. Wernter, & E. Riloff (Eds.), Lecture Notes in AI: Vol. 1004, Connectionist, statistical and symbolic approaches to learning for natural language (pp. 203-216). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
58. Hale, J. (2006). Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence. Cognitive Science, 30, 643-672.
59. Harel, D. (1988). On visual formalisms. Communications of the ACM, 31, 514-530.
60. Harel, D. (2007). Statecharts in the making: A personal account. In HOPL III: Proceedings of the Third ACM SIGPLAN Conference on History of Programming Languages (pp. 5-1-5-43). New York: ACM.
61. Harel, D., Kugler, H., & Pnueli, A. (2005). Synthesis revisited: Generating statechart models from scenario-based requirements. In Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 3393, pp. 309-324). London: Springer-Verlag.
62. Harris, Z. S. (1946). From morpheme to utterance. Language, 22, 161-183.
63. Harris, Z. S. (1952). Discourse analysis. Language, 28, 1-30.
64. Harris, Z. S. (1991). A theory of language and information. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
65. Henson, R. N. A. (1999). Coding position in short-term memory. International Journal of Psycho-logy, 34, 403-409.
66. Henson, R. N. A., & Burgess, N. (1997). Representations of serial order. In J. A. Bullinaria, D. W. Glasspool, & G. Houghton (Eds.), 4th Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop (pp. 283-300). London: Springer.
67. Herrmann, E., Call, J., Lloreda, M., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science, 317, 1360-1366.
68. Hinton, G. E. (2007). Learning multiple layers of representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 428-434.
69. Hockema, S. A., & Smith, L. B. (2009). Learning your language, outside-in and inside-out. Linguistics, 47, 453-479.
70. Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 26, 55-88.
71. Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1986). Function and structure in maternal speech: Their relation to the child's development of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 22, 155-163.
72. Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1990). Maternal speech and the child's development of syntax: A further look. Journal of Child Language, 17, 85-99.
73. Hosaka, R., Araki, O., & Ikeguchi, T. (2008). STDP provides the substrate for igniting synfire chains by spatiotemporal input patterns. Neural Computation, 20, 415-435.
74. Houghton, G., & Hartley, T. (1996). Parallels models of serial behaviour: Lashley revisited. Psyche 2(25).
75. Hume, D. (1748). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Retrieved June 30, 2010, from.
76. Ikegaya, Y., Aaron, G., Cossart, R., Aronov, D., Lampl, I., Ferster, D., & Yuste, R. (2004). Synfire chains and cortical songs: Temporal modules of cortical activity. Science, 304, 559-564.
77. Izhikevich, E. M. (2006). Polychronization: Computation with spikes. Neural Computation, 18, 245-282.
78. Izhikevich, E. M. (2007). Solving the distal reward problem through linkage of STDP and dopamine signaling. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 2443-2452.
79. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Retrieved June 30, 2010, from.
80. Jelinek, F. (1990). Self-organized language modeling for speech recognition. In A. Waibel & K-F. Lee (Eds.), Readings in speech recognition (pp. 450-506). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. (Originally published as an IBM internal report, November 1982)
81. Jensen, O., & Lisman, J. E. (2005). Hippocampal sequence-encoding driven by a cortical multi-item working memory buffer. Trends in Neurosciences, 28, 67-72.
82. Ji, D., & Wilson, M. A. (2007). Coordinated memory replay in the visual cortex and hippocampus during sleep. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 100-107.
83. Jones, M. W., & Wilson, M. A. (2005). Theta rhythms coordinate hippocampal-prefrontal interactions in a spatial memory task. PLoS Biology, 3, 2187-2199.
84. Jurafsky, D. (2003). Probabilistic modeling in psycholinguistics: Linguistic comprehension and production. In R. Bod, J. Hay, & S. Jannedy (Eds.), Probabilistic linguistics (pp. 39-96). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. Kemp, C., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2008). The discovery of structural form. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105, 10687-10692.
86. Kersten, D., & Yuille, A. (2003). Bayesian models of object perception. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 1-9.
87. Kuntay, A., & Slobin, D. (1996). Listening to a Turkish mother: Some puzzles for acquisition. In D. Slobin & J. Gerhardt (Eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 265-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
88. Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (pp. 112-146). New York: Wiley.
89. Lee, A. K., & Wilson, M. A. (2002). Memory of sequential experience in the hippocampus during slow wave sleep. Neuron, 36, 1183-1194.
90. Levinson, S. C. (2006). On the human interactional engine. In N. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality (pp. 39-69). Oxford, England: Berg.
91. Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106, 1126-1177.
92. Levy, W. B. (1996). A sequence predicting CA3 is a flexible associator that learns and uses context to solve hippocampal-like tasks. Hippocampus, 6, 579-590.
93. Levy, W. B., Hocking, A. B., & Wu, X. (2005). Interpreting hippocampal function as recoding and forecasting. Neural Networks, 18, 1242-1264.
94. Lieberman, P. (2002). Human language and our reptilian brain: The subcortical bases of speech, syntax, and thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
95. MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk (Vols. 1-2). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
96. Makinen, E., & Systa, T. (2002). Minimally adequate teacher synthesizes statechart diagrams. Acta Informatica, 38, 235-259.
97. Marr, D., & Poggio, T. (1977). From understanding computation to understanding neural circuitry. Neurosciences Research Progress Bulletin, 15, 470-488.
98. Merker, B. (2004). Cortex, countercurrent context, and dimensional integration of lifetime memory. Cortex, 40, 559-576.
99. Merker, B., & Okanoya, K. (2007). The natural history of human language: Bridging the gaps without magic. In C. Lyon, C. L. Nehaniv, & A. Cangelosi (Eds.), Emergence of communication and language (pp. 403-420). London: Springer-Verlag.
100. Meyer, P., Mecklinger, A., Grunwald, T., Fell, J., Elger, C. E., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Language processing within the human medial temporal lobe. Hippocampus, 15, 451-459.
101. Müller, R-A., & Basho, S. (2004). Are nonlinguistic functions in "Broca's area" prerequisites for language acquisition? fMRI findings from an ontogenetic viewpoint. Brain and Language, 89, 329-336.
102. Muller, R. U., & Kubie, J. L. (1989). The firing of hippocampal place cells predicts the future position of freely moving rats. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 4101-4110.
103. Nelson, K. (1977). Facilitating children's syntax acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 13, 101-107.
104. Newmeyer, F. (1998). Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
105. Okanoya, K., & Merker, B. (2007). Neural substrates for string-context mutual segmentation: A path to human language. In C. Lyon, C. L. Nehaniv, & A. Cangelosi (Eds.), Emergence of communication and language (pp. 421-434). London: Springer-Verlag.
106. O'Keefe, J., & Dostrovsky, J. (1971). The hippocampus as a spatial map: Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely moving rat. Brain Research, 34, 171-175.
107. Onnis, L., Waterfall, H. R., & Edelman, S. (2008). Learn locally, act globally: Learning language from variation set cues. Cognition, 109, 423-430.
108. O'Reilly, R. C. (2006). Biologically based computational models of high-level cognition. Science, 314, 91-94.
109. O'Reilly, R. C., & Frank, M. J. (2006). Making working memory work: A computational model of learning in the frontal cortex and basal ganglia. Neural Computation, 18, 283-328.
110. O'Reilly, R. C., & Norman, K. A. (2002). Hippocampal and neocortical contributions to memory: Advances in the complementary learning systems framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 505-510.
111. Pereira, A. F., Smith, L. B., & Yu, C. (2008). Social coordination in toddler's word learning:Interacting systems of perception and action. Connection Science, 20, 73-89.
112. Pereira, F. (2000). Formal grammar and information theory: Together again? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 358(1769), 1239-1253.
113. Peyrache, A., Khamassi, M., Benchenane, K., Wiener, S. I., & Battaglia, F. P. (2009). Replay of rule-learning related neural patterns in the prefrontal cortex during sleep. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 919-929.
114. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169-225.
115. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 105-110.
116. Pietroski, P. M. (2003). The character of natural language semantics. In A. Barber (Ed.), Epistemology of language (pp. 217-256). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
117. Putnam, H. (1967). The "innateness hypothesis" and explanatory models in linguistics. Synthese, 17, 12-22.
118. Quine, W. V. (1961). The problem of meaning in linguistics. In S. Saporta (Ed.), Psycholinguistics: a book of readings (pp. 251-261). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
119. Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
120. Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. A. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers' and listeners' eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29, 39-54.
121. Richardson, D. C., & Spivey, M. J. (2000). Representation, space and Hollywood Squares:Looking at things that aren't there anymore. Cognition, 76, 269-295.
122. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928.
123. Schendan, H. E., Searl, M. M., Melrose, R. J., & Stern, C. E. (2003). An fMRI study of the role of the medial temporal lobe in implicit and explicit sequence learning. Neuron, 37, 1013-1025.
124. Seger, C. A. (2006). The basal ganglia in human learning. The Neuroscientist, 12, 285-290.
125. Seger, C. A., & Cincotta, C. M. (2006). Dynamics of frontal, striatal, and hippocampal systems in rule learning. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1546-1555.
126. Shapiro, M. (2009). Memory networks: Answering the call of the hippocampus. Current Biology, 19, R329-R330.
127. Smith, L. B., & Gasser, M. (2005). The development of embodied cognition: Six lessons from babies. Artificial Life, 11, 13-30.
128. Smith, L. B., & Yu, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via crosssituational statistics. Cognition, 106, 333-338.
129. Solan, Z., Horn, D., Ruppin, E., & Edelman, S. (2005). Unsupervised learning of natural languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 11629-11634.
130. Stenning, K., & van Lambalgen, M. (2008). Human reasoning and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
131. Syal, S., & Finlay, B. L. (2009). Motivating language learning: Thinking outside the cortex. Developmental Science, in press.
132. Szmrecsanyi, B. (2005). Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1, 113-149.
133. Thal, D. J., & Flores, M. (2001). Development of sentence interpretation strategies by typically developing and late-talking toddlers. Journal of Child Language, 28, 173-193.
134. Thomaz, A. L., & Breazeal, C. (2008). Experiments in socially guided exploration: Lessons learned in building robots that learn with and without human teachers [Special Issue]. Connection Science, 20, 91-110.
135. Ullman, M. T. (2006). Is Broca's area part of a basal ganglia thalamocortical circuit? Cortex, 42, 480-485.
136. Von Berger, E., Wulfeck, B., Bates, E., & Fink, N. (1996). Developmental changes in realtime sentence processing. First Language, 16, 193-222.
137. Wallenstein, G. V., Eichenbaum, H., & Hasselmo, M. E. (1998). The hippocampus as an associator of discontiguous events. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 317-323.
138. Waterfall, H. R. (2006). A little change is a good thing: Feature theory, language acquisition and variation sets. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Chicago.
139. Waterfall, H. R., & Edelman, S. (2009). The neglected universals: Learnability constraints and discourse cues. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 471-472.
140. Waterfall, H. R., Sandbank, B., Onnis, L., & Edelman, S. (2010). An empirical generative framework for computational modeling of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 37, 671-703.
141. Weber, B., Wellmer, J., Reuber, M., Mormann, F., Weis, S., Urbach, H., Ruhlmann, J., Elger, C. E., & Fernandez, G. (2006). Left hippocampal pathology is associated with atypical language lateralization in patients with focal epilepsy. Brain, 129, 346-351.
142. Werker, J. F., & Yeung, H. H. (2005). Infant speech perception bootstraps word learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 519-527.
143. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans., 3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
144. Yu, C., & Ballard, D. (2007). A unified model of word learning: Integrating statistical and social cues. Neurocomputing, 70, 2149-2165.