Rethinking governance in management research

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 57, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1535-1543

  Tihanyi, Laszlo ^a   Graffin, Scott ^b   George, Gerard ^c  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84918574505     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2014.4006     Document Type: Editorial

References (40)

1. Baum, J. A. C., & McGahan, A. M. 2013. The reorganization of legitimate violence: The contested terrain of the private military and security industry during the post-Cold War era. Research in Organizational Behavior, 33: 3-37.
2. Bednar, M. K. 2012. Watchdog or lapdog? A behavioral view of the media as a corporate governance mechanism. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 131-150.
3. Belogolovsky, E., & Bamberger, P. 2014. Signaling in secret: Pay for performance and the incentive and sorting effects of pay secrecy. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1706-1733.
4. Briscoe, F., Chin, M. K., & Hambrick, D. 2014. CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1786-1809.
5. Blair, M. M., & Stout, L. A. 1999. A team production theory of corporate law. Virginia Law Review, 85: 247-328.
6. Bundy, J., Shropshire, C., & Buchholtz, A. K. 2013. Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Academy of Management Review, 38: 352-376.
7. Cadbury, A.. 1992. Report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance. London, UK: Gee.
8. Carton, A., Murphy, C., & Clark, J. 2014. A (blurry) vision of the future: How leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1544-1570.
9. Cowen, A. P., & Marcel, J. J. 2011. Damaged goods: Board decisions to dismiss reputationally compromised directors. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 509-527.
10. Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, C. M. 2007. The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation. Academy of Management Annals, 1: 1-64.
11. Fligstein, N., & Choo, J. 2005. Law and corporate governance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1: 61-84.
12. George, G., Haas, M. R., & Pentland, A. 2014. Big data and management. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 321-326.
13. Gomulya, D., & Boeker, W. 2014. How firms respond to financial restatement: CEO successors and external reactions. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1759-1785.
14. Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. 2014. Towards dynamic governance 2014: European corporate governance report. London, UK: Author.
15. Hollensbe, E., Wookey, C., Hickey, L., George, G., & Nichols, V. 2014. Organizations with purpose. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1227-1234.
16. Huy, Q., Corley, K., & Kraatz, M. 2014. From support to mutiny: Shifting legitimacy judgments and emotional reactions impacting the implementation of radical change. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1650-1680.
17. Inoue, C. F. K. V., Lazzarini, S. G., & Musacchio, A. 2013. Leviathan as a minority shareholder: Firm-level implications of state equity purchases. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 1775-1801.
18. Jayachandran, S., Kalaignanam, K., & Eilert, M. A. 2013. Product and environmental social performance: Varying effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 1255-1264.
19. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-360.
20. Joseph, J., Ocasio, W., & McDonnell, M. H. 2014. The structural elaboration of board independence: Executive power, institutional logics, and the adoption of CEO-only board structures in U.S. corporate governance. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1834-1858.
21. Kacperczyk, A. 2009. With greater power comes greater responsibility? Takeover protection and corporate attention to stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 261-285.
22. Khurana, R. 2002. Searching for a corporate savior: The irrational quest for charismatic CEOs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. King, B. G. 2008. A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 395-421.
24. Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. 2012. Who is in charge? A property rights perspective on stakeholder governance. Strategic Organization, 10: 304-315.
25. Lavie, D., Haunschild, P. R., & Khanna, P. 2012. Organizational differences, relational mechanisms, and alliance performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 1453-1479.
26. McDonnell, M.-H., & King, B. G. 2013. Keeping up appearances: Reputational threat and impression management after social movement boycotts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 387-419.
27. McGahan, A. M. 2014. AOM 2015 theme: Opening governance. Theme for the 75th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Retrieved October 26, 2014, from http://aom.org/uploadedFiles/Meetings/annualmeeting/2015/AOM2015Theme-OpeningGovernance.pdf.
28. Misangyi, V. F., & Acharya, A. G. 2014. Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1681-1705.
29. Nadkarni, S., & Chen, J. 2014. Bridging yesterday, today, and tomorrow: CEO temporal focus, environmental dynamism, and rate of new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1810-1833.
30. Patel, P. C., & Cooper, D. 2014. Structural power equality between family and non-family TMT members and the performance of family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1624-1649.
31. Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. 2001. Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Pollock, T. G., Rindova, V. P., & Maggitti, P. G. 2008. Market watch: Information and availability cascades among the media and investors in the U.S. IPO market. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 335-358.
33. Rhee, E., & Fiss, P. 2014. Framing controversial actions: Regulatory focus, source credibility, and stock market reaction to poison pill adoption. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1734-1758.
34. Scott, B., Garza, A., Conlon, D., & Kim, Y. J. 2014. Why do managers act fairly in the first place? A daily investigation of "hot" and "cold" motives and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1571-1591.
35. Shipilov, A. V., Greve, H. R., & Rowley, T. J. 2010. When do interlocks matter? Institutional logics and the diffusion of multiple corporate governance practices. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 846-864.
36. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52: 737-783.
37. Smith, W. 2014. Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1592-1623.
38. Wiesenfeld, B. M., Wurthmann, K. A., & Hambrick, D. C. 2008. The stigmatization and devaluation of elites associated with corporate failures: A process model. Academy of Management Review, 33: 231-251.
39. Zavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M. D., Reger, R. K., & Shapiro, D. L. 2012. Managing the message: The effects of firm actions and industry spillovers on media coverage following wrongdoing. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 1079-1101.
40. Zhang, Y., & Wiersema, M. F. 2009. Stock market reaction to CEO certification: The signaling role of CEO background. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 693-710.