Sexual isolation evolves faster than hybrid inviability in a diverse and sexually dimorphic genus of fish (Percidae: Etheostoma)

Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 317-327

  Mendelson, Tamra C ^a,b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

Etheostoma; Hybrid inviability; Postmating isolation; Premating isolation; Reproductive isolation; Sexual isolation; Sexual selection; Speciation

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; HYBRID; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); VIABILITY;

ETHEOSTOMA; PERCIDAE;

EID: 0037297739     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00266.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Avise, J. C. 1994. Molecular markers, natural history, and evolution. Chapman and Hall, New York.
3. Bailey, R. M., and D. A. Etnier. 1988. Comments on the subgenera of darters (Percidae) with descriptions of two new species of Etheostoma (Ulocentra) from the southeastern United States. Misc. Pub. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 175:1-48.
4. Barraclough, T. G., P. H. Harvey, and S. Nee. 1995. Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 259:211-215.
5. Birkhead, T. R. 2000. Promiscuity: an evolutionary history of sperm competition. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Blair, W. F. 1964. Isolating mechanisms and interspecies interactions in anuran amphibians. Q. Rev. Biol. 39:334-344.
7. Bordenstein, S. R., F. P. O'Hara, and J. H. Werren. 2001. Wolbachia-induced incompatibility precedes other hybrid incompatibilities in Nasonia. Nature 409:707-710.
8. Butlin, R. K. 1989. Reinforcement of premating isolation. Pp. 158-179 in D. Otte and J. A. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
9. Butlin, R. K., and M. G. Ritchie. 1994. Behavior and speciation. Pp. 43-79 in P. J. B. Slater and T. J. Halliday, eds. Behavior and evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
10. Carson, H. L. 1986. Sexual selection and speciation. Pp. 391-409 in S. Karlin and E. Nevo, eds. Evolutionary processes and theory. Academic Press, London.
11. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362-381.
12. _. 1997. "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited, Evolution 51:295-303.
13. _. 1998. The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353:287-305.
14. Dobzhansky, T. 1936. Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21:113-135.
15. _. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
16. Edwards, S. V., and P. Beerli. 2000. Gene divergence, population divergence, and the variance in coalescence time in phylogeographic studies. Evolution 54:1839-1854.
17. Etnier, D. A., and W. C. Starnes. 1993. The fishes of Tennessee. Univ. of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN.
18. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
19. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
20. Foltz, D. W. 1997. Hybridization frequency is negatively correlated with divergence time of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in a sea star (Leptasterias spp.) species complex. Evolution 51:283-288.
21. Futuyma, D. J. 1986. Evolutionary biology. 2d ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
22. Gleason, J. M., and M. G. Ritchie. 1998. Evolution of courtship song and reproductive isolation in the Drosophila willistoni complex: Do sexual signals diverge the most quickly? Evolution 52:1493-1500.
23. Grant, B. R., and P. R. Grant. 1996. Cultural inheritance of song and its role in the evolution of Darwin's finches. Evolution 50:2471-2487.
24. Grant, P. R. 2001. Reconstructing the evolution of birds on islands: 100 years of research. Oikos 92:385-403.
25. Howard, D. J. 1999. Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:109-132.
26. 1 hybrids between the percid fishes, Etheostoma spectabile and E. lepidum. Copeia 1960:57-59.
27. _. 1960. Duration of sperm function in the percid fishes Etheostoma lepidum and E. spectabile, associated with sympatry of the parental populations. Copeia 1960:1-9.
28. _. 1967. Geographic variations in survival of hybrids between etheostomatine fishes. Bull. Tex. Mem. Mus. 13:1-72.
29. Hubbs, C., and K. Strawn. 1957. Relative variability of hybrids between the darters, Etheostoma spectabile and Percina caprodes. Evolution 11:1-10.
30. Johns, G. C., and J. C. Avise. 1998. A comparative summary of genetic distances in the vertebrates from the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1481-1490.
31. Knowlton, N., L. A. Weigt, L. A. Solorzano, D. K. Mills, and E. Bermingham. 1993. Divergence in proteins, mitochondrial DNA, and reproductive compatibility across the Isthmus of Panama. Science 260:1629-1632.
32. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:3721-3725.
33. Lande, R., and M. J. Kirkpatrick. 1988. Ecological speciation by sexual selection. J. Theor. Biol. 133:85-98.
34. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer Jr. 1981. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, NC.
35. Linder, A. D. 1958. Behavior and hybridization of the species of Etheostoma (Percidae). Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 61:195-212.
36. Markow, T. 1997. Assortative fertilization in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7756-7760.
37. Mayr, E. 1963. Populations, species, and evolution. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
38. McEvey, S. F., ed. 1993. Evolution and the recognition concept of species: collected writings, H. E. H. Paterson. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD.
39. Mitra, S., H. Landel, and S. Pruett-Jones. 1996. Species richness covaries with mating system in birds. Auk 113:544-551.
40. Møller, A. P., and J. J. Cuervo. 1998. Speciation and feather ornamentation in birds. Evolution 52:859-869.
41. Muller, H. J. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6:71-125.
42. Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
43. Orr, H. A. 1997. Haldane's rule. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:195-218.
44. Owens, I. P. F., P. M. Bennett, and P. H. Harvey. 1999. Species richness among birds: Body size, life history, sexual selection, or ecology? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266:933-939.
45. Page, L. M. 1981. The genera and subgenera of darters (Percidae, Etheostomatini). Occas. Pap. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kans. 90:1-69.
46. _. 1983. Handbook of darters. TFH Publications, Saddle Brook, NJ.
47. Palumbi, S. R. 1994. Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25:547-572.
48. Panhuis, T. M., R. Butlin, M. Zuk, and T. Tregenza. 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Evol. Ecol. 16:364-371.
49. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. ModelTest. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
50. Prager, E. R., and A. C. Wilson. 1975. Slow evolutionary loss of the potential for heterospecific hybridization in birds: a manifestation of slow regulatory evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72:200-204.
51. Rice, W. R., and E. E. Hostert. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: What have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47:1637-1653.
52. Ringo, J. M. 1977. Why 300 species of Hawaiian Drosophila? The sexual selection hypothesis. Evolution 31:694-696.
53. Ritchie, M. G., M. Saarikettu, S. Livingstone, and A. Hoikkala. 2001. Characterization of female preference functions for Drosophila montana courtship songs and a test of the temperature coupling hypothesis. Evolution 55:721-727.
54. Rosen, D. E. 1979. Fishes from the uplands and intermontane basins of Guatemala: revisionary studies and comparative geography. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 162:267-375.
55. Sasa, M. M., P. T. Chippindale, and N. A. Johnson. 1998. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in frogs. Evolution 52:1811-1820.
56. Song, C. B., T. J. Near, and L. M. Page. 1998. Phylogenetic relations among percid fishes as inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b DNA sequence data. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 10:343-353.
57. Stalker, H. D. 1942. Sexual isolation in the species complex Drosophila virilis. Genetics 27:238-257.
58. Strawn, K. 1961. A comparison of meristic means and variances of wild and laboratory-raised samples of the fishes, Etheostoma lepidum and E. grahami (Percidae). Tex. J. Sci. 13:127-159.
59. Strawn, K., and C. Hubbs. 1956. Observations on stripping small fishes for experimental purposes. Copeia 1956:114-116.
60. Swofford, D. L. 1998. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Ver. 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
61. Tilley, S. G., P. A. Verrell, and S. J. Arnold. 1990. Correspondence between sexual isolation and allozyme differentiation: a test in the salamander Desmognathus ochropheus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87:2715-2719.
62. Turner, T. F. 1997. Mitochondrial control region sequences and phylogenetic systematics of darters. Copeia 2:319-338.
63. Werren, J. H. 1998. Wolbachia and speciation. Pp. 245-260 in D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
64. West-Eberhard, M. J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58:155-183.
65. Wu, C. I., and M. F. Palopoli. 1994. Genetics of postmating reproductive isolation in animals. Annu. Rev. Genet. 28:283-308.
66. Zuckerkandl, E., and L. Pauling. 1965. Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. Pp. 97-166 in V. Bryson and H. J. Vogel, eds. Evolving genes and proteins. Academic Press, New York.