Systematic characterization of deubiquitylating enzymes for roles in maintaining genome integrity

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1016-1026

  Nishi, Ryotaro ^a   Wijnhoven, Paul ^a   Le Sage, Carlos ^a   Tjeertes, Jorrit ^a,d   Galanty, Yaron ^a   Forment, Josep V ^a   Clague, Michael J ^b   Urbé, Sylvie ^b   Jackson, Stephen P ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^d NOVARTIS PHARMA AG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING PROTEIN; DEUBIQUITINASE; PROTEIN NFRKB; PROTEIN UCHL5; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; ENZYME; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; ISOENZYME; NFRKB PROTEIN, HUMAN; PROTEASOME; UBIQUITIN THIOLESTERASE; UCHL5 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ENZYME ACTIVITY; G2 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENOME INTEGRITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; CLASSIFICATION; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DNA DAMAGE; GENETICS; IMMUNOBLOTTING; METABOLISM; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA INTERFERENCE; TUMOR CELL LINE; UBIQUITINATION;

CELL LINE, TUMOR; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; ENZYMES; G2 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; HUMANS; IMMUNOBLOTTING; ISOENZYMES; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; PHYLOGENY; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA INTERFERENCE; UBIQUITIN THIOLESTERASE; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84922010371     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: 14764679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb3028     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Hoeijmakers, J. H. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 411, 366-374 (2001).
2. Khanna, K. K. & Jackson, S. P. DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nat. Genet. 27, 247-254 (2001).
3. Kastan, M. B. DNA damage responses: mechanisms and roles in human disease: 2007 G.H.A. Clowes Memorial Award Lecture. Mol. Cancer Res. 6, 517-524 (2008).
4. Shiloh, Y. The ATM-mediated DNA-damage response: taking shape. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31, 402-410 (2006).
5. Jackson, S. P. Sensing and repairing DNA double-strand breaks. Carcinogenesis 23, 687-696 (2002).
6. Jackson, S. P. & Durocher, D. Regulation of DNA damage responses by ubiquitin and SUMO. Mol. Cell 49, 795-807 (2013).
7. Kerscher, O., Felberbaum, R. & Hochstrasser, M. Modification of proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 22, 159-180 (2006).
8. Komander, D. & Rape, M. The ubiquitin code. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81, 203-229 (2012).
9. Reyes-Turcu, F. E., Ventii, K. H. & Wilkinson, K. D. Regulation and cellular roles of ubiquitin-specific deubiquitinating enzymes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 363-397 (2009).
10. Komander, D., Clague, M. J. & Urbe, S. Breaking the chains: structure and function of the deubiquitinases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 550-563 (2009).
11. Khoronenkova, S. V. et al. ATM-dependent downregulation of USP7/HAUSP by PPM1G activates p53 response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 45, 801-813 (2012).
12. Nakajima, S. et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease 5 is required for the efficient repair of DNA double-strand breaks. PLoS ONE 9, e84899 (2014).
13. Nicassio, F. et al. Human USP3 is a chromatin modifier required for S phase progression and genome stability. Curr. Biol. 17, 1972-1977 (2007).
14. Nijman, S. M. et al. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP1 regulates the Fanconi anemia pathway. Mol. Cell 17, 331-339 (2005).
15. Nishikawa, H. et al. BRCA1-associated protein 1 interferes with BRCA1/BARD1 RING heterodimer activity. Cancer Res. 69, 111-119 (2009).
16. Sobhian, B. et al. RAP80 targets BRCA1 to specific ubiquitin structures at DNA damage sites. Science 316, 1198-1202 (2007).
17. Wiltshire, T. D. et al. Sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition identifies ubiquitin-specific peptidase 11 (USP11) as a regulator of DNA double-strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 14565-14571 (2010).
18. Yu, H. et al. Tumor suppressor and deubiquitinase BAP1 promotes DNA double-strand break repair. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 285-290 (2014).
19. Polo, S. E. & Jackson, S. P. Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications. Genes. Dev. 25, 409-433 (2011).
20. Yoshida, A., Yoneda-Kato, N. & Kato, J. Y. CSN5 specifically interacts with CDK2 and controls senescence in a cytoplasmic cyclin E-mediated manner. Sci. Rep. 3, 1054 (2013).
21. Burrows, A. C., Prokop, J. & Summers, M. K. Skp1-Cul1-F-box ubiquitin ligase (SCF(βTrCP))-mediated destruction of the ubiquitin-specific protease USP37 during G2-phase promotes mitotic entry. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 39021-39029 (2012).
22. Aressy, B. et al. A screen for deubiquitinating enzymes involved in the G(2)/M checkpoint identifies USP50 as a regulator of HSP90-dependent Wee1 stability. Cell Cycle 9, 3815-3822 (2010).
23. Matsuoka, S. et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 316, 1160-1166 (2007).
24. Nakada, S. et al. Non-canonical inhibition of DNA damage-dependent ubiquitination by OTUB1. Nature 466, 941-946 (2010).
25. Mosbech, A., Lukas, C., Bekker-Jensen, S. & Mailand, N. The deubiquitylating enzyme USP44 counteracts the DNA double-strand break response mediated by the RNF8 and RNF168 ubiquitin ligases. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 16579-16587 (2013).
26. Kato, K. et al. Fine-tuning of DNA damage-dependent ubiquitination by OTUB2 supports the DNA repair pathway choice. Mol. Cell 53, 617-630 (2014).
27. Yao, T. et al. Proteasome recruitment and activation of the Uch37 deubiquitinating enzyme by Adrm1. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 994-1002 (2006).
28. Sartori, A. A. et al. Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 450, 509-514 (2007).
29. Gravel, S., Chapman, J. R., Magill, C. & Jackson, S. P. DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes. Dev. 22, 2767-2772 (2008).
30. Qiu, X. B. et al. hRpn13/ADRM1/GP110 is a novel proteasome subunit that binds the deubiquitinating enzyme, UCH37. EMBO J. 25, 5742-5753 (2006).
31. Hamazaki, J. et al. A novel proteasome interacting protein recruits the deubiquitinating enzyme UCH37 to 26S proteasomes. EMBO J. 25, 4524-4536 (2006).
32. Lam, Y. A., Xu, W., DeMartino, G. N. & Cohen, R. E. Editing of ubiquitin conjugates by an isopeptidase in the 26S proteasome. Nature 385, 737-740 (1997).
33. Jacquemont, C. & Taniguchi, T. Proteasome function is required for DNA damage response and fanconi anemia pathway activation. Cancer Res. 67, 7395-7405 (2007).
34. Murakawa, Y. et al. Inhibitors of the proteasome suppress homologous DNA recombination in mammalian cells. Cancer Res. 67, 8536-8543 (2007).
35. Mailand, N. et al. RNF8 ubiquitylates histones at DNA double-strand breaks and promotes assembly of repair proteins. Cell 131, 887-900 (2007).
36. Kolas, N. K. et al. Orchestration of the DNA-damage response by the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase. Science 318, 1637-1640 (2007).
37. Huen, M. S. et al. RNF8 transduces the DNA-damage signal via histone ubiquitylation and checkpoint protein assembly. Cell 131, 901-914 (2007).
38. Yao, T. et al. Distinct modes of regulation of the Uch37 deubiquitinating enzyme in the proteasome and in the Ino80 chromatin-remodeling complex. Mol. Cell 31, 909-917 (2008).
39. Gospodinov, A., Tsaneva, I. & Anachkova, B. RAD51 foci formation in response to DNA damage is modulated by TIP49. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 41, 925-933 (2009).
40. Gospodinov, A. et al. Mammalian Ino80 mediates double-strand break repair through its role in DNA end strand resection. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 4735-4745 (2011).
41. Park, E. J., Hur, S. K. & Kwon, J. Human INO80 chromatin-remodelling complex contributes to DNA double-strand break repair via the expression of Rad54B and XRCC3 genes. Biochem. J. 431, 179-187 (2010).
42. Wu, S. et al. A YY1-INO80 complex regulates genomic stability through homologous recombination-based repair. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1165-1172 (2007).
43. Chen, L. et al. Subunit organization of the human INO80 chromatin remodeling complex: an evolutionarily conserved core complex catalyzes ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 11283-11289 (2011).
44. Seeber, A., Hauer, M. & Gasser, S. M. Nucleosome remodelers in double-strand break repair. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 23, 174-184 (2013).
45. Min, J. N. et al. The mINO80 chromatin remodeling complex is required for efficient telomere replication and maintenance of genome stability. Cell Res. 23, 1396-1413 (2013).
46. Aymard, F. et al. Transcriptionally active chromatin recruits homologous recombination at DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 366-374 (2014).
47. Kolas, N. K. et al. Orchestration of the DNA-damage response by the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase. Science 318, 1637-1640 (2007).
48. Galanty, Y. et al. Mammalian SUMO E3-ligases PIAS1 and PIAS4 promote responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 462, 935-939 (2009).
49. Huertas, P. & Jackson, S. P. Human CtIP mediates cell cycle control of DNA end resection and double strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 9558-9565 (2009).
50. Sakaue-Sawano, A. et al. Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell-cycle progression. Cell 132, 487-498 (2008).
51. Galanty, Y., Belotserkovskaya, R., Coates, J. & Jackson, S. P. RNF4, a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase, promotes DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev. 26, 1179-1195 (2012).
52. Certo, M. T. et al. Tracking genome engineering outcome at individual DNA breakpoints. Nat. Methods 8, 671-676 (2011).
53. Forment, J. V., Walker, R. V. & Jackson, S. P. A high-throughput, flow cytometry-based method to quantify DNA-end resection in mammalian cells. Cytometry A 81, 922-928 (2012).