Changes in sexual signals are greater than changes in ecological traits in a dichromatic group of fishes

Evolution

Volumn 68, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 3618-3628

  Martin, Michael D ^a   Mendelson, Tamra C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital photography; Etheostoma; Morphometrics; Natural selection; Sexual selection; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ETHEOSTOMA; PISCES;

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PERCH; PIGMENTATION; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENETIC VARIATION; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; PERCHES; PIGMENTATION; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84914127177     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12509     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Alford, J. and D. Beckett . 2007. Selective predation by four darter (Percidae) species on larval chironomids (Diptera) from a Mississippi stream. Environ. Biol. Fishes 78:353-364.
2. Allender, C., O. Seehausen, M. Knight, G. Turner, and N. Maclean . 2003. Divergent selection during speciation of Lake Malawi cichlid fishes inferred from parallel radiations in nuptial coloration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:14074-14079.
3. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
4. Arnegard, M. E., P. B. McIntyre, L. J. Harmon, M. L. Zelditch, W. G. Crampton, J. K. Davis, J. P. Sullivan, S. Lavoué, and C. D. Hopkins . 2010. Sexual signal evolution outpaces ecological divergence during electric fish species radiation. Am. Nat. 176:335-356.
5. Arnold, S. E., S. Faruq, V. Savolainen, P. W. McOwan, and L. Chittka . 2010. FReD: the floral reflectance database-a web portal for analyses of flower colour. PLoS One 5:e14287.
6. Barraclough, T. G., P. H. Harvey, and S. Nee . 1995. Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 259:211-215.
7. Boone, K. T. 2011. Purification and characterization of blue and green chromoprotein pigments from the integument of male darters in the genus Etheostoma. Unpubl. M.S. diss., Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA.
8. Boughman, J. W. 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411:944-948.
9. Boul, K. E., W. Chris Funk, C. R. Darst, D. C. Cannatella, and M. J. Ryan . 2007. Sexual selection drives speciation in an Amazonian frog. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 274:399-406.
10. Carlson, R. L. 2008. Morphological change in the tessellated darter (Etheostoma olmstedi) following the introduction of the banded darter (E. zonale) to the Susquehanna River drainage. Copeia 2008:661-668.
11. Carlson, R. L., and P. Wainwright . 2010. The ecological morphology of darter fishes (Percidae: Etheostomatinae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 100:30-45.
12. Carlson, R. L., P. C. Wainwright, and T. J. Near . 2009. Relationship between species co-occurrence and rate of morphological change in Percina darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae). Evolution 63:767-778.
13. Ciccotto, P. J., J. M. Gumm, and T. C. Mendelson . 2014. No evidence for color or size preference in either sex of a dichromatic stream fish, Percina roanoka. Environ. Biol. Fish. 97:187-195.
14. Clotfelter, E. D., D. R. Ardia, and K. J. McGraw . 2007. Red fish, blue fish: trade-offs between pigmentation and immunity in Betta splendens. Behav. Ecol. 18:1139-1145.
15. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr . 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
16. Danley, P. D., and T. D. Kocher . 2001. Speciation in rapidly diverging systems: lessons from Lake Malawi. Mol. Ecol. 10:1075-1086.
17. Douglas, M. E., and W. J. Matthews . 1992. Does morphology predict ecology? Hypothesis testing within a freshwater stream fish assemblage. Oikos 65:213-224.
18. Etnier, D. A., and R. M. Bailey . 1989. Etheostoma (Ulocentra) flavum, a new darter from the Tennessee and Cumberland river drainages. Occ. Pap. Mus. Zoo. Univ. Mich. 717:1-24.
19. Felsenstien, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
20. Gavrilets, S. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
21. Govardovskii, V. I., N. Fyhrquist, T. Reuter, D. G. Kuzmin, and K. Donner . 2000. In search of the visual pigment template. Vis. Neurosci. 17:509-528.
22. Gray, S. M., F. L. Hart, M. E. M. Tremblay, T. J. Lisney, and C. W. Hawryshyn . 2011. The effects of handling time, ambient light, and anaesthetic method, on the standardized measurement of fish colouration. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 68:330-342.
23. Guill, J. M., D. C. Heins, and C. S. Hood . 2003a. The effect of phylogeny on interspecific body shape variation in darters (Pisces: Percidae). Syst. Biol. 52:488-500.
24. Guill, J. M., C. S. Hood, and D. C. Heins . 2003b. Body shape variation within and among three species of darters (Perciformes: Percidae). Ecol. Freshw. Fish 12:134-140.
25. Gumm, J. M., and T. C. Mendelson . 2011. The evolution of multi-component visual signals in darters (genus Etheostoma). Curr. Zool. 57:125-139.
26. Gumm, J., K. Feller, and T. Mendelson . 2011. Spectral characteristics of male nuptial coloration in darters (Etheostoma). Copeia 2011:319-326.
27. Gumm, J. M., E. R. Loew, and T. C. Mendelson . 2012. Differences in spectral sensitivity within and among species of darters (genus Etheostoma). Vis. Res. 55:19-23.
28. Hammer, Ø., D. T. Harper, and P. D. Ryan . 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeont. Electr. 4:1-9.
29. Hatfield, T., and D. Schluter . 1999. Ecological speciation in sticklebacks: environment-dependent hybrid fitness. Evolution 53:866-873.
30. Herrel, A., J. J. Meyers, and B. Vanhooydonck . 2001. Correlations between habitat use and body shape in a phrynosomatid lizard (Urosaurus ornatus): a population-level analysis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 74:305-314.
31. Hill, G. E. 1990. Female house finches prefer colourful males: sexual selection for a condition-dependent trait. Anim. Behav. 40:563-572.
32. Hofmann, C. M., T. W. Cronin, and K. E. Omland . 2006. Using spectral data to reconstruct evolutionary changes in coloration: carotenoid color evolution in New World orioles. Evolution 60:1680-1691.
33. Knouft, J. H. 2003. Convergence, divergence, and the effect of congeners on body size ratios in stream fishes. Evolution 57:2374-2382.
34. Kodric-Brown, A. 1985. Female preference and sexual selection for male coloration in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 17:199-205.
35. Korzan, W. J., and R. D. Fernald . 2007. Territorial male color predicts agonistic behavior of conspecifics in a color polymorphic species. Behav. Ecol. 18:318-323.
36. Kraaijeveld, K., F. J. L. Kraaijeveld-Smit, and M. E. Maan . 2011. Sexual selection and speciation: the comparative evidence revisited. Biol. Rev. 86:367-377.
37. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:3721-3725.
38. Langerhans, R. B., M. E. Gifford, and E. O. Joseph . 2007. Ecological speciation in Gambusia fishes. Evolution 61:2056-2074.
39. Leal, M., and L. J. Fleishman . 2004. Differences in visual signal design and detectability between allopatric populations of Anolis lizards. Am. Nat. 163:26-39.
40. Ligon, R. A., and K. J. McGraw . 2013. Chameleons communicate with complex colour changes during contests: different body regions convey different information. Biol. Lett. 9:20130892.
41. Maan, M. E., and O. Seehausen . 2011. Ecology, sexual selection and speciation. Ecol. Lett. 14:591-602.
42. Marie Curie Speciation Network. 2012. What do we need to know about speciation? Trends Ecol. Evol. 27:27-39.
43. Martin, M. D., and T. C. Mendelson . 2012. Signal divergence is correlated with genetic distance and not environmental differences in darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evol. Biol. 39:231-241.
44. Martin, M. D., and T. C. Mendelson . 2013. Incomplete behavioural isolation and asymmetric female preference in darter sister species (Percidae: Etheostoma). J. Fish Biol. 83:1371-1380.
45. Masta, S. E., and W. P. Maddison . 2002. Sexual selection driving diversification in jumping spiders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:4442-4447.
46. Mendelson, T. C. 2003. Sexual isolation evolves faster than hybrid inviability in a diverse and sexually dimorphic genus of fish (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 57:317-327.
47. Mendelson, T. C., and K. L. Shaw . 2005. Sexual behaviour: rapid speciation in an arthropod. Nature 433:375-376.
48. Mendelson, T. C., and M. K. Wong . 2010. AFLP phylogeny of the snubnose darters and allies (Percidae: Etheostoma) provides resolution across multiple levels of divergence. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 57:1253-1259.
49. Near, T. J., C. M. Bossu, G. S. Bradburd, R. L. Carlson, R. C. Harrington, P. R. Hollingsworth, B. P. Keck, and D. A. Etnier . 2011. Phylogeny and temporal diversification of darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae). Syst. Biol. 60:565-595.
50. Nicholson, K. E., L. J. Harmon, and J. B. Losos . 2007. Evolution of Anolis lizard dewlap diversity. PLoS ONE 2:e274.
51. Norton, S. F. 1995. A functional approach to ecomorphological patterns of feeding in cottid fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish. 44:61-78.
52. Nosil, P. 2012. Ecological speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
53. Nosil, P., B. J. Crespi, R. Gries, and G. Gries . 2007. Natural selection and divergence in mate preference during speciation. Genetica 129:309-327.
54. Olsson, M. 1994. Nuptial coloration in the sand lizard, Lacerta agilis: an intra-sexually selected cue to lighting ability. Anim. Behav. 48:607-613.
55. Page, L., and B. Burr . 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes. Houghton Mifflin, New York, NY.
56. Page, L. M., and D. Swofford . 1984. Morphological correlates of ecological specialization in darters. Environ. Biol. Fish. 11:139-159.
57. Panhuis, T. M., R. Butlin, M. Zuk, and T. Tregenza . 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:364-371.
58. Pike, T. W. 2011. Using digital cameras to investigate animal colouration: estimating sensor sensitivity functions. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65:849-858.
59. Porter, B., A. Fiumera, and J. Avise . 2002. Egg mimicry and allopaternal care: two mate-attracting tactics by which nesting striped darter (Etheostoma virgatum) males enhance reproductive success. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51:350-359.
60. Powers, S. L., and R. L. Mayden . 2003. Etheostoma cervus: a new species from the forked deer river system in western Tennessee with comparison to Etheostoma pyrrhogaster (Percidae: subgenus Ulocentra). Copeia 2003:576-582.
61. Powers, S. L., and R. L. Mayden . 2007. Evolution, systematics and biogeography of the Etheostoma simoterum species complex (Percidae: subgenus Ulocentra). Bull. Ala. Mus. Nat. Hist. 25:1-23.
62. Price, T. 2008. Speciation in birds. Roberts & Company Publishers, Greenwood Village, CO.
63. Prum, R. O. 2012. Aesthetic evolution by mate choice: Darwin's really dangerous idea. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 367:2253-2265.
64. Pyron, M. 1995. Mating patterns and a test for female mate choice in Etheostoma spectabile (Pisces, Percidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36:407-412.
65. Rincón, P. A., M. Bastir, and G. D. Grossman . 2007. Form and performance: body shape and prey-capture success in four drift-feeding minnows. Oecologia 152:345-355.
66. Ritchie, M. 2007. Sexual selection and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38:79-102.
67. Rodriguez, R. L., A. C. Hallett, J. T. Kilmer, and K. D. Fowler-Finn . 2013. Curves as traits: genetic and environmental variation in mate preference functions. J. Evol. Biol. 26:434-442.
68. Rüber, L., and D. C. Adams . 2001. Evolutionary convergence of body shape and trophic morphology in cichlids from Lake Tanganyika. J. Evol. Biol. 14:325-332.
69. Rundle, H. D., and P. Nosil . 2005. Ecological speciation. Ecol. Lett. 8:336-352.
70. Safran, R. J., C. R. Neuman, K. J. McGraw, and I. J. Lovette . 2005. Dynamic paternity allocation as a function of male plumage color in barn swallows. Science 309:2210-2212.
71. Safran, R. J., S. M. Flaxman, M. Kopp, D. E. Irwin, D. Briggs, M. R. Evans, W. C. Funk, D. A. Gray, E. A. Hebets, N. Seddon, et al. 2012. A robust new metric of phenotypic distance to estimate and compare multiple trait differences among populations. Curr. Zool. 58:426-439.
72. Safran, R. J., E. S. C. Scordato, L. B. Symes, R. L. Rodríguez, and T. C. Mendelson . 2013. Contributions of natural and sexual selection to the evolution of premating reproductive isolation: a research agenda. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28: 643-650.
73. Schluter, D. 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:372-380.
74. Schneider, C. A., W. S. Rasband, and K. W. Eliceiri . 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9:671-675.
75. Seehausen, O., Y. Terai, I. S. Magalhaes, K. L. Carleton, H. D. J. Mrosso, R. Miyagi, I. van der Sluijs, M. V. Schneider, M. E. Maan, H. Tachida, et al. 2008. Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Nature 455:620-626.
76. Servedio, M. R., G. S. V. Doorn, M. Kopp, A. M. Frame, and P. Nosil . 2011. Magic traits in speciation: magic but not rare? Trends Ecol. Evol. 26:389-397.
77. Stevens, M., C. A. Páraga, I. C. Cuthill, J. C. Partridge, and T. S. Troscianko . 2007. Using digital photography to study animal coloration. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 90:211-237.
78. Stevens, M., M. C. Stoddard, and J. P. Higham . 2009. Studying primate color: towards visual system-dependent methods. Int. J. Primatol. 30:893-917.
79. Valentin, A. E., X. Penin, J. P. Chanut, J. M. Sévigny, and F. J. Rohlf . 2008. Arching effect on fish body shape in geometric morphometric studies. J. Fish Biol. 73:623-638.
80. van Snik Gray, E., J. Boltz, K. Kellogg, and J. Stauffer . 1997. Food resource partitioning by nine sympatric darter species. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 126:822-840
81. Wainwright, P., and B. Richard . 1995. Predicting patterns of prey use from morphology of fishes. Pp. 97-113 in J. Luczkovich, P. Motta, S. Norton, and K. Liem, eds. Ecomorphology of fishes. Springer, The Netherlands.
82. Westland, S., and C. Ripamonti . 2004. Computational colour science using MATLAB. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
83. Williams, T. H., and T. C. Mendelson . 2010. Behavioral isolation based on visual signals in a sympatric pair of darter species. Ethology 116:1038-1049.
84. Williams, T. H., and T. C. Mendelson . 2011. Female preference for male coloration may explain behavioural isolation in sympatric darters. Anim. Behav. 82:683-689.
85. Williams, T. H., and T. C. Mendelson . 2013. Male and female responses to species-specific coloration in darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Anim. Behav. 85:1251-1259.
86. Williams, T. H., J. M. Gumm, and T. C. Mendelson . 2013. Sexual selection acting on a speciation trait in darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Behav. Ecol. 24:1407-1414.
87. Zhou, M., and R. C. Fuller . 2014. Reproductive isolation between two darter species is enhanced and asymmetric in sympatry. J. Fish Biol. 84:1389-1400.