Framing, intentions, and trust-choice incompatibility

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 103, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 238-255

  Keren, Gideon ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Choice; Framing; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249023050     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Agresti A. An introduction to categorical data analysis (1996), Wiley, New York
2. Bacharach M., and Gambetta D. Trust in signs. In: Cook K.S. (Ed). Trust in society Vol. 2 (2001), Russel Sage Foundation series on trust, NY
3. Blomqvist K. The many faces of trust. Scandinavian Journal of Management 13 (1997) 271-286
4. Braithwaite V., and Levi M. Trust and governance (1998), Sage, London
5. Camerer C.F. Gifts as economic signals and social symbols. American Journal of Sociology 94 (1988) S180-S214
6. Clark H.H., and Schober M.F. asking questions and influencing answers. In: Tanur J.M. (Ed). Questions about questions (1992), Russel sage, New York 15-48
7. Colman A.M. Game theory and its applications. 2nd (1995), Butterworth, Oxford second edition
8. Eagly A.H., Wood W., and Chaiken S. Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 4 (1978) 424-435
9. Elster (1989). The cement of society: a study in social order. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
10. Frisch D. reasons for framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human decision Processes 54 (1993) 399-429
11. Grice H.P. Logic and conversation. In: Cole P., and Morgan J.L. (Eds). Syntax and Semantics (1975), Academic Press, New York 113-128
12. Grice H.P. Further notes on logic and conversation. In: Cole P., and Morgan J.L. (Eds). Syntax and Semantics (1975), Academic Press, New York 113-128
13. Hilton D.J. The social context of reasoning: conversational inference and rational judgment. Psychological Bulletin 118 (1995) 248-271
14. Hodges L.V., and Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta analysis (1985), Academic press, Orlando
15. Hsee C.K. The evaluability hypothesis: an explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human decision Processes 67 (1996) 247-257
16. Johnson M.D. Consumer choice strategies for comparing non-comparable alternatives. Journal of consumer research 11 (1984) 741-753
17. Johnson R.D., and Levin I.P. More than meets the eye: the effect of missing information on purchase evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research 12 (1985) 169-177
18. Kahneman D., and Tversky A. Prospect Theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 47 (1979) 263-291
19. Keren G., and Raub W. Resolving social conflicts via hostage posting: theoretical and empirical considerations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122 (1993) 429-448
20. Korniol R. Reading people's minds: a transformation rule model for predicting others' thoughts and feelings. Advancements in Experimental Social Psychology 23 (1990) 211-247
21. Kramer R.M., and Cook K. Trust and distrust in organizations: dilemmas and approaches (2004), Sage, London
22. Levin I.P. Associative effects of information framing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (1987) 85-86
23. Levin I.P., and Gaeth G.J. How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research 15 (1988) 374-378
24. Levin I.P., Schneider S.L., and Gaeth G.J. All frames are not created equal: a topology and critical analysis of framing effect. Organizational Behavior and Human decision Processes 76 (1998) 149-188
25. Lewis D.K. Convention (1969), Harvard University press, Cambridge MA
26. McCabe K.A., Rigdon M.L., and Smith V.L. Positive reciprocity, and intentions in trust games. Journal of Economic and Behavior and Organization 52 (2003) 267-275
27. McKenzie C.R.M., and Nelson J.D. What a speaker's choice of frame reveals: reference points, frame selection, and framing effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10 (2003) 596-602
28. Meyerowitz B.E., and Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (1987) 500-510
29. Peeters G., and Czapinski J. Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: the distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology 1 (1990) 33-60
30. Petty R.E., and Wegener D.T. Attitude change: multiple roles of persuasion variables. In: Gilbert D.T., Fiske S.T., and Lindzey G. (Eds). The handbook of social psychology (1998), McGraw-Hill, New York 323-390
31. Raub W., and Keren G. Hostages as a commitment device: a game theoretic model and an empirical test of some scenarios. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations 21 (1993) 43-67
32. Sally D. 'What an ugly baby!': risk dominance, sympathy, and the coordination of meaning. Rationality and Society 14 (2002) 78-108
33. Sanford A.J., Fay N., Stewart A., and Moxey L. Perspective in statements of quality, with implications for consumer psychology. Psychological Science 13 (2002) 130-134
34. Schwartz N. Judgment in a social context: biases, shortcomings, and the logic of conversation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 26 (1994) 12-123
35. Shafir E. Compatibility in Cognition and decision (1995). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 32 (1995) 247-274
36. Shiv B., Edell J.A., and Payne J.W. Factors affecting the impact of negativity vs. positivity framed Ad messages. Journal of Consumer research 24 (1997) 285-294
37. Shiv B., Edell J.A., and Payne J.W. Does elaboration increase or decrease the effectiveness of negativity vs. positivity framed messages?. Journal of Consumer Research 31 (2004) 199-208
38. Teigen K., and Brun W. Verbal probabilities: a question of frame?. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 15 (2002) 1-20
39. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211 (1981) 453-458
40. Ulmann-Margalit E. Trust, distrust, and in between. In: Hardin R. (Ed). Trust and trust worthiness (2002), Russel Sage, N.Y.
41. Van Lange P.A.M., and Kuhlman D.M. Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: a test of the might vs. morality effect. Journal of personality and Social Psychology 51 (1994) 110-116