Phylogenomic investigation of CR1 LINE diversity in reptiles

Systematic Biology

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 902-911

  Shedlock, Andrew M ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amniote; CR1 LINE; Phylogenomics; Reptilia; Retroelement; RT domain

Indexed keywords

ALLIGATOR; ALLIGATOR MISSISSIPPIENSIS; ANOLIS CAROLINENSIS; ANOLIS SMARAGDINUS; AVES; CHRYSEMYS; CHRYSEMYS PICTA; DROMAIUS NOVAEHOLLANDIAE; MAMMALIA; REPTILIA; SPHENODON PUNCTATUS; TAENIOPYGIA GUTTATA; TESTUDINES; VERTEBRATA;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIRD; GENETICS; GENOMICS; LONG INTERSPERSED REPEAT; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; REPTILE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BIRDS; GENOMICS; LONG INTERSPERSED NUCLEOTIDE ELEMENTS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; REPTILES; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

EID: 33947098659     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150601091924     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adey, N. B., S. A. Schichman, D. K. Graham, S. N. Peterson, M. H. Edgell, and C. A. Hutchison, 3rd. 1994. Rodent LI evolution has been driven by a single dominant lineage that has repeatedly acquired new transcriptional regulatory sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol 11:778-789.
2. Batzer, M., and P. L. Deininger. 2001. Alu repeats and human genomic diversity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:370-379.
3. Boissinot, S., P. Chevret, and A. V. Furano. 2000. LI (LINE-1) Retrotransposon evolution and amplification in recent human history. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:915-928.
4. Burch, J. B. E., D. L. Davis, and N. B. Haas. 1993. Chicken repeat 1 elements contain a poZ-like open reading frame and belong to the non-long terminal repeat class of retrotransposons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:8199-8203.
5. Cao, Y, M. D. Sorenson, Y. Kumazawa, D. P. Mindell, and M. Hasegawa. 2000. Phylogenetic position of turtles among amniotes: Evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Gene 259:139-148.
6. Edwards, S. V., W. B. Jennings, and A. M. Shedlock. 2005. Phylogenetics of modern birds in the era of genomics. Proc. R Soc. Lond. B 272:979-992.
7. Elgar, G., M. S. Clark, S. Meek, S. Smith, and W. S. 1999. Generation and analysis of 25 Mb of genomic DNA from the pufferfish Fugu rubripes by sequence scanning. Genome Res. 9:960-971.
8. Garland, T., Jr., A. W. Dickerman, C. M. Janis, and J. A. Jones. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol. 42:265-292.
9. Garland, T, Jr., and S. C. Adolph. 1994. Why not to do two species comparative studies: Limitations on inferring adaptation. Physiol. Zool. 67:797-828.
10. Garland, T., Jr., and R. A. Ives. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: Confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 155:346-364.
11. Gilbert, N., and D. Labuda. 1999. CORE-SINEs: Eukaryotic short interspersed retroposing elements with common sequence motifs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:2869-2874.
12. Gregory, T. R. 2005 Animal Genome Size Database (http://www. genomesize.com).
13. Hedges, S. B., and L. L. Poling. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of reptiles.Science 283:998-1001.
14. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
15. Hughes, A., and H. Piontkivska. 2005. DNA repeat arrays in chicken and human genomes and the adaptive evolution of avian genome size. BMC Evol. Biol. 5:12.
16. Hughes, A. L., and M. K. Hughes. 1995 Small genomes for better flyers. Nature 377: 391.
17. ICGSC, International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium. 2004. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432:695-716.
18. Jaillon, O., J.-M. Aury, F. Brunet, J.-L. Petit, N. Stange-Thomann, E. Mauceli, L. Bouneau, C. Fischer, C. Ozouf-Costaz, A. Bernot, et al. 2004. Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype. Nature 431:946-957.
19. Janke, A., D. Erpenbeck, M. Nilsson, and U. Arnason. 2001 The mitochondrial genomes of the iguana (Iguana iguana) and the caiman (Caiman crocodylus): Implications for amniote phylogeny. Proc. R. Soc. Lond.B 268:623-631.
20. Jurka,J., V. V. Kapitonov, A. Pavlicek, P. Klownowski, O. Kohany, and J. Walichiewicz. 2005. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements ( www.girinst.org/repbase/index.html). Cytogenet. Genome Res. 110:462-467.
21. Kajikawa, M., K. Ohshima, and N. Okada. 1997. Determination of the entire sequence of turtle CR1: The first open reading frame of the turtle CR1 element encodes a protein with a novel zinc finger motif. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1206-1217.
22. Kajikawa, M., and N. Okada. 2002. LINEs mobilize SINEs in the Eel through a shared 3' sequence. Cell 111:433-444.
23. Kazazian, H. H. J. 2004. Mobile elements: Drivers of genome evolution. Science 303:1626-1632.
24. Khan, H., A. Smit, and S. Boissinot. 2006. Molecular evolution and tempo of amplification of human LINE-1 retrotransposons since the origin of primates. Genome Res. 16:78-87.
25. Kumar, S., and B. Hedges. 1998. A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution. Nature 392:917-920.
26. Lander, E. S., L. M. Linton, B. Birren, C. Nusbaum, M. C. Zody, J. Baldwin, K. Devon, K. Dewar, M. Doyle, W. FitzHugh, et al. 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409:860-921.
27. Lee, M. S. Y. 2001 Molecules, morphology and the monophyly of diapsid reptiles. Contr. Zool. 70:1-22.
28. Lovsin, N., F. Gubensek, and D. Kordi. 2001. Evolutionary dynamics in a novel L2 clade of non-LTR retrotransposons in Deuterostomia. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:2213-2224.
29. Luan, D. D., H. Korman, J. L. Jakubczak, and T. Eickbush. 1993. Reverse transcription of R2Bm RNA is primed by a nick at the chromosomal target site: A mechanism for non-LTR retrotransposition. Cell 72:595-605.
30. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 2000. MacClade 4: Interactive analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
31. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 2005. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 1.06. http:// mesquiteproject.org.
32. Malik, H. S., W. D. Burke, and T. Eickbush. 1999. The age and evolution of non-LTR retrotransposable elements. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:793-805.
33. Mindell, D. P., M. D. Sorenson, D. E. Dimcheff, M. Hasegawa, J. C. Ast, and T. Yuri. 1999. Interordinal relationships of birds and other reptiles based on whole mitochondrial genomes. Syst. Biol. 48:138-152.
34. Nagy, K. A., I. A. Girard, and T. K. Brown. 1999. Energetics of freeranging mammals, reptiles, and birds. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 19:247-277.
35. Nishihara, H., A. F. A. Smit, and O. Norihiro. 2006. Functional noncoding sequences derived from SINEs in the mammalian genome. Genome Res. 16:864-874.
36. Ohshima, K., M. Hamada, T. Y, and N. Okada. 1996. The 3' ends of short interspersed repetitive elements are derived from the 3' ends of long interspersed repetitive elements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:3756-3764.
37. Okada, N., A. M. Shedlock, and M. Nikaido. 2004. Retroposon mapping in molecular systematics. Pages 189-226 in Mobile genetic elements (W. J. Miller and P. Capy, eds.). Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey.
38. Olmo, E. 2003. Reptiles: A group in transition in the evolution of genome size and the nucleotypic effect. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 101:166-171.
39. Pagel, M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877-884.
40. Piskurek, O., C. C. Austin, and N. Okada. 2006. Sauria SINEs: Novel short interspersed transposable lements that are widespread in reptilian genomes. J. Mol. Evol. 62:630-644.
41. Primmer, C. R., T. Raudsepp, B. P. Chowdhary, A. P. Moller, and H. Ellegren. 1997. Low frequency of microsatellites in the avian genome. Genome Res. 7:471-482.
42. Reipell, O., and M. deBraga. 1996. Turtles as diapsid reptiles. Nature 384.
43. RGSPC, Rat Genome Sequencing Project Consortium. 2004. Genome sequence of the brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution. Nature 428:493-521.
44. Ronquist, F., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
45. Sasaki, T., K. Takahashi, M. Nikaido, S. Miura, Y. Yasukawa, and N. Okada. 2004. First application of the SINE (short interspersed repetitive element) method to infer phylogenetic relationships in reptiles: An example from the turtle superfamily Testudinoidea. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:705-715.
46. Shedlock, A. M., C. W. Botka, S. Zhao, J. Shetty, T. Zhang, J. S. Liu, P. J. Deschavanne, and S. V. Edwards. 2006a. Phylogenomics of nonavian reptiles and the structure of the ancestral amniote genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Submitted.
47. Shedlock, A. M., D. Janes, and S. V. Edwards. 2006b. Amniote phylogenomics: Testing evolutionary hypotheses with BAC library scanning and targeted clone analysis of large-scale DNA sequences from reptiles. In Phylogenomics (W. J. Murphy, ed.). Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, in press.
48. Shedlock, A. M., and N. Okada. 2000. SINE insertions: Powerful tools for molecular systematics. Bioessays 22:148-160.
49. Shedlock, A. M., K. Takahashi, and N. Okada. 2004. SINEs of speciation: Tracking lineages with retroposons. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:545-553.
50. Silva, R., and J. B. Burch. 1989. Evidence that chicken CR1 elements represent a novel family of retroposons. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:3563-3566.
51. Smit, A. F. A. 1999. Interspersed repeats and other mementos of transposable elements in mammalian genomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9:657-663.
52. Smit, A. F. A. 2006. RepeatMasker version 3.1.5 (http://www. repeatmasker.org).
53. Smit, A. F. A., and A. D. Riggs. 1995. MIRs are classic, tRNA-derived SINEs that amplified before the mammalian radiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:98-102.
54. Stumph, W. E., P. Kristo, M. J. Tsai, and B. W. O'Malley. 1981. A chicken middle-repetitive DNA sequence which shares homology with mammalian ubiquitous repeats Nucleic Acids Res. 9:5383-5397.
55. Swofford, D. L. 1999. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) v.4.0b. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
56. Thompson, J., D. Higgins, and T. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
57. Vandergon, T. L., and M. Reitman. 1994. Evolution of chicken repeat 1(CR1) elements: evidence for ancient subfamilies and multiple progenitors. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:886-898.
58. Waltari, E., and S. V. Edwards. 2002. Evolutionary dynamics of intron size, genome size, and physiological correlates in archosaurs. Am. Nat. 160:539-552.
59. Watanabe, M., M. Nikaido, T. Tsuda, H. Inoko, D. P. Mindell, K. Murata, and N. Okada. 2006. The rise and fall of the CR1 subfamily in the lineage leading to penguins. Gene 365:57-66.
60. Waterston, R. H., K. Lindblad-Toh, E. Birney, J. Rogers, J. F. Abril, P. Agarwal, R. Agarwala, R. Ainscough, M. Alexandersson, P. An, et al. 2002. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420:520-562.
61. Weiner, A. M., P. L. Deininger, and A. Efstratiadis. 1986. Nonviral retroposons: Genes, pseudogenes, and transposable elements generated by the reverse flow of genetic information. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 55:631-661.
62. Wicker, T, J. S. Robertson, S. R. Schulze, F. A. Feltus, V. Magrini, J. A. Morrison, E. R. Mardis, R. K. Wilson, D. G. Peterson, A. H. Paterson, and R. Ivarie. 2004. The repetitive landscape of the chicken genome. Genome Res. 15:126-136.
63. Wilkinson, M., J. Thorley, and M. J. Benton. 1997. Uncertain turtle relationships. Nature 387:466.
64. Xiong, Y, and T. H. Eickbush. 1990. Origin and evolution of retroelements based upon their reverse transcriptase sequences. EMBO J. 9:3353-3362.
65. Zardoya, R., and A. Meyer. 1998. Complete mitochondrial genome suggests diapsid affinities of turtles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:14226-14231.