Exploring teachers' use of TPACK in design talk: The collaborative design of technology-rich early literacy activities

Computers and Education

Volumn 82, Issue , 2015, Pages 250-262

  Boschman, Ferry ^a   McKenney, Susan ^b   Voogt, Joke ^c  

^a WINDESHEIM UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Collaborative design; Design talk; ICT learning activities; TPACK

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; EDUCATION;

COLLABORATIVE DESIGN; KNOWLEDGE DOMAINS; LEARNING ACTIVITY; TEACHERS'; TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE; THREE PHASIS; TPACK; TWO DOMAINS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 84919808116     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D., &Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 533-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.09.001.
2. Boschman, F., McKenney S., Voogt, J., (2014). Understanding decision making in teachers' curriculum design approaches. Educational Technology Research and Development, doi:10.1007/s11423-014-9341-x.
3. Clay, M. (1966). Emergent reading behaviour. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. New Zealand: University of Auckland.
4. Deketelaere, A., & Kelchtermans, G. (1996). Collaborative curriculum development: an encounter of different professional knowledge systems. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 16.
5. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, Pe1dagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 319-346.
6. Doyle, W., & Ponder, G. A. (1977). The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making. Interchange, 8(3), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01189290.
7. Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). Practicing change: curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 153-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00351.x.
8. Ertmer, P. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: the final frontier in our quest for technology integration? (EJ732691) Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 16.
9. Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2010). Teacher technology change: how knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
10. Frederiksen, C. H. (1999). Learning to reason through discourse in a problem-based learning group. Discourse Processes, 27(2), 135-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638539909545055.
11. Gholami, K., & Husu, J. (2010). How do teachers reason about their practice? Representing the epistemic nature of teachers' practical knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1520-1529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.001.
12. Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953-1960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010.
13. Handelzalts, A. (2009). Collaborative curriculum development in teacher design teams. PhD Doctoral. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.
14. Henry, S. (2012). Instructional conversations: A qualitative exploration of differences in elementary teachers' team discussions. ED Doctoral Dissertation. Harvard University.
15. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370000701798495.
16. Hong, Y.-C., & Choi, I. (2011). Three dimensions of reflective thinking in solving design problems: a conceptual model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 687-710. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9202-9.
17. Hoogveld, A., Paas, F., & Jochems, W. (2005). Training higher education teachers for instructional design of competency-based education: product-oriented versus processoriented worked examples. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 287-297.
18. Huizinga, T., Handelzalts, A., Nieveen, N., & Voogt, J. M. (2014). Teacher involvement in curriculum design: need for support to enhance teachers' design expertise. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 33-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.834077.
19. Jonassen, D. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02300500.
20. Jonassen, D. (2012). Designing for decision making. Educational Technology Research & Development, 60(2), 341-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9230-5.
21. Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Baumer, A. (2001). Just-in-time information presentation and the acquisition of complex cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(4), 373-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0747-5632(01)00011-5.
22. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740-762.
23. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tay, L. Y. (2014). TPACK-in-Action: unpacking the contextual influences of teachers' construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 78(0), 20-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.022.
24. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: putting learning by design (TM) into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1204-2.
25. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New technologies in early childhood literacy research: a review of research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3(1), 59-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14687984030031003.
26. Macnamara, J. (1972). Cognitive basis of language learning in infants. Psychological Review, 79, 1-12.
27. Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). The new taxonomy of educational objectives. Corwin Press.
28. McKenney, S., Bradley, B., & Boschman, F. (2011). Assessing teacher beliefs about early literacy curriculum implementation. Paper presented at the AERA conference New-Orleans.
29. McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2009). Designing technology for emergent literacy: the PictoPal initiative. Computers & Education, 52, 719-729.
30. van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Perspectives on problem solving and instruction. Computers & Education, 64(0), 153-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.025.
31. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
32. Porras-Hernández, L. H., & Salinas-Amescua, B. (2013). Strengthening TPACK: a broader notion of context and the use of teacher's narratives to reveal knowledge construction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 223-244.
33. Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189x029001004.
34. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
35. Rojas-Drummond, S., Mazón, N., Fernández, M., & Wegerif, R. (2006). Explicit reasoning, creativity and co-construction in primary school children's collaborative activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(2), 84-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.06.001.
36. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
37. Schon, D. (1992). Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Research in Engineering Design, 3(3), 131-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01580516.
38. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
39. Van Driel, J., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673-695.
40. Verhoeven, L., & Aarnoutse, C. (1999). Tussendoelen beginnende geletterdheid: Een leerlijn voor groep 1 tot en met 3. Nijmegen: Expertisecentrum Nederlands.
41. Vermunt, J. D., & Endedijk, M. D. (2011). Patterns in teacher learning in different phases of the professional career. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 294-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.019.
42. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge e a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x.
43. Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 9(6), 493-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00013-4.
44. Wieringa, N., Janssen, F. J. J. M., & Van Driel, J. H. (2011). Biology teachers designing context-based lessons for their classroom practicedthe importance of rules-of-thumb. International Journal of Science Education, 33(17), 2437-2462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.553969.