The effect of phylogeny on interspecific body shape variation in darters (Pisces: Percidae)

Systematic Biology

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 488-500

  Guill, J Michael ^a   Heins, David C ^a   Hood, Craig S ^b,c  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Body shape variation; Geometric morphometrics; Phylogenetic effect; Thin plate spline

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HISTOLOGY; PERCIFORMES; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; BIOMETRY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; PERCIFORMES; PHYLOGENY;

ANHINGIDAE; ANIMALIA; PERCIDAE; PERCIFORMES; PISCES;

EID: 0042069653     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150309314     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. ABELL, A. J., B. J. COLE, R. REYES, AND D. C. WIERNASZ. 1999. Sexual selection on body size and shape in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis cresson. Evolution 53:535-545.
2. BAILEY, R. M., AND D. A. ETNIER. 1988. Comments on the subgenera of darters (Percidae) with descriptions of two new species of Etheostoma (Ulocentra) from southeastern United States. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 175:1-48.
3. BART, H. L., JR., AND L. M. PAGE. 1992. The influence of size and phylogeny on life history variation in North American percids. Pages 553-572 in Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes (R. L. Mayden, ed.). Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, California.
4. BÖHNING-GAESE, K., AND R. OBERRATH. 1999. Phylogenetic effects on morphological, life-history, behavioural and ecological traits of birds. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1:347-364.
5. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
6. BUTLER, M. A., T. W. SCHOENER, AND J. B. LOSOS. 2000. The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Evolution 54:259-272.
7. CARPENTER, K. E. 1996. Morphometric pattern and feeding mode in emperor fishes (Lethrinidae, Perciformes). Pages 479-487 in Advances in morphometrics (L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds.). Plenum, New York.
8. DOUGLAS, M. E. 1987. An ecomorphological analysis of niche packing and niche dispersion in stream fish clades. Pages 144-149 in Community and evolutionary ecology of North American stream fishes (W. J. Matthews and D. C. Heins, eds.). Univ. Oklahoma Press, Norman.
9. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
10. FISHER, W. L., AND W. D. PEARSON. 1987. Patterns of resource utilization among four species of darters in three central Kentucky streams. Pages 69-76 in Community and evolutionary ecology of North American stream fishes (W. J. Matthews and D. C. Heins, eds.). Univ. Oklahoma Press, Norman.
11. FLEMING, I. A., AND M. R. GROSS. 1989. Evolution of adult female life history and morphology in a Pacific salmon (coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch). Evolution 43:141-157.
12. FOSTER, S. A., J. A. BAKER, AND M. A. BELL. 1992. Phenotypic integration of life history and morphology: An example from three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. J. Fish Biol. 41:21-35.
13. GARLAND, T., P. E. MIDFORD, AND A. R. IVES. 1999. An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral values. Am. Zool. 39:374-388.
14. GATZ, A. J. 1979a. Community organization in fishes as indicated by morphological features. Evolution 60:711-718.
15. GATZ, A. J. 1979b. Ecological morphology of freshwater stream fishes. Tulane Stud. Zool. Bot. 21:91-124.
16. GITTLEMAN, J. L., AND M. KOT. 1990. Adaptation: Statistics and a null model for estimating phylogenetic effects. Syst. Zool. 39:227-241.
17. GUILL, J. M., C. S. HOOD, AND D. C. HEINS. 2003. Body shape variation within and among three species of darters (Perciformes: Percidae). Ecol. Freshwater Fish 12:134-140.
18. HARVEY, P. H., AND M. D. PAGEL. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
19. HOOD, C. S., AND D. C. HEINS. 2000. Ontogeny and allometry of body shape in the blacktail shiner, Cyprinella venusta. Copeia 2000:270-275.
20. IRSCHICK, D. J., T. E. MACRINI, S. KORUBA, AND J. FORMAN. 2000. Ontogenetic differences in morphology, habitat use, behavior, and sprinting capacity in two West Indian Anolis lizards. J. Herpetol. 34:444-451.
21. JONES, K. E., AND A. MACLARNON. 2001. Bat life histories: Testing models of mammalian life-history evolution. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3:465-476.
22. KINZINGER, A. P., R. M. WOOD, AND S. A. WELSH. 2001. Systematics of Etheostoma tippecanoe and Etheostoma denoncourti (Perciformes: Percidae). Copeia 2001:235-239.
23. KUEHNE, R. A., AND R. W. BARBOUR. 1983. The American darters. Univ. Press of Kentucky, Lexington.
24. LOSOS, J. B., AND B. SINERVO. 1989. The effect of morphology and perch size on sprint performance in Anolis lizards. J. Exp. Biol. 145:23-30.
25. MARCUS, L. F., E. HINGST-ZAHER, AND H. ZAHER. 2000. Application of landmark morphometrics to skulls representing the orders of living mammals. Hystrix It. J. Mamm. (N.S.) 11:27-47.
26. MARTINS, E. P. (ed.). 1996. Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
27. NAGEL, L., AND D. SCHLUTER. 1998. Body size, natural selection, and speciation in sticklebacks. Evolution 52:209-218.
28. NEAR, T. J. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of Percina (Percidae: Etheostomatinae). Copeia 2002:1-14.
29. NEAR, T. J., J. C. PORTERfiELD, AND L. M. PAGE. 2000. Evolution of cytochrome b and the molecular systematics of Ammocrypta. Copeia 2000:701-711.
30. PAGE, L. M. 1983. Handbook of darters. TFH, Neptune City, New Jersey.
31. PAGE, L. M., AND D. L. SWOFFORD. 1984. Morphological correlates of ecological specialization in darters. Environ. Biol. Fish. 11:139-159.
32. PAINE, M. D. 1990. Life history tactics of darters (Percidae: Etheostomatiini [sic]) and their relationship with body size, reproductive behaviour, latitude and rarity. J. Fish Biol. 37:473-488.
33. REYMENT, R. A. 1991. Multidimensional palaeobiology. Pergamon Press, Elmsford, New York.
34. ROHLF, F. J. 1997. tpsRegr - Thin-plate spline regression software, version 1.13. State Univ. New York, Stony Brook.
35. ROHLF, F. J. 1998. tpsSmall, version 1.19. State Univ. New York, Stony Brook.
36. ROHLF, F. J. 2001a. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: Geometric interpretations. Evolution 55:2143-2160.
37. ROHLF, F. J. 2001b. NTSYSpc: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.10x. Exeter Software, Setauket, New York.
38. ROHLF, F. J., A. LOY, AND M. CORTI. 1996. Morphometric analysis of Old World Talpidae (Mammalia, Insectivora) using partial-warp scores. Syst. Biol. 45:344-362.
39. ROHLF, F. J., AND D. SLICE. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 39:40-59.
40. ROSENBERG, M. S. 2002. Fiddler crab claw shape variation: A geometric morphometric analysis across the genus Uca (Crustacea: Brachyura: Ocypodidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 75:147-162.
41. RÜBER, L., AND D. C. ADAMS. 2001. Evolutionary convergence of body shape and trophic morphology in cichlids from Lake Tanganyika. J. Evol. Biol. 14:325-332.
42. SMOUSE, P. E., J. C. LONG, AND R. R. SOKAL. 1986. Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst. Zool. 35:627-632.
43. SOKAL, R. R. 1979. Testing statistical significance of geographic variation patterns. Syst. Zool. 28:227-232.
44. SONG, C. B., T. J. NEAR, AND L. M. PAGE. 1998. Phylogenetic relations among percid fishes as inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b DNA sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10:343-353.
45. TOLINE, C. A., AND A. J. BAKER. 1993. Foraging tactic as a potential selection pressure influencing geographic differences in body shape among populations of dace (Phoxinus eos). Can. J. Zool. 71:2178-2184.
46. VANHOOYDONCK, B., AND R. VAN DAMME. 1999. Evolutionary relationships between body shape and habitat use in lacertid lizards. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1:785-805.
47. WALKER, J. A. 1997. Ecological morphology of lacustrine threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus L. (Gasterosteidae) body shape. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 61:3-50.
48. WEBB, P. W. 1984. Body form, locomotion and foraging in aquatic vertebrates. Am. Zool. 24:107-120.
49. WELSH, S. A., AND S. A. PERRY. 1998. Habitat partitioning in a community of darters in the Elk River, West Virginia. Environ. Biol. Fish. 51:411-419.
50. WINEMILLER, K. O. 1992. Ecomorphology of freshwater fishes. Natl. Geogr. Res. 8:308-327.
51. WOOD, B. M., AND M. B. BAIN. 1995. Morphology and microhabitat use in stream fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52:1487-1498.
52. WOOD, R. M., AND R. L. MAYDEN. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships among selected darter subgenera (Teleostei: Percidae) as inferred from an analysis of allozymes. Copeia 1997:265-274.