CR1 retroposons provide a new insight into the phylogeny of Phasianidae species (Aves: Galliformes)

Gene

Volumn 502, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 125-132

  Liu, Zhaofeng ^a   He, Liwei ^a,b   Yuan, Honggang ^a   Yue, Bisong ^a   Li, Jing ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HEBEI NORMAL UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

CR1 retroposons; Phasianidae; Phylogenetic relationship

Indexed keywords

ARBOROPHILA RUFIPECTUS; ARTICLE; AVIAN GENETICS; BIRD; CHICKEN; CLONE; GALLIFORMES; GENE INSERTION; GENE LOCUS; GENE SEQUENCE; HYBRID; INTROGRESSION; MITOCHONDRION; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROPOSON; SPECIES;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; GALLIFORMES; GENETIC LOCI; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; RETROELEMENTS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID; TERMINAL REPEAT SEQUENCES;

ARBOROPHILA RUFIPECTUS; AVES; BAMBUSICOLA THORACICA; GALLIFORMES; GALLUS GALLUS; PHASIANIDAE;

EID: 84861341358     PISSN: 03781119     EISSN: 18790038     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.04.068     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Armstrong M.H., Braun E.L., Kimball R.T. Phylogenetic utility of avian ovomucoid intron G: a comparison of nuclear and mitochondrial phylogenies in Galliformes. Auk 2001, 118:799-804.
2. Bashir A., Ye C., Price A.L., Bafna V. Orthologous repeats and mammalian phylogenetic inference. Genome Res. 2005, 15:998-1006.
3. Batzer M.A., Deininger P.L. A human-specific subfamily of Alu sequences. Genomics 1991, 9:481-487.
4. Bonilla A.J., Braun E.L., Kimball R.T. Comparative molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of 3'-UTR and introns in Galliformes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 56:536-542.
5. Bush K.L., Strobeck C. Phylogenetic relationships of the Phasianidae reveals possible non-pheasant taxa. J. Hered. 2003, 94:472-489.
6. Cantrell M.A., et al. An ancient retrovirus-like element contains hot spots for SINE insertion. Genetics 2001, 158(2):769-777.
7. Churakov G., Kriegs J.O., Baertsch R., Zemann A., Brosius J., Schmitz J. Mosaic retroposon insertion patterns in placental mammals. Genome Res. 2009, 19:868-875.
8. Collar N.J., Crosby M.J., Stattersfield A.J. Birds to Watch 2: The World List of Threatened Birds 1994, Bird Life International, Cambridge, 407.
9. Crowe T.M., et al. Phylogenetics, biogeography and classification of, and character evolution in, gamebirds (Aves: Galliformes): effects of character exclusion, data partitioning and missing data. Cladistics 2006, 22:495-532.
10. Delacour J. The Pheasants of the World 1977, Spur Publications, Surrey, UK.
11. Dyke G.J., Gulas B.E., Crowe T.M. Suprageneric relationships of galliform birds (Aves, Galliformes): a cladistic analysis of morphological characters. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2003, 137:227-244.
12. Edwards S.V., Bryan Jennings W., Shedlock A.M. Phylogenetics of modern birds in the era of genomics. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2005, 272(1567):979-992.
13. Funk D.J., Omland I.E. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2003, 34:397-423.
14. Gasper J., Shiina T., Inoko H., Edwards S.V. Songbird genomics: analysis of 45 kb upstream of a polymorphic Mhc class II gene in red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Genomics 2001, 75:26-34.
15. Grant P.R., Grant B.R. Hybridization of bird species. Science 1992, 256:193-197.
16. Hackett S.J., et al. A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science 2008, 320:1763-1768.
17. Han K.L., et al. Are transposable element insertions homoplasy free?: an examination using the avian tree of life. Syst. Biol. 2011, 60(3):375-386.
18. He L.W., et al. The complete mitochondrial genome of the Sichuan Hill Partridge (Arborophila rufipectus) and a phylogenetic analysis with related species. Gene 2009, 435(1-2):23-28.
19. Hess C.M., Gasper J., Hoekstra H., Hill C., Edwards S.V. MHC class II pseudogene and genomic signature of a 32-kb cosmid in the house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus). Genome Res. 2000, 10:613-623.
20. Huang Z.H., et al. Phylogenetic relationships of four endemic genera of the Phasianidae in China. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 53:378-383.
21. [ICGSC]International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 2004, 432:695-777.
22. International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (accessed 12 August 2009). http://www.iucnredlist.org.
23. Johnsgard P.A. The Pheasants of the World 1986, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Johnsgard P.A. The Quails, Partridges, and Francolins of the World 1988, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
25. Kaiser V.B., Tuinen M.V., Ellegren H. Insertion events of CR1 retrotransposable elements elucidate the phylogenetic branching order in galliform birds. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24(1):338-347.
26. Kan X.Z., et al. Phylogeny of major lineages of galliform birds (Aves: Galliformes) based on complete mitochondrial genomes. Genet. Mol. Res. 2010, 9(3):1625-1633.
27. Kapitonov V.V., Jurka J. The esterase and PHD domains in CR1-like non-LTR retrotransposons. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2003, 20:38-46.
28. Kent W.J. BLAT-the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 2002, 12(4):656-664.
29. Kimball R.T., Braun E.L. A multigene phylogeny of Galliformes supports a single origin of erectile ability in non-feathered facial traits. J. Avian Biol. 2008, 39:438-445.
30. Kimball R.T., Braun E.L., Zwartjes P.W., Crowe T.M., Ligon J.D. A molecular phylogeny of the pheasants and partridges suggests that these lineages are not monophyletic. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1999, 11:38-54.
31. Kohany O., Gentles A.J., Hankus L., Jurka J. Annotation, submission and screening of repetitive elements in Repbase: RepbaseSubmitter and Censor. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:474.
32. Kriegs J.O., Churakov G., Kiefmann M., Jordan U., Brosius J., Schmitz J. Retroposed elements as archives for the evolutionary history of placental mammals. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4(4):e91.
33. Kriegs J.O., et al. Waves of genomic hitchhikers shed light on the evolution of gamebirds (Aves: Galliformes). BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:190-221.
34. Kriegs J., et al. Retroposon insertions provide insights into deep lagomorph evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27(12):2678-2681.
35. Lei L.F., Lu T.C. China Endemic Birds 2006, Science Press, Beijing.
36. Liao W.B., Li C., Hu J.C., Lu X. Habitat utilization of Sichuan Hill Partridge (Arborophila rufipectus) in the non-breeding period in Laojunshan Nature Reserve. Zool. Res. 2007, 28(2):172-178.
37. Lucchini V., Randi E. Molecular evolution of the mtDNA control-region in galliform birds. Proceedings of the 22 International Ornithological Congress, Durban 1999, 732-739. Birdlife South Africa, Johannesburg. N.J. Adams, R.H. Slotow (Eds.).
38. Meng Y., Dai B., Ran J.H., Li J., Yue B.S. Phylogenetic position of the genus Tetraophasis (Aves, Galliformes, Phasianidae) as inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear sequences. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2008, 36:626-637.
39. Meng Y., et al. Complete mitochondrial genome of Tetraophasis szechenyii Madarász, 1885 (Aves: Galliformes: Phasianidae), and its genetic variation as inferred from the mitochondrial DNA Control Region. J. Nat. Hist. 2010, 44:2955-2964.
40. Murata S., Takasaki N., Saitoh M., Okada N. Determination of the phylogenetic relationships among Pacific salmonids by using short interspersed elements (SINEs) as temporal landmarks of evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1993, 90(15):6995-6999.
41. Peterle T.J. Intergeneric galliform hybrids: a review. Wilson Bull. 1951, 63:219-223.
42. Randi E., Fusco G., Lorenzisni R., Crowe T.M. Phylogenetic relationships and rates of allozyme evolution within the Phasianidae. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1991, 19:213-221.
43. Ray D.A., et al. Alu insertion loci and platyrrhine primate phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2005, 35:117-126.
44. Ray D.A., Xing J., Salem A.H., Batzer M.A. SINEs of a nearly perfect character. Syst. Biol. 2006, 55:928-935.
45. Ray D., Han K., Walker J.A., Batzer M.A. Laboratory methods for the analysis of primate mobile elements. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 628:153-179.
46. Sambrook J., Russell D.W. Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual 2002, Science Press, Beijing. third ed.
47. Shedlock A.M., Okada N. SINE insertions: powerful tools for molecular systematics. Bioessays 2000, 22:148-160.
48. Shedlock A.M., Takahashi K., Okada N. SINEs of speciation: tracking lineages with retroposons. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:545-553.
49. Shen Y.Y., et al. A mitogenomic perspective on the ancient, rapid radiation in the Galliformes with an emphasis on the Phasianidae. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10:132.
50. Sibley C.G., Ahlquist J.E. Logeny and Classification of Birds 1990, Yale University Press, New Haven.
51. Smit A.F.A., Hubley R., Green P. RepeatMasker Open-3.0 [Internet] Available from:. http://www.repeatmasker.org.
52. Smith E.J., Shi L., Tu Z. Gallus gallus aggrecan gene-based phylogenetic analysis of selected avian groups. Genetica 2005, 124:23-32.
53. St John J., Quinn T.W. Recent CR1 non-LTR retrotransposon activity in coscoroba reveals an insertion site preference. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:567.
54. St John J., Cotter J.P., Quinn T.W. A recent chicken repeat 1 retrotransposition confirms the Coscoroba-Cape Barren goose clade. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2005, 37:83-90.
55. Stumph W.E., Kristo P., Tsai M.J., O'Malley B.W. A chicken middle-repetitive DNA-sequence which shares homology with mammalian ubiquitous repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981, 9:5383-5397.
56. Swofford D.L. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other 746 Methods). Version 4.0b10 2003, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
57. Treplin S., Tiedemann R. Specific chicken repeat 1 (CR1) retrotransposon insertion suggests phylogenetic affinity of rockfowls (genus Picathartes) to crows and ravens (Corvidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 43:328-337.
58. Van de Lagemaat L.N., Gagnier L., Medstrand P., Mager D.L. Genomic deletions and precise removal of transposable elements mediated by short identical DNA segments in primates. Genome Res. 2005, 15:1243-1249.
59. Waddell P.J., Kishino H., Ota R. A phylogenetic foundation for comparative mammalian genomics. Genome Inform. 2001, 12:141-154.
60. Watanabe M., et al. The rise and fall of the CR1 subfamily in the lineage leading to penguins. Gene 2006, 365:57-66.
61. Wicker T., et al. The repetitive landscape of the chicken genome. Genome Res. 2005, 15:126-136.
62. Xing J., Witherspoon D.J., Ray D.A., Batzer M.A., Jorde L.B. Mobile DNA elements in primate and human evolution. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2007, (Suppl. 45):2-19.
63. Xu Z.F., Mei W.Z., Zhang G., Cheng X.H., Zeng Z.Q. Observation on the winter habitats of Sichuan hill-partridge. Chin. J. Zool. 1994, 29(2):21-23.