Multiple lineages of ancient CR1 retroposons shaped the early genome evolution of amniotes

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 205-217

  Suh, Alexander ^a,b   Churakov, Gennady ^a   Ramakodi, Meganathan P ^c,i,j   Platt, Roy N ^c,d   Jurka, Jerzy ^e   Kojima, Kenji K ^e   Caballero, Juan ^f   Smit, Arian F ^f   Vliet, Kent A ^g   Hoffmann, Federico G ^c   Brosius, Jurgen ^a   Green, Richard E ^h   Braun, Edward L ^g   Ray, David A ^c,d   Schmitz, Jurgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Genetic Information Research Institute   (United States)

^f INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁱ FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^j Temple University   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

amniotes; chicken repeat 1; comparative genomics; crocodilian genomes; phylogenomics; Transposable elements

Indexed keywords

AMNIOTA; AVES; CROCODYLIDAE (ALL CROCODILES); LEPIDOSAURIA; MAMMALIA; MONOTREMATA; SERPENTES; TESTUDINES; THERIA;

RETROPOSON;

ANIMAL; CROCODILIAN; GENETICS; GENOME; LONG INTERSPERSED REPEAT; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; RETROPOSON; TURTLE;

ALLIGATORS AND CROCODILES; ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME; LONG INTERSPERSED NUCLEOTIDE ELEMENTS; PHYLOGENY; RETROELEMENTS; TURTLES;

EID: 84919656263     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evu256     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Abrusán G, Krambeck H-J, Junier T, Giordano J, Warburton PE. 2008. Biased distributions and decay of long interspersed nuclear elements in the chicken genome. Genetics 178:573-581.
2. Alfö ldi J, et al. 2011. The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals. Nature 477: 587-591.
3. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 215:403-410.
4. Baker AJ, Haddrath O, McPherson JD, Cloutier A. 2014. Genomic support for a moa-tinamou clade and adaptive morphological convergence in flightless ratites. Mol Biol Evol. 31:1686-1696.
5. Burch JBE, Davis DL, Haas NB. 1993. Chicken repeat 1 elements contain a pol-like open reading frame and belong to the non-long terminal repeat class of retrotransposons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 90: 8199-8203.
6. Castoe TA, et al. 2013. The Burmese python genome reveals themolecular basis for extreme adaptation in snakes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 110: 20645-20650.
7. Chong AY, et al. 2014. Evolution and gene capture in ancient endogenous retroviruses-insights from the crocodilian genomes. Retrovirology 11:71.
8. Churakov G, et al. 2009. Mosaic retroposon insertion patterns in placental mammals. Genome Res. 19:868-875.
9. Churakov G, et al. 2010. A novel web-based TinT application and the chronology of the primate Alu retroposon activity. BMC Evol Biol. 10:376.
10. Dasmahapatra KK, et al. 2012. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487:94-98.
11. Delfino M, et al. 2008. A complete skull of Allodaposuchus precedens Nopcsa, 1928 (Eusuchia) and a reassessment of the morphology of the taxon based on the Romanian remains. J Vertebr Paleontol. 28: 111-122.
12. Diez CM, Meca E, Tenaillon MI, Gaut BS. 2014. Three groups of transposable elements with contrasting copy number dynamics and host responses in the maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) genome. PLoS Genet. 10: e1004298.
13. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792-1797.
14. Edgar RC. 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460-2461.
15. Gatesy J, Amato G, Norell M, DeSalle R, Hayashi C. 2003. Combined support for wholesale taxic atavism in gavialine crocodylians. Syst Biol. 52:403-422.
16. Green RE, et al. 2014. Three crocodilian genomes reveal ancestral patterns of evolution among archosaurs. Science 346:1335.
17. Haas NB, et al. 2001. Subfamilies of CR1 non-LTR retrotransposons have different 50-UTR sequences but are otherwise conserved. Gene 265: 175-183.
18. Haas NB, Grabowski JM, Sivitz AB, Burch JBE. 1997. Chicken repeat 1 (CR1) elements, which define an ancient family of vertebrate non-LTR retrotransposons, contain two closely spaced open reading frames. Gene 197:305-309.
19. Haddrath O, Baker AJ. 2012. Multiple nuclear genes and retroposons support vicariance and dispersal of the palaeognaths, and an Early Cretaceous origin of modern birds. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 279: 4617-4625.
20. Han K-L, et al. 2011. Are transposable element insertions homoplasy free: an examination using the avian tree of life. Syst Biol. 60: 375-386.
21. Harshman J, Huddleston CJ, Bollback JP, Parsons TJ, Braun MJ. 2003. True and false gharials: a nuclear gene phylogeny of Crocodylia. Syst Biol. 52:386-402.
22. Hillier LW, et al. 2004. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432:695-716.
23. Holliday CM, Gardner NM. 2012. A new eusuchian crocodyliform with novel cranial integument and its significance for the origin and evolution of Crocodylia. PLoS One 7:e30471.
24. Janes DE, Organ CL, Fujita MK, Shedlock AM, Edwards SV. 2010. Genome evolution in reptilia, the sister group of mammals. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 11:239-264.
25. Janke A, Gullberg A, Hughes S, Aggarwal R, Arnason U. 2005. Mitogenomic analyses place the gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) on the crocodile tree and provide pre-K/T divergence times for most crocodilians. J Mol Evol. 61:620-626.
26. Jarvis ED, et al. 2014. Whole genome analyses resolve the early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science 346:1320-1331.
27. Jurka J, et al. 2005. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet Genome Res. 110:462-467.
28. Kaiser VB, van Tuinen M, Ellegren H. 2007. Insertion events of CR1 retrotransposable elements elucidate the phylogenetic branching order in galliform birds. Mol Biol Evol. 24:338-347.
29. Kajikawa M, Ohshima K, Okada N. 1997. Determination of the entire sequence of turtle CR1: the first open reading frame of the turtle CR1 element encodes a protein with a novel zinc finger motif. Mol Biol Evol. 14:1206-1217.
30. Kapitonov VV, Jurka J. 2003. The esterase and PHD domains in CR1-like non-LTR retrotransposons. Mol Biol Evol. 20:38-46.
31. Katoh K, Toh H. 2008. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Brief Bioinform. 9:286-298.
32. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 16:111-120
33. Kordis D. 2009. Transposable elements in reptilian and avian (Sauropsida) genomes. Cytogenet Genome Res. 127:94-111.
34. Kordis D, Lovsin N, Gubensek F. 2006. Phylogenomic analysis of the L1 retrotransposons in Deuterostomia. Syst Biol. 55:886-901.
35. Kriegs JO, et al. 2007. Waves of genomic hitchhikers shed light on the evolution of gamebirds (Aves: Galliformes). BMC Evol Biol. 7:190.
36. Lander ES, et al. 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409:860-921.
37. Liu GE, Jiang L, Tian F, Zhu B, Song J. 2009. Calibration of mutation rates reveals diverse subfamily structure of galliform CR1 repeats. Genome Biol Evol. 1:119-130.
38. Liu Z, He L, Yuan H, Yue B, Li J. 2012. CR1 retroposons provide a new insight into the phylogeny of Phasianidae species (Aves: Galliformes). Gene 502:125-132
39. Lovsin N, Gubensek F, Kordis D. 2001. Evolutionary dynamics in a novel L2 clade of non-LTR retrotransposons in Deuterostomia. Mol Biol Evol. 18: 2213-2224.
40. Luan DD, Korman MH, Jakubczak JL, Eickbush TH. 1993. Reverse transcription of R2Bm RNA is primed by a nick at the chromosomal target site: a mechanism for non-LTR retrotransposition. Cell 72: 595-605.
41. Meganathan PR, Dubey B, Batzer MA, Ray DA, Haque I. 2011. Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of three Crocodylus species and their comparison within the Order Crocodylia. Gene 478:35-41.
42. Mikkelsen TS, et al. 2007. Genome of the marsupial Monodelphis domestica reveals innovation in non-coding sequences. Nature 447:167-177.
43. Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). New Orleans (LA): Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). p. 1-8.
44. Nishihara H, Maruyama S, Okada N. 2009. Retroposon analysis and recent geological data suggest near-simultaneous divergence of the three superorders of mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:5235-5240.
45. Novick PA, Basta H, Floumanhaft M, McClure MA, Boissinot S. 2009. The evolutionary dynamics of autonomous non-LTR retrotransposons in the lizard Anolis carolinensis shows more similarity to fish than mammals. Mol Biol Evol. 26:1811-1822.
46. Oaks JR. 2011. A time-calibrated species tree of Crocodylia reveals a recent radiation of the true crocodiles. Evolution 65:3285-3297.
47. Organ CL, Canoville A, Reisz RR, Laurin M. 2011. Paleogenomic data suggest mammal-like genome size in the ancestral amniote and derived large genome size in amphibians. J Evol Biol. 24:372-380.
48. Organ CL, Shedlock AM, Meade A, Pagel M, Edwards SV. 2007. Origin of avian genome size and structure in non-avian dinosaurs. Nature 446: 180-184.
49. Pagán HJT, Smith JD, Hubley RM, Ray DA. 2010. PiggyBac-ing on a primate genome: novel elements, recent activity and horizontal transfer. Genome Biol Evol. 2:293-303.
50. Petrov DA, Hartl DL. 1998. High rate of DNA loss in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis species groups. Mol Biol Evol. 15: 293-302.
51. Ray DA, Xing J, Salem A-H, Batzer MA. 2006. SINEs of a nearly perfect character. Syst Biol. 55:928-935.
52. Scheyer TM, et al. 2013. Crocodylian diversity peak and extinction in the late Cenozoic of the northern Neotropics. Nat Commun. 4:1907.
53. Sereno P, Larsson H. 2009. Cretaceous crocodyliforms from the Sahara. ZooKeys 28:1-143.
54. Shaffer HB, et al. 2013. The western painted turtle genome, a model for the evolution of extreme physiological adaptations in a slowly evolving lineage. Genome Biol. 14:R28.
55. Shedlock AM. 2006. Phylogenomic investigation of CR1 LINE diversity in reptiles. Syst Biol. 55:902-911.
56. Shedlock AM, Edwards SV. 2009. Amniotes (Amniota). In: Hedges SB, Kumar S, editors. The timetree of life. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 375-379.
57. Shedlock AM, et al. 2007. Phylogenomics of nonavian reptiles and the structure of the ancestral amniote genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:2767-2772.
58. Shedlock AM, Takahashi K, Okada N. 2004. SINEs of speciation: tracking lineages with retroposons. Trends Ecol Evol. 19:545-553.
59. Smit A, Hubley R, Green P. 1996-2014. RepeatMasker Open-3.3.0. Available from: http://www.repeatmasker.org.
60. St John J, et al. 2012. Sequencing three crocodilian genomes to illuminate the evolution of archosaurs and amniotes. Genome Biol. 13:415.
61. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst Biol. 75:758-771.
62. Stumph WE, Hodgson CP, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW. 1984. Genomic structure and possible retroviral origin of the chicken CR1 repetitive DNA sequence family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 81:6667-6671.
63. Stumph WE, Kristo P, Tsai M-J, O'Malley BW. 1981. A chicken middlerepetitive DNA sequence which shares homology with mammalian ubiquitous repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 9:5383-5398.
64. Suh A, et al. 2014. Early Mesozoic coexistence of amniotes and Hepadnaviridae. PLoS Genet. 10:e1004559.
65. Suh A, Kriegs JO, Brosius J, Schmitz J. 2011. Retroposon insertions and the chronology of avian sex chromosome evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 28: 2993-2997.
66. Suh A, Kriegs JO, Donnellan S, Brosius J, Schmitz J. 2012. A universal method for the study of CR1 retroposons in non-model bird genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 29:2899-2903.
67. Suh A, Paus M, et al. 2011. Mesozoic retroposons reveal parrots as the closest living relatives of passerine birds. Nat Commun. 2:443.
68. Tollis M, Boissinot S. 2011. The transposable element profile of the Anolis genome: how a lizard can provide insights into the evolution of vertebrate genome size and structure. Mob Genet Elements. 1: 107-111.
69. Vandergon TL, Reitman M. 1994. Evolution of chicken repeat 1 (CR1) elements: evidence for ancient subfamilies and multiple progenitors. Mol Biol Evol. 11:886-898.
70. Vonk FJ, et al. 2013. The king cobra genome reveals dynamic gene evolution and adaptation in the snake venom system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 110:20651-20656.
71. Waddell PJ, Kishino H, Ota R. 2001. A phylogenetic foundation for comparative mammalian genomics. Genome Inform. 12:141-154.
72. Wan Q-H, et al. 2013. Genome analysis and signature discovery for diving and sensory properties of the endangered Chinese alligator. Cell Res. 23:1091-1105.
73. Wang Z, et al. 2013. The draft genomes of soft-shell turtle and green sea turtle yield insights into the development and evolution of the turtlespecific body plan. Nat Genet. 45:701-706.
74. Warren WC, et al. 2008. Genome analysis of the platypus reveals unique signatures of evolution. Nature 453:175-183.
75. WarrenWC, et al. 2010. The genome of a songbird. Nature 464:757-762.
76. Wicker T, et al. 2005. The repetitive landscape of the chicken genome. Genome Res. 15:126-136.