Behavioral Isolation Based on Visual Signals in a Sympatric Pair of Darter Species

Ethology

Volumn 116, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1038-1049

  Williams, Tory H ^a   Mendelson, Tamra C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; COEVOLUTION; COEXISTENCE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FISH; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MATE CHOICE; NUPTIAL GIFT; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; RARE SPECIES; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIGNAL; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SYMPATRY; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

NORTH AMERICA;

ANHINGIDAE; ANIMALIA; ETHEOSTOMA; ETHEOSTOMA BARRENENSE; ETHEOSTOMA ZONALE; PISCES;

EID: 78649482617     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01816.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Andersson, M. 1994: Sexual Selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Archard, G. A., Cuthill, I. C., Partridge, J. C. & Van Oosterhout, C. 2008: Female guppies (Poecilia reticulata) show no preference for conspecific chemosensory cues in the field or an artificial flow chamber. Behaviour 145, 1329-1346.
3. Arnqvist, G., Edvardsson, M., Friberg, U. & Nilsson, T. 2000: Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 10460-10464.
4. Aspbury, A. S. & Basolo, A. L. 2002: Repeatable female preferences, mating order and mating success in the poeciliid fish, Heterandria formosa. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51, 238-244.
5. Baker, M. C. & Baker, A. E. M. 1990: Reproductive behavior of female buntings: isolating mechanisms in a hybridizing pair of species. Evolution 44, 332-338.
6. Barraclough, T. G., Harvey, P. H. & Nee, S. 1995: Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 259, 211-215.
7. Blais, J., Plenderleith, M., Rico, C., Taylor, M. I., Seehausen, O., Van Oosterhout, C. & Turner, G. F. 2009: Assortative mating among Lake Malawi cichlid fish populations is not simply predictable from male nuptial colour. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, e53.
8. TM 1.0. Accessed April 2008.
9. Crapon de Caprona, M. D. & Ryan, M. J. 1990: Conspecific mate recognition in swordtails, Xiphophorus nigrensis and X. pigmaeus (Poeciliidae): olfactory and visual cues. Anim. Behav. 39, 290-296.
10. Dijkstra, P. D., Seehausen, O. & Groothuis, T. G. G. 2005: Direct male-male competition can facilitate invasion of new colour types in Lake Victoria cichlids. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58, 136-146.
11. Dijkstra, P. D., Seehausen, O., Gricar, B. L. A., Maan, M. E. & Groothuis, T. G. G. 2006: Can male-male competition stabilize speciation? A test in Lake Victoria cichlids. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59, 704-713.
12. Dijkstra, P. D., Seehausen, O., Pierotti, M. E. R. & Groothuis, T. G. G. 2007: Male-male competition and speciation: aggression bias towards differently coloured rivals varies between stages of speciation in a Lake Victoria cichlid species complex. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 496-502.
13. Emlen, D. J. 2008: The evolution of animal weapons. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 387-413.
14. Etnier, D. A. & Starnes, W. C. 1993: The Fishes of Tennessee. The Univ. of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN.
15. Fuller, R. C. 2003: Disentangling female mate choice and male competition in the Rainbow Darter, Etheostoma caeruleum. Copeia 1, 138-148.
16. Gage, M. J. G., Parker, G. A., Nylin, S. & Wiklund, C. 2002: Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 2309-2316.
17. Gonçalves, D. M. & Oliveira, R. F. 2003: Time spent close to a sexual partner as a measure of female mate preference in a sex-role-reversed population of the blenny Salaria pavo (Risso) (Pisces: Blenniidae). Acta Ethol 6, 1-5.
18. Grether, G. F., Losin, N., Anderson, C. N. & Okamato, K. 2009: The role of interspecific interference competition in character displacement and the evolution of competitor recognition. Biol. Rev. 84, 617-635.
19. Gumm, J. M., Gonzalez, R., Aspbury, A. S. & Gabor, C. R. 2006: Do I know you? Species recognition operates within and between the sexes in a unisexual-bisexual species complex of mollies. Ethology 112, 448-457.
20. Hebets, E. A. & Uetz, G. W. 2000: Leg ornamentation and the efficacy of courtship display in four species of wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 47, 280-286.
21. Heubel, K. U. & Schlupp, I. 2008: Seasonal plasticity in male mating preferences in sailfin mollies. Behav. Ecol. 19, 1080-1086.
22. Hollingsworth, P. R. Jr. & Near, T. J. 2009: Temporal patterns of diversification and microendemism in Eastern highland endemic barcheek darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae). Evolution 63, 228-243.
23. Hubbs, C. L. 1955: Hybridization between fish species in nature. Syst. Zool. 4, 1-20.
24. Hubbs, C. 1967: Geographic variations in survival of hybrids between Etheostomatine fishes. Bull. Tex. Mem. Mus. 13, 1-72.
25. Isaac, N. J. B., Jones, K. E., Gittleman, J. L. & Purvis, A. 2005: Correlates of species richness in mammals: body size, life history, and ecology. Am. Nat. 165, 600-608.
26. Jiggins, C. D., Naisbit, R. E., Coe, R. L. & Mallet, J. 2001: Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411, 302-305.
27. Jiggins, C. D., Estrada, C. & Rodrigues, A. 2004: Mimicry and the evolution of premating isolation in Heliconius melpomene Linnaeus. J. Evol. Biol. 17, 680-691.
28. Katzourakis, A., Purvis, A., Azmeh, S., Rotheray, G. & Gilbert, F. 2001: Macroevolution of hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae): the effect of using higher-level taxa in studies of biodiversity, and correlates of species richness. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 219-227.
29. Keck, B. P. & Near, T. J. 2009: Patterns of natural hybridization in darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae). Copeia 4, 758-773.
30. Kodric-Brown, A. & Strecker, U. 2001: Responses of Cyprinodon maya and C. labiosus females to visual and olfactory cues of conspecific and heterospecific males. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73, 541-548.
31. Lande, R. 1981: Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 3721-3725.
32. Lehtonen, T. K. & Lindstrom, K. 2008: Repeatability of mating preferences in the sand goby. Anim. Behav. 75, 55-61.
33. Maan, M. E. & Cummings, M. E. 2008: Female preferences for aposematic signal components in a polymorphic poison frog. Evolution 62, 2334-2345.
34. Magurran, A. E. & Ramnarine, I. W. 2004: Learned mate recognition and reproductive isolation in guppies. Anim. Behav. 67, 1077-1082.
35. Matsubayashi, K. W. & Katakura, H. 2007: Unilateral mate choice causes bilateral behavioral isolation between two closely related phytophagous ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachninae). Ethology 113, 686-691.
36. Melo, M. C., Salazar, C., Jiggins, C. D. & Linares, M. 2009: Assortative mating preferences among hybrids offers a route to hybrid speciation. Evolution 63, 1660-1665.
37. Mendelson, T. C. 2003: Sexual isolation evolves faster than hybrid inviability in a diverse and sexually dimorphic genus of freshwater fish (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 57, 317-327.
38. Mendelson, T. C. & Simons, J. N. 2006: AFLPs resolve cytonuclear discordance and increase resolution among barcheek darters (Percidae: Etheostoma: Catonotus). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 41, 445-453.
39. Mendelson, T. C., Imhoff, V. E. & Venditti, J. J. 2007: The accumulation of reproductive barriers during speciation: postmating barriers in two behaviorally isolated species of darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 61, 2596-2606.
40. Mikami, O. K., Kohda, M. & Kawata, M. 2004: A new hypothesis for species co-existence, male-male repulsion promotes co-existence of competing species. Pop. Ecol. 46, 213-217.
41. Mitra, S., Landel, H. & Pruett-Jones, S. 1996: Species richness covaries with mating system in birds. Auk 113, 544-551.
42. Møller, A. P. & Cuervo, J. J. 1998: Speciation and feather ornamentation in birds. Evolution 52, 859-869.
43. Morrow, E. H., Pitcher, T. E. & Arnqvist, G. 2003: No evidence that sexual selection is an 'engine of speciation' in birds. Ecol. Lett. 6, 228-234.
44. Near, T. J. & Benard, M. F. 2004: Rapid allopatric speciation in logperch darters (Percidae: Percina). Evolution 58, 2798-2808.
45. Page, L. M. 1983: Handbook of Darters. T. F. H. Pub. Inc., Neptune City, NJ.
46. Page, L. M. & Burr, B. M. 1991: A Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes: North America North of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York.
47. Porter, B. A., Cavender, T. M. & Fuerst, P. A. 2002: Molecular phylogeny of the snubnose darters, subgenus Ulocentra (Genus Etheostoma, Family Percidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22, 364-374.
48. Poschadel, J. R., Meyer-Lucht, Y. & Plath, M. 2006: Response to chemical cues from conspecifics reflects male mating preference for large females and avoidance of large competitors in the European pond turtle, Emys orbicularis. Behaviour 143, 569-587.
49. Powers, S. L. & Mayden, R. L. 2003: Etheostoma cervus: a new species from the Forked Deer River system in western Tennessee with comparison to Etheostoma pyrrhogaster (Percidae: Subgenus Ulocentra). Copeia 3, 576-582.
50. Pyron, M. 1995: Mating patterns and a test for female mate choice in Etheostoma spectabile (Pisces, Percidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36, 407-412.
51. Ritchie, M. G. 2007: Sexual selection and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38, 79-102.
52. Seddon, N., Merrill, R. M. & Tobias, J. A. 2008: Sexually selected traits predict patterns of species richness in a diverse clade of suboscine birds. Am. Nat. 171, 620-631.
53. Seehausen, O. & Schluter, D. 2004: Male-male competition and nuptial-colour displacement as a diversifying force in Lake Victoria cichlid fishes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 1345-1353.
54. Seehausen, O. & Van Alphen, J. J. M. 1998: The effect of male coloration on female mate choice in closely related Lake Victoria cichlids (Haplochromis nyererei complex). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42, 1-8.
55. Smadja, C. & Butlin, R. K. 2009: On the scent of speciation: the chemosensory system and its role in premating isolation. Heredity 102, 77-97.
56. Stalker, H. D. 1942: Sexual isolation studies in the species complex Drosophila virilis. Genetics 27, 238-257.
57. Summers, K., Symula, R., Clough, M. & Cronin, T. 1999: Visual mate choice in poison frogs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 266, 2141-2145.
58. Uy, J. A. C., Moyle, R. G. & Filardi, C. E. 2009: Plumage and song differences mediate species recognition between incipient flycatcher species of the Solomon Islands. Evolution 63, 153-164.
59. West-Eberhard, M. J. 1983: Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58, 155-183.
60. Wiernasz, D. C. & Kingsolver, J. G. 1992: Wing melanin pattern medites species recognition in Pieris occidentalis. Anim. Behav. 43, 89-94.