Volumetric Misfit in CAD/CAM and Cast Implant Frameworks: A University Laboratory Study

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 267-274

  Almasri, Riad ^a,b,c   Drago, Carl J ^d,e   Siegel, Sharon Crane ^a   Hardigan, Patrick C ^a  

^a NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c Prosthodontist   (United States)

^d Dental Research   (United States)

^e OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Conventional frameworks; Precision of fit

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; IMAGE PROCESSING; MANDIBLE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, OVERLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MANDIBLE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 79958717128     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00709.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Tan K, Rubenstein J, Nicholls J, et al: Three-dimensional analysis of the casting accuracy of one-piece, osseointegrated implant-retained prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:346-363
2. Guichet D, Caputo A, Choi H, et al: Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw- or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 2000;15:239-246
3. Romero G, Engelmeier R, Powers J, et al: Accuracy of three corrective techniques for implant bar fabrication. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:602-607
4. Binon P, Sutter F, Beaty K, et al: The role of screws in implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9(Suppl):48-63
5. Jemt T, Lekholm U: Measurements of bone and framework deformations induced by misfit of implant superstructures: a pilot study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:272-280
6. May K, Edge M, Lang B, et al: The Periotest method: implant-supported framework precision of fit evaluation. J Prosthodont 1996;5:206-213
7. Calderini A, Maiorana C, Garlini G, et al: A simplified method to assess precision of fit between framework and supporting implants: a preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:831-838
8. Jemt T: In vivo measurements of precision of fit involving implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:151-158
9. Jemt T, Book K: Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:620-625
10. Torsello F, di Torresanto VM, Ercoli C, et al: Evaluation of marginal precision of one-piece complete arch titanium frameworks fabricated with five different methods for implant-supported restorations. Clin Oral Impl Res 2008;19:772-779
11. Riedy SJ, Lang BR, Lang BE: Fit of implant frameworks fabricated by different techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:596-604
12. Jemt T, Back T, Petersson A: Precision of CNC-milled titanium frameworks for implant treatment in the edentulous jaw. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:209-215
13. Ortorp A, Linden B, Jemt T: Clinical experiences of laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible. A 5-year report. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:65-72
14. Bergendal B, Palmqvist S: Laser-welded titanium framework for implant-supported fixed prostheses: a 5-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:69-71
15. Ortorp A, Jemt T, Back T, et al: Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:194-200
16. Ortorp A, Jemt T: Clinical experience of CNC-milled titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous jaw: a 3-year interim report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4:104-109
17. Ortorp A, Jemt T: Clinical experiences of computer numeric control-milled titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous jaw: a 5-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:199-209
18. Al-Fadda SA, Zarb GA, Finer Y: A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:125-131
19. Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, et al: An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:470-476
20. Shehab AH, Pappas M, Burns DR, et al: Comparative tensile strengths of preceramic and postceramic solder connectors using high-palladium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:148-152
21. Goolik A: Personal Communication, Biomedical Engineering Biomet 3i, Palm Beach Gardens, FL
22. Barry C, Oetter T, Lane M, et al: Keys to CAD/CAM in small shipyards. Presented at the 1998 SNAME Annual Meeting, June, 2004
23. Szalapaj P. 3D objects. In Szalapaj P (ed): CAD principles for architectural design: analytical approaches to computational representation of architectural form. London, Architectural Press, Reed Educational and Professional Publishing, 2001