Reproductive isolation between two darter species is enhanced and asymmetric in sympatry

Journal of Fish Biology

Volumn 84, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1389-1400

  Zhou, M ^a   Fuller, R C ^a  

^a Shelford Vivarium   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioural isolation; Etheostoma caeruleum; Etheostoma spectabile: hybridization; Orangethroat darter; Rainbow darter

Indexed keywords

ETHEOSTOMA CAERULEUM; ETHEOSTOMA SPECTABILE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOURAL ISOLATION; CROSS BREEDING; ETHEOSTOMA CAERULEUM; ETHEOSTOMA SPECTABILE: HYBRIDIZATION; FEMALE; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; OOCYTE; ORANGETHROAT DARTER; PERCH; RAINBOW DARTER; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SYMPATRY;

BEHAVIOURAL ISOLATION; ETHEOSTOMA CAERULEUM; ETHEOSTOMA SPECTABILE: HYBRIDIZATION; ORANGETHROAT DARTER; RAINBOW DARTER;

ANIMALS; CROSSES, GENETIC; FEMALE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MALE; OVUM; PERCHES; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SYMPATRY;

EID: 84899621364     PISSN: 00221112     EISSN: 10958649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.12364     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Blair, W. F. (1955). Mating call and stage of speciation in the Microhyla olivacea-M. carolinensis complex. Evolution 9, 469-480. doi: 10.2307/2405481
2. Bordenstein, S. R., Drapeau, M. D. & Werren, J. H. (2000). Intraspecific variation in sexual isolation in the jewel wasp Nasonia. Evolution 54, 567-573. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00059.x
3. Bossu, C. M. & Near, T. J. (2009). Gene trees reveal repeated instances of mitochondrial DNA introgression in orangethroat darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Systematic Biology 58, 114-129. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syp014
4. Branson, B. A. & Campbell, J. B. (1969). Hybridization in the darters Etheostoma spectabile and Etheostoma radiosum cyanorum. Copeia 1969, 70-75. doi: 10.2307/1441697
5. Butlin, R. (1987). Speciation by reinforcement. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2, 8-13. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(87)90193-5
6. Butlin, R. (1989). Reinforcement of premating isolation. In Speciation and its Consequences (Otte, D. & Endler, J. A., eds), pp. 158-179. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
7. Cooley, J. R. (2007). Decoding asymmetries in reproductive character displacement. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 156, 89-96 doi: 10.1635/0097-3157(2007)156[89:DAIRCD]2.0.CO;2.
8. Cooley, J. R., Marshall, D. C., Hill, K. B. & Simon, C. (2006). Reconstructing asymmetrical reproductive character displacement in a periodical cicada contact zone. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19, 855-868. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01056.x
9. Coyne, J. A. & Orr, H. A. (1989). Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43, 362-381. doi: 10.2307/2409213
10. Dobzhansky, T. (1940). Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. American Naturalist 74, 312-321. doi: 10.1086/280899
11. Dobzhansky, T. (1951). Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
12. Echelle, A. A., Schenck, J. R. & Hill, L. G. (1974). Etheostoma spectabile-E. radiosum hybridization in Blue River, Oklahoma. American Midland Naturalist 91, 182-194. doi: 10.2307/2424521
13. Fuller, R. C. (2003). Disentangling female mate choice and male competition in the Rainbow Darter, Etheostoma caeruleum. Copeia 2003, 138-148.
14. Green, W. W., Mirza, R. S. & Pyle, G. G. (2008). Kin recognition and cannibalistic behaviours by adult male fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). Naturwissenschaften 95, 269-272. doi: 10.1007/s00114-007-0319-y
15. Hatfield, T. & Schluter, D. (1996). A test for sexual selection on hybrids of two sympatric sticklebacks. Evolution 50, 2429-2434. doi: 10.2307/2410710
16. Howard, D. J. (1993). Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process (Harrison, R. G., ed), pp. 43-69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Hubbs, C. L. (1955). Hybridization between fish species in nature. Systematic Zoology 4, 1-20. doi: 10.2307/2411933
18. Hubbs, C. (1958). Fertility of F1 hybrids between the percid fishes, Etheostoma spectabile and E. lepidum. Copeia 1958, 57-59. doi: 10.2307/1439556
19. Hubbs, C. & Strawn, K. (1957). Survival of F1 hybrids between fishes of the subfamily Etheostominae. Journal of Experimental Zoology 134, 33-62. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401340103
20. Jaenike, J., Dyer, K. A., Cornish, C. & Minhas, M. S. (2006). Asymmetrical reinforcement and Wolbachia infection in Drosophila. PLoS BIOLOGY 4, 1852-1862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040325
21. Keck, N. P. & Near, T. J. (2009). Patterns of natural hybridization in darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae). Copeia 2009, 758-773. doi: 10.1643/CI-09-008
22. Kozak, G. M., Rudolph, A. B., Colon, B. L. & Fuller, R. C. (2012). Postzygotic isolation evolves before prezygotic isolation between fresh and saltwater populations of the rainwater killifish, Lucania parva. International. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2012, Article 523967. doi: 10.1155/2012/523967
23. Lang, N. J. & Mayden, R. L. (2007). Systematics of the subgenus Oligocephalus (Teleostei: Percidae: Etheostoma) with complete subgeneric sampling of the genus Etheostoma. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43, 605-615. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.09.022
24. Lemmon, E. M. & Lemmon, A. R. (2010). Reinforcement in chorus frogs: lifetime fitness estimates including intrinsic natural selection and sexual selection against hybrids. Evolution 64, 1748-1761. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00955.x
25. Linder, A. D. (1958). Behavior and hybridization of the species of Etheostoma (Percidae). Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Sciences 61, 195-212. doi: 10.2307/3626647
26. Loekle, D. M., Madison, D. M. & Christian, J. J. (1982). Time dependency and kin recognition of cannibalistic behaviour among poeciliid fishes. Behavioral and Neural Biology 35, 315-318. doi: 10.1016/S0163-1047(82)90749-X
27. Manica, A. (2002). Filial cannibalism in teleost fish. Biological Reviews 77, 261-277 doi: 10.1017/S1464793101005905.
28. Matute, D. R. (2010). Reinforcement can overcome gene flow during speciation in Drosophila. Current Biology 20, 2229-2233. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.036
29. Mendelson, T. C. (2003). Sexual isolation evolves faster than hybrid inviability in a diverse and sexually dimorphic genus of fish (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 57, 317-327. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00266.x
30. Mendelson, T. C., Imhoff, V. E. & Venditti, J. J. (2007). The accumulation of reproductive barriers during speciation: postmating barriers in two behaviorally isolated species of darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 61, 2596-2606. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00220.x
31. Mrowka, W. (1987). Filial cannibalism and reproductive success in the maternal mouth brooding cichlid fish Pseudocrenilabrus multicolor. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 21, 257-265. doi: 10.1007/BF00292507
32. Near, T. J. (2002). Phylogenetic relationships of Percina (Percidae: Etheostomatinae). Copeia 2002, 1-14 doi: 10.1643/0045-8511(2002)002[0001:PROPPE]2.0.CO;2.
33. Near, T. J. & Benard, M. F. (2004). Rapid allopatric speciation in logperch darters (Percidae: Percina). Evolution 58, 2798-2808. doi: 10.1554/04-172
34. Near, T. J., Porterfield, J. C. & Page, L. M. (2000). Evolution of cytochrome b and the molecular systematics of Ammocrypta. Copeia 2000, 701-711 doi: 10.1643/0045-8511(2000)000[0701:EOCBAT]2.0.CO;2.
35. Near, T. J., Bossu, C. M., Bradburd, G. S., Carlson, R. L., Harrington, R. C., Hollingsworth, P. R. Jr., Keck, B. P. & Etnier, D. A. (2011). Phylogeny and temporal diversification of darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae). Systematic Biology 60, 565-595. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syr052
36. Noor, M. A. F. (1995). Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375, 674-675. doi: 10.1038/375674a0
37. Noor, M. A. F. (1999). Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83, 503-508. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6886320
38. Nosil, P. & Yukilevich, R. (2008). Mechanisms of reinforcement in natural and simulated polymorphic populations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 95, 305-319. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01048.x
39. Nosil, P., Crespi, B. J. & Sandoval, C. P. (2003). Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 270, 1911-1918. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2457
40. Olsén, K. H. (1992). Kin recognition in fish mediated by chemical cues. In Fish Chemoreception (Hara, T. J., ed), pp. 229-248. Dordrecht: Springer.
41. Page, L. M. (1983). Handbook of Darters. Neptune City, NJ: T.F.H. Publications.
42. Page, L. M., Hardman, M. & Near, T. J. (2003). Phylogenetic relationships of barcheek darters (Percidae: Etheostoma, subgenus Catonotus) with descriptions of two new species. Copeia 2003, 512-530. doi: 10.1643/CI-02-259R
43. Pfennig, K. S. & Simovich, M. A. (2002). Differential selection to avoid hybridization in two toad species. Evolution 56, 1840-1848. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00198.x
44. Pyron, M. (1995). Mating patterns and a test for female mate choice in Etheostoma spectabile (Pisces, Percidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36, 407-412.
45. Ramsey, J., Bradshaw, H. D. Jr. & Schemske, D. W. (2003). Components of reproductive isolation between the monkeyflowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phrymaceae). Evolution 57, 1520-1534 doi: 10.1554/01-352.
46. Ray, J. M., Lang, N. J., Wood, R. M. & Mayden, R. L. (2008). History repeated: recent and historical mitochondrial introgression between the current darter Etheostoma uniporum and rainbow darter Etheostoma caeruleum (Teleostei: Percidae). Journal of Fish Biology 72, 418-434. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01732.x
47. Rundle, H. D. & Schluter, D. (1998). Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 52, 200-208. doi: 10.2307/2410935
48. Schwartz, F. J. (1972). World literature to fish hybrids with an analysis by family, species, and hybrid. Publications of the Gulf Coast Research Laboratory 3, 1-328.
49. Scribner, K. T., Page, K. S. & Bartron, M. L. (2001). Hybridization in freshwater fishes: a review of case studies and cytonuclear methods of biological inference. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 10, 293-323. doi: 10.1023/A:1016642723238
50. Servedio, M. R. & Noor, M. A. F. (2003). The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34, 339-364. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132412
51. Slastenenko, E. P. (1957). A list of natural fish hybrids of the world. Hydrobiological Research Institute of the Faculty of Science of the University of Istanbul Series B4, 76-97.
52. Smadja, C. & Ganem, G. (2005). Asymmetrical reproductive character displacement in the house mouse. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 1485-1493. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00944.x
53. Smith, C. (1991). Filial cannibalism as a reproductive strategy in care-giving teleosts? Netherlands Journal of Zoology 42, 607-613 doi: 10.1163/156854292X00107.
54. Smith, C. & Reay, P. (1991). Cannibalism in teleost fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 1, 41-64 doi: 10.1007/BF00042661.
55. Vamosi, S. M. & Schluter, D. (1999). Sexual selection against hybrids between sympatric stickleback species: Evidence from a field experiment. Evolution 53, 874-879. doi: 10.2307/2640727
56. Wiley, E. O. & Mayden, R. L. (1985). Species and speciation in phylogenetic systematics, with examples from the North American fish fauna. Annals of the Missouri Botanic Garden 72, 596-635. doi: 10.2307/2399217
57. Williams, T. H. & Mendelson, T. C. (2010). Behavioral isolation based on visual signals in a sympatric pair of darter species. Ethology 116, 1038-1049. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01816.x
58. Winn, H. E. (1958). Observations on the reproductive habits of darters (Pisces-Percidae). American Midland Naturalist 59, 190-212. doi: 10.2307/2422384
59. Wong, B. B., Fisher, H. S. & Rosenthal, G. G. (2005). Species recognition by male swordtails via chemical cues. Behavioral Ecology 16, 818-822. doi: 10.1093/beheco/ari058