A Comparison of Fit of CNC-Milled Titanium and Zirconia Frameworks to Implants

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 14, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2012, Pages

  Abduo, Jaafar ^a   Lyons, Karl ^a   Waddell, Neil ^a   Bennani, Vincent ^a   Swain, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Distortion; Framework fit; In vitro study; Misfit; Screw retention; Strain gauge

Indexed keywords

DENTAL MATERIAL; EPOXY RESIN; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTURE; DENTURE BASE; EDENTULOUSNESS; ENDODONTICS; FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATHOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TRANSDUCER; YOUNG MODULUS;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE BASES; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; ELASTIC MODULUS; EPOXY RESINS; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, ANATOMIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TRANSDUCERS; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84860843802     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00334.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11:156-158.
2. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50:399-410.
3. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6:270-276.
4. Karl M, Rosch S, Graef F, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. Strain situation after fixation of three-unit ceramic veneered implant superstructures. Implant Dent 2005; 14:157-165.
5. Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: current status. Implant Dent 2001; 10:85-92.
6. Takahashi T, Gunne J. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89:256-260.
7. Ortorp A, Jemt T, Back T, Jalevik T. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16:194-200.
8. Al-Fadda SA, Zarb GA, Finer Y. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20:125-131.
9. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008; 24:299-307.
10. Ichim I, Swain MV, Kieser JA. Mandibular stiffness in humans: numerical predictions. J Biomech 2006; 39:1903-1913.
11. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co., 1985:199.
12. Ishigaki S, Nakano T, Yamada S, Nakamura T, Takashima F. Biomechanical stress in bone surrounding an implant under simulated chewing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:97-102.
13. Abduo J, Bennani V, Lyons K, Waddell N, Swain M. A novel in vitro approach to assess the fit of implant frameworks. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02019.x.
14. White GE. The construction of a mandibular fixed complete framework. In: White GE, ed. Osseointegrated dental technology. Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 1993:103-129.
15. de Torres EM, Rodrigues RC, de Mattos Mda G, Ribeiro RF. The effect of commercially pure titanium and alternative dental alloys on the marginal fit of one-piece cast implant frameworks. J Dent 2007; 35:800-805.
16. Tan PL, Gratton DG, Diaz-Arnold AM, Holmes DC. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations. J Prosthodont 2008; 17:378-383.
17. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005; 113:174-179.
18. Kapos T, Ashy LM, Gallucci GO, Weber HP, Wismeijer D. Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24:110-117.
19. Tsuge T, Hagiwara Y, Matsumura H. Marginal fit and microgaps of implant-abutment interface with internal anti-rotation configuration. Dent Mater J 2008; 27:29-34.
20. Clelland NL, Carr AB, Gilat A. Comparison of strains transferred to a bone simulant between as-cast and postsoldered implant frameworks for a five-implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthodont 1996; 5:193-200.
21. Terminasov YS, Yakhontov AG. Distortion of lattice structure of metals by grinding. Met Sci Heat Treat 1959; 1:19-23.
22. Kikuchi M. The use of cutting temperature to evaluate the machinability of titanium alloys. Acta Biomater 2009; 5:770-775.
23. Abele E, Frohlich B. High speed milling of titanium alloys. APEM 2008; 3:131-140.
24. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Fit of all-ceramic posterior fixed partial denture frameworks in vitro. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007; 27:567-575.
25. Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Li J, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117:319-325.
26. Ortorp A, Jemt T. CNC-milled titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous jaw: a 10-year comparative clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00232.x.
27. Abduo J, Lyons K, Swain M. Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37:866-876.
28. Lindstrom H, Preiskel H. The implant-supported telescopic prosthesis: a biomechanical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16:34-42.
29. Millington ND, Leung T. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: stresses generated on the superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8:511-516.
30. Kunavisarut C, Lang LA, Stoner BR, Felton DA. Finite element analysis on dental implant-supported prostheses without passive fit. J Prosthodont 2002; 11:30-40.