Understanding decision making in teachers' curriculum design approaches

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 393-416

  Boschman, Ferry ^a   McKenney, Susan ^a,b   Voogt, Joke ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d WINDESHEIM UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Early literacy; Kindergarten; Qualitative analysis; Technology integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904970428     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-014-9341-x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter: freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. New York: State University of New York Press.
2. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational researcher, 33(8), 3-15. doi: 10. 3102/0013189x033008003.
3. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673-708). London: Prentice Hall International.
4. Buchanan, T. K., Burts, D. C., Bidner, J., White, V. F., & Charlesworth, R. (1998). Predictors of the developmental appropriateness of the beliefs and practices of first, second, and third grade teachers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13(3), 459-483. doi: 10. 1016/S0885-2006(99)80052-0.
5. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363-395). New-York: Macmillan.
6. Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221-227. doi: 10. 1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0.
7. Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427-441. doi: 10. 1016/j. destud. 2004. 06. 002.
8. Cviko, A., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2012). Teachers enacting a technology-rich curriculum for emergent literacy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(1), 31-54. doi: 10. 1007/s11423-011-9208-3.
9. Davis, E. A., Beyer, C., Forbes, C. T., & Stevens, S. (2011). Understanding pedagogical design capacity through teachers' narratives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 797-810. doi: 10. 1016/j. tate. 2011. 01. 005.
10. de Kock, A., Sleegers, P., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2005). New learning and choices of secondary school teachers when arranging learning environments. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(7), 799-816. doi: 10. 1016/j. tate. 2005. 05. 012.
11. Deketelaere, A., & Kelchtermans, G. (1996). Collaborative curriculum development: An encounter of different professional knowledge systems. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 2(1), 16.
12. Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425-437. doi: 10. 1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6.
13. Doyle, W., & Ponder, G. A. (1977). The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making. Interchange, 8(3), 1-12. doi: 10. 1007/bf01189290.
14. George, J. M., & Lubben, F. (2002). Facilitating teachers' professional growth through their involvement in creating context-based materials in science. International Journal of Educational Development, 22(6), 659-672.
15. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The Making of a Teacher: Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education. New York: Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University.
16. Handelzalts, A. (2009). Collaborative curriculum development in teacher design teams (PhD Doctoral). Universiteit Twente, Enschede.
17. Hong, Y.-C., & Choi, I. (2011). Three dimensions of reflective thinking in solving design problems: a conceptual model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 687-710. doi: 10. 1007/s11423-011-9202-9.
18. Hoogveld, A. W. M., Paas, F., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2003). Application of an instructional systems design approach by teachers in higher education: Individual versus team design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 581-590.
19. Hoogveld, A. W. M., Paas, F., Jochems, W. M. G., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2001). The effects of a Web-based training in an instructional systems design approach on teachers' instructional design behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(4), 363-371.
20. Horn, I. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Teacher College Records, 112(1), 225-259.
21. Jonassen, D. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85. doi: 10. 1007/bf02300500.
22. Jonassen, D. (2012). Designing for decision making. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(2), 341-359. doi: 10. 1007/s11423-011-9230-5.
23. Kerr, S. T. (1981). How teachers design their materials: Implications for instructional design. Instructional Science, 10(4), 363-378.
24. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
25. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740-762.
26. Lawson, B. (2004). Schemata, gambits and precedent: Some factors in design expertise. Design Studies, 25(5), 443-457. doi: 10. 1016/j. destud. 2004. 05. 001.
27. Lera, S. G. (1981). Empirical and theoretical studies of design judgement: A review. Design Studies, 2(1), 19-26. doi: 10. 1016/0142-694X(81)90025-9.
28. Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers' communities of practice: opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 917-946. doi: 10. 1016/s0742-051x(02)00052-5.
29. McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2009). Designing technology for emergent literacy: The PictoPal initiative. Computers & Education, 52, 719-729.
30. Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. New Jersey: University Press Group Limited.
31. Parke, H. M., & Coble, C. R. (1997). Teachers designing curriculum as professional development: A model for transformational science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(8), 773-789.
32. Rapanta, C., Maina, M., Lotz, N., & Bacchelli, A. (2013). Team design communication patterns in e-learning design and development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 581-605. doi: 10. 1080/0158791960170103.
33. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
34. Rittel, H. J., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169. doi: 10. 1007/BF01405730.
35. Stempfle, J., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2002). Thinking in design teams-an analysis of team communication. Design Studies, 23(5), 473-496. doi: 10. 1016/S0142-694X(02)00004-2.
36. Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. New York: Heinemann.
37. Stipek, D. J., & Byler, P. (1997). Early childhood education teachers: Do they practice what they preach? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12(3), 305-325.
38. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
39. Turbill, J. (2001). A researcher goes to school: Using technology in the kindergarten literacy curriculum. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1(3), 255-279. doi: 10. 1177/14687984010013002.
40. Walker, D. F. (1971). A study of deliberation in three curriculum projects. Curriculum Theory Network, 7, 118-134.