Fit of CAD/CAM implant frameworks: A comprehensive review

Journal of Oral Implantology

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 758-766

  Abduo, Jaafar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Distortion; Implant framework fit; Misfit; Titanium; Zirconia

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTURE; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE DESIGN; HUMANS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84918828929     PISSN: 01606972     EISSN: 15481336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00117     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50:399-410.
2. Abduo J, Bennani V, Waddell N, Lyons K, Swain M. Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants . 2010;25:506-515.
3. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:719-728.
4. Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: current status. Implant Dent. 2001;10: 85-92.
5. Abduo J, Lyons K, Bennani V, Waddell N, Swain M. Fit of screw-retained fixed implant frameworks fabricated by different methods: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24:207-220.
6. Kapos T, Ashy LM, Gallucci GO, Weber HP, Wismeijer D. Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24: 110-117.
7. Abduo J, Lyons K, Swain M. Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:866-876.
8. Tan PL, Gratton DG, Diaz-Arnold AM, Holmes DC. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations. J Prosthodont . 2008;17:378-383.
9. Karl M, Graef F, Wichmann M, Krafft T. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107:232-238.
10. Att W, Komine F, Gerds T, Strub JR. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101:239-247.
11. Al-Fadda SA, Zarb GA, Finer Y. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20:125-131.
12. Almasri R, Drago CJ, Siegel SC, Hardigan PC. Volumetric misfit in CAD/CAM and cast implant frameworks: a university laboratory study. J Prosthodont . 2011;20:267-274.
13. Drago C, Saldarriaga RL, Domagala D, Almasri R. Volumetric determination of the amount of misfit in CAD/CAM and cast implant frameworks: a multicenter laboratory study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:920-929.
14. Jemt T, Back T, Petersson A. Precision of CNC-milled titanium frameworks for implant treatment in the edentulous jaw. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:209-215.
15. Ortorp A, Jemt T, Back T, Jalevik T. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16:194-200.
16. Takahashi T, Gunne J. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:256-260.
17. Torsello F, di Torresanto VM, Ercoli C, Cordaro L. Evaluation of the marginal precision of one-piece complete arch titanium frameworks fabricated using five different methods for implantsupported restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:772-779.
18. Karl M, Holst S. Strain development of screw-retained implant-supported fixed restorations: procera implant bridge versus conventionally cast restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25: 166-169.
19. Karl M, Taylor TD. Effect of material selection on the passivity of fit of implant-supported restorations created with computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:739-745.
20. Karl M, Graef F, Wichmann M. Strain development of implant-supported fixed prostheses copy milled from zirconia ceramic. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24:479-481.
21. Sierraalta M, Vivas JL, Razzoog ME, Wang RF. Precision of fit of titanium and cast implant frameworks using a new matching formula. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:374315.
22. Hjalmarsson L, Ortorp A, Smedberg JI, Jemt T. Precision of fit to implants: a comparison of Cresco and Procera implant bridge frameworks. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;12:271-280.
23. Abduo J, Lyons K, Waddell N, Bennani V, Swain M. A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(Suppl 1):e20-e29.
24. Jemt T, Lekholm U, Johansson CB. Bone response to implant-supported frameworks with differing degrees of misfit preload: in vivo study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2: 129-137.
25. Ortorp A, Jonsson D, Mouhsen A, Vult von Steyern P. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater. 2011;27:356-363.
26. Persson A, Andersson M, Oden A, Sandborgh-Englund G. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95:194-200.
27. Jemt T, Stenport V. Implant treatment with fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part 2: prosthetic technique and clinical maintenance in two patient cohorts restored between 1986 and 1987 and 15 years later. Int J Prosthodont . 2011;24:356-362.
28. Ortorp A, Jemt T. Early laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible: a 15-year comparative follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11: 311-322.
29. Ortorp A, Jemt T. CNC-milled titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous jaw: a 10-year comparative clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:88-99.
30. Tsuge T, Hagiwara Y, Matsumura H. Marginal fit and microgaps of implant-abutment interface with internal antirotation configuration. Dent Mater J. 2008;27:29-34.
31. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a twoimplant 15-degree divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:468-475.
32. Del'Acqua MA, Arioli-Filho JN, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A, Jr. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants . 2008; 23:226-236.
33. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater. 2008;24:299-307.
34. Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Li J, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117:319-325.
35. Larsson C, Vult von Steyern P. Five-year follow-up of implant-supported Y-TZP and ZTA fixed dental prostheses. A randomized, prospective clinical trial comparing two different material systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23:555-561.
36. Larsson C, Vult von Steyern P, Nilner K. A prospective study of implant-supported full-arch yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal mandibular fixed dental prostheses: three-year results. Int J Prosthodont . 2010;23:364-369.