On the definition and possible underpinnings of framing effects: A brief review and a critical evaluation

Perspectives on Framing

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 3-33

  Keren, Gideon ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921288675     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (87)

1. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70 (Whole number 416).
2. Bargh, J. A. (2006). What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 147-168.
3. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
4. Birnbaum, M. (1999). How to show that 9>221: Collect judgments in a between subjects design. Psychological Methods, 1, 241-249.
5. Brendl, M. C. (2001). Goals and the compatibility principle in attitudes, judgment, and choice. In G. B. Moskowitz (Ed.), The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 317-332). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.
7. Clark, H. H., & Schober, M. F. (1992). Asking questions and influencing answers. In J. M. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about questions (pp. 15-48). New York: Russel Sage.
8. Cohen, L. J. (1981). Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 317-370.
9. Colman, A. M. (1995). Game theory and its applications. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
10. Druckman, J. N. (2001a). Evaluating framing effects. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 91-101.
11. Druckman, J. N. (2001b). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23, 225-256.
12. Fairhurst, G. T. (2005). Reframing the art of framing: Problems and prospects for leadership. Leadership, 1, 165-185.
13. Fiedler, K. (2008). Language - A toolbox for sharing and influencing social reality. Perspective on Psychological Science, 3, 38-47.
14. Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
15. Friend, R., Rafferty, Y., & Bramel, D. (1990). A puzzling misinterpretation of the Asch "conformity" study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 29-44.
16. Frisch, D. (1993). Reasons for framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 399-429.
17. Ganzach, Y., & Schul, Y. (1995). The influence of information and goal framing on decision. Acta Psychologica, 89, 23-36.
18. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
19. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
20. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. C. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
21. Grice, H. P. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 113-128). New York: Academic Press.
22. Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 79-109.
23. Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level-theory. New York: Harper.
24. Holleman, B. C., & Pander Maat, H. L. W. (2009). The pragmatics of profiling: Framing effects in text interpretation and text production. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2204-2221.
25. Hsee, C. K. (1996). The evaluability hypothesis: an explanation for preferences reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 247-257.
26. Hsee, C. K., Loewenstein, G. F., Blount, S., & Bazerman, M. H. (1999). Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 576-590.
27. Johnson, E. J., Bellman, S., & Lohse, G. L. (2002). Defaults, framing, and privacy: Why opting in-opting out. Marketing Letters, 13, 5-15.
28. Kahneman, D. (1992). Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making, 51, 296-312.
29. Kahneman, D. (2000). Preface. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values and frames (pp. ix-xvii). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Kahneman, D., & Snell, J. (1990). Predicting utility. In R. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in decision making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
32. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
33. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-324.
34. Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 375-405.
35. Kanouse, D. E., & Hanson, L. R. (1972). Negativity in evaluation. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 47-62). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
36. Keren, G. (2007). Framing, intentions, and trust-choice incompatibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 238-255.
37. Kubovy, M., & Psotka, J. (1976). The predominance of seven and the apparent spontaneity of numerical choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 291-294.
38. LeBoeuf, R. A., & Shafir, E. (2003). Deep thoughts and shallow frames: On the susceptibility to framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 77-92.
39. Levin, I. P. (1987). Associative effects of information framing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 85-86.
40. Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 374-378.
41. Levin, I. P., Johnson, R. D., Russo, C. P., & Deldin, P. J. (1985). Framing effects in Judgments tasks with varying amounts of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 36, 362-377.
42. Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 149-188.
43. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44. Levinson, S. C. (1995). Interactional biases in human thinking. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Social Intelligence and Interaction (pp. 221-260). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. S. (1944). Levels of aspiration. In J. M. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavioral disorders. New York: Ronald Press.
46. Lewis, D. K. (1969). Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Loewenstein, G. (1988). Frames of mind in intertemporal choice. Management Science, 34, 200-214.
48. Magen, E., Dweck, C., & Gross, J. J. (2008). The hidden zero effect. Psychological Science, 19, 648-649.
49. Mandel, D. R. (2001). Gain-loss framing and choice: Separating outcome formulations from descriptors formulations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 56-76.
50. McCann, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (1992). Personal and contextual factors in communication: A review of the "communication game". In G. R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction, and social cognition (pp. 144-172). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51. McKenzie, C. R. M., & Nelson, J. D. (2003). What a speaker's choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selection, and framing effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 596-602.
52. Mehta, J., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1994a). The nature of salience: An experimental investigation of pure coordination games. American Economic Review, 84, 658-673.
53. Mehta, J., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1994b). Focal points in pure coordination games: An experimental investigation. Theory and Decision, 36, 163-185.
54. Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 33-60.
55. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
56. Quattrone, G. A., & Tversky, A. (1988). Contrasting rational and psychological analysis of political choice. American Political Science Review, 82, 719-736.
57. Read, D., Loewenstein, G., & Rabin, M. (1999). Choice bracketing. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 171-179.
58. Redelmeier, D. A., & Tversky, A. (1992). On the framing of multiple prospects. Psychological Science, 3, 191-193.
59. Rock, I. (1975). An introduction to perception. New York: Macmillan.
60. Rosenthal, R. (1966). Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: AppletonCentury Crofts.
61. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
62. Roszkowski, M. J., & Snelbecker, G. E. (1990). Effects of "framing" on measures of risk tolerance: Financial planners are not immune. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19, 237-246.
63. Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3-19.
64. Sally, D. (2002). "What an ugly baby!": Risk dominance, sympathy, and the coordination of meaning. Rationality and Society, 14, 78-108.
65. Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Schwarz, N. (1994). Judgment in social context: Biases, shortcomings, and the logic of conversation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 123-162.
67. Schwarz, N. (1996). Cognition and Communication: Judgmental Biases, research methods, and the logic of communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
68. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523.
69. Shafir, E. (1993). Choosing vs. rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others. Memory and Cognition, 21, 546-556.
70. Shafir, E. (1995). Compatibility in cognition and decision. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 32, 247-274.
71. Sher, S., & McKenzie, C. R. M. (2006). Information leakage from logically equivalent frames. Cognition, 101, 467-494.
72. Sher, S., & McKenzie, C. R. M. (2008). Framing effects and rationality. In N. Chater & M. Oaksford (Eds.), The probabilistic mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73. Simon, R. J. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
74. Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 281-295.
75. Slovic, P., Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1990). Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. In, R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in decision making. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
76. Soman, D. (2004). Framing, loss aversion, and mental accounting. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 379-398). Oxford: Blackwell.
77. Sugden, R. (2005). Experiments as models and experiments as tests. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12, 291-302.
78. Teigen, K. H., & Brun, W. (1999). The directionality of verbal probability expressions: Effects on decisions, predictions, and probabilistic reasoning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 155-190.
79. Teigen, K., & Karevold, K. I. (2005). Looking back versus looking ahead: Framing of time and work at different stages of a project. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 229-246.
80. Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4, 199-214.
81. Thaler, R. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 183-206.
82. Thaler, R., Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., & Schwartz, A. (1997). The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk taking: An experimental test. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 647-661.
83. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
84. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, 251-278.
85. Van Buiten, M., & Keren, G. (2009a). Speaker-listener incompatibility: Joint and separate processing in risky choice framing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 106-115.
86. Van Buiten, M., & Keren, G. (2009b). Speakers choice of frame in binary choice: Effects of recommendation mode and option attractiveness. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 51-63.
87. Wänke, M., Schwarz, N., & Noëlle-Neumann, E. (1995). Question wording in comparative judgments: Understanding and manipulating the dynamics of the direction of comparison. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 347-372.