An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 378-383

  Tan, Philip L ^a,b   Gratton, David G ^a   Diaz Arnold, Ana M ^a   Holmes, David C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b Contemporary Prosthdontics ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Crown; Fixed prosthodontics; Marginal gap; Titanium

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; FIT CHECKER; FIT-CHECKER; SILICONE DERIVATIVE; TITANIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; ENDODONTICS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; SILICONES; TITANIUM;

EID: 47249089599     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00302.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, et al : Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1991 65 : 357 364
2. Sorensen SE, Larsen IB, Jorgensen KD : Gingival and alveolar bone reaction to marginal fit of subgingival crown margins. Scand J Dent Res 1986 94 : 109 114
3. Gavelis JR, Morency JD, Riley ED, et al : The effect of various finish line preparations on the marginal seal and occlusal seat of full crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent 1981 45 : 138 145
4. Jacobs MS, Windeler AS : An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent 1991 65 : 436 442
5. Christensen GJ : Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. J Prosthet Dent 1966 16 : 297 305
6. Hunter AJ, Hunter AR : Gingival margins for crowns: a review and discussion. Part II: discrepancies and configurations. J Prosthet Dent 1990 64 : 636 642
7. Baldissara P, Baldissara S, Scotti R : Reliability of tactile perception using sharp and dull explorers in marginal opening identification. Int J Prosthodont 1998 11 : 591 594
8. Jahangiri L, Wahlers C, Hittelman E, et al : Assessment of sensitivity and specificity of clinical evaluation of cast restoration marginal accuracy compared to stereomicroscopy. J Prosthet Dent 2005 93 : 138 142
9. Wanserski DJ, Sobczak KP, Monaco JG, et al : An analysis of margin adaptation of all-porcelain facial margin ceramometal crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1986 56 : 289 292
10. Belser UC, MacEntee MI, Richter WA : Fit of three porcelain-fused-to- metal marginal designs in vivo: a scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 1985 53 : 24 29
11. Samet N, Resheff B, Gelbard S, et al : A CAD/CAM system for the production of metal copings for porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1995 73 : 457 463
12. Besimo C, Jeger C, Guggenheim R : Marginal adaptation of titanium frameworks produced by CAD/CAM techniques. Int J Prosthodont 1997 10 : 541 546
13. Karlsson S : The fit of Procera titanium crowns: an in vitro and clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993 51 : 129 134
14. Leong D, Chai J, Lautenschlager E, et al : Marginal fit of machine-milled titanium and cast titanium single crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1994 7 : 440 447
15. Harris IR, Wickens JL : A comparison of the fit of spark-eroded titanium copings and cast gold alloy copings. Int J Prosthodont 1994 7 : 348 355
16. Valderrama S, Van Roekel N, Andersson M, et al : A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of titanium and gold-platinum-palladium metal ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995 8 : 29 37