Bone response to implant-supported frameworks with differing degrees of misfit preload: In vivo study in rabbits

Clinical implant dentistry and related research

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 129-137

  Jemt, Torsten ^a   Lekholm, Ulf ^a   Johansson, Carina B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE REMODELING; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; FEMALE; IMPLANT; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROSTHESIS; RABBIT; TIBIA; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE;

ANIMALS; BONE REMODELING; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PROSTHESIS FITTING; RABBITS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIBIA; TORQUE;

EID: 0034576929     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00003.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. 1 Brånemark P‐I, Hansson B, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaws: experience from a 10‐year period. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1977.
2. 2 Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983 ; 49: 843–848.
3. 3 Klineberg I, Murray G. Design of superstructures for osseointegrated fixtures: prosthetic reconstructions on osseointegrated implants. Proceedings of the Gothenburg conference September 1983. Swed Dent J Suppl 1985; 28: 63–70.
4. 4 Jemt T, Lekholm U. Measurements of bone and framework deformations induced by misfit of implant superstructure. A pilot study in rabbits. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998 ; 9: 272–280.
5. 5 Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in full‐arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994 ; 9: 169–178.
6. 6 Jemt T, Book K. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996 ; 11: 620–625.
7. 7 Carr A, Gerard D, Larsen P. The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting pros‐theses with different level of misfit. J Prosthet Dent 1996 ; 76: 500–509.
8. 8 Adell R, Lekholm U, Brånemark P‐I. Surgical procedures. In: Brånemark P‐I, Zarb G, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue‐integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985: 211–232.
9. 9 Forsmalm G. Förhållandet mellan åtdragningsmoment och förspänningskraft i distansskruvförbandet, ø 3 mm. Gothenburg, Sweden T94/00877: Nobel Biocare AB, 1994.
10. 10 Donath K. Preparations of histological sections. Nordstedt, Germany: Exakt‐Kulzer‐Publications, 1988: 1–16.
11. 11 Colton T. Statistics in medicine. Boston: Little, Brown, 1974: 241–250.
12. 12 Haraldsson T. A photoelastic study of some biomechanical factors affecting the anchorage of osseointegrated implants in the jaw. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1980 ; 14: 209–214.
13. 13 Chen J, Estrele M, Roberts E. Mechanical response to functional loading around the threads of retromolar endosseous implants utilized for orthodontic anchorage: coordinated histomorphometric and finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999 ; 14: 282–289.
14. 14 Lanyon L, Rubin C. Static vs. dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodeling. J Biomech 1984 ; 17: 897–905.
15. 15 Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws. A study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual check‐up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991 ; 6: 270–276.
16. 16 Trogen A. Detektering av felaktig passning för käkbens‐förankrad protetik. MSc thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1994.
17. 17 Smedberg J‐I, Nilner K, Rangert B, Svensson S, Glantz P‐O. On the influence of superstructure load: a methodological and clinical study. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996 ; 7: 55–63.
18. 18 Millington N, Leung T. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: stress generated on the superstructure relative to size of fit discrepancy. Int J Prosthodont 1995 ; 8: 511–516.
19. 19 Patterson EA. Passivity: its meaning, significance, and assessment in relation to implant supported prostheses. In: Naert I, ed. Passive fit of implant supported superstructures: “fiction or reality?” Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1995: 17–28.
20. 20 Jörneus L. Screws and cylinders in the Nobelpharma implant system. Nobelpharma News 1987 ; 1: 7–10.
21. 21 Laurell L. Occlusal forces and chewing ability in dentitions with cross‐arch bridges. Swed Dent J Suppl 1985 ; 26: 5–45.
22. 22 Isidor F. Histological evaluation of peri‐implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997 ; 8: 1–9.
23. 23 Wennerberg A, Jemt T. Complications in partially edentulous implant patients: a 5‐year retrospective follow‐up study of 133 patients supplied with unilateral maxillary prostheses. Clin Impl Dent Relat Res 1999 ; 1: 49–56.
24. 24 Ivanoff C‐J, Gröndahl K, Bergström C, Brånemark P‐I, Lekholm U. Influence of bicortical or monocortical anchorage on maxillary implant stability. A 15‐year retrospective study of Brånemark System implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999 ; 14: 103–110.
25. 25 Esposito M. On biological failures of osseointegrated oral implants. Odont Dr thesis, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1999.