Disruption of SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases Slx5-Slx8/RNF4 alters RecQ-like helicase Sgs1/BLM localization in yeast and human cells

DNA Repair

Volumn 26, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-14

  Böhm, Stefanie ^a   Mihalevic, Michael Joseph ^a   Casal, Morgan Alexandra ^a   Bernstein, Kara Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

BLM; RNF4; Sgs1; Slx5 Slx8; STUbL

Indexed keywords

BLOOM SYNDROME HELICASE; HYDROXYUREA; MESYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; RECQ HELICASE; RECQ LIKE HELICASE SGS1; REGULATOR PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN E3 LIGASE RNF4; UBIQUITIN LIGASE SLX5 SLX8; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; RNF4 PROTEIN, HUMAN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SGS1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SLX5 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SLX8 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SUMO PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; EUKARYOTE; GENE SILENCING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IONIZING RADIATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEPLETION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN TARGETING; REGULATORY MECHANISM; S PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; SUMOYLATION; U2OS CELL LINE; YEAST CELL; ADOLESCENT; CELL NUCLEUS; FEMALE; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; RECOMBINATION REPAIR; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TUMOR CELL LINE; UBIQUITINATION;

EUKARYOTA; MAMMALIA; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

ADOLESCENT; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPLICATION; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; FEMALE; GENE KNOCKDOWN TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; RECOMBINATIONAL DNA REPAIR; RECQ HELICASES; S PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SMALL UBIQUITIN-RELATED MODIFIER PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84920721207     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: 15687856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Bernstein K.A., Gangloff S., Rothstein R. The RecQ DNA helicases in DNA repair. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2010, 44:393-417.
2. Chu W.K., Hickson I.D. RecQ helicases: multifunctional genome caretakers. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9:644-654.
3. Barea F., Tessaro S., Bonatto D. In silico analyses of a new group of fungal and plant RecQ4-homologous proteins. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2008, 32:349-358.
4. Kwon S.H., Choi D.H., Lee R., Bae S.H. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hrq1 requires a long 3'-tailed DNA substrate for helicase activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 427:623-628.
5. Choi D.H., Lee R., Kwon S.H., Bae S.H. Hrq1 functions independently of Sgs1 to preserve genome integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Microbiol. 2013, 51:105-112.
6. Ellis N.A., Groden J., Ye T.Z., Straughen J., Lennon D.J., Ciocci S., Proytcheva M., German J. The Bloom's syndrome gene product is homologous to RecQ helicases. Cell 1995, 83:655-666.
7. Nordlund P., Reichard P. Ribonucleotide reductases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006, 75:681-706.
8. Kitamura E., Blow J.J., Tanaka T.U. Live-cell imaging reveals replication of individual replicons in eukaryotic replication factories. Cell 2006, 125:1297-1308.
9. Branzei D., Foiani M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:208-219.
10. Friedel A.M., Pike B.L., Gasser S.M. ATR/Mec1: coordinating fork stability and repair. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21:237-244.
11. Segurado M., Tercero J.A. The S-phase checkpoint: targeting the replication fork. Biol. Cell 2009, 101:617-627.
12. Labib K., De Piccoli G. Surviving chromosome replication: the many roles of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 366:3554-3561.
13. Liberi G., Maffioletti G., Lucca C., Chiolo I., Baryshnikova A., Cotta-Ramusino C., Lopes M., Pellicioli A., Haber J.E., Foiani M. Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:339-350.
14. Sogo J.M., Lopes M., Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 2002, 297:599-602.
15. Lopes M., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., Newlon C.S., Foiani M. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 2001, 412:557-561.
16. Sengupta S., Linke S.P., Pedeux R., Yang Q., Farnsworth J., Garfield S.H., Valerie K., Shay J.W., Ellis N.A., Wasylyk B., Harris C.C. BLM helicase-dependent transport of p53 to sites of stalled DNA replication forks modulates homologous recombination. EMBO J. 2003, 22:1210-1222.
17. Cobb J.A., Bjergbaek L., Shimada K., Frei C., Gasser S.M. DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J. 2003, 22:4325-4336.
18. Bjergbaek L., Cobb J.A., Tsai-Pflugfelder M., Gasser S.M. Mechanistically distinct roles for Sgs1p in checkpoint activation and replication fork maintenance. EMBO J. 2005, 24:405-417.
19. Frei C., Gasser S.M. The yeast Sgs1p helicase acts upstream of Rad53p in the DNA replication checkpoint and colocalizes with Rad53p in S-phase-specific foci. Genes Dev. 2000, 14:81-96.
20. Ouyang K.J., Woo L.L., Zhu J., Huo D., Matunis M.J., Ellis N.A. SUMO modification regulates BLM and RAD51 interaction at damaged replication forks. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7:e1000252.
21. Eladad S., Ye T.Z., Hu P., Leversha M., Beresten S., Matunis M.J., Ellis N.A. Intra-nuclear trafficking of the BLM helicase to DNA damage-induced foci is regulated by SUMO modification. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005, 14:1351-1365.
22. Böhm S., Bernstein K.A. The role of post-translational modifications in fine-tuning BLM helicase function during DNA repair. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2014, 22C:123-132.
23. Tkach J.M., Yimit A., Lee A.Y., Riffle M., Costanzo M., Jaschob D., Hendry J.A., Ou J., Moffat J., Boone C., Davis T.N., Nislow C., Brown G.W. Dissecting DNA damage response pathways by analysing protein localization and abundance changes during DNA replication stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14:966-976.
24. Pan X., Ye P., Yuan D.S., Wang X., Bader J.S., Boeke J.D. A DNA integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 2006, 124:1069-1081.
25. Pan X., Yuan D.S., Xiang D., Wang X., Sookhai-Mahadeo S., Bader J.S., Hieter P., Spencer F., Boeke J.D. A robust toolkit for functional profiling of the yeast genome. Mol. Cell 2004, 16:487-496.
26. Collins S.R., Miller K.M., Maas N.L., Roguev A., Fillingham J., Chu C.S., Schuldiner M., Gebbia M., Recht J., Shales M., Ding H., Xu H., Han J., Ingvarsdottir K., Cheng B., Andrews B., Boone C., Berger S.L., Hieter P., Zhang Z., Brown G.W., Ingles C.J., Emili A., Allis C.D., Toczyski D.P., Weissman J.S., Greenblatt J.F., Krogan N.J. Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 2007, 446:806-810.
27. Slater M.L. Effect of reversible inhibition of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis on the yeast cell cycle. J. Bacteriol. 1973, 113:263-270.
28. Mullen J.R., Kaliraman V., Ibrahim S.S., Brill S.J. Requirement for three novel protein complexes in the absence of the Sgs1 DNA helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2001, 157:103-118.
29. Ii T., Mullen J.R., Slagle C.E., Brill S.J. Stimulation of in vitro sumoylation by Slx5-Slx8: evidence for a functional interaction with the SUMO pathway. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2007, 6:1679-1691.
30. Ii T., Fung J., Mullen J.R., Brill S.J. The yeast Slx5-Slx8 DNA integrity complex displays ubiquitin ligase activity. Cell Cycle 2007, 6:2800-2809.
31. Prudden J., Pebernard S., Raffa G., Slavin D.A., Perry J.J., Tainer J.A., McGowan C.H., Boddy M.N. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability. EMBO J. 2007, 26:4089-4101.
32. Burgess R.C., Rahman S., Lisby M., Rothstein R., Zhao X. The Slx5-Slx8 complex affects sumoylation of DNA repair proteins and negatively regulates recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27:6153-6162.
33. Zhang C., Roberts T.M., Yang J., Desai R., Brown G.W. Suppression of genomic instability by SLX5 and SLX8 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2006, 5:336-346.
34. Nagai S., Dubrana K., Tsai-Pflugfelder M., Davidson M.B., Roberts T.M., Brown G.W., Varela E., Hediger F., Gasser S.M., Krogan N.J. Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 2008, 322:597-602.
35. Hakli M., Karvonen U., Janne O.A., Palvimo J.J. SUMO-1 promotes association of SNURF (RNF4) with PML nuclear bodies. Exp. Cell Res. 2005, 304:224-233.
36. Yin Y., Seifert A., Chua J.S., Maure J.F., Golebiowski F., Hay R.T. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF4 is required for the response of human cells to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 2012, 26:1196-1208.
37. Galanty Y., Belotserkovskaya R., Coates J., Jackson S.P. RNF4, a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase, promotes DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev. 2012, 26:1179-1195.
38. Groocock L.M., Nie M., Prudden J., Moiani D., Wang T., Cheltsov A., Rambo R.P., Arvai A.S., Hitomi C., Tainer J.A., Luger K., Perry J.J., Lazzerini-Denchi E., Boddy M.N. RNF4 interacts with both small ubiquitin-like modifier and nucleosomes to promote the DNA damage response. EMBO Rep. 2014.
39. Bernstein K.A., Shor E., Sunjevaric I., Fumasoni M., Burgess R.C., Foiani M., Branzei D., Rothstein R. Sgs1 function in the repair of DNA replication intermediates is separable from its role in homologous recombinational repair. EMBO J. 2009, 28:915-925.
40. James P., Halladay J., Craig E.A. Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast. Genetics 1996, 144:1425-1436.
41. Thomas B.J., Rothstein R. Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell 1989, 56:619-630.
42. Sherman F., Fink G.R., Hicks J.B. Methods in Yeast Genetics 1986, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
43. Knop M., Siegers K., Pereira G., Zachariae W., Winsor B., Nasmyth K., Schiebel E. Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR-based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines. Yeast 1999, 15:963-972.
44. Janke C., Magiera M.M., Rathfelder N., Taxis C., Reber S., Maekawa H., Moreno-Borchart A., Doenges G., Schwob E., Schiebel E., Knop M. A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast 2004, 21:947-962.
45. Gietz R.D., Sugino A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene 1988, 74:527-534.
46. Bernstein K.A., Mimitou E.P., Mihalevic M.J., Chen H., Sunjaveric I., Symington L.S., Rothstein R. Resection activity of the Sgs1 helicase alters the affinity of DNA ends for homologous recombination proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2013, 1241-1251.
47. Böhm S., Lamberti G., Fernandez-Saiz V., Stapf C., Buchberger A. Cellular functions of Ufd2 and Ufd3 in proteasomal protein degradation depend on Cdc48 binding. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31:1528-1539.
48. Schneider C.A., Rasband W.S., Eliceiri K.W. NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:671-675.
49. Petermann E., Orta M.L., Issaeva N., Schultz N., Helleday T. Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair. Mol. Cell 2010, 37:492-502.
50. Ma W., Resnick M.A., Gordenin D.A. Apn1 and Apn2 endonucleases prevent accumulation of repair-associated DNA breaks in budding yeast as revealed by direct chromosomal analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:1836-1846.
51. Mathiasen D.P., Lisby M. Cell cycle regulation of homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 38:172-184.
52. Bianchi V., Pontis E., Reichard P. Changes of deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate pools induced by hydroxyurea and their relation to DNA synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261:16037-16042.
53. Tercero J.A., Diffley J.F. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 2001, 412:553-557.
54. Pellicioli A., Lucca C., Liberi G., Marini F., Lopes M., Plevani P., Romano A., Di Fiore P.P., Foiani M. Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J. 1999, 18:6561-6572.
55. Barlow J.H., Rothstein R. Rad52 recruitment is DNA replication independent and regulated by Cdc28 and the Mec1 kinase. EMBO J. 2009, 28:1121-1130.
56. Alabert C., Bianco J.N., Pasero P. Differential regulation of homologous recombination at DNA breaks and replication forks by the Mrc1 branch of the S-phase checkpoint. EMBO J. 2009, 28:1131-1141.
57. Hegnauer A.M., Hustedt N., Shimada K., Pike B.L., Vogel M., Amsler P., Rubin S.M., van Leeuwen F., Guenole A., van Attikum H., Thoma N.H., Gasser S.M. An N-terminal acidic region of Sgs1 interacts with Rpa70 and recruits Rad53 kinase to stalled forks. EMBO J. 2012, 31:3768-3783.
58. Sollier J., Driscoll R., Castellucci F., Foiani M., Jackson S.P., Branzei D. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Esc2 and Smc5-6 proteins promote sister chromatid junction-mediated intra-S repair. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20:1671-1682.
59. Bergink S., Jentsch S. Principles of ubiquitin and SUMO modifications in DNA repair. Nature 2009, 458:461-467.
60. Branzei D., Sollier J., Liberi G., Zhao X., Maeda D., Seki M., Enomoto T., Ohta K., Foiani M. Ubc9- and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 2006, 127:509-522.
61. Lu C.Y., Tsai C.H., Brill S.J., Teng S.C. Sumoylation of the BLM ortholog, Sgs1, promotes telomere-telomere recombination in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 488-498.
62. Seyfried N.T., Xu P., Duong D.M., Cheng D., Hanfelt J., Peng J. Systematic approach for validating the ubiquitinated proteome. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80:4161-4169.
63. Sriramachandran A.M., Dohmen R.J. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 75-85.
64. Alvaro D., Lisby M., Rothstein R. Genome-wide analysis of Rad52 foci reveals diverse mechanisms impacting recombination. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3:e228.
65. Mullen J.R., Das M., Brill S.J. Genetic evidence that polysumoylation bypasses the need for a SUMO-targeted Ub ligase. Genetics 2011, 187:73-87.
66. Uzunova K., Gottsche K., Miteva M., Weisshaar S.R., Glanemann C., Schnellhardt M., Niessen M., Scheel H., Hofmann K., Johnson E.S., Praefcke G.J., Dohmen R.J. Ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic control of SUMO conjugates. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:34167-34175.
67. Zhong S., Hu P., Ye T., Stan R., Ellis N., Pandolfi P. A role for PML and the nuclear body in genomic stability. Oncogene 1999, 18:7941-7947.
68. Bischof O., Kim S.H., Irving J., Beresten S., Ellis N.A., Campisi J. Regulation and localization of the Bloom syndrome protein in response to DNA damage. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 153:367-380.
69. Costanzo M., Baryshnikova A., Bellay J., Kim Y., Spear E.D., Sevier C.S., Ding H., Koh J.L., Toufighi K., Mostafavi S., Prinz J., St Onge R.P., VanderSluis B., Makhnevych T., Vizeacoumar F.J., Alizadeh S., Bahr S., Brost R.L., Chen Y., Cokol M., Deshpande R., Li Z., Lin Z.Y., Liang W., Marback M., Paw J., San Luis B.J., Shuteriqi E., Tong A.H., van Dyk N., Wallace I.M., Whitney J.A., Weirauch M.T., Zhong G., Zhu H., Houry W.A., Brudno M., Ragibizadeh S., Papp B., Pal C., Roth F.P., Giaever G., Nislow C., Troyanskaya O.G., Bussey H., Bader G.D., Gingras A.C., Morris Q.D., Kim P.M., Kaiser C.A., Myers C.L., Andrews B.J., Boone C. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 2010, 327:425-431.
70. Melnick A., Licht J.D. Deconstructing a disease: RARalpha, its fusion partners, and their roles in the pathogenesis of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 1999, 93:3167-3215.
71. Muller S., Matunis M.J., Dejean A. Conjugation with the ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO-1 regulates the partitioning of PML within the nucleus. EMBO J. 1998, 17:61-70.
72. Tatham M.H., Geoffroy M.C., Shen L., Plechanovova A., Hattersley N., Jaffray E.G., Palvimo J.J., Hay R.T. RNF4 is a poly-SUMO-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase required for arsenic-induced PML degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:538-546.
73. Lallemand-Breitenbach V., Jeanne M., Benhenda S., Nasr R., Lei M., Peres L., Zhou J., Zhu J., Raught B., de The H. Arsenic degrades PML or PML-RARalpha through a SUMO-triggered RNF4/ubiquitin-mediated pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:547-555.
74. German J., Crippa L.P., Bloom D. Bloom's syndrome. III. Analysis of the chromosome aberration characteristic of this disorder. Chromosoma 1974, 48:361-366.
75. Tikoo S., Madhavan V., Hussain M., Miller E.S., Arora P., Zlatanou A., Modi P., Townsend K., Stewart G.S., Sengupta S. Ubiquitin-dependent recruitment of the Bloom syndrome helicase upon replication stress is required to suppress homologous recombination. EMBO J. 2013, 32:1778-1792.
76. Cobb J.A., Schleker T., Rojas V., Bjergbaek L., Tercero J.A., Gasser S.M. Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:3055-3069.
77. Branzei D., Vanoli F., Foiani M. SUMOylation regulates Rad18-mediated template switch. Nature 2008, 456:915-920.
78. Liu Y., Nielsen C.F., Yao Q., Hickson I.D. The origins and processing of ultra fine anaphase DNA bridges. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2014, 26C:1-5.
79. Chan K.L., North P.S., Hickson I.D. BLM is required for faithful chromosome segregation and its localization defines a class of ultrafine anaphase bridges. EMBO J. 2007, 26:3397-3409.
80. Germann S.M., Schramke V., Pedersen R.T., Gallina I., Eckert-Boulet N., Oestergaard V.H., Lisby M. TopBP1/Dpb11 binds DNA anaphase bridges to prevent genome instability. J. Cell Biol. 2014, 204:45-59.
81. Lisby M., Barlow J.H., Burgess R.C., Rothstein R. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 2004, 118:699-713.
82. Davies S.L., North P.S., Dart A., Lakin N.D., Hickson I.D. Phosphorylation of the Bloom's syndrome helicase and its role in recovery from S-phase arrest. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24:1279-1291.
83. Davalos A.R., Kaminker P., Hansen R.K., Campisi J. ATR and ATM-dependent movement of BLM helicase during replication stress ensures optimal ATM activation and 53BP1 focus formation. Cell Cycle 2004, 3:1579-1586.
84. Ouyang K.J., Yagle M.K., Matunis M.J., Ellis N.A. BLM SUMOylation regulates ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks. Front. Genet. 2013, 4:167.
85. German J., Sanz M.M., Ciocci S., Ye T.Z., Ellis N.A. Syndrome-causing mutations of the BLM gene in persons in the Bloom's Syndrome Registry. Hum. Mutat. 2007, 28:743-753.
86. Goss K.H., Risinger M.A., Kordich J.J., Sanz M.M., Straughen J.E., Slovek L.E., Capobianco A.J., German J., Boivin G.P., Groden J. Enhanced tumor formation in mice heterozygous for Blm mutation. Science 2002, 297:2051-2053.
87. Gruber S.B., Ellis N.A., Scott K.K., Almog R., Kolachana P., Bonner J.D., Kirchhoff T., Tomsho L.P., Nafa K., Pierce H., Low M., Satagopan J., Rennert H., Huang H., Greenson J.K., Groden J., Rapaport B., Shia J., Johnson S., Gregersen P.K., Harris C.C., Boyd J., Rennert G., Offit K. BLM heterozygosity and the risk of colorectal cancer. Science 2002, 297:2013.
88. Thompson E.R., Doyle M.A., Ryland G.L., Rowley S.M., Choong D.Y., Tothill R.W., Thorne H., Barnes D.R., Li J., Ellul J., Philip G.K., Antill Y.C., James P.A., Trainer A.H., Mitchell G., Campbell I.G. Exome sequencing identifies rare deleterious mutations in DNA repair genes FANCC and BLM as potential breast cancer susceptibility alleles. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1002894.
89. Saito M., Fujimitsu Y., Sasano T., Yoshikai Y., Ban-Ishihara R., Nariai Y., Urano T., Saitoh H. The SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase RNF4 localizes to etoposide-exposed mitotic chromosomes: implication for a novel DNA damage response during mitosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 83-88.