Differences in spectral sensitivity within and among species of darters (genus Etheostoma)

Vision Research

Volumn 55, Issue , 2012, Pages 19-23

  Gumm, Jennifer M ^a   Loew, Ellis R ^b   Mendelson, Tamra C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^b Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Behavior; Etheostoma; Individual variation; Microspectrophotometry; Spectral sensitivity

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DARTER; FEMALE; FRESHWATER FISH; MALE; MICROSPECTROPHOTOMETRY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA CONE; RETINA ROD; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECTRAL SENSITIVITY; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; COLOR PERCEPTION; PERCHES; RETINAL PIGMENTS; RETINAL ROD PHOTORECEPTOR CELLS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SEX FACTORS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84856476927     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Archer S.N., Lythgoe J.N. The visual pigment basis for cone polymorphism in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Vision Research 1990, 30:225-233.
2. Bailey R.M., Etnier D.A. Comments on the subgenera of darters (Percidae) with descriptions of two new species of Etheostoma (Ulocentra) from southeastern United States. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology at the University of Michigan 1988, 175:1-48.
3. Boschung H.T., Mayden R.L. Fishes of Alabama 2004, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
4. Boughman J.W. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 2001, 411:944-948.
5. Bowmaker J.K. The visual pigments of fish. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 1995, 15:1-31.
6. Bowmaker J.K., Loew E.R., Liebman P.A. Variation in the [lambda] max of rhodopsin from individual frogs. Vision Research 1975, 15:997-1003.
7. Carleton K.L. Cichlid fish visual systems: Mechanisms of spectral tuning. Integrative Zoology 2009, 4:75-86.
8. Carleton K.L., Harosi F.I., Kocher T.D. Visual pigments of African cichlid fishes: Evidence for ultraviolet vision from microspectrophotometry and DNA sequences. Vision Research 2000, 40:879-890.
9. Carleton K.L., Kocher T.D. Cone opsin genes of African cichlid fishes: Tuning spectral sensitivity by differential gene expression. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2001, 18(8):1540-1550.
10. Carleton K.L., Parry J.W.L., Bowmaker J.K., Hunt D.M., Seehausen O. Colour vision and speciation in Lake Victoria cichlids of the genus Pundamilia. Molecular Ecology 2005, 14:4341-4353.
11. Cummings M.E. Sensory trade-offs predict signal divergence in surfperch. Evolution 2007, 530:545.
12. Dangles O., Irschick D., Chittka L., Casas J. Variability in sensory ecology: Expanding the bridge between physiology and evolutionary biology. Quarterly Review of Biology 2009, 84(1):51-74.
13. Dalton B.E., Cronin T.W., Marshall N.J., Carleton K.L. The fish eye view: are cichlids conspicuous?. J Exp Biol 2010, 213(Pt 13):2243-2255.
14. Endler J.A. Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication signals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 1993, 340:215-225.
15. Endler J.A. Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1995, 10(1):22-29.
16. Etnier D.A., Starnes W.C. The fishes of Tennessee 1993, The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, Tennessee.
17. Fuller R.C., Carleton K.L., Fadool J.M., Spady T.C., Travis J. Population variation in opsin expression in the bluefin killifish, Lucania goodei: A real-time PCR study. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 2004, 190:147-154.
18. Fuller R.C., Houle D., Travis J. Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences. American Naturalist 2005, 166(4):437-446.
19. Govardovskii V.I., Fyhrquist N., Reuter T., Kuzmin D.G., Donner K. In search of the visual pigment template. Visual Neuroscience 2000, 17(4):509-528.
20. Gumm J.M., Feller K.D., Mendelson T.C. Spectral characteristics of male nuptial coloration in darters (Etheostoma). Copiea 2011, 2011:319-326.
21. Gumm J.M., Mendelson T.C. The evolution of multi-component visual signals in darters (genus Etheostoma). Current Zoology 2011, 57(2):125-139.
22. Hárosi F.I. An analysis of two spectral properties of vertebrate visual pigments. Vision Research 1994, 34(11):1359-1367.
23. Hoffmann M., Tripathi N., Henz S.R., Lindholm A.K., Weigel D., Breden F., et al. Opsin gene duplication and diversification in the guppy, a model for sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society B - Biological Sciences 2007, 274(1606):33-42.
24. Jokela-Maatta M., Vartio A., Paulin L., Donner K. Individual variation in rod absorbance spectra correlated with opsin gene polymorphism in sand goby (Pomatoschistus minutus). Journal of Experimental Biology 2009, 212(21):3415-3421.
25. Jordan R., Kellogg K., Howe D., Juanes F., Stauffer J., Loew E. Photopigment spectral absorbances of Lake Malawi cichlids. Journal of Fish Biology 2006, 68:1291-1299.
26. Kirk J.T.O. Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems 1983, Cambridge University Press, New York.
27. Larmuseau M.H.D., Vancampenhout K., Raeymaekers J.A.M., Van Houdt J.K.J., Volckaert F.A.M. Differential modes of selection on the rhodopsin gene in coastal Baltic and North Sea populations of the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Molecular Ecology 2010, 19(11):2256-2268.
28. Loew E. A third, ultraviolet-sensitive, visual pigment in the Tokay gecko (Gekko gekko). Vision Research 1994, 34(11):1427-1431.
29. Loew E.R., Dartnall H.J.A. Vitamin A1/A2-based visual pigment mixtures in cones of the rudd. Vision Research 1976, 16:891-896.
30. Loew E.R., Wahl C.M. A short-wavelength sensitive mechanism in juvenile yellow perch, Perca flavescens. Vision Research 1991, 31:353-360.
31. Mendelson T.C. Sexual isolation evolves faster than hybrid inviability in a diverse and sexually dimorphic genus of fish (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 2003, 57(2):317-327.
32. Mendelson T.C., Imhoff V.E., Venditti J.J. The accumulation of reproductive barriers during speciation: Postmating barriers in two behaviorally isolated species of darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 2007, 61(11):2596-2606.
33. Mendelson T.C., Wong M.K. AFLP phylogeny of the snubnose darters and allies (Percidae: Etheostoma) provides resolution across multiple levels of divergence. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2010, 57(3):1253-1259.
34. Page L.M., Burr B.M. A field guide to the freshwater fishes of North America North of Mexico 2011, Houghton-Mifflin Co, Boston, MA.
35. Parry J.W.L., Bowmaker J.K. Visual pigment reconstitution in intact goldfish retina using synthetic retinaldehyde isomers. Vision Research 2000, 40(17):2241-2247.
36. Parry J.W.L., Carleton K.L., Spady T.C., Carboo A., Hunt D.M., Bowmaker J.K. Mix and match colour vision: Tuning spectral sensitivity by differential opsin gene expression in Lake Malawi cichlids. Current Biology 2005, 15:1734-1739.
37. Porter B.A., Cavender T.M., Fuerst P.A. Molecular phylogeny of the snubnose darters, subgenus Ulocentra (genus Etheostoma, family Percidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2002, 22(3):364-374.
38. Powers S.L., Mayden R.L. Etheostoma cervus: A new species from the Forked Deer River system in western Tennessee with comparison to Etheostoma pyrrhogaster (Percidae: subgenus Ulocentra). Copeia 2003, 2003(3):576-582.
39. Reckel F., Melzer R.R. Regional variations in the outer retina of atherinomorpha (Beloniformes, Atheriniformes, Cyprinodontiformes: Teleostei): Photoreceptors, cone patterns, and cone densities. Journal of Morphology 2003, 257(3):270-288.
40. Seehausen O., Terai Y., Magalhaes I.S., Carleton K.L., Mrosso H.D.J., Miyagi R., et al. Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Nature 2008, 455:620-626.
41. Smith T.A., Mendelson T.C., Page L.M. AFLPs support deep relationships among darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae) consistent with morphological hypotheses. Heredity 2011, 10.1038/hdy.2011.50.
42. Spady T.C., Seehausen O., Loew E.R., Jordan R.C., Kocher T.D., Carleton K.L. Adaptive molecular evolution in the opsin genes of rapidly speciating cichlid species. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005, 22:1412-1422.
43. Wahl C.M., Mills E.L., McFarland W.N., DeGisi J.S. Ontogenetic changes in prey selection and visual acuity of the yellow perch, Perca flavescens. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1993, 50(4):743-749.
44. Williams T.H., Mendelson T.C. Behavioral isolation based on visual signals in a sympatric pair of darter species. Ethology 2010, 116(11):1038-1049.
45. Williams T.H., Mendelson T.C. Female preference for male colouration may explain behavioural isolation in sympatric darters. Anim Behav 2011, 82:683-689.
46. Yokoyama S. Evolution of vertebrate visual pigments. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2000, 19:385-419.