Body shape variation within and among three species of darters (Perciformes: Percidae)

Ecology of Freshwater Fish

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 134-140

  Guill, J Michael ^a   Hood, C S ^b   Heins, D C ^a  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Darter; Etheostoma; Geometric morphometrics; Interspecific variation; Intraspecific variation; Thin plate spline

Indexed keywords

BODY SHAPE; ECOMORPHOLOGY; GEOMETRY; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; PERCID;

ANHINGIDAE; ETHEOSTOMA; ETHEOSTOMA CAERULEUM; ETHEOSTOMA NIGRUM; ETHEOSTOMA STIGMAEUM; PERCIDAE; PERCIFORMES; PISCES;

EID: 0038270592     PISSN: 09066691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0633.2003.00008.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bart, H.L. Jr & Taylor, M.S. 1999. Systematic review of subgenus Fuscatelum of Etheostoma with description of a new species from the upper Black Warrior River system, Alabama. Tulane Studies in Zoology and Botany 31: 23-50.
2. Bookstein, F.L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bookstein, F.L. 1996. Standard formula for the uniform shape component in landmark data. In: Marcus, L.F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G.J.P. & Slice, D., eds. Advances in morphometrics. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 131-151.
4. Bookstein, F.L., Chernoff, B., Elder, R.L., Humphries, J.M. Jr, Smith, G.R. & Strauss, R.E. 1985. Morphometrics in evolutionary biology: the geometry of size and shape change, with examples from fishes. Philadelphia: Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.
5. Caldecutt, W.J. & Adams, D.C. 1998. Morphometrics of trophic osteology in the threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. Copeia 1998: 827-838.
6. Carpenter, K.E. 1996. Morphometric pattern and feeding mode in emperor fishes (Lethrinidae, Perciformes). In: Marcus, L.F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G.J.P. & Slice, D., eds. Advances in morphometrics. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 479-487.
7. Corti, M. & Crosetti, D. 1996. Geographic variation in the grey mullet: a geometric morphometric analysis using partial warp scores. Journal of Fish Biology 48: 255-269.
8. Dryden, I.L. & Mardia, K.V. 1998. Statistical shape analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Fink, W.L. & Zelditch, M.L. 1997. Shape analysis and taxonomic status of Pygocentrus piranhas (Ostariophysi, Characiformes) from the Paraguay and Paraná river basins of South America. Copeia 1997: 179-182.
10. Gould, S.J. & Lewontin, R.C. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B. Biological Sciences 205: 581-598.
11. Heins, D.C. & Baker, J.A. 1989. Growth, population structure, and reproduction of the percid fish Percina vigil. Copeia 1989: 727-736.
12. Hood, C.S. & Heins, D.C. 2000. Ontogeny and allometry of body shape in the blacktail shiner, Cyprinella venusta. Copeia 2000: 270-275.
13. Kuehne, R.A. & Barbour, R.W. 1983. The American darters. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
14. Marcus, L.F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G.J.P. & Slice, D., ed. 1996. Advances in morphometrics. New York: Plenum Press.
15. Mardia, K.V., Kent, J.T. & Bibby, J.M. 1979. Multivariate analysis. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.
16. Meacham, C.A. & Duncan, T. 1993. MorphoSys, v. 1.29. Berkeley: University Herbarium, University of California.
17. Page, L.M. 1983. Handbook of darters. Neptune City, NJ: TFH Publications.
18. Page, L.M. & Swofford, D.L. 1984. Morphological correlates of ecological specialization in darters. Environmental Biology of Fishes 11: 139-159.
19. Paine, M.D. 1986. Developmental allometry in three species of darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Canadian Journal of Zoology 64: 347-352.
20. Rohlf, F.J. 1997. tpsRegr - Thin-plate spline regression software, v. 1.13. Stony Brook: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York.
21. Rohlf, F.J. & Bookstein, F.L., ed. 1990. Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.
22. Rohlf, F.J. & Marcus, L.F. 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 129-132.
23. SAS Institute Inc. 1996. The SAS system, v. 6.12. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
24. SAS Institute Inc. 1999. JMP, v. 3.2.6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
25. Slice, D.E. 1998. Morpheus et al. v. 1-30-98. Stony Brook: Distributed by the Author, Department of Ecology and Evolution. State University of New York.
26. Thompson, D.W. 1952. On growth and form, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Williams, J.D. 1975. Systematics of the percid fishes of the subgenus Ammocrypta, genus Ammocrypta, with descriptions of two new species. Bulletin of the Alabama Museum of Natural History 1: 1-56.
28. Wood, B.M. & Bain, M.B. 1995. Morphology and microhabitat use in stream fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52: 1487-1498.
29. Wood, R.M. & Mayden, R.L. 1993. Systematics of the Etheostoma jordani species group (Teleostei: Percidae), with descriptions of three new species. Bulletin of the Alabama Museum of Natural History 16: 31-46.