Insertion events of CR1 retrotransposable elements elucidate the phylogenetic branching order in galliform birds

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 338-347

  Kaiser, Vera B ^a   Van Tuinen, Marcel ^b   Ellegren, Hans ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Birds; Cladogram; Genomics; Phylogenetics; Retrotransposon

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DNA HYBRIDIZATION; DNA SEQUENCE; ELECTROPHORESIS; GALLIFORMES; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE INSERTION; GENE SEQUENCE; KARYOTYPE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; POLYPHYLY; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; TRANSPOSON;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; GALLIFORMES; GENOME; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; PHYLOGENY; RETROELEMENTS;

AVES; CRACIDAE; GALLIFORMES; MEGAPODIIDAE; PHASIANIDAE;

EID: 33845901252     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msl164     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Armstrong MH, Braun EL, Kimball RT. 2001. The phylogenetic utility of avian ovomucoid intron G: a comparison of nuclear and mitochondrial phylogenies in Galliformes. Auk. 118:799-804.
2. Axelsson E, Smith NGC, Sundström H, Berlin S, Ellegren H. 2004. Male-biased mutation rate and divergence in autosomal, Z-linked and W-linked introns of chicken and turkey. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1538-1547.
3. Bashir A, Ye C, Price AL, Bafna V. 2005. Orthologous repeats and mammalian phylogenetic inference. Genome Res. 15:998-1006.
4. Berlin S, Brandström M, Backström N, Axelsson E, Smith NGC, Ellegren H. Forthcoming 2006. Substitution rate heterogeneity and the male mutation bias. J Mol Evol. 2262-2323.
5. Brown WR, Hubbard SJ, Tickle C, Wilson SA. 2003. The chicken as a model for large-scale analysis of vertebrate gene function. Nature Rev Genet. 4:87-98.
6. Bush KL, Strobeck C. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of the Phasianidae reveals possible non-pheasant taxa. J Hered. 94:472-489.
7. Cooper MD, Raymond DA, Peterson RD, South MA, Good RA. 1966. The functions of the thymus system and the bursa system in the chicken. J Exp Med. 123:75-102.
8. Cracraft J, Barker FK, Braun M. et al. (14 co-authors) 2004. Phylogenetic relationships among modern birds (Neornithes). In: Cracraft J, Donoghue MJ, editors. Assembling the tree of life. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 468-489.
9. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA. 2006. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PloS Genet. 2:e68.
10. Dimcheff DE, Drovetski SV, Mindell DP. 2002. Phylogeny of Tetraoninae and other galliform birds using mitochondrial 12S and ND2 genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 24:203-215.
11. Dyke GJ, Gulas BE, Crowe TM. 2003. Suprageneric relationships of galliform birds (Aves: Galliformes): a cladistic analysis of morphological characters. Zool J Linn Soc. 137:227-244.
12. Edwards SV, Bryan Jennings W, Shedlock AM. 2005. Phylogenetics of modern birds in the era of genomics. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B. 272:979-992.
13. Ellsworth DL, Honeycutt RL, Silvy NJ. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships among North American grouse inferred from restriction endonuclease analysis of mitochondrial DNA. Condor. 97:492-502.
14. Ericson PGP, Johansson US. 2003. Phylogeny of Passerida (Aves: Passeriformes) based on nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 29:126-138.
15. Ericson PG, Christidis L, Cooper A, Irestedt M, Jackson J, Johansson US, Norman JA. 2002. A Gondwanan origin of passerine birds supported by DNA sequences of endemic New Zealand wrens. Proc R Soc Lond B. 269:235-241.
16. Fain MG, Houde P. 2004. Parallel radiations in the primary clades of birds. Evolution. 58:2558-2573.
17. Garcia-Moreno J, Sorenson MD, Mindell DP. 2003. Congruent avian phylogenies inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. J Mol Evol. 56:1-11.
18. Gasper J, Shiina T, Inoko H, Edwards SV. 2001. Songbird genomics: analysis of 45 kb upstream of a polymorphic Mhc class II gene in red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Genomics. 75:26-34.
19. Groth JG, Barrowclough GF. 1999. Basal divergences in birds and the phylogenetic utility of the nuclear RAG-1 gene. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 12:115-123.
20. Gutierrez RJ, Zink RM, Yang SY. 1983. Genic variation, systematic biogeographic relationships of some galliform birds. Auk. 100:33-47.
21. Haas NB, Grabowski JM, Sivitz AB, Burch JBE. 1997. Chicken repeat 1 (CR1) elements, which define an ancient family of vertebrate non-LTR retrotransposons, contain two closely spaced open reading frames. Gene. 197:305-309.
22. Helm-Bychowski KM, Wilson AC. 1986. Rates of nuclear DNA evolution in pheasant-like birds: evidence from restriction maps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 83:688-692.
23. Henderson JY, Moir AJ, Fothergill LA, Fothergill JE. 1981. Sequences of sixteen phosphoserine peptides from ovalbumins of eight species. Eur J Biochem. 114:439-450.
24. Hess CM, Gasper J, Hoekstra H, Hill C, Edwards SV. 2000. MHC class II pseudogene and genomic signature of a 32-kb cosmid in the house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus). Genome Res. 10:613-623.
25. Hillis DM, Pollock DD, McGuire JA, Zwickl DJ. 2003. Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference. Syst Biol. 52:124-126.
26. [ICGSC] International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium. 2004. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature. 432:695-777.
27. [IHGSC] International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 409:860-921.
28. Irestedt M, Fjeldså J, Nylander JAA, Ericson PGP. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of typical antbirds (Thamnophilidae) and test of incongruence based on Bayes factors. BMC Evol Biol. 4:23.
29. Johnsgard PA. 1986. The pheasants of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Jolles J, Schoentgen F, Jolles P, Prager EM, Wilson AC. 1976. Amino acid sequence and immunological properties of chachalaca egg white lysozyme. J Mol Evol. 8:59-78.
31. Kajikawa M, Ichiyanagi K, Tanaka N, Okada N. 2005. Isolation and characterization of active LINE and SINEs from the eel. Mol Biol Evol. 22:673-682.
32. Kapitonov VV, Jurka J. 2003. The esterase and PHD domains in CR1-like non-LTR retrotransposons. Mol Biol Evol. 20:38-46.
33. Kikuchi S, Fujima D, Sasazaki S, Tsuji S, Mizutani M, Fujiwara A, Mannen H. 2005. Construction of a genetic linkage map of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) based on AFLP and microsatellite markers. Anim Genet. 36:227-231.
34. Kimball RT, Braun EL, Zwartjes PW, Crowe TM, Ligon JD. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of the pheasants and partridges suggests that these lineages are not monophyletic. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 11:38-54.
35. [MGSC] Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium. 2002. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature. 420:520-562.
36. Murata S, Takasaki N, Saitoh M, Okada N. 1993. Determination of the phylogenetic relationships among Pacific salmonids by using short interspersed elements (SINEs) as temporal landmarks of evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 90:6995-6999.
37. Nikaido M, Hamilton H, Makino H, Sasaki T, Takahashi K, Goto M, Kanda N, Pastene LA, Okada N; SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators. 2006. Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators' Workshop 2005. Baleen whale phylogeny and past extensive radiation event revealed by SINE insertion analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 23: 866-873.
38. Nikaido M, Rooney AP, Okada N. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among cetartiodactyls based on insertions of short and long interspersed elements: hippopotamuses are the closest extant relatives of whales. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:10261-10266.
39. Nishihara H, Satta Y, Nikaido M, Thewissen JGM, Stanhope MJ, Okada N. 2005. A retrosposon analysis of Afrotherian phylogeny. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1823-1833.
40. Okada N. 1991. SINEs: short interspersed repeated elements of the eukaryotic genome. Trends Ecol Evol. 6:358-361.
41. Okada N, Shedlock A, Nikaido M. 2003. Retroposon mapping in molecular systematics. In: Miller WJ, Capy P, editors. Methods in molecular biology. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press. p. 189-226.
42. Pecon-Slattery J, Pearks Wilkerson AJ, Murphy WJ, O'Brien SJ. 2004. Phylogenetic assessment of introns and SINEs within the Y chromosome using the cat family Felidae as a species tree. Mol Biol Evol. 21:2299-2309.
43. Pereira SL, Baker AJ. 2006. A molecular time-scale for galliform birds accounting for uncertainty in time estimates and heterogeneity of rates of DNA substitutions across lineages and sites. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 38:499-509.
44. Pizzari T, Cornwallis CK, Lovlie H, Jakobsson S, Birkhead TR. 2003. Sophisticated sperm allocation in male fowl. Nature. 426:70-74.
45. Poe S, Chubb AL. 2004. Birds in a bush: five genes indicate explosive evolution of avian orders. Evolution. 58:404-415.
46. Prager EM, Wilson AC. 1976. Congruency of phylogenies derived from different proteins. A molecular analysis of the phylogenetic position of cracid birds. J Mol Evol. 9:45-57.
47. Prychitko TM, Moore WS. 2003. Alignment and phylogenetic analysis of b-fibrinogen gene in phylogenetic analysis of woodpeckers (Aves: Picidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 8:193-204.
48. Ray DA, Xing J, Hedges DJ, et al. (13 co-authors). 2005. Alu insertion loci and platyrrhine primate phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 35:117-126.
49. Reed KM, Chaves LD, Hall MK, Knutson TP, Harry DE. 2005. A comparative genetic map of the turkey genome. Cytogenet Genome Res. 111:118-127.
50. Sasaki T, Takahashi K, Nikaido M, Miura S, Yasukawa Y, Okada N. 2004. First application of the SINE (short interspersed repetitive element) method to infer phylogenetic relationships in reptiles: an example from the turtle superfamily Testudinoidea. Mol Biol Evol. 21:705-715.
51. Shedlock AM, Okada N. 2000. SINE insertions: powerful tools for molecular systematics. BioEssays. 22:148-160.
52. Shibusawa M, Nishibori M, Nishida-Umehara C, Tsudzuki M, Masabanda J, Griffin DK, Matsuda Y. 2004a. Karyotypic evolution in the Galliformes: an examination of the process of karyotypic evolution by comparison of the molecular cytogenetic findings with the molecular phylogeny. Cytogenet Gen Res. 106:111-119.
53. Shibusawa M, Nishida-Umehara C, Tsudzuki M, Masabanda J, Griffin DK, Matsuda Y. 2004b. A comparative karyological study of the blue-breasted quail (Cotunix chinensis, Phasianidae) and California quail (Callipepla californica, Odontophoridae). Cytogenet Gen Res. 106:82-90.
54. Shimamura M, Yasue H, Oshima K, Abe H, Kato H, Kishiro T, Goto M, Munechika I, Okada N. 1997. Molecular evidence from retroposons that whales form a clade within even-toed ungulates. Nature. 388:666-670.
55. Sibley GC, Ahlquist JE. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular evolution. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.
56. Slack KE, Jones CM, Tatsuro A, Harrison GL, Fordyce RE, Arnason U, Penny D. 2006. Early penguin fossils, plus mitochondrial genomes, calibrate avian evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 23:1144-1155.
57. Smith EJ, Shi L, Tu Z. 2005. Gallus gallus agrecan gene-based phylogenetic analysis of selected avian groups. Genetica. 124:23-32.
58. Stehelin D, Varmus HE, Bishop JM, Vogt PK. 1976. DNA related to the transforming gene(s) of avian sarcoma viruses is present in normal avian DNA. Nature. 260:170-173.
59. St John J, Cotter JP, Quinn TW. 2005. A recent chicken repeat 1 retrotransposition confirms the Coscoroba-Cape Barren goose clade. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 37:83-90.
60. Tachida H, Iizuka M. 1993. A population genetic study of the evolution of SINEs. I. Polymorphism with regard to the presence or absence of an element. Genetics. 133:1023-1030.
61. Takahashi K, Nishida M, Yuma M, Okada N. 2001. Retroposition of the AFC family of SINEs (short interspersed repetitive elements) before and during the adaptive radiation of cichlid fishes in Lake Malawi and related inferences about phylogeny. J Mol Evol. 53:496-507.
62. Terai Y, Takahashi K, Nishida M, Sato T, Okada N. 2003. Using SINEs to probe ancient explosive speciation: hidden radiation of African cichlids? Mol Biol Evol. 20:924-930.
63. Thomas JW, Touchman JW, Blakesley RW, et al. (71 co-authors). 2003. Comparative analyses of multi-species sequences from targeted genomic regions. Nature. 424:788-793.
64. Vandergon TL, Reitman M. 1994. Evolution of chicken repeat 1 (CR1) elements: evidence for ancient subfamilies and multiple progenitors. Mol Biol Evol. 11:886-898.
65. van de Lagemaat LN, Gagnier L, Medstrand P, Mager DL. 2005. Genomic deletions and precise removal of transposable elements mediated by short identical DNA segments in primates. Genome Res. 15:1243-1249.
66. van Tuinen M, Butvill DB, Kirsch JAW, Hedges SB. 2001. Convergence and divergence in the evolution of aquatic birds. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B. 268:1345-1350.
67. van Tuinen M, Dyke GJ. 2004. Calibration of galliform molecular clocks using multiple fossils and genetic partitions. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 30:74-86.
68. van Tuinen MC, Sibley G, Hedges SB. 2000. The early history of modern birds inferred from DNA sequence of mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal genes. Mol Biol Evol. 17:451-457.
69. von Schantz T, Göransson G, Andersson G, Fröberg I, Grahn M, Helgee A, Wittzeel H. 1989. Female choice selects for a viability-based male trait in pheasant. Nature. 337:166-169.
70. Watanabe M, Nikaido M, Tsuda TT, Inoko H, Mindell DP, Murata K, Okada N. 2006. The rise and fall of the CR1 subfamily in the lineage leading to penguins. Gene. 365:57-66.
71. Wicker T, Robertson JS, Schulze SR, et al. (11 co-author) 2005. The repetitive landscape of the chicken genome. Genome Res. 15:126-136.